From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
To: Harry Wentland <harry.wentland@amd.com>,
Alex Hung <alex.hung@amd.com>,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: stylon.wang@amd.com, haoping.liu@amd.com,
srinivasan.shanmugam@amd.com, sunpeng.li@amd.com,
Qingqing.Zhuo@amd.com, Xinhui.Pan@amd.com,
Rodrigo.Siqueira@amd.com, daniel.wheeler@amd.com,
aurabindo.pillai@amd.com, hersenxs.wu@amd.com,
hamza.mahfooz@amd.com, daniel@ffwll.ch, wayne.lin@amd.com,
alexander.deucher@amd.com, airlied@gmail.com,
christian.koenig@amd.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/amd/display: Remove unwanted drm edid references
Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2023 18:14:02 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87led7v58l.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <39a7f19a-e6b6-4962-b7e0-4f33cb78938c@amd.com>
On Fri, 15 Sep 2023, Harry Wentland <harry.wentland@amd.com> wrote:
> On 2023-09-05 13:13, Alex Hung wrote:
>> [WHY]
>> edid_override and drm_edid_override_connector_update, according to drm
>> documentation, should not be referred outside drm_edid.
>>
>> [HOW]
>> Remove and replace them accordingly.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Alex Hung <alex.hung@amd.com>
>> ---
>> .../gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm.c | 23 ++-----------------
>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm.c
>> index 1bb1a394f55f..f6a255773242 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm.c
>> @@ -6372,15 +6372,12 @@ amdgpu_dm_connector_late_register(struct drm_connector *connector)
>> static void amdgpu_dm_connector_funcs_force(struct drm_connector *connector)
>> {
>> struct amdgpu_dm_connector *aconnector = to_amdgpu_dm_connector(connector);
>> + struct amdgpu_connector *amdgpu_connector = to_amdgpu_connector(connector);
>> struct dc_link *dc_link = aconnector->dc_link;
>> struct dc_sink *dc_em_sink = aconnector->dc_em_sink;
>> struct edid *edid;
>>
>> - if (!connector->edid_override)
>> - return;
>> -
>> - drm_edid_override_connector_update(&aconnector->base);
>> - edid = aconnector->base.edid_blob_ptr->data;
>> + edid = drm_get_edid(connector, &amdgpu_connector->ddc_bus->aux.ddc);
>
> Looks like we only call this in the case where a connector is forced, so
> drm_get_edid will never try to read the edid from the ddc but always gives
> us the override_edid. Please spell that out in the commit description so
> anyone else looking at the patch doesn't have to trace it themselves.
Connector forcing is only about forcing the connector status. The probe
helper will call ->force instead of ->detect.
But this has nothing to do with override_edid. That's completely
orthogonal.
Here, you can call drm_get_edid() if you like. Connector forcing just
bypasses the DDC probe for determining connector status. If connector is
forced off, you won't get the EDID, regardless of override/firmware
EDID, but if it's forced on, the EDID read proceeds.
And the EDID read has the priority order 1) override EDID if set via
edid_override debugfs, 2) firmware EDID if set via edid_firmware module
parameter, and 3) regular DDC read.
BR,
Jani.
>
>> aconnector->edid = edid;
>>
>> /* Update emulated (virtual) sink's EDID */
>> @@ -6421,22 +6418,6 @@ static void create_eml_sink(struct amdgpu_dm_connector *aconnector)
>> };
>> struct edid *edid;
>>
>> - if (!aconnector->base.edid_blob_ptr) {
>
> Can edid_blob_ptr never be NULL?
>
> Harry
>
>> - /* if connector->edid_override valid, pass
>> - * it to edid_override to edid_blob_ptr
>> - */
>> -
>> - drm_edid_override_connector_update(&aconnector->base);
>> -
>> - if (!aconnector->base.edid_blob_ptr) {
>> - DRM_ERROR("No EDID firmware found on connector: %s ,forcing to OFF!\n",
>> - aconnector->base.name);
>> -
>> - aconnector->base.force = DRM_FORCE_OFF;
>> - return;
>> - }
>> - }
>> -
>> edid = (struct edid *) aconnector->base.edid_blob_ptr->data;
>>
>> aconnector->edid = edid;
>
--
Jani Nikula, Intel
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
To: Harry Wentland <harry.wentland@amd.com>,
Alex Hung <alex.hung@amd.com>,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: stylon.wang@amd.com, haoping.liu@amd.com,
srinivasan.shanmugam@amd.com, sunpeng.li@amd.com,
Qingqing.Zhuo@amd.com, Xinhui.Pan@amd.com,
Rodrigo.Siqueira@amd.com, daniel.wheeler@amd.com,
aurabindo.pillai@amd.com, hersenxs.wu@amd.com,
hamza.mahfooz@amd.com, wayne.lin@amd.com,
alexander.deucher@amd.com, christian.koenig@amd.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/amd/display: Remove unwanted drm edid references
Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2023 18:14:02 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87led7v58l.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <39a7f19a-e6b6-4962-b7e0-4f33cb78938c@amd.com>
On Fri, 15 Sep 2023, Harry Wentland <harry.wentland@amd.com> wrote:
> On 2023-09-05 13:13, Alex Hung wrote:
>> [WHY]
>> edid_override and drm_edid_override_connector_update, according to drm
>> documentation, should not be referred outside drm_edid.
>>
>> [HOW]
>> Remove and replace them accordingly.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Alex Hung <alex.hung@amd.com>
>> ---
>> .../gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm.c | 23 ++-----------------
>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm.c
>> index 1bb1a394f55f..f6a255773242 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm.c
>> @@ -6372,15 +6372,12 @@ amdgpu_dm_connector_late_register(struct drm_connector *connector)
>> static void amdgpu_dm_connector_funcs_force(struct drm_connector *connector)
>> {
>> struct amdgpu_dm_connector *aconnector = to_amdgpu_dm_connector(connector);
>> + struct amdgpu_connector *amdgpu_connector = to_amdgpu_connector(connector);
>> struct dc_link *dc_link = aconnector->dc_link;
>> struct dc_sink *dc_em_sink = aconnector->dc_em_sink;
>> struct edid *edid;
>>
>> - if (!connector->edid_override)
>> - return;
>> -
>> - drm_edid_override_connector_update(&aconnector->base);
>> - edid = aconnector->base.edid_blob_ptr->data;
>> + edid = drm_get_edid(connector, &amdgpu_connector->ddc_bus->aux.ddc);
>
> Looks like we only call this in the case where a connector is forced, so
> drm_get_edid will never try to read the edid from the ddc but always gives
> us the override_edid. Please spell that out in the commit description so
> anyone else looking at the patch doesn't have to trace it themselves.
Connector forcing is only about forcing the connector status. The probe
helper will call ->force instead of ->detect.
But this has nothing to do with override_edid. That's completely
orthogonal.
Here, you can call drm_get_edid() if you like. Connector forcing just
bypasses the DDC probe for determining connector status. If connector is
forced off, you won't get the EDID, regardless of override/firmware
EDID, but if it's forced on, the EDID read proceeds.
And the EDID read has the priority order 1) override EDID if set via
edid_override debugfs, 2) firmware EDID if set via edid_firmware module
parameter, and 3) regular DDC read.
BR,
Jani.
>
>> aconnector->edid = edid;
>>
>> /* Update emulated (virtual) sink's EDID */
>> @@ -6421,22 +6418,6 @@ static void create_eml_sink(struct amdgpu_dm_connector *aconnector)
>> };
>> struct edid *edid;
>>
>> - if (!aconnector->base.edid_blob_ptr) {
>
> Can edid_blob_ptr never be NULL?
>
> Harry
>
>> - /* if connector->edid_override valid, pass
>> - * it to edid_override to edid_blob_ptr
>> - */
>> -
>> - drm_edid_override_connector_update(&aconnector->base);
>> -
>> - if (!aconnector->base.edid_blob_ptr) {
>> - DRM_ERROR("No EDID firmware found on connector: %s ,forcing to OFF!\n",
>> - aconnector->base.name);
>> -
>> - aconnector->base.force = DRM_FORCE_OFF;
>> - return;
>> - }
>> - }
>> -
>> edid = (struct edid *) aconnector->base.edid_blob_ptr->data;
>>
>> aconnector->edid = edid;
>
--
Jani Nikula, Intel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-09-15 17:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-09-05 17:13 [PATCH] drm/amd/display: Remove unwanted drm edid references Alex Hung
2023-09-05 17:13 ` Alex Hung
2023-09-11 8:42 ` Jani Nikula
2023-09-11 8:42 ` Jani Nikula
2023-09-15 13:47 ` Harry Wentland
2023-09-15 13:47 ` Harry Wentland
2023-09-15 15:14 ` Jani Nikula [this message]
2023-09-15 15:14 ` Jani Nikula
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87led7v58l.fsf@intel.com \
--to=jani.nikula@intel.com \
--cc=Qingqing.Zhuo@amd.com \
--cc=Rodrigo.Siqueira@amd.com \
--cc=Xinhui.Pan@amd.com \
--cc=airlied@gmail.com \
--cc=alex.hung@amd.com \
--cc=alexander.deucher@amd.com \
--cc=amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=aurabindo.pillai@amd.com \
--cc=christian.koenig@amd.com \
--cc=daniel.wheeler@amd.com \
--cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=hamza.mahfooz@amd.com \
--cc=haoping.liu@amd.com \
--cc=harry.wentland@amd.com \
--cc=hersenxs.wu@amd.com \
--cc=srinivasan.shanmugam@amd.com \
--cc=stylon.wang@amd.com \
--cc=sunpeng.li@amd.com \
--cc=wayne.lin@amd.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.