From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
To: Alex Deucher <alexdeucher@gmail.com>, Bernard Zhao <bernard@vivo.com>
Cc: "Alex Sierra" <alex.sierra@amd.com>,
"David Airlie" <airlied@linux.ie>, "Oak Zeng" <Oak.Zeng@amd.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Maling list - DRI developers" <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
"Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>,
kernel@vivo.com, "Huang Rui" <ray.huang@amd.com>,
"amd-gfx list" <amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
"Alex Deucher" <alexander.deucher@amd.com>,
"Xiaojie Yuan" <xiaojie.yuan@amd.com>,
"Sam Ravnborg" <sam@ravnborg.org>,
"Felix Kuehling" <Felix.Kuehling@amd.com>,
"Kent Russell" <kent.russell@amd.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Optimized division operation to shift operation
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2020 10:41:37 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87lfmx5h72.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CADnq5_Phca3L-HGOQz0DPBoARHgwcJRK_a7-WmeFMPkrPWeOeg@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, 14 Apr 2020, Alex Deucher <alexdeucher@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 14, 2020 at 9:05 AM Bernard Zhao <bernard@vivo.com> wrote:
>>
>> On some processors, the / operate will call the compiler`s div lib,
>> which is low efficient, We can replace the / operation with shift,
>> so that we can replace the call of the division library with one
>> shift assembly instruction.
This was applied already, and it's not in a driver I look after... but
to me this feels like something that really should be
justified. Using >> instead of / for multiples of 2 division mattered 20
years ago, I'd be surprised if it still did on modern compilers.
BR,
Jani.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Bernard Zhao <bernard@vivo.com>
>
> Applied. thanks.
>
> Alex
>
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gmc_v6_0.c | 4 ++--
>> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gmc_v7_0.c | 4 ++--
>> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gmc_v8_0.c | 4 ++--
>> 3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gmc_v6_0.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gmc_v6_0.c
>> index b205039..66cd078 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gmc_v6_0.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gmc_v6_0.c
>> @@ -175,10 +175,10 @@ static int gmc_v6_0_mc_load_microcode(struct amdgpu_device *adev)
>> amdgpu_ucode_print_mc_hdr(&hdr->header);
>>
>> adev->gmc.fw_version = le32_to_cpu(hdr->header.ucode_version);
>> - regs_size = le32_to_cpu(hdr->io_debug_size_bytes) / (4 * 2);
>> + regs_size = le32_to_cpu(hdr->io_debug_size_bytes) >> 3;
>> new_io_mc_regs = (const __le32 *)
>> (adev->gmc.fw->data + le32_to_cpu(hdr->io_debug_array_offset_bytes));
>> - ucode_size = le32_to_cpu(hdr->header.ucode_size_bytes) / 4;
>> + ucode_size = le32_to_cpu(hdr->header.ucode_size_bytes) >> 2;
>> new_fw_data = (const __le32 *)
>> (adev->gmc.fw->data + le32_to_cpu(hdr->header.ucode_array_offset_bytes));
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gmc_v7_0.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gmc_v7_0.c
>> index 9da9596..ca26d63 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gmc_v7_0.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gmc_v7_0.c
>> @@ -193,10 +193,10 @@ static int gmc_v7_0_mc_load_microcode(struct amdgpu_device *adev)
>> amdgpu_ucode_print_mc_hdr(&hdr->header);
>>
>> adev->gmc.fw_version = le32_to_cpu(hdr->header.ucode_version);
>> - regs_size = le32_to_cpu(hdr->io_debug_size_bytes) / (4 * 2);
>> + regs_size = le32_to_cpu(hdr->io_debug_size_bytes) >> 3;
>> io_mc_regs = (const __le32 *)
>> (adev->gmc.fw->data + le32_to_cpu(hdr->io_debug_array_offset_bytes));
>> - ucode_size = le32_to_cpu(hdr->header.ucode_size_bytes) / 4;
>> + ucode_size = le32_to_cpu(hdr->header.ucode_size_bytes) >> 2;
>> fw_data = (const __le32 *)
>> (adev->gmc.fw->data + le32_to_cpu(hdr->header.ucode_array_offset_bytes));
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gmc_v8_0.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gmc_v8_0.c
>> index 27d83204..295039c 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gmc_v8_0.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gmc_v8_0.c
>> @@ -318,10 +318,10 @@ static int gmc_v8_0_tonga_mc_load_microcode(struct amdgpu_device *adev)
>> amdgpu_ucode_print_mc_hdr(&hdr->header);
>>
>> adev->gmc.fw_version = le32_to_cpu(hdr->header.ucode_version);
>> - regs_size = le32_to_cpu(hdr->io_debug_size_bytes) / (4 * 2);
>> + regs_size = le32_to_cpu(hdr->io_debug_size_bytes) >> 3;
>> io_mc_regs = (const __le32 *)
>> (adev->gmc.fw->data + le32_to_cpu(hdr->io_debug_array_offset_bytes));
>> - ucode_size = le32_to_cpu(hdr->header.ucode_size_bytes) / 4;
>> + ucode_size = le32_to_cpu(hdr->header.ucode_size_bytes) >> 2;
>> fw_data = (const __le32 *)
>> (adev->gmc.fw->data + le32_to_cpu(hdr->header.ucode_array_offset_bytes));
>>
>> --
>> 2.7.4
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> amd-gfx mailing list
>> amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
>> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx
> _______________________________________________
> dri-devel mailing list
> dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
--
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center
_______________________________________________
amd-gfx mailing list
amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
To: Alex Deucher <alexdeucher@gmail.com>, Bernard Zhao <bernard@vivo.com>
Cc: "Alex Sierra" <alex.sierra@amd.com>,
"David Airlie" <airlied@linux.ie>, "Oak Zeng" <Oak.Zeng@amd.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Maling list - DRI developers" <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
"Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>,
kernel@vivo.com, "Huang Rui" <ray.huang@amd.com>,
"amd-gfx list" <amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
"Alex Deucher" <alexander.deucher@amd.com>,
"Xiaojie Yuan" <xiaojie.yuan@amd.com>,
"Sam Ravnborg" <sam@ravnborg.org>,
"Felix Kuehling" <Felix.Kuehling@amd.com>,
"Kent Russell" <kent.russell@amd.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Optimized division operation to shift operation
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2020 10:41:37 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87lfmx5h72.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CADnq5_Phca3L-HGOQz0DPBoARHgwcJRK_a7-WmeFMPkrPWeOeg@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, 14 Apr 2020, Alex Deucher <alexdeucher@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 14, 2020 at 9:05 AM Bernard Zhao <bernard@vivo.com> wrote:
>>
>> On some processors, the / operate will call the compiler`s div lib,
>> which is low efficient, We can replace the / operation with shift,
>> so that we can replace the call of the division library with one
>> shift assembly instruction.
This was applied already, and it's not in a driver I look after... but
to me this feels like something that really should be
justified. Using >> instead of / for multiples of 2 division mattered 20
years ago, I'd be surprised if it still did on modern compilers.
BR,
Jani.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Bernard Zhao <bernard@vivo.com>
>
> Applied. thanks.
>
> Alex
>
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gmc_v6_0.c | 4 ++--
>> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gmc_v7_0.c | 4 ++--
>> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gmc_v8_0.c | 4 ++--
>> 3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gmc_v6_0.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gmc_v6_0.c
>> index b205039..66cd078 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gmc_v6_0.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gmc_v6_0.c
>> @@ -175,10 +175,10 @@ static int gmc_v6_0_mc_load_microcode(struct amdgpu_device *adev)
>> amdgpu_ucode_print_mc_hdr(&hdr->header);
>>
>> adev->gmc.fw_version = le32_to_cpu(hdr->header.ucode_version);
>> - regs_size = le32_to_cpu(hdr->io_debug_size_bytes) / (4 * 2);
>> + regs_size = le32_to_cpu(hdr->io_debug_size_bytes) >> 3;
>> new_io_mc_regs = (const __le32 *)
>> (adev->gmc.fw->data + le32_to_cpu(hdr->io_debug_array_offset_bytes));
>> - ucode_size = le32_to_cpu(hdr->header.ucode_size_bytes) / 4;
>> + ucode_size = le32_to_cpu(hdr->header.ucode_size_bytes) >> 2;
>> new_fw_data = (const __le32 *)
>> (adev->gmc.fw->data + le32_to_cpu(hdr->header.ucode_array_offset_bytes));
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gmc_v7_0.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gmc_v7_0.c
>> index 9da9596..ca26d63 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gmc_v7_0.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gmc_v7_0.c
>> @@ -193,10 +193,10 @@ static int gmc_v7_0_mc_load_microcode(struct amdgpu_device *adev)
>> amdgpu_ucode_print_mc_hdr(&hdr->header);
>>
>> adev->gmc.fw_version = le32_to_cpu(hdr->header.ucode_version);
>> - regs_size = le32_to_cpu(hdr->io_debug_size_bytes) / (4 * 2);
>> + regs_size = le32_to_cpu(hdr->io_debug_size_bytes) >> 3;
>> io_mc_regs = (const __le32 *)
>> (adev->gmc.fw->data + le32_to_cpu(hdr->io_debug_array_offset_bytes));
>> - ucode_size = le32_to_cpu(hdr->header.ucode_size_bytes) / 4;
>> + ucode_size = le32_to_cpu(hdr->header.ucode_size_bytes) >> 2;
>> fw_data = (const __le32 *)
>> (adev->gmc.fw->data + le32_to_cpu(hdr->header.ucode_array_offset_bytes));
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gmc_v8_0.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gmc_v8_0.c
>> index 27d83204..295039c 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gmc_v8_0.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gmc_v8_0.c
>> @@ -318,10 +318,10 @@ static int gmc_v8_0_tonga_mc_load_microcode(struct amdgpu_device *adev)
>> amdgpu_ucode_print_mc_hdr(&hdr->header);
>>
>> adev->gmc.fw_version = le32_to_cpu(hdr->header.ucode_version);
>> - regs_size = le32_to_cpu(hdr->io_debug_size_bytes) / (4 * 2);
>> + regs_size = le32_to_cpu(hdr->io_debug_size_bytes) >> 3;
>> io_mc_regs = (const __le32 *)
>> (adev->gmc.fw->data + le32_to_cpu(hdr->io_debug_array_offset_bytes));
>> - ucode_size = le32_to_cpu(hdr->header.ucode_size_bytes) / 4;
>> + ucode_size = le32_to_cpu(hdr->header.ucode_size_bytes) >> 2;
>> fw_data = (const __le32 *)
>> (adev->gmc.fw->data + le32_to_cpu(hdr->header.ucode_array_offset_bytes));
>>
>> --
>> 2.7.4
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> amd-gfx mailing list
>> amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
>> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx
> _______________________________________________
> dri-devel mailing list
> dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
--
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
To: Alex Deucher <alexdeucher@gmail.com>, Bernard Zhao <bernard@vivo.com>
Cc: "Alex Sierra" <alex.sierra@amd.com>,
"Oak Zeng" <Oak.Zeng@amd.com>,
"Maling list - DRI developers" <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
"David Airlie" <airlied@linux.ie>,
"Felix Kuehling" <Felix.Kuehling@amd.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"amd-gfx list" <amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
kernel@vivo.com, "Huang Rui" <ray.huang@amd.com>,
"Kent Russell" <kent.russell@amd.com>,
"Alex Deucher" <alexander.deucher@amd.com>,
"Sam Ravnborg" <sam@ravnborg.org>,
"Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>,
"Xiaojie Yuan" <xiaojie.yuan@amd.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Optimized division operation to shift operation
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2020 10:41:37 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87lfmx5h72.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CADnq5_Phca3L-HGOQz0DPBoARHgwcJRK_a7-WmeFMPkrPWeOeg@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, 14 Apr 2020, Alex Deucher <alexdeucher@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 14, 2020 at 9:05 AM Bernard Zhao <bernard@vivo.com> wrote:
>>
>> On some processors, the / operate will call the compiler`s div lib,
>> which is low efficient, We can replace the / operation with shift,
>> so that we can replace the call of the division library with one
>> shift assembly instruction.
This was applied already, and it's not in a driver I look after... but
to me this feels like something that really should be
justified. Using >> instead of / for multiples of 2 division mattered 20
years ago, I'd be surprised if it still did on modern compilers.
BR,
Jani.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Bernard Zhao <bernard@vivo.com>
>
> Applied. thanks.
>
> Alex
>
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gmc_v6_0.c | 4 ++--
>> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gmc_v7_0.c | 4 ++--
>> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gmc_v8_0.c | 4 ++--
>> 3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gmc_v6_0.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gmc_v6_0.c
>> index b205039..66cd078 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gmc_v6_0.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gmc_v6_0.c
>> @@ -175,10 +175,10 @@ static int gmc_v6_0_mc_load_microcode(struct amdgpu_device *adev)
>> amdgpu_ucode_print_mc_hdr(&hdr->header);
>>
>> adev->gmc.fw_version = le32_to_cpu(hdr->header.ucode_version);
>> - regs_size = le32_to_cpu(hdr->io_debug_size_bytes) / (4 * 2);
>> + regs_size = le32_to_cpu(hdr->io_debug_size_bytes) >> 3;
>> new_io_mc_regs = (const __le32 *)
>> (adev->gmc.fw->data + le32_to_cpu(hdr->io_debug_array_offset_bytes));
>> - ucode_size = le32_to_cpu(hdr->header.ucode_size_bytes) / 4;
>> + ucode_size = le32_to_cpu(hdr->header.ucode_size_bytes) >> 2;
>> new_fw_data = (const __le32 *)
>> (adev->gmc.fw->data + le32_to_cpu(hdr->header.ucode_array_offset_bytes));
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gmc_v7_0.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gmc_v7_0.c
>> index 9da9596..ca26d63 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gmc_v7_0.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gmc_v7_0.c
>> @@ -193,10 +193,10 @@ static int gmc_v7_0_mc_load_microcode(struct amdgpu_device *adev)
>> amdgpu_ucode_print_mc_hdr(&hdr->header);
>>
>> adev->gmc.fw_version = le32_to_cpu(hdr->header.ucode_version);
>> - regs_size = le32_to_cpu(hdr->io_debug_size_bytes) / (4 * 2);
>> + regs_size = le32_to_cpu(hdr->io_debug_size_bytes) >> 3;
>> io_mc_regs = (const __le32 *)
>> (adev->gmc.fw->data + le32_to_cpu(hdr->io_debug_array_offset_bytes));
>> - ucode_size = le32_to_cpu(hdr->header.ucode_size_bytes) / 4;
>> + ucode_size = le32_to_cpu(hdr->header.ucode_size_bytes) >> 2;
>> fw_data = (const __le32 *)
>> (adev->gmc.fw->data + le32_to_cpu(hdr->header.ucode_array_offset_bytes));
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gmc_v8_0.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gmc_v8_0.c
>> index 27d83204..295039c 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gmc_v8_0.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gmc_v8_0.c
>> @@ -318,10 +318,10 @@ static int gmc_v8_0_tonga_mc_load_microcode(struct amdgpu_device *adev)
>> amdgpu_ucode_print_mc_hdr(&hdr->header);
>>
>> adev->gmc.fw_version = le32_to_cpu(hdr->header.ucode_version);
>> - regs_size = le32_to_cpu(hdr->io_debug_size_bytes) / (4 * 2);
>> + regs_size = le32_to_cpu(hdr->io_debug_size_bytes) >> 3;
>> io_mc_regs = (const __le32 *)
>> (adev->gmc.fw->data + le32_to_cpu(hdr->io_debug_array_offset_bytes));
>> - ucode_size = le32_to_cpu(hdr->header.ucode_size_bytes) / 4;
>> + ucode_size = le32_to_cpu(hdr->header.ucode_size_bytes) >> 2;
>> fw_data = (const __le32 *)
>> (adev->gmc.fw->data + le32_to_cpu(hdr->header.ucode_array_offset_bytes));
>>
>> --
>> 2.7.4
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> amd-gfx mailing list
>> amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
>> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx
> _______________________________________________
> dri-devel mailing list
> dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
--
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-04-15 7:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-04-14 11:35 [PATCH] Optimized division operation to shift operation Bernard Zhao
2020-04-14 11:35 ` Bernard Zhao
2020-04-14 11:35 ` Bernard Zhao
2020-04-14 18:15 ` Alex Deucher
2020-04-14 18:15 ` Alex Deucher
2020-04-14 18:15 ` Alex Deucher
2020-04-15 7:41 ` Jani Nikula [this message]
2020-04-15 7:41 ` Jani Nikula
2020-04-15 7:41 ` Jani Nikula
2020-04-15 7:57 ` Christian König
2020-04-15 7:57 ` Christian König
2020-04-15 7:57 ` Christian König
2020-04-15 9:16 ` Daniel Vetter
2020-04-15 9:16 ` Daniel Vetter
2020-04-15 9:16 ` Daniel Vetter
2020-04-15 9:39 ` David Laight
2020-04-15 9:39 ` David Laight
2020-04-15 9:39 ` David Laight
2020-04-15 14:08 ` Deucher, Alexander
2020-04-15 14:08 ` Deucher, Alexander
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87lfmx5h72.fsf@intel.com \
--to=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
--cc=Felix.Kuehling@amd.com \
--cc=Oak.Zeng@amd.com \
--cc=airlied@linux.ie \
--cc=alex.sierra@amd.com \
--cc=alexander.deucher@amd.com \
--cc=alexdeucher@gmail.com \
--cc=amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=bernard@vivo.com \
--cc=christian.koenig@amd.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=kent.russell@amd.com \
--cc=kernel@vivo.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ray.huang@amd.com \
--cc=sam@ravnborg.org \
--cc=xiaojie.yuan@amd.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.