From: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
To: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>
Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux@arm.linux.org.uk, rnayak@ti.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 23/25] OMAP4: PM: Add CPUidle support
Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2011 10:45:08 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87k498pejf.fsf@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1315144466-9395-24-git-send-email-santosh.shilimkar@ti.com> (Santosh Shilimkar's message of "Sun, 4 Sep 2011 19:24:24 +0530")
Hi Santosh,
Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com> writes:
> Add OMAP4 CPUIDLE support. CPU1 is left with defualt idle and
> the low power state for it is managed via cpu-hotplug.
>
> This patch adds MPUSS low power states in cpuidle.
>
> C1 - CPU0 ON + CPU1 ON + MPU ON
> C2 - CPU0 OFF + CPU1 OFF + MPU CSWR
> C3 - CPU0 OFF + CPU1 OFF + MPU OSWR
>
> OMAP4460 onwards, MPUSS power domain doesn't support OFF state any more
> anymore just like CORE power domain. The deepest state supported is OSWr.
> Ofcourse when MPUSS and CORE PD transitions to OSWR along with device
> off mode, even the memory contemts are lost which is as good as
> the PD off state.
>
> On OMAP4 because of hardware constraints, no low power states are
> targeted when both CPUs are online and in SMP mode. The low power
> states are attempted only when secondary CPU gets offline to OFF
> through hotplug infrastructure.
>
> Thanks to Nicole Chalhoub <n-chalhoub@ti.com> for doing exhaustive
> C-state latency profiling.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@ti.com>
> Signed-off-by: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>
> Cc: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
A handful of minor comments below...
[...]
> +/**
> + * omap4_enter_idle - Programs OMAP4 to enter the specified state
> + * @dev: cpuidle device
> + * @state: The target state to be programmed
> + *
> + * Called from the CPUidle framework to program the device to the
> + * specified low power state selected by the governor.
> + * Returns the amount of time spent in the low power state.
> + */
> +static int omap4_enter_idle(struct cpuidle_device *dev,
> + struct cpuidle_state *state)
> +{
> + struct omap4_idle_statedata *cx = cpuidle_get_statedata(state);
> + struct timespec ts_preidle, ts_postidle, ts_idle;
> + u32 cpu1_state;
> +
> + /* Used to keep track of the total time in idle */
> + getnstimeofday(&ts_preidle);
> +
> + local_irq_disable();
> + local_fiq_disable();
> +
> + /*
> + * Keep demoting CPU0 C-state till CPU1 hits OFF state.
IMO, the working here isn't as clear as it could be. IOW, I don't like
"keep demoting", which makes it sound iterative through a set of states,
where what's happening here is a one-time decision.
Rather, what I think you mean is "CPU0 has to stay on (e.g in C1) until
CPU1 is off."
> + * This is necessary to honour hardware recommondation
> + * of triggeing all the possible low power modes once CPU1 is
> + * out of coherency and in OFF mode.
> + * Update dev->last_state so that governor stats reflects right
> + * data.
> + */
> + cpu1_state = pwrdm_read_pwrst(cpu1_pd);
> + if (cpu1_state != PWRDM_POWER_OFF) {
> + dev->last_state = dev->safe_state;
> + cx = cpuidle_get_statedata(dev->safe_state);
> + }
> +
> + /* Call idle CPU PM enter notifier chain */
This comment doesn't add any value over the code. If anything, a
comment explaining why it's only there for off-mode transitions would be
helpful.
> + if (cx->cpu_state == PWRDM_POWER_OFF)
> + cpu_pm_enter();
I think the CPU PM notifier usage should probably be a separate patch.
> + pwrdm_set_logic_retst(mpu_pd, cx->mpu_logic_state);
> + omap_set_pwrdm_state(mpu_pd, cx->mpu_state);
> +
> + /* Call idle CPU cluster PM enter notifier chain */
> + if ((cx->mpu_state == PWRDM_POWER_RET) &&
> + (cx->mpu_logic_state == PWRDM_POWER_OFF))
> + cpu_cluster_pm_enter();
> +
> + omap4_enter_lowpower(dev->cpu, cx->cpu_state);
> +
> + /* Call idle CPU PM exit notifier chain */
As above, this comment doesn't add any value over the code.
While I understand why it's only done for CPU0 here (CPU1 is managed by
hotplug), we should anticipating the moment where we will have forgotten
why it's only done for CPU0, and add a comment here.
> + if (pwrdm_read_prev_pwrst(cpu0_pd) == PWRDM_POWER_OFF)
> + cpu_pm_exit();
> +
> + /* Call idle CPU cluster PM exit notifier chain */
again, comment not helpful
> + if (omap4_mpuss_read_prev_context_state())
> + cpu_cluster_pm_exit();
> +
> + getnstimeofday(&ts_postidle);
> + ts_idle = timespec_sub(ts_postidle, ts_preidle);
> +
> + local_irq_enable();
> + local_fiq_enable();
> +
> + return ts_idle.tv_nsec / NSEC_PER_USEC + ts_idle.tv_sec * USEC_PER_SEC;
> +}
> +
> +DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct cpuidle_device, omap4_idle_dev);
> +
> +struct cpuidle_driver omap4_idle_driver = {
> + .name = "omap4_idle",
> + .owner = THIS_MODULE,
> +};
> +
> +/* Fill in the state data from the mach tables and register the driver_data */
if documented, it should have a kerneldoc header instead
> +static inline struct omap4_idle_statedata *_fill_cstate(
> + struct cpuidle_device *dev,
> + int idx, const char *descr)
> +{
> + struct omap4_idle_statedata *cx = &omap4_idle_data[idx];
> + struct cpuidle_state *state = &dev->states[idx];
> +
> + state->exit_latency = cpuidle_params_table[idx].exit_latency;
> + state->target_residency = cpuidle_params_table[idx].target_residency;
> + state->flags = CPUIDLE_FLAG_TIME_VALID;
> + state->enter = omap4_enter_idle;
> + cx->valid = cpuidle_params_table[idx].valid;
> + sprintf(state->name, "C%d", idx + 1);
> + strncpy(state->desc, descr, CPUIDLE_DESC_LEN);
> + cpuidle_set_statedata(state, cx);
> +
> + return cx;
> +}
Kevin
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: khilman@ti.com (Kevin Hilman)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 23/25] OMAP4: PM: Add CPUidle support
Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2011 10:45:08 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87k498pejf.fsf@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1315144466-9395-24-git-send-email-santosh.shilimkar@ti.com> (Santosh Shilimkar's message of "Sun, 4 Sep 2011 19:24:24 +0530")
Hi Santosh,
Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com> writes:
> Add OMAP4 CPUIDLE support. CPU1 is left with defualt idle and
> the low power state for it is managed via cpu-hotplug.
>
> This patch adds MPUSS low power states in cpuidle.
>
> C1 - CPU0 ON + CPU1 ON + MPU ON
> C2 - CPU0 OFF + CPU1 OFF + MPU CSWR
> C3 - CPU0 OFF + CPU1 OFF + MPU OSWR
>
> OMAP4460 onwards, MPUSS power domain doesn't support OFF state any more
> anymore just like CORE power domain. The deepest state supported is OSWr.
> Ofcourse when MPUSS and CORE PD transitions to OSWR along with device
> off mode, even the memory contemts are lost which is as good as
> the PD off state.
>
> On OMAP4 because of hardware constraints, no low power states are
> targeted when both CPUs are online and in SMP mode. The low power
> states are attempted only when secondary CPU gets offline to OFF
> through hotplug infrastructure.
>
> Thanks to Nicole Chalhoub <n-chalhoub@ti.com> for doing exhaustive
> C-state latency profiling.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@ti.com>
> Signed-off-by: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>
> Cc: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
A handful of minor comments below...
[...]
> +/**
> + * omap4_enter_idle - Programs OMAP4 to enter the specified state
> + * @dev: cpuidle device
> + * @state: The target state to be programmed
> + *
> + * Called from the CPUidle framework to program the device to the
> + * specified low power state selected by the governor.
> + * Returns the amount of time spent in the low power state.
> + */
> +static int omap4_enter_idle(struct cpuidle_device *dev,
> + struct cpuidle_state *state)
> +{
> + struct omap4_idle_statedata *cx = cpuidle_get_statedata(state);
> + struct timespec ts_preidle, ts_postidle, ts_idle;
> + u32 cpu1_state;
> +
> + /* Used to keep track of the total time in idle */
> + getnstimeofday(&ts_preidle);
> +
> + local_irq_disable();
> + local_fiq_disable();
> +
> + /*
> + * Keep demoting CPU0 C-state till CPU1 hits OFF state.
IMO, the working here isn't as clear as it could be. IOW, I don't like
"keep demoting", which makes it sound iterative through a set of states,
where what's happening here is a one-time decision.
Rather, what I think you mean is "CPU0 has to stay on (e.g in C1) until
CPU1 is off."
> + * This is necessary to honour hardware recommondation
> + * of triggeing all the possible low power modes once CPU1 is
> + * out of coherency and in OFF mode.
> + * Update dev->last_state so that governor stats reflects right
> + * data.
> + */
> + cpu1_state = pwrdm_read_pwrst(cpu1_pd);
> + if (cpu1_state != PWRDM_POWER_OFF) {
> + dev->last_state = dev->safe_state;
> + cx = cpuidle_get_statedata(dev->safe_state);
> + }
> +
> + /* Call idle CPU PM enter notifier chain */
This comment doesn't add any value over the code. If anything, a
comment explaining why it's only there for off-mode transitions would be
helpful.
> + if (cx->cpu_state == PWRDM_POWER_OFF)
> + cpu_pm_enter();
I think the CPU PM notifier usage should probably be a separate patch.
> + pwrdm_set_logic_retst(mpu_pd, cx->mpu_logic_state);
> + omap_set_pwrdm_state(mpu_pd, cx->mpu_state);
> +
> + /* Call idle CPU cluster PM enter notifier chain */
> + if ((cx->mpu_state == PWRDM_POWER_RET) &&
> + (cx->mpu_logic_state == PWRDM_POWER_OFF))
> + cpu_cluster_pm_enter();
> +
> + omap4_enter_lowpower(dev->cpu, cx->cpu_state);
> +
> + /* Call idle CPU PM exit notifier chain */
As above, this comment doesn't add any value over the code.
While I understand why it's only done for CPU0 here (CPU1 is managed by
hotplug), we should anticipating the moment where we will have forgotten
why it's only done for CPU0, and add a comment here.
> + if (pwrdm_read_prev_pwrst(cpu0_pd) == PWRDM_POWER_OFF)
> + cpu_pm_exit();
> +
> + /* Call idle CPU cluster PM exit notifier chain */
again, comment not helpful
> + if (omap4_mpuss_read_prev_context_state())
> + cpu_cluster_pm_exit();
> +
> + getnstimeofday(&ts_postidle);
> + ts_idle = timespec_sub(ts_postidle, ts_preidle);
> +
> + local_irq_enable();
> + local_fiq_enable();
> +
> + return ts_idle.tv_nsec / NSEC_PER_USEC + ts_idle.tv_sec * USEC_PER_SEC;
> +}
> +
> +DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct cpuidle_device, omap4_idle_dev);
> +
> +struct cpuidle_driver omap4_idle_driver = {
> + .name = "omap4_idle",
> + .owner = THIS_MODULE,
> +};
> +
> +/* Fill in the state data from the mach tables and register the driver_data */
if documented, it should have a kerneldoc header instead
> +static inline struct omap4_idle_statedata *_fill_cstate(
> + struct cpuidle_device *dev,
> + int idx, const char *descr)
> +{
> + struct omap4_idle_statedata *cx = &omap4_idle_data[idx];
> + struct cpuidle_state *state = &dev->states[idx];
> +
> + state->exit_latency = cpuidle_params_table[idx].exit_latency;
> + state->target_residency = cpuidle_params_table[idx].target_residency;
> + state->flags = CPUIDLE_FLAG_TIME_VALID;
> + state->enter = omap4_enter_idle;
> + cx->valid = cpuidle_params_table[idx].valid;
> + sprintf(state->name, "C%d", idx + 1);
> + strncpy(state->desc, descr, CPUIDLE_DESC_LEN);
> + cpuidle_set_statedata(state, cx);
> +
> + return cx;
> +}
Kevin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-09-16 17:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 238+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-09-04 13:54 [PATCH 00/25] OMAP4: PM: suspend, CPU-hotplug and CPUilde support Santosh Shilimkar
2011-09-04 13:54 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-09-04 13:54 ` [PATCH 01/25] ARM: mm: Add strongly ordered descriptor support Santosh Shilimkar
2011-09-04 13:54 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-09-13 20:23 ` Tony Lindgren
2011-09-13 20:23 ` Tony Lindgren
2011-09-14 5:36 ` Shilimkar, Santosh
2011-09-14 5:36 ` Shilimkar, Santosh
2011-09-04 13:54 ` [PATCH 02/25] OMAP4: Redefine mandatory barriers for OMAP to include interconnect barriers Santosh Shilimkar
2011-09-04 13:54 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-09-13 20:27 ` Tony Lindgren
2011-09-13 20:27 ` Tony Lindgren
2011-09-14 5:39 ` Shilimkar, Santosh
2011-09-14 5:39 ` Shilimkar, Santosh
2011-09-14 10:24 ` Santosh
2011-09-14 10:24 ` Santosh
2011-09-15 17:17 ` Kevin Hilman
2011-09-15 17:17 ` Kevin Hilman
2011-09-15 17:24 ` Shilimkar, Santosh
2011-09-15 17:24 ` Shilimkar, Santosh
2011-09-15 17:53 ` Tony Lindgren
2011-09-15 17:53 ` Tony Lindgren
2011-09-15 18:22 ` Shilimkar, Santosh
2011-09-15 18:22 ` Shilimkar, Santosh
2011-09-15 19:43 ` Tony Lindgren
2011-09-15 19:43 ` Tony Lindgren
2011-09-15 20:00 ` Shilimkar, Santosh
2011-09-15 20:00 ` Shilimkar, Santosh
2011-09-16 12:01 ` Shilimkar, Santosh
2011-09-16 12:01 ` Shilimkar, Santosh
2011-09-04 13:54 ` [PATCH 03/25] OMAP4: PM: Use custom omap_do_wfi() for suspend and default idle Santosh Shilimkar
2011-09-04 13:54 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-09-04 13:54 ` [PATCH 04/25] OMAP4: Remove un-used do_wfi() macro Santosh Shilimkar
2011-09-04 13:54 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-09-04 13:54 ` [PATCH 05/25] OMAP4: Use WARN_ON() instead of BUG_ON() with graceful exit Santosh Shilimkar
2011-09-04 13:54 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-09-05 10:11 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2011-09-05 10:11 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2011-09-05 10:42 ` Santosh
2011-09-05 10:42 ` Santosh
2011-09-05 10:47 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-09-05 10:47 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-09-05 10:51 ` Santosh
2011-09-05 10:51 ` Santosh
2011-09-08 18:51 ` Jean Pihet
2011-09-08 18:51 ` Jean Pihet
2011-09-04 13:54 ` [PATCH 06/25] OMAP4: Export omap4_get_base*() rather than global address pointers Santosh Shilimkar
2011-09-04 13:54 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-09-04 13:54 ` [PATCH 07/25] OMAP4: PM: Add SAR RAM support Santosh Shilimkar
2011-09-04 13:54 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-09-04 13:54 ` [PATCH 08/25] OMAP4: PM: Keep static dep between MPUSS-EMIF and MPUSS-L3 and DUCATI-L3 Santosh Shilimkar
2011-09-04 13:54 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-09-08 18:06 ` Kevin Hilman
2011-09-08 18:06 ` Kevin Hilman
2011-09-09 4:21 ` Santosh
2011-09-09 4:21 ` Santosh
2011-09-04 13:54 ` [PATCH 09/25] OMAP4: PM: Avoid omap4_pm_init() on OMAP4430 ES1.0 Santosh Shilimkar
2011-09-04 13:54 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-09-04 13:54 ` [PATCH 10/25] OMAP4: PM: Initialise all the clockdomains to supported states Santosh Shilimkar
2011-09-04 13:54 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-09-04 13:54 ` [PATCH 11/25] OMAP: Add Secure HAL and monitor mode API infrastructure Santosh Shilimkar
2011-09-04 13:54 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-09-08 18:58 ` Jean Pihet
2011-09-08 18:58 ` Jean Pihet
2011-09-09 4:22 ` Santosh
2011-09-09 4:22 ` Santosh
2011-09-04 13:54 ` [PATCH 12/25] OMAP: Add support to allocate the memory for secure RAM Santosh Shilimkar
2011-09-04 13:54 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-09-08 19:19 ` Jean Pihet
2011-09-08 19:19 ` Jean Pihet
2011-09-09 9:43 ` Santosh
2011-09-09 9:43 ` Santosh
2011-09-09 12:54 ` Jean Pihet
2011-09-09 12:54 ` Jean Pihet
2011-09-09 14:09 ` Shilimkar, Santosh
2011-09-09 14:09 ` Shilimkar, Santosh
2011-09-04 13:54 ` [PATCH 13/25] OMAP4: PM: Add WakeupGen module as OMAP gic_arch_extn Santosh Shilimkar
2011-09-04 13:54 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-09-08 18:27 ` Kevin Hilman
2011-09-08 18:27 ` Kevin Hilman
2011-09-09 4:29 ` Santosh
2011-09-09 4:29 ` Santosh
2011-09-09 7:19 ` Thomas Gleixner
2011-09-09 7:19 ` Thomas Gleixner
2011-09-09 8:07 ` Santosh
2011-09-09 8:07 ` Santosh
2011-09-09 8:18 ` Thomas Gleixner
2011-09-09 8:18 ` Thomas Gleixner
2011-09-09 9:05 ` Santosh
2011-09-09 9:05 ` Santosh
2011-09-12 7:56 ` Thomas Gleixner
2011-09-12 7:56 ` Thomas Gleixner
2011-09-12 8:44 ` Santosh
2011-09-12 8:44 ` Santosh
2011-09-08 19:16 ` Jean Pihet
2011-09-08 19:16 ` Jean Pihet
2011-09-09 4:23 ` Santosh
2011-09-09 4:23 ` Santosh
2011-09-13 20:36 ` Tony Lindgren
2011-09-13 20:36 ` Tony Lindgren
2011-09-14 5:34 ` Shilimkar, Santosh
2011-09-14 5:34 ` Shilimkar, Santosh
2011-09-14 15:21 ` Tony Lindgren
2011-09-14 15:21 ` Tony Lindgren
2011-09-14 16:49 ` Santosh
2011-09-14 16:49 ` Santosh
2011-09-14 17:08 ` Tony Lindgren
2011-09-14 17:08 ` Tony Lindgren
2011-09-14 17:13 ` Santosh
2011-09-14 17:13 ` Santosh
2011-09-14 17:18 ` Tony Lindgren
2011-09-14 17:18 ` Tony Lindgren
2011-09-14 17:21 ` Santosh
2011-09-14 17:21 ` Santosh
2011-09-14 17:22 ` Santosh
2011-09-14 17:22 ` Santosh
2011-09-14 19:04 ` Tony Lindgren
2011-09-14 19:04 ` Tony Lindgren
2011-09-15 2:57 ` Santosh
2011-09-15 2:57 ` Santosh
2011-09-15 9:36 ` Cousson, Benoit
2011-09-15 9:36 ` Cousson, Benoit
2011-09-15 12:02 ` Shilimkar, Santosh
2011-09-15 12:02 ` Shilimkar, Santosh
2011-09-15 13:29 ` Woodruff, Richard
2011-09-15 13:29 ` Woodruff, Richard
2011-09-04 13:54 ` [PATCH 14/25] OMAP4: PM: Add CPUX OFF mode support Santosh Shilimkar
2011-09-04 13:54 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-09-08 19:39 ` Jean Pihet
2011-09-08 19:39 ` Jean Pihet
2011-09-09 9:59 ` Santosh
2011-09-09 9:59 ` Santosh
2011-09-09 8:04 ` Shawn Guo
2011-09-09 8:04 ` Shawn Guo
2011-09-09 8:09 ` Santosh
2011-09-09 8:09 ` Santosh
2011-09-09 14:13 ` Shawn Guo
2011-09-09 14:13 ` Shawn Guo
2011-09-09 14:11 ` Shilimkar, Santosh
2011-09-09 14:11 ` Shilimkar, Santosh
2011-09-09 15:27 ` Shawn Guo
2011-09-09 15:27 ` Shawn Guo
2011-09-09 16:59 ` Santosh
2011-09-09 16:59 ` Santosh
2011-09-09 18:34 ` Kevin Hilman
2011-09-09 18:34 ` Kevin Hilman
2011-09-10 3:39 ` Shilimkar, Santosh
2011-09-10 3:39 ` Shilimkar, Santosh
2011-09-09 23:34 ` Shawn Guo
2011-09-09 23:34 ` Shawn Guo
2011-09-10 3:38 ` Shilimkar, Santosh
2011-09-10 3:38 ` Shilimkar, Santosh
2011-09-10 4:54 ` Shawn Guo
2011-09-10 4:54 ` Shawn Guo
2011-09-10 5:51 ` Santosh
2011-09-10 5:51 ` Santosh
2011-09-12 21:06 ` Kevin Hilman
2011-09-12 21:06 ` Kevin Hilman
2011-09-13 5:39 ` Santosh
2011-09-13 5:39 ` Santosh
2011-09-13 17:33 ` Kevin Hilman
2011-09-13 17:33 ` Kevin Hilman
2011-09-14 5:26 ` Shilimkar, Santosh
2011-09-14 5:26 ` Shilimkar, Santosh
2011-09-04 13:54 ` [PATCH 15/25] OMAP4: Remove __INIT from omap_secondary_startup() to re-use it for hotplug Santosh Shilimkar
2011-09-04 13:54 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-09-04 13:54 ` [PATCH 16/25] OMAP4: PM: Program CPU1 to hit OFF when off-lined Santosh Shilimkar
2011-09-04 13:54 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-09-12 21:12 ` Kevin Hilman
2011-09-12 21:12 ` Kevin Hilman
2011-09-13 5:35 ` Santosh
2011-09-13 5:35 ` Santosh
2011-09-04 13:54 ` [PATCH 17/25] OMAP4: PM: CPU1 wakeup workaround from Low power modes Santosh Shilimkar
2011-09-04 13:54 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-09-04 13:54 ` [PATCH 18/25] OMAP4: suspend: Add MPUSS power domain RETENTION support Santosh Shilimkar
2011-09-04 13:54 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-09-15 0:27 ` Kevin Hilman
2011-09-15 0:27 ` Kevin Hilman
2011-09-15 3:19 ` Santosh
2011-09-15 3:19 ` Santosh
2011-09-04 13:54 ` [PATCH 19/25] OMAP4: PM: Add WakeupGen and secure GIC low power support Santosh Shilimkar
2011-09-04 13:54 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-09-04 13:54 ` [PATCH 20/25] OMAP4: PM: Add L2X0 cache lowpower support Santosh Shilimkar
2011-09-04 13:54 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-09-05 14:01 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2011-09-05 14:01 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2011-09-05 14:13 ` Santosh
2011-09-05 14:13 ` Santosh
2011-09-16 17:23 ` Kevin Hilman
2011-09-16 17:23 ` Kevin Hilman
2011-09-18 8:46 ` Santosh
2011-09-18 8:46 ` Santosh
2011-09-04 13:54 ` [PATCH 21/25] OMAP4: PM: Add MPUSS power domain OSWR support Santosh Shilimkar
2011-09-04 13:54 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-09-12 18:52 ` Kevin Hilman
2011-09-12 18:52 ` Kevin Hilman
2011-09-13 5:37 ` Santosh
2011-09-13 5:37 ` Santosh
2011-09-13 7:39 ` Jean Pihet
2011-09-13 7:39 ` Jean Pihet
2011-09-13 8:25 ` Santosh
2011-09-13 8:25 ` Santosh
2011-09-04 13:54 ` [PATCH 22/25] OMAP4: PM: Add power domain statistics support Santosh Shilimkar
2011-09-04 13:54 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-09-05 10:08 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2011-09-05 10:08 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2011-09-05 10:43 ` Santosh
2011-09-05 10:43 ` Santosh
2011-09-04 13:54 ` [PATCH 23/25] OMAP4: PM: Add CPUidle support Santosh Shilimkar
2011-09-04 13:54 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-09-16 17:45 ` Kevin Hilman [this message]
2011-09-16 17:45 ` Kevin Hilman
2011-09-18 8:47 ` Santosh
2011-09-18 8:47 ` Santosh
2011-09-04 13:54 ` [PATCH 24/25] OMAP4: cpuidle: Switch to gptimer from twd in deeper C-states Santosh Shilimkar
2011-09-04 13:54 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-09-16 17:51 ` Kevin Hilman
2011-09-16 17:51 ` Kevin Hilman
2011-09-18 8:48 ` Santosh
2011-09-18 8:48 ` Santosh
2011-09-04 13:54 ` [PATCH 25/25] OMAP3: CPUidle: Make use of CPU PM notifiers Santosh Shilimkar
2011-09-04 13:54 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-09-08 17:57 ` Kevin Hilman
2011-09-08 17:57 ` Kevin Hilman
2011-09-09 4:20 ` Santosh
2011-09-09 4:20 ` Santosh
2011-09-09 7:17 ` Santosh
2011-09-09 7:17 ` Santosh
2011-09-08 20:15 ` [PATCH 00/25] OMAP4: PM: suspend, CPU-hotplug and CPUilde support Jean Pihet
2011-09-08 20:15 ` Jean Pihet
2011-09-09 4:25 ` Santosh
2011-09-09 4:25 ` Santosh
2011-09-20 11:24 ` Vishwanath Sripathy
2011-09-20 11:24 ` Vishwanath Sripathy
2011-09-20 11:37 ` Santosh
2011-09-20 11:37 ` Santosh
2011-09-20 11:57 ` Santosh
2011-09-20 11:57 ` Santosh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87k498pejf.fsf@ti.com \
--to=khilman@ti.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=rnayak@ti.com \
--cc=santosh.shilimkar@ti.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.