Re: [PATCH RESEND] archive: rewrite description for compression level option

["Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason" <avarab@gmail.com>]

On Fri, Oct 15 2021, Bagas Sanjaya wrote:

> On 14/10/21 23.51, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>> Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@gmail.com> writes:
>> 
>>> Currently, the description of compression level option (`-<number>` or
>>> `-#`) only specifies two level (`-0` and `-9`), giving the impression
>>> that only both levels are accepted, although other level number can be
>>> specified. Rewrite the description.
>> While I find that the updated description is more detailed [*], I am
>> not sure if the change to the heading is an improvement for readers,
>> as I do not think of a case where users would choose to use anything
>> other than to use (1) no compression level option, (2) '-0' for
>> speed, or (3) '-9' for size, and explicitly singling out `-0` and
>> `-9` like the current text does would help those who wonder what the
>> option, used in a script written by somebody else that they are
>> given to maintain, mean, better than the updated text that does not
>> even allow /-9 in their pager to look for the description, if you
>> only had `-<number>` or `-#`.
>> Also, unless we take `-47`, I do not think it is a good idea to
>> spell it as `-<number>`.  Perhaps `-<digit>` is OK, but it shares
>> exactly the same issue as `-<number>` I mentioned above.
>
> Maybe we can say `-0 ... -9` to indicate the syntax, while both the
> endpoints are common but special case.
>
> Also, we don't mention default compression level (`-6`?).

Whatever we do here maybe we'd do well to emulate what "man gzip" does,
up to and including perhaps adding the --fast and --best synonyms to
"git archive"?