[PATCH] net: ath9k: use devm for gpio_request_one

[PATCH] net: ath9k: use devm for gpio_request_one

[Rosen Penev]

No need to manually free the gpio now.

Remove if statement as it's redundant now. The gpio bit now gets cleared
whether set or not.

Signed-off-by: Rosen Penev <rosenp@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/hw.c | 7 ++-----
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/hw.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/hw.c
index 5982e0db45f9..dc18a813f1a0 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/hw.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/hw.c
@@ -2732,7 +2732,7 @@ static void ath9k_hw_gpio_cfg_soc(struct ath_hw *ah, u32 gpio, bool out,
 	if (ah->caps.gpio_requested & BIT(gpio))
 		return;
 
-	err = gpio_request_one(gpio, out ? GPIOF_OUT_INIT_LOW : GPIOF_IN, label);
+	err = devm_gpio_request_one(ah->dev, gpio, out ? GPIOF_OUT_INIT_LOW : GPIOF_IN, label);
 	if (err) {
 		ath_err(ath9k_hw_common(ah), "request GPIO%d failed:%d\n",
 			gpio, err);
@@ -2801,10 +2801,7 @@ void ath9k_hw_gpio_free(struct ath_hw *ah, u32 gpio)
 
 	WARN_ON(gpio >= ah->caps.num_gpio_pins);
 
-	if (ah->caps.gpio_requested & BIT(gpio)) {
-		gpio_free(gpio);
-		ah->caps.gpio_requested &= ~BIT(gpio);
-	}
+	ah->caps.gpio_requested &= ~BIT(gpio);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(ath9k_hw_gpio_free);
 
-- 
2.45.2

[PATCH] net: ath9k: use devm for gpio_request_one

[Rosen Penev]

Simpler.

Signed-off-by: Rosen Penev <rosenp@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/hw.c | 6 ++----
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/hw.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/hw.c
index 5982e0db45f9..04a4b9ea61c3 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/hw.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/hw.c
@@ -2732,7 +2732,7 @@ static void ath9k_hw_gpio_cfg_soc(struct ath_hw *ah, u32 gpio, bool out,
 	if (ah->caps.gpio_requested & BIT(gpio))
 		return;
 
-	err = gpio_request_one(gpio, out ? GPIOF_OUT_INIT_LOW : GPIOF_IN, label);
+	err = devm_gpio_request_one(ah->dev, gpio, out ? GPIOF_OUT_INIT_LOW : GPIOF_IN, label);
 	if (err) {
 		ath_err(ath9k_hw_common(ah), "request GPIO%d failed:%d\n",
 			gpio, err);
@@ -2801,10 +2801,8 @@ void ath9k_hw_gpio_free(struct ath_hw *ah, u32 gpio)
 
 	WARN_ON(gpio >= ah->caps.num_gpio_pins);
 
-	if (ah->caps.gpio_requested & BIT(gpio)) {
-		gpio_free(gpio);
+	if (ah->caps.gpio_requested & BIT(gpio))
 		ah->caps.gpio_requested &= ~BIT(gpio);
-	}
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(ath9k_hw_gpio_free);
 
-- 
2.45.2

Re: [PATCH] net: ath9k: use devm for gpio_request_one

[Kalle Valo]

Rosen Penev <rosenp@gmail.com> writes:

> Simpler.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rosen Penev <rosenp@gmail.com>

The title prefix should be "wifi:". I can fix that, no need to resend
because of this.

-- 
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/

https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches

Re: [PATCH] net: ath9k: use devm for gpio_request_one

[Toke Høiland-Jørgensen]

Rosen Penev <rosenp@gmail.com> writes:

> No need to manually free the gpio now.
>
> Remove if statement as it's redundant now. The gpio bit now gets cleared
> whether set or not.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rosen Penev <rosenp@gmail.com>

So presumably these will conflict with this patch?

https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/patch/3b46f6c7-4372-4cc9-9a7c-2c1c06d29324@gmail.com/

-Toke

Re: [PATCH] net: ath9k: use devm for gpio_request_one

[Rosen Penev]

On Thu, Aug 1, 2024 at 1:26 AM Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> Rosen Penev <rosenp@gmail.com> writes:
>
> > No need to manually free the gpio now.
> >
> > Remove if statement as it's redundant now. The gpio bit now gets cleared
> > whether set or not.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Rosen Penev <rosenp@gmail.com>
>
> So presumably these will conflict with this patch?
>
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/patch/3b46f6c7-4372-4cc9-9a7c-2c1c06d29324@gmail.com/
This does not look related.
>
> -Toke

Re: [PATCH] net: ath9k: use devm for gpio_request_one

[Toke Høiland-Jørgensen]

Rosen Penev <rosenp@gmail.com> writes:

> On Thu, Aug 1, 2024 at 1:26 AM Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@kernel.org> wrote:
>>
>> Rosen Penev <rosenp@gmail.com> writes:
>>
>> > No need to manually free the gpio now.
>> >
>> > Remove if statement as it's redundant now. The gpio bit now gets cleared
>> > whether set or not.
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Rosen Penev <rosenp@gmail.com>
>>
>> So presumably these will conflict with this patch?
>>
>> https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/patch/3b46f6c7-4372-4cc9-9a7c-2c1c06d29324@gmail.com/
> This does not look related.

Ah, no, you're right; was confusing the PCI-internal device managed
thing with the generic one :)

-Toke

Re: [PATCH] net: ath9k: use devm for gpio_request_one

[Toke Høiland-Jørgensen]

Rosen Penev <rosenp@gmail.com> writes:

> Simpler.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rosen Penev <rosenp@gmail.com>

Acked-by: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@toke.dk>

Re: [PATCH] net: ath9k: use devm for gpio_request_one

[Kalle Valo]

Rosen Penev <rosenp@gmail.com> wrote:

> Using devm_gpio_request_one() is simpler as then we don't need to call
> gpio_free().
> 
> Signed-off-by: Rosen Penev <rosenp@gmail.com>
> Acked-by: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@toke.dk>
> Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <quic_kvalo@quicinc.com>

Patch applied to ath-next branch of ath.git, thanks.

8aabc03c7d22 wifi: ath9k: use devm for gpio_request_one()

-- 
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/patch/20240731210312.7622-1-rosenp@gmail.com/

https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches