From: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
To: jean.pihet@newoldbits.com
Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Jean Pihet <j-pihet@ti.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/9] ARM: OMAP3: hwmod: rename the smartreflex entries
Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2012 10:33:03 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87k41dkks0.fsf@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1332173578-27422-6-git-send-email-j-pihet@ti.com> (jean pihet's message of "Mon, 19 Mar 2012 17:12:54 +0100")
+Benoit
jean.pihet@newoldbits.com writes:
> From: Jean Pihet <j-pihet@ti.com>
>
> Change the name field value to better reflect the smartreflex
> integration in the system
>
> Signed-off-by: Jean Pihet <j-pihet@ti.com>
> ---
> arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_hwmod_3xxx_data.c | 8 ++++----
> arch/arm/mach-omap2/smartreflex.c | 2 +-
> 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_hwmod_3xxx_data.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_hwmod_3xxx_data.c
> index d7d4c70..40f57c4 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_hwmod_3xxx_data.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_hwmod_3xxx_data.c
> @@ -2751,7 +2751,7 @@ static struct omap_hwmod_ocp_if *omap34xx_sr1_slaves[] = {
> };
>
> static struct omap_hwmod omap34xx_sr1_hwmod = {
> - .name = "sr1",
> + .name = "mpu_iva",
Should this be "smartreflex_mpu_iva"?
The OMAP4 SR hwmods have a 'smartreflex_' prefix which seems better.
> .class = &omap34xx_smartreflex_hwmod_class,
> .main_clk = "sr1_fck",
> .prcm = {
> @@ -2775,7 +2775,7 @@ static struct omap_hwmod_ocp_if *omap36xx_sr1_slaves[] = {
> };
>
> static struct omap_hwmod omap36xx_sr1_hwmod = {
> - .name = "sr1",
> + .name = "mpu_iva",
> .class = &omap36xx_smartreflex_hwmod_class,
> .main_clk = "sr1_fck",
> .prcm = {
> @@ -2803,7 +2803,7 @@ static struct omap_hwmod_ocp_if *omap34xx_sr2_slaves[] = {
> };
>
> static struct omap_hwmod omap34xx_sr2_hwmod = {
> - .name = "sr2",
> + .name = "core",
> .class = &omap34xx_smartreflex_hwmod_class,
> .main_clk = "sr2_fck",
> .prcm = {
> @@ -2827,7 +2827,7 @@ static struct omap_hwmod_ocp_if *omap36xx_sr2_slaves[] = {
> };
>
> static struct omap_hwmod omap36xx_sr2_hwmod = {
> - .name = "sr2",
> + .name = "core",
> .class = &omap36xx_smartreflex_hwmod_class,
> .main_clk = "sr2_fck",
> .prcm = {
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/smartreflex.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/smartreflex.c
> index c18d47d..b2728a5 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/smartreflex.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/smartreflex.c
> @@ -184,7 +184,7 @@ static void sr_set_regfields(struct omap_sr *sr)
> sr->err_weight = OMAP3430_SR_ERRWEIGHT;
> sr->err_maxlimit = OMAP3430_SR_ERRMAXLIMIT;
> sr->accum_data = OMAP3430_SR_ACCUMDATA;
> - if (!(strcmp(sr->name, "sr1"))) {
> + if (!(strcmp(sr->name, "sr_mpu_iva"))) {
Why the 'sr_' prefix?
> sr->senn_avgweight = OMAP3430_SR1_SENNAVGWEIGHT;
> sr->senp_avgweight = OMAP3430_SR1_SENPAVGWEIGHT;
> } else {
Kevin
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: khilman@ti.com (Kevin Hilman)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 5/9] ARM: OMAP3: hwmod: rename the smartreflex entries
Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2012 10:33:03 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87k41dkks0.fsf@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1332173578-27422-6-git-send-email-j-pihet@ti.com> (jean pihet's message of "Mon, 19 Mar 2012 17:12:54 +0100")
+Benoit
jean.pihet at newoldbits.com writes:
> From: Jean Pihet <j-pihet@ti.com>
>
> Change the name field value to better reflect the smartreflex
> integration in the system
>
> Signed-off-by: Jean Pihet <j-pihet@ti.com>
> ---
> arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_hwmod_3xxx_data.c | 8 ++++----
> arch/arm/mach-omap2/smartreflex.c | 2 +-
> 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_hwmod_3xxx_data.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_hwmod_3xxx_data.c
> index d7d4c70..40f57c4 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_hwmod_3xxx_data.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_hwmod_3xxx_data.c
> @@ -2751,7 +2751,7 @@ static struct omap_hwmod_ocp_if *omap34xx_sr1_slaves[] = {
> };
>
> static struct omap_hwmod omap34xx_sr1_hwmod = {
> - .name = "sr1",
> + .name = "mpu_iva",
Should this be "smartreflex_mpu_iva"?
The OMAP4 SR hwmods have a 'smartreflex_' prefix which seems better.
> .class = &omap34xx_smartreflex_hwmod_class,
> .main_clk = "sr1_fck",
> .prcm = {
> @@ -2775,7 +2775,7 @@ static struct omap_hwmod_ocp_if *omap36xx_sr1_slaves[] = {
> };
>
> static struct omap_hwmod omap36xx_sr1_hwmod = {
> - .name = "sr1",
> + .name = "mpu_iva",
> .class = &omap36xx_smartreflex_hwmod_class,
> .main_clk = "sr1_fck",
> .prcm = {
> @@ -2803,7 +2803,7 @@ static struct omap_hwmod_ocp_if *omap34xx_sr2_slaves[] = {
> };
>
> static struct omap_hwmod omap34xx_sr2_hwmod = {
> - .name = "sr2",
> + .name = "core",
> .class = &omap34xx_smartreflex_hwmod_class,
> .main_clk = "sr2_fck",
> .prcm = {
> @@ -2827,7 +2827,7 @@ static struct omap_hwmod_ocp_if *omap36xx_sr2_slaves[] = {
> };
>
> static struct omap_hwmod omap36xx_sr2_hwmod = {
> - .name = "sr2",
> + .name = "core",
> .class = &omap36xx_smartreflex_hwmod_class,
> .main_clk = "sr2_fck",
> .prcm = {
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/smartreflex.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/smartreflex.c
> index c18d47d..b2728a5 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/smartreflex.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/smartreflex.c
> @@ -184,7 +184,7 @@ static void sr_set_regfields(struct omap_sr *sr)
> sr->err_weight = OMAP3430_SR_ERRWEIGHT;
> sr->err_maxlimit = OMAP3430_SR_ERRMAXLIMIT;
> sr->accum_data = OMAP3430_SR_ACCUMDATA;
> - if (!(strcmp(sr->name, "sr1"))) {
> + if (!(strcmp(sr->name, "sr_mpu_iva"))) {
Why the 'sr_' prefix?
> sr->senn_avgweight = OMAP3430_SR1_SENNAVGWEIGHT;
> sr->senp_avgweight = OMAP3430_SR1_SENPAVGWEIGHT;
> } else {
Kevin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-04-18 17:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 71+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-03-19 16:12 [PATCH v2 0/9] PM: Create the AVS class of drivers jean.pihet
2012-03-19 16:12 ` jean.pihet at newoldbits.com
2012-03-19 16:12 ` [PATCH 1/9] ARM: OMAP3+: voltage: export functions to plat/voltage.h jean.pihet
2012-03-19 16:12 ` jean.pihet at newoldbits.com
2012-04-18 17:27 ` Kevin Hilman
2012-04-18 17:27 ` Kevin Hilman
2012-04-18 20:36 ` Jean Pihet
2012-04-18 20:36 ` Jean Pihet
2012-04-18 20:36 ` Jean Pihet
2012-03-19 16:12 ` [PATCH 2/9] ARM: OMAP2+: SmartReflex: move the driver specific macros in include/linux/power jean.pihet
2012-03-19 16:12 ` jean.pihet at newoldbits.com
2012-04-04 19:10 ` Trilok Soni
2012-04-04 19:10 ` Trilok Soni
2012-04-04 19:41 ` Cousson, Benoit
2012-04-04 19:41 ` Cousson, Benoit
2012-04-04 19:41 ` Cousson, Benoit
2012-04-05 6:53 ` Trilok Soni
2012-04-05 6:53 ` Trilok Soni
2012-04-05 8:59 ` Jean Pihet
2012-04-05 8:59 ` Jean Pihet
2012-04-05 9:35 ` Trilok Soni
2012-04-05 9:35 ` Trilok Soni
2012-04-19 13:54 ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-04-19 13:54 ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-04-19 16:02 ` Jean Pihet
2012-04-19 16:02 ` Jean Pihet
2012-04-19 16:02 ` Jean Pihet
2012-04-19 17:06 ` Kevin Hilman
2012-04-19 17:06 ` Kevin Hilman
2012-04-19 17:06 ` Kevin Hilman
2012-03-19 16:12 ` [PATCH 3/9] ARM: OMAP3+: SmartReflex: class drivers should use struct omap_sr * jean.pihet
2012-03-19 16:12 ` jean.pihet at newoldbits.com
2012-03-19 16:12 ` [PATCH 4/9] ARM: OMAP2+: smartreflex: Use the names from hwmod data instead of voltage domains jean.pihet
2012-03-19 16:12 ` jean.pihet at newoldbits.com
2012-03-19 16:12 ` [PATCH 5/9] ARM: OMAP3: hwmod: rename the smartreflex entries jean.pihet
2012-03-19 16:12 ` jean.pihet at newoldbits.com
2012-04-18 17:33 ` Kevin Hilman [this message]
2012-04-18 17:33 ` Kevin Hilman
2012-04-18 20:41 ` Jean Pihet
2012-04-18 20:41 ` Jean Pihet
2012-04-18 20:41 ` Jean Pihet
2012-03-19 16:12 ` [PATCH 6/9] ARM: OMAP2+: SmartReflex: introduce a busy loop condition test macro jean.pihet
2012-03-19 16:12 ` jean.pihet at newoldbits.com
2012-03-19 16:12 ` [PATCH 7/9] ARM: OMAP2+: SmartReflex: Use per-OPP data structure jean.pihet
2012-03-19 16:12 ` jean.pihet at newoldbits.com
2012-04-18 18:21 ` Kevin Hilman
2012-04-18 18:21 ` Kevin Hilman
2012-04-18 20:52 ` Jean Pihet
2012-04-18 20:52 ` Jean Pihet
2012-04-18 20:52 ` Jean Pihet
2012-03-19 16:12 ` [PATCH 8/9] ARM: OMAP2+: SmartReflex: add POWER_AVS Kconfig options jean.pihet
2012-03-19 16:12 ` jean.pihet at newoldbits.com
2012-03-19 16:12 ` [PATCH 9/9] ARM: OMAP: SmartReflex: Move smartreflex driver to drivers/ jean.pihet
2012-03-19 16:12 ` jean.pihet at newoldbits.com
2012-04-18 18:17 ` Kevin Hilman
2012-04-18 18:17 ` Kevin Hilman
2012-04-03 11:14 ` [PATCH v2 0/9] PM: Create the AVS class of drivers Jean Pihet
2012-04-03 11:14 ` Jean Pihet
2012-04-03 11:14 ` Jean Pihet
2012-04-18 8:04 ` Jean Pihet
2012-04-18 8:04 ` Jean Pihet
2012-04-19 0:08 ` Greg KH
2012-04-19 0:08 ` Greg KH
2012-04-18 18:29 ` Kevin Hilman
2012-04-18 18:29 ` Kevin Hilman
2012-04-18 18:30 ` Kevin Hilman
2012-04-18 18:30 ` Kevin Hilman
2012-04-18 18:30 ` Kevin Hilman
2012-04-18 18:49 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-04-18 18:49 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-04-18 18:49 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87k41dkks0.fsf@ti.com \
--to=khilman@ti.com \
--cc=j-pihet@ti.com \
--cc=jean.pihet@newoldbits.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.