From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
To: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>, cgel.zte@gmail.com
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>,
intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
luo penghao <luo.penghao@zte.com.cn>,
Zeal Robot <zealci@zte.com.cn>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH linux-next] drm/i915/display: Delete redundant post_mask assignment
Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2021 15:20:15 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87lf0v44j4.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YbCtUZUSbEpCuDoi@intel.com>
On Wed, 08 Dec 2021, Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 08, 2021 at 07:46:19AM +0000, cgel.zte@gmail.com wrote:
>> From: luo penghao <luo.penghao@zte.com.cn>
>>
>> This value will be overwritten by the following if statement, even
>> if the if is not executed, the value will not be used
>>
>> The clang_analyzer complains as follows:
>>
>> Value stored to 'port_mask' is never read
>>
>> Reported-by: Zeal Robot <zealci@zte.com.cn>
>> Signed-off-by: luo penghao <luo.penghao@zte.com.cn>
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_ddi.c | 1 -
>> 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_ddi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_ddi.c
>> index bd18432..3aad0c3 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_ddi.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_ddi.c
>> @@ -2011,7 +2011,6 @@ void intel_ddi_sanitize_encoder_pll_mapping(struct intel_encoder *encoder)
>> return;
>> }
>>
>> - port_mask = BIT(encoder->port);
>> ddi_clk_needed = encoder->base.crtc;
>>
>> if (encoder->type == INTEL_OUTPUT_DSI) {
>
> 'port_mask' declaration could now be moved into this block.
I've basically given up on patches from cgel.zte@gmail.com,
luo.penghao@zte.com.cn, zealci@zte.com.cn, etc. The patches are the
simplest possible changes to silence static analyzer warnings, with no
further analysis of the issues, and no follow-up on questions.
Until that changes, I think we're better off just regarding them static
as analyzer reports.
BR,
Jani.
>
>> --
>> 2.15.2
>>
--
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
To: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>, cgel.zte@gmail.com
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>,
intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
luo penghao <luo.penghao@zte.com.cn>,
Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>,
Zeal Robot <zealci@zte.com.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH linux-next] drm/i915/display: Delete redundant post_mask assignment
Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2021 15:20:15 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87lf0v44j4.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YbCtUZUSbEpCuDoi@intel.com>
On Wed, 08 Dec 2021, Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 08, 2021 at 07:46:19AM +0000, cgel.zte@gmail.com wrote:
>> From: luo penghao <luo.penghao@zte.com.cn>
>>
>> This value will be overwritten by the following if statement, even
>> if the if is not executed, the value will not be used
>>
>> The clang_analyzer complains as follows:
>>
>> Value stored to 'port_mask' is never read
>>
>> Reported-by: Zeal Robot <zealci@zte.com.cn>
>> Signed-off-by: luo penghao <luo.penghao@zte.com.cn>
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_ddi.c | 1 -
>> 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_ddi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_ddi.c
>> index bd18432..3aad0c3 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_ddi.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_ddi.c
>> @@ -2011,7 +2011,6 @@ void intel_ddi_sanitize_encoder_pll_mapping(struct intel_encoder *encoder)
>> return;
>> }
>>
>> - port_mask = BIT(encoder->port);
>> ddi_clk_needed = encoder->base.crtc;
>>
>> if (encoder->type == INTEL_OUTPUT_DSI) {
>
> 'port_mask' declaration could now be moved into this block.
I've basically given up on patches from cgel.zte@gmail.com,
luo.penghao@zte.com.cn, zealci@zte.com.cn, etc. The patches are the
simplest possible changes to silence static analyzer warnings, with no
further analysis of the issues, and no follow-up on questions.
Until that changes, I think we're better off just regarding them static
as analyzer reports.
BR,
Jani.
>
>> --
>> 2.15.2
>>
--
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-12-08 13:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-12-08 7:46 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH linux-next] drm/i915/display: Delete redundant post_mask assignment cgel.zte
2021-12-08 7:46 ` cgel.zte
2021-12-08 7:46 ` cgel.zte
2021-12-08 13:04 ` [Intel-gfx] " Ville Syrjälä
2021-12-08 13:04 ` Ville Syrjälä
2021-12-08 13:04 ` Ville Syrjälä
2021-12-08 13:20 ` Jani Nikula [this message]
2021-12-08 13:20 ` Jani Nikula
2021-12-08 14:54 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for " Patchwork
2021-12-08 18:47 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87lf0v44j4.fsf@intel.com \
--to=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
--cc=airlied@linux.ie \
--cc=cgel.zte@gmail.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luo.penghao@zte.com.cn \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
--cc=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
--cc=zealci@zte.com.cn \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.