All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
To: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 06/12] drm/edid: add typedef for block read function
Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2022 12:48:50 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87lewchrwd.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Yk7Ts/ejETyarJSh@intel.com>

On Thu, 07 Apr 2022, Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 07, 2022 at 12:14:32PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
>> Make the callback a bit easier on the eye.
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c | 18 +++++++++---------
>>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>> 
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c
>> index ba54701f91f6..926ffe5cd97e 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c
>> @@ -2037,10 +2037,11 @@ int drm_add_override_edid_modes(struct drm_connector *connector)
>>  }
>>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_add_override_edid_modes);
>>  
>> +typedef int read_block_fn(void *context, u8 *buf, unsigned int block, size_t len);
>> +
>
> The header still has the eyesore. Maybe we want to put the typedef
> there?

Decided to leave that for the future, possibly with a s/u8*/void*/
change.

Thanks,
Jani.


>
> Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
>
>>  static struct edid *drm_do_get_edid_base_block(struct drm_connector *connector,
>> -	int (*get_edid_block)(void *data, u8 *buf, unsigned int block,
>> -			      size_t len),
>> -	void *data)
>> +					       read_block_fn read_block,
>> +					       void *context)
>>  {
>>  	int *null_edid_counter = connector ? &connector->null_edid_counter : NULL;
>>  	bool *edid_corrupt = connector ? &connector->edid_corrupt : NULL;
>> @@ -2053,7 +2054,7 @@ static struct edid *drm_do_get_edid_base_block(struct drm_connector *connector,
>>  
>>  	/* base block fetch */
>>  	for (try = 0; try < 4; try++) {
>> -		if (get_edid_block(data, edid, 0, EDID_LENGTH))
>> +		if (read_block(context, edid, 0, EDID_LENGTH))
>>  			goto out;
>>  		if (drm_edid_block_valid(edid, 0, false, edid_corrupt))
>>  			break;
>> @@ -2097,9 +2098,8 @@ static struct edid *drm_do_get_edid_base_block(struct drm_connector *connector,
>>   * Return: Pointer to valid EDID or NULL if we couldn't find any.
>>   */
>>  struct edid *drm_do_get_edid(struct drm_connector *connector,
>> -	int (*get_edid_block)(void *data, u8 *buf, unsigned int block,
>> -			      size_t len),
>> -	void *data)
>> +			     read_block_fn read_block,
>> +			     void *context)
>>  {
>>  	int j, invalid_blocks = 0;
>>  	struct edid *edid, *new, *override;
>> @@ -2108,7 +2108,7 @@ struct edid *drm_do_get_edid(struct drm_connector *connector,
>>  	if (override)
>>  		return override;
>>  
>> -	edid = drm_do_get_edid_base_block(connector, get_edid_block, data);
>> +	edid = drm_do_get_edid_base_block(connector, read_block, context);
>>  	if (!edid)
>>  		return NULL;
>>  
>> @@ -2125,7 +2125,7 @@ struct edid *drm_do_get_edid(struct drm_connector *connector,
>>  		int try;
>>  
>>  		for (try = 0; try < 4; try++) {
>> -			if (get_edid_block(data, block, j, EDID_LENGTH))
>> +			if (read_block(context, block, j, EDID_LENGTH))
>>  				goto out;
>>  			if (drm_edid_block_valid(block, j, false, NULL))
>>  				break;
>> -- 
>> 2.30.2

-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
To: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/12] drm/edid: add typedef for block read function
Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2022 12:48:50 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87lewchrwd.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Yk7Ts/ejETyarJSh@intel.com>

On Thu, 07 Apr 2022, Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 07, 2022 at 12:14:32PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
>> Make the callback a bit easier on the eye.
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c | 18 +++++++++---------
>>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>> 
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c
>> index ba54701f91f6..926ffe5cd97e 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c
>> @@ -2037,10 +2037,11 @@ int drm_add_override_edid_modes(struct drm_connector *connector)
>>  }
>>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_add_override_edid_modes);
>>  
>> +typedef int read_block_fn(void *context, u8 *buf, unsigned int block, size_t len);
>> +
>
> The header still has the eyesore. Maybe we want to put the typedef
> there?

Decided to leave that for the future, possibly with a s/u8*/void*/
change.

Thanks,
Jani.


>
> Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
>
>>  static struct edid *drm_do_get_edid_base_block(struct drm_connector *connector,
>> -	int (*get_edid_block)(void *data, u8 *buf, unsigned int block,
>> -			      size_t len),
>> -	void *data)
>> +					       read_block_fn read_block,
>> +					       void *context)
>>  {
>>  	int *null_edid_counter = connector ? &connector->null_edid_counter : NULL;
>>  	bool *edid_corrupt = connector ? &connector->edid_corrupt : NULL;
>> @@ -2053,7 +2054,7 @@ static struct edid *drm_do_get_edid_base_block(struct drm_connector *connector,
>>  
>>  	/* base block fetch */
>>  	for (try = 0; try < 4; try++) {
>> -		if (get_edid_block(data, edid, 0, EDID_LENGTH))
>> +		if (read_block(context, edid, 0, EDID_LENGTH))
>>  			goto out;
>>  		if (drm_edid_block_valid(edid, 0, false, edid_corrupt))
>>  			break;
>> @@ -2097,9 +2098,8 @@ static struct edid *drm_do_get_edid_base_block(struct drm_connector *connector,
>>   * Return: Pointer to valid EDID or NULL if we couldn't find any.
>>   */
>>  struct edid *drm_do_get_edid(struct drm_connector *connector,
>> -	int (*get_edid_block)(void *data, u8 *buf, unsigned int block,
>> -			      size_t len),
>> -	void *data)
>> +			     read_block_fn read_block,
>> +			     void *context)
>>  {
>>  	int j, invalid_blocks = 0;
>>  	struct edid *edid, *new, *override;
>> @@ -2108,7 +2108,7 @@ struct edid *drm_do_get_edid(struct drm_connector *connector,
>>  	if (override)
>>  		return override;
>>  
>> -	edid = drm_do_get_edid_base_block(connector, get_edid_block, data);
>> +	edid = drm_do_get_edid_base_block(connector, read_block, context);
>>  	if (!edid)
>>  		return NULL;
>>  
>> @@ -2125,7 +2125,7 @@ struct edid *drm_do_get_edid(struct drm_connector *connector,
>>  		int try;
>>  
>>  		for (try = 0; try < 4; try++) {
>> -			if (get_edid_block(data, block, j, EDID_LENGTH))
>> +			if (read_block(context, block, j, EDID_LENGTH))
>>  				goto out;
>>  			if (drm_edid_block_valid(block, j, false, NULL))
>>  				break;
>> -- 
>> 2.30.2

-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center

  reply	other threads:[~2022-04-11  9:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-04-07  9:14 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 00/12] drm/edid: low level EDID block read refactoring etc Jani Nikula
2022-04-07  9:14 ` Jani Nikula
2022-04-07  9:14 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 01/12] drm/edid: convert edid_is_zero() to edid_block_is_zero() for blocks Jani Nikula
2022-04-07  9:14   ` Jani Nikula
2022-04-07  9:14 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 02/12] drm/edid: have edid_block_check() detect blocks that are all zero Jani Nikula
2022-04-07  9:14   ` Jani Nikula
2022-04-07  9:14 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 03/12] drm/edid: refactor EDID block status printing Jani Nikula
2022-04-07  9:14   ` Jani Nikula
2022-04-07 11:54   ` [Intel-gfx] " Ville Syrjälä
2022-04-07 11:54     ` Ville Syrjälä
2022-04-11  9:49     ` [Intel-gfx] " Jani Nikula
2022-04-11  9:49       ` Jani Nikula
2022-04-07  9:14 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 04/12] drm/edid: add a helper to log dump an EDID block Jani Nikula
2022-04-07  9:14   ` Jani Nikula
2022-04-07  9:14 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 05/12] drm/edid: pass struct edid to connector_bad_edid() Jani Nikula
2022-04-07  9:14   ` Jani Nikula
2022-04-07 11:56   ` [Intel-gfx] " Ville Syrjälä
2022-04-07 11:56     ` Ville Syrjälä
2022-04-07  9:14 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 06/12] drm/edid: add typedef for block read function Jani Nikula
2022-04-07  9:14   ` Jani Nikula
2022-04-07 12:06   ` [Intel-gfx] " Ville Syrjälä
2022-04-07 12:06     ` Ville Syrjälä
2022-04-11  9:48     ` Jani Nikula [this message]
2022-04-11  9:48       ` Jani Nikula
2022-04-07  9:14 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 07/12] drm/edid: abstract an EDID block read helper Jani Nikula
2022-04-07  9:14   ` Jani Nikula
2022-04-07  9:14 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 08/12] drm/edid: use EDID block read helper in drm_do_get_edid() Jani Nikula
2022-04-07  9:14   ` Jani Nikula
2022-04-07  9:14 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 09/12] drm/edid: convert extension block read to EDID block read helper Jani Nikula
2022-04-07  9:14   ` Jani Nikula
2022-04-07  9:14 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 10/12] drm/edid: drop extra local var Jani Nikula
2022-04-07  9:14   ` Jani Nikula
2022-04-07  9:14 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 11/12] drm/edid: add single point of return to drm_do_get_edid() Jani Nikula
2022-04-07  9:14   ` Jani Nikula
2022-04-07  9:14 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 12/12] drm/edid: add EDID block count and size helpers Jani Nikula
2022-04-07  9:14   ` Jani Nikula
2022-04-07 15:07   ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2] " Jani Nikula
2022-04-07 15:07     ` Jani Nikula
2022-04-07 12:24 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BUILD: failure for drm/edid: low level EDID block read refactoring etc Patchwork
2022-04-07 12:41   ` Jani Nikula
2022-04-07 12:44 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 00/12] " Ville Syrjälä
2022-04-07 12:44   ` Ville Syrjälä
2022-04-11  9:51   ` [Intel-gfx] " Jani Nikula
2022-04-11  9:51     ` Jani Nikula
2022-04-07 17:43 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for drm/edid: low level EDID block read refactoring etc. (rev2) Patchwork
2022-04-07 23:17 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for drm/edid: low level EDID block read refactoring etc. (rev3) Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87lewchrwd.fsf@intel.com \
    --to=jani.nikula@intel.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.