All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
To: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>
Cc: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org,
	"Cezary Rojewski" <cezary.rojewski@intel.com>,
	"Takashi Iwai" <tiwai@suse.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	"Pierre-Louis Bossart" <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>,
	"Amadeusz Sławiński" <amadeuszx.slawinski@linux.intel.com>,
	"linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org" <linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Mohan Kumar D" <mkumard@nvidia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] ALSA: hda: Rework snd_hdac_stream_reset() to use macros
Date: Wed, 05 Oct 2022 16:07:54 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87lepugy85.wl-tiwai@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9677f39a-5297-bb1c-d4e3-62484ec1cf25@nvidia.com>

On Wed, 05 Oct 2022 15:52:01 +0200,
Jon Hunter wrote:
> 
> 
> On 05/10/2022 13:29, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> 
> ...
> 
> >> HDA playback is failing on -next for various Tegra boards. Bisect is
> >> point to this commit and reverting it fixes the problem. I was a bit
> >> puzzled why this change is causing a problem, but looking closer there
> >> is a difference between the previous code that was calling
> >> snd_hdac_stream_readb() and the new code that is calling
> >> snd_hdac_stream_readb_poll(). The function snd_hdac_stream_readb()
> >> calls snd_hdac_aligned_mmio() is see if the device has an aligned MMIO
> >> which Tegra does and then would call snd_hdac_aligned_read(). However,
> >> now the code always call readb() and this is breaking Tegra.
> >> 
> >> So it is either necessary to update snd_hdac_stream_readb_poll() to
> >> handle this or revert this change.
> > 
> > Does the patch below work?
> > 
> > 
> > thanks,
> > 
> > Takashi
> > 
> > -- 8< --
> > --- a/include/sound/hdaudio.h
> > +++ b/include/sound/hdaudio.h
> > @@ -592,8 +592,8 @@ int snd_hdac_get_stream_stripe_ctl(struct hdac_bus *bus,
> >   #define snd_hdac_stream_readb(dev, reg) \
> >   	snd_hdac_reg_readb((dev)->bus, (dev)->sd_addr + AZX_REG_ ## reg)
> >   #define snd_hdac_stream_readb_poll(dev, reg, val, cond, delay_us, timeout_us) \
> > -	readb_poll_timeout((dev)->sd_addr + AZX_REG_ ## reg, val, cond, \
> > -			   delay_us, timeout_us)
> > +	read_poll_timeout(snd_hdac_reg_readb, val, cond, delay_us, timeout_us,\
> > +			  false, (dev)->bus, (dev)->sd_addr + AZX_REG_ ## reg)
> >   #define snd_hdac_stream_readl_poll(dev, reg, val, cond, delay_us, timeout_us) \
> >   	readl_poll_timeout((dev)->sd_addr + AZX_REG_ ## reg, val, cond, \
> >   			   delay_us, timeout_us)
> 
> 
> Amazingly it does not work. I would have thought that would, but it
> does not. I am a bit puzzled by that?

Interesting, it must be a subtle difference.
What about passing true?  It seems that the original code has the
udelay(3) before the loop.


Takashi

-- 8< --
--- a/include/sound/hdaudio.h
+++ b/include/sound/hdaudio.h
@@ -592,8 +592,8 @@ int snd_hdac_get_stream_stripe_ctl(struct hdac_bus *bus,
 #define snd_hdac_stream_readb(dev, reg) \
 	snd_hdac_reg_readb((dev)->bus, (dev)->sd_addr + AZX_REG_ ## reg)
 #define snd_hdac_stream_readb_poll(dev, reg, val, cond, delay_us, timeout_us) \
-	readb_poll_timeout((dev)->sd_addr + AZX_REG_ ## reg, val, cond, \
-			   delay_us, timeout_us)
+	read_poll_timeout(snd_hdac_reg_readb, val, cond, delay_us, timeout_us,\
+			  true, (dev)->bus, (dev)->sd_addr + AZX_REG_ ## reg)
 #define snd_hdac_stream_readl_poll(dev, reg, val, cond, delay_us, timeout_us) \
 	readl_poll_timeout((dev)->sd_addr + AZX_REG_ ## reg, val, cond, \
 			   delay_us, timeout_us)

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
To: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>
Cc: "Amadeusz Sławiński" <amadeuszx.slawinski@linux.intel.com>,
	"Takashi Iwai" <tiwai@suse.com>,
	alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	"Cezary Rojewski" <cezary.rojewski@intel.com>,
	"Pierre-Louis Bossart" <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>,
	"Jaroslav Kysela" <perex@perex.cz>,
	"linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org" <linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Mohan Kumar D" <mkumard@nvidia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] ALSA: hda: Rework snd_hdac_stream_reset() to use macros
Date: Wed, 05 Oct 2022 16:07:54 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87lepugy85.wl-tiwai@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9677f39a-5297-bb1c-d4e3-62484ec1cf25@nvidia.com>

On Wed, 05 Oct 2022 15:52:01 +0200,
Jon Hunter wrote:
> 
> 
> On 05/10/2022 13:29, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> 
> ...
> 
> >> HDA playback is failing on -next for various Tegra boards. Bisect is
> >> point to this commit and reverting it fixes the problem. I was a bit
> >> puzzled why this change is causing a problem, but looking closer there
> >> is a difference between the previous code that was calling
> >> snd_hdac_stream_readb() and the new code that is calling
> >> snd_hdac_stream_readb_poll(). The function snd_hdac_stream_readb()
> >> calls snd_hdac_aligned_mmio() is see if the device has an aligned MMIO
> >> which Tegra does and then would call snd_hdac_aligned_read(). However,
> >> now the code always call readb() and this is breaking Tegra.
> >> 
> >> So it is either necessary to update snd_hdac_stream_readb_poll() to
> >> handle this or revert this change.
> > 
> > Does the patch below work?
> > 
> > 
> > thanks,
> > 
> > Takashi
> > 
> > -- 8< --
> > --- a/include/sound/hdaudio.h
> > +++ b/include/sound/hdaudio.h
> > @@ -592,8 +592,8 @@ int snd_hdac_get_stream_stripe_ctl(struct hdac_bus *bus,
> >   #define snd_hdac_stream_readb(dev, reg) \
> >   	snd_hdac_reg_readb((dev)->bus, (dev)->sd_addr + AZX_REG_ ## reg)
> >   #define snd_hdac_stream_readb_poll(dev, reg, val, cond, delay_us, timeout_us) \
> > -	readb_poll_timeout((dev)->sd_addr + AZX_REG_ ## reg, val, cond, \
> > -			   delay_us, timeout_us)
> > +	read_poll_timeout(snd_hdac_reg_readb, val, cond, delay_us, timeout_us,\
> > +			  false, (dev)->bus, (dev)->sd_addr + AZX_REG_ ## reg)
> >   #define snd_hdac_stream_readl_poll(dev, reg, val, cond, delay_us, timeout_us) \
> >   	readl_poll_timeout((dev)->sd_addr + AZX_REG_ ## reg, val, cond, \
> >   			   delay_us, timeout_us)
> 
> 
> Amazingly it does not work. I would have thought that would, but it
> does not. I am a bit puzzled by that?

Interesting, it must be a subtle difference.
What about passing true?  It seems that the original code has the
udelay(3) before the loop.


Takashi

-- 8< --
--- a/include/sound/hdaudio.h
+++ b/include/sound/hdaudio.h
@@ -592,8 +592,8 @@ int snd_hdac_get_stream_stripe_ctl(struct hdac_bus *bus,
 #define snd_hdac_stream_readb(dev, reg) \
 	snd_hdac_reg_readb((dev)->bus, (dev)->sd_addr + AZX_REG_ ## reg)
 #define snd_hdac_stream_readb_poll(dev, reg, val, cond, delay_us, timeout_us) \
-	readb_poll_timeout((dev)->sd_addr + AZX_REG_ ## reg, val, cond, \
-			   delay_us, timeout_us)
+	read_poll_timeout(snd_hdac_reg_readb, val, cond, delay_us, timeout_us,\
+			  true, (dev)->bus, (dev)->sd_addr + AZX_REG_ ## reg)
 #define snd_hdac_stream_readl_poll(dev, reg, val, cond, delay_us, timeout_us) \
 	readl_poll_timeout((dev)->sd_addr + AZX_REG_ ## reg, val, cond, \
 			   delay_us, timeout_us)

  reply	other threads:[~2022-10-05 14:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-08-18 14:15 [PATCH v2 0/4] hda: Minor cleanups Amadeusz Sławiński
2022-08-18 14:15 ` Amadeusz Sławiński
2022-08-18 14:15 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] ALSA: hda: Move stream-register polling macros Amadeusz Sławiński
2022-08-18 14:15   ` Amadeusz Sławiński
2022-08-18 14:15 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] ALSA: hda: Rework snd_hdac_stream_reset() to use macros Amadeusz Sławiński
2022-08-18 14:15   ` Amadeusz Sławiński
2022-10-05 12:10   ` Jon Hunter
2022-10-05 12:10     ` Jon Hunter
2022-10-05 12:29     ` Takashi Iwai
2022-10-05 12:29       ` Takashi Iwai
2022-10-05 13:52       ` Jon Hunter
2022-10-05 13:52         ` Jon Hunter
2022-10-05 14:07         ` Takashi Iwai [this message]
2022-10-05 14:07           ` Takashi Iwai
2022-10-05 14:26           ` Jon Hunter
2022-10-05 14:26             ` Jon Hunter
2022-10-05 14:47             ` Amadeusz Sławiński
2022-10-05 20:16               ` Jon Hunter
2022-10-06  8:45       ` Jon Hunter
2022-10-06  8:45         ` Jon Hunter
2022-10-07  8:49         ` Amadeusz Sławiński
2022-08-18 14:15 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] ALSA: hda: Remove unused MAX_PIN_CONFIGS constant Amadeusz Sławiński
2022-08-18 14:15   ` Amadeusz Sławiński
2022-08-18 14:15 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] ALSA: hda: Remove unused defines Amadeusz Sławiński
2022-08-18 14:15   ` Amadeusz Sławiński
2022-08-19 12:05 ` [PATCH v2 0/4] hda: Minor cleanups Takashi Iwai
2022-08-19 12:05   ` Takashi Iwai

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87lepugy85.wl-tiwai@suse.de \
    --to=tiwai@suse.de \
    --cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
    --cc=amadeuszx.slawinski@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=cezary.rojewski@intel.com \
    --cc=jonathanh@nvidia.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mkumard@nvidia.com \
    --cc=pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=tiwai@suse.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.