* [PATCH] drm/i915: Remove WARN_ON and WARN_ON_ONCE overrides. @ 2020-04-02 5:52 ` Pankaj Bharadiya 0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread From: Pankaj Bharadiya @ 2020-04-02 5:52 UTC (permalink / raw) To: jani.nikula, daniel, intel-gfx, dri-devel, Joonas Lahtinen, Rodrigo Vivi, David Airlie Cc: pankaj.laxminarayan.bharadiya Now we have new struct drm_device based drm_WARN* macros. These are preferred over the regular WARN* macros. Remove WARN_ON and WARN_ON_ONCE overriedes to avoid any temptations to use them in the future. Suggested-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Pankaj Bharadiya <pankaj.laxminarayan.bharadiya@intel.com> --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_utils.h | 15 --------------- 1 file changed, 15 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_utils.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_utils.h index 03a73d2bd50d..c666a64375d9 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_utils.h +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_utils.h @@ -36,21 +36,6 @@ struct timer_list; #define FDO_BUG_URL "https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/wikis/How-to-file-i915-bugs" -#undef WARN_ON -/* Many gcc seem to no see through this and fall over :( */ -#if 0 -#define WARN_ON(x) ({ \ - bool __i915_warn_cond = (x); \ - if (__builtin_constant_p(__i915_warn_cond)) \ - BUILD_BUG_ON(__i915_warn_cond); \ - WARN(__i915_warn_cond, "WARN_ON(" #x ")"); }) -#else -#define WARN_ON(x) WARN((x), "%s", "WARN_ON(" __stringify(x) ")") -#endif - -#undef WARN_ON_ONCE -#define WARN_ON_ONCE(x) WARN_ONCE((x), "%s", "WARN_ON_ONCE(" __stringify(x) ")") - #define MISSING_CASE(x) WARN(1, "Missing case (%s == %ld)\n", \ __stringify(x), (long)(x)) -- 2.23.0 _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Remove WARN_ON and WARN_ON_ONCE overrides. @ 2020-04-02 5:52 ` Pankaj Bharadiya 0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread From: Pankaj Bharadiya @ 2020-04-02 5:52 UTC (permalink / raw) To: jani.nikula, daniel, intel-gfx, dri-devel, Joonas Lahtinen, Rodrigo Vivi, David Airlie Now we have new struct drm_device based drm_WARN* macros. These are preferred over the regular WARN* macros. Remove WARN_ON and WARN_ON_ONCE overriedes to avoid any temptations to use them in the future. Suggested-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Pankaj Bharadiya <pankaj.laxminarayan.bharadiya@intel.com> --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_utils.h | 15 --------------- 1 file changed, 15 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_utils.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_utils.h index 03a73d2bd50d..c666a64375d9 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_utils.h +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_utils.h @@ -36,21 +36,6 @@ struct timer_list; #define FDO_BUG_URL "https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/wikis/How-to-file-i915-bugs" -#undef WARN_ON -/* Many gcc seem to no see through this and fall over :( */ -#if 0 -#define WARN_ON(x) ({ \ - bool __i915_warn_cond = (x); \ - if (__builtin_constant_p(__i915_warn_cond)) \ - BUILD_BUG_ON(__i915_warn_cond); \ - WARN(__i915_warn_cond, "WARN_ON(" #x ")"); }) -#else -#define WARN_ON(x) WARN((x), "%s", "WARN_ON(" __stringify(x) ")") -#endif - -#undef WARN_ON_ONCE -#define WARN_ON_ONCE(x) WARN_ONCE((x), "%s", "WARN_ON_ONCE(" __stringify(x) ")") - #define MISSING_CASE(x) WARN(1, "Missing case (%s == %ld)\n", \ __stringify(x), (long)(x)) -- 2.23.0 _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: Remove WARN_ON and WARN_ON_ONCE overrides. 2020-04-02 5:52 ` [Intel-gfx] " Pankaj Bharadiya @ 2020-04-02 6:22 ` Jani Nikula -1 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread From: Jani Nikula @ 2020-04-02 6:22 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Pankaj Bharadiya, daniel, intel-gfx, dri-devel, Joonas Lahtinen, Rodrigo Vivi, David Airlie Cc: pankaj.laxminarayan.bharadiya On Thu, 02 Apr 2020, Pankaj Bharadiya <pankaj.laxminarayan.bharadiya@intel.com> wrote: > Now we have new struct drm_device based drm_WARN* macros. These are > preferred over the regular WARN* macros. > > Remove WARN_ON and WARN_ON_ONCE overriedes to avoid any temptations to > use them in the future. Well, since they are overrides of macros in bug.h, the users are still there. There are still 100+ users in i915. You just don't get as much information with them after this patch. I'm not opposed to this patch, but at the same time I'd like to see more converted to the drm_WARN* alternatives. Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> BR, Jani. > > Suggested-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> > Signed-off-by: Pankaj Bharadiya <pankaj.laxminarayan.bharadiya@intel.com> > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_utils.h | 15 --------------- > 1 file changed, 15 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_utils.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_utils.h > index 03a73d2bd50d..c666a64375d9 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_utils.h > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_utils.h > @@ -36,21 +36,6 @@ struct timer_list; > > #define FDO_BUG_URL "https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/wikis/How-to-file-i915-bugs" > > -#undef WARN_ON > -/* Many gcc seem to no see through this and fall over :( */ > -#if 0 > -#define WARN_ON(x) ({ \ > - bool __i915_warn_cond = (x); \ > - if (__builtin_constant_p(__i915_warn_cond)) \ > - BUILD_BUG_ON(__i915_warn_cond); \ > - WARN(__i915_warn_cond, "WARN_ON(" #x ")"); }) > -#else > -#define WARN_ON(x) WARN((x), "%s", "WARN_ON(" __stringify(x) ")") > -#endif > - > -#undef WARN_ON_ONCE > -#define WARN_ON_ONCE(x) WARN_ONCE((x), "%s", "WARN_ON_ONCE(" __stringify(x) ")") > - > #define MISSING_CASE(x) WARN(1, "Missing case (%s == %ld)\n", \ > __stringify(x), (long)(x)) -- Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Remove WARN_ON and WARN_ON_ONCE overrides. @ 2020-04-02 6:22 ` Jani Nikula 0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread From: Jani Nikula @ 2020-04-02 6:22 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Pankaj Bharadiya, daniel, intel-gfx, dri-devel, Joonas Lahtinen, Rodrigo Vivi, David Airlie On Thu, 02 Apr 2020, Pankaj Bharadiya <pankaj.laxminarayan.bharadiya@intel.com> wrote: > Now we have new struct drm_device based drm_WARN* macros. These are > preferred over the regular WARN* macros. > > Remove WARN_ON and WARN_ON_ONCE overriedes to avoid any temptations to > use them in the future. Well, since they are overrides of macros in bug.h, the users are still there. There are still 100+ users in i915. You just don't get as much information with them after this patch. I'm not opposed to this patch, but at the same time I'd like to see more converted to the drm_WARN* alternatives. Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> BR, Jani. > > Suggested-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> > Signed-off-by: Pankaj Bharadiya <pankaj.laxminarayan.bharadiya@intel.com> > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_utils.h | 15 --------------- > 1 file changed, 15 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_utils.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_utils.h > index 03a73d2bd50d..c666a64375d9 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_utils.h > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_utils.h > @@ -36,21 +36,6 @@ struct timer_list; > > #define FDO_BUG_URL "https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/wikis/How-to-file-i915-bugs" > > -#undef WARN_ON > -/* Many gcc seem to no see through this and fall over :( */ > -#if 0 > -#define WARN_ON(x) ({ \ > - bool __i915_warn_cond = (x); \ > - if (__builtin_constant_p(__i915_warn_cond)) \ > - BUILD_BUG_ON(__i915_warn_cond); \ > - WARN(__i915_warn_cond, "WARN_ON(" #x ")"); }) > -#else > -#define WARN_ON(x) WARN((x), "%s", "WARN_ON(" __stringify(x) ")") > -#endif > - > -#undef WARN_ON_ONCE > -#define WARN_ON_ONCE(x) WARN_ONCE((x), "%s", "WARN_ON_ONCE(" __stringify(x) ")") > - > #define MISSING_CASE(x) WARN(1, "Missing case (%s == %ld)\n", \ > __stringify(x), (long)(x)) -- Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: Remove WARN_ON and WARN_ON_ONCE overrides. 2020-04-02 6:22 ` [Intel-gfx] " Jani Nikula @ 2020-04-02 7:27 ` Daniel Vetter -1 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread From: Daniel Vetter @ 2020-04-02 7:27 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jani Nikula Cc: David Airlie, Pankaj Bharadiya, intel-gfx, dri-devel, Rodrigo Vivi On Thu, Apr 2, 2020 at 8:23 AM Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com> wrote: > > On Thu, 02 Apr 2020, Pankaj Bharadiya <pankaj.laxminarayan.bharadiya@intel.com> wrote: > > Now we have new struct drm_device based drm_WARN* macros. These are > > preferred over the regular WARN* macros. > > > > Remove WARN_ON and WARN_ON_ONCE overriedes to avoid any temptations to > > use them in the future. > > Well, since they are overrides of macros in bug.h, the users are still > there. There are still 100+ users in i915. You just don't get as much > information with them after this patch. > > I'm not opposed to this patch, but at the same time I'd like to see more > converted to the drm_WARN* alternatives. Yeah our overrides are super useful, I think better to try to move them to the core version. So many times when I didn't know which warning was hit in a bug report (warnings in drm core already have this problem), and the additional output here would have helped. I'd at least keep this for now. -Daniel > Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> > > > BR, > Jani. > > > > > Suggested-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> > > Signed-off-by: Pankaj Bharadiya <pankaj.laxminarayan.bharadiya@intel.com> > > --- > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_utils.h | 15 --------------- > > 1 file changed, 15 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_utils.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_utils.h > > index 03a73d2bd50d..c666a64375d9 100644 > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_utils.h > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_utils.h > > @@ -36,21 +36,6 @@ struct timer_list; > > > > #define FDO_BUG_URL "https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/wikis/How-to-file-i915-bugs" > > > > -#undef WARN_ON > > -/* Many gcc seem to no see through this and fall over :( */ > > -#if 0 > > -#define WARN_ON(x) ({ \ > > - bool __i915_warn_cond = (x); \ > > - if (__builtin_constant_p(__i915_warn_cond)) \ > > - BUILD_BUG_ON(__i915_warn_cond); \ > > - WARN(__i915_warn_cond, "WARN_ON(" #x ")"); }) > > -#else > > -#define WARN_ON(x) WARN((x), "%s", "WARN_ON(" __stringify(x) ")") > > -#endif > > - > > -#undef WARN_ON_ONCE > > -#define WARN_ON_ONCE(x) WARN_ONCE((x), "%s", "WARN_ON_ONCE(" __stringify(x) ")") > > - > > #define MISSING_CASE(x) WARN(1, "Missing case (%s == %ld)\n", \ > > __stringify(x), (long)(x)) > > -- > Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation +41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Remove WARN_ON and WARN_ON_ONCE overrides. @ 2020-04-02 7:27 ` Daniel Vetter 0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread From: Daniel Vetter @ 2020-04-02 7:27 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jani Nikula; +Cc: David Airlie, intel-gfx, dri-devel On Thu, Apr 2, 2020 at 8:23 AM Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com> wrote: > > On Thu, 02 Apr 2020, Pankaj Bharadiya <pankaj.laxminarayan.bharadiya@intel.com> wrote: > > Now we have new struct drm_device based drm_WARN* macros. These are > > preferred over the regular WARN* macros. > > > > Remove WARN_ON and WARN_ON_ONCE overriedes to avoid any temptations to > > use them in the future. > > Well, since they are overrides of macros in bug.h, the users are still > there. There are still 100+ users in i915. You just don't get as much > information with them after this patch. > > I'm not opposed to this patch, but at the same time I'd like to see more > converted to the drm_WARN* alternatives. Yeah our overrides are super useful, I think better to try to move them to the core version. So many times when I didn't know which warning was hit in a bug report (warnings in drm core already have this problem), and the additional output here would have helped. I'd at least keep this for now. -Daniel > Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> > > > BR, > Jani. > > > > > Suggested-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> > > Signed-off-by: Pankaj Bharadiya <pankaj.laxminarayan.bharadiya@intel.com> > > --- > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_utils.h | 15 --------------- > > 1 file changed, 15 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_utils.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_utils.h > > index 03a73d2bd50d..c666a64375d9 100644 > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_utils.h > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_utils.h > > @@ -36,21 +36,6 @@ struct timer_list; > > > > #define FDO_BUG_URL "https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/wikis/How-to-file-i915-bugs" > > > > -#undef WARN_ON > > -/* Many gcc seem to no see through this and fall over :( */ > > -#if 0 > > -#define WARN_ON(x) ({ \ > > - bool __i915_warn_cond = (x); \ > > - if (__builtin_constant_p(__i915_warn_cond)) \ > > - BUILD_BUG_ON(__i915_warn_cond); \ > > - WARN(__i915_warn_cond, "WARN_ON(" #x ")"); }) > > -#else > > -#define WARN_ON(x) WARN((x), "%s", "WARN_ON(" __stringify(x) ")") > > -#endif > > - > > -#undef WARN_ON_ONCE > > -#define WARN_ON_ONCE(x) WARN_ONCE((x), "%s", "WARN_ON_ONCE(" __stringify(x) ")") > > - > > #define MISSING_CASE(x) WARN(1, "Missing case (%s == %ld)\n", \ > > __stringify(x), (long)(x)) > > -- > Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation +41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: Remove WARN_ON and WARN_ON_ONCE overrides. 2020-04-02 7:27 ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter @ 2020-04-02 8:09 ` Jani Nikula -1 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread From: Jani Nikula @ 2020-04-02 8:09 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Daniel Vetter Cc: David Airlie, Pankaj Bharadiya, intel-gfx, dri-devel, Rodrigo Vivi On Thu, 02 Apr 2020, Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch> wrote: > On Thu, Apr 2, 2020 at 8:23 AM Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com> wrote: >> >> On Thu, 02 Apr 2020, Pankaj Bharadiya <pankaj.laxminarayan.bharadiya@intel.com> wrote: >> > Now we have new struct drm_device based drm_WARN* macros. These are >> > preferred over the regular WARN* macros. >> > >> > Remove WARN_ON and WARN_ON_ONCE overriedes to avoid any temptations to >> > use them in the future. >> >> Well, since they are overrides of macros in bug.h, the users are still >> there. There are still 100+ users in i915. You just don't get as much >> information with them after this patch. >> >> I'm not opposed to this patch, but at the same time I'd like to see more >> converted to the drm_WARN* alternatives. > > Yeah our overrides are super useful, I think better to try to move > them to the core version. So many times when I didn't know which > warning was hit in a bug report (warnings in drm core already have > this problem), and the additional output here would have helped. I'd > at least keep this for now. The drm_WARN_ON, drm_WARN_ON_ONCE macros in drm_print.h are comparable replacements, with the device info as well as the condition. BR, Jani. > -Daniel > >> Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> >> >> >> BR, >> Jani. >> >> > >> > Suggested-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> >> > Signed-off-by: Pankaj Bharadiya <pankaj.laxminarayan.bharadiya@intel.com> >> > --- >> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_utils.h | 15 --------------- >> > 1 file changed, 15 deletions(-) >> > >> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_utils.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_utils.h >> > index 03a73d2bd50d..c666a64375d9 100644 >> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_utils.h >> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_utils.h >> > @@ -36,21 +36,6 @@ struct timer_list; >> > >> > #define FDO_BUG_URL "https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/wikis/How-to-file-i915-bugs" >> > >> > -#undef WARN_ON >> > -/* Many gcc seem to no see through this and fall over :( */ >> > -#if 0 >> > -#define WARN_ON(x) ({ \ >> > - bool __i915_warn_cond = (x); \ >> > - if (__builtin_constant_p(__i915_warn_cond)) \ >> > - BUILD_BUG_ON(__i915_warn_cond); \ >> > - WARN(__i915_warn_cond, "WARN_ON(" #x ")"); }) >> > -#else >> > -#define WARN_ON(x) WARN((x), "%s", "WARN_ON(" __stringify(x) ")") >> > -#endif >> > - >> > -#undef WARN_ON_ONCE >> > -#define WARN_ON_ONCE(x) WARN_ONCE((x), "%s", "WARN_ON_ONCE(" __stringify(x) ")") >> > - >> > #define MISSING_CASE(x) WARN(1, "Missing case (%s == %ld)\n", \ >> > __stringify(x), (long)(x)) >> >> -- >> Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center -- Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Remove WARN_ON and WARN_ON_ONCE overrides. @ 2020-04-02 8:09 ` Jani Nikula 0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread From: Jani Nikula @ 2020-04-02 8:09 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Daniel Vetter; +Cc: David Airlie, intel-gfx, dri-devel On Thu, 02 Apr 2020, Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch> wrote: > On Thu, Apr 2, 2020 at 8:23 AM Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com> wrote: >> >> On Thu, 02 Apr 2020, Pankaj Bharadiya <pankaj.laxminarayan.bharadiya@intel.com> wrote: >> > Now we have new struct drm_device based drm_WARN* macros. These are >> > preferred over the regular WARN* macros. >> > >> > Remove WARN_ON and WARN_ON_ONCE overriedes to avoid any temptations to >> > use them in the future. >> >> Well, since they are overrides of macros in bug.h, the users are still >> there. There are still 100+ users in i915. You just don't get as much >> information with them after this patch. >> >> I'm not opposed to this patch, but at the same time I'd like to see more >> converted to the drm_WARN* alternatives. > > Yeah our overrides are super useful, I think better to try to move > them to the core version. So many times when I didn't know which > warning was hit in a bug report (warnings in drm core already have > this problem), and the additional output here would have helped. I'd > at least keep this for now. The drm_WARN_ON, drm_WARN_ON_ONCE macros in drm_print.h are comparable replacements, with the device info as well as the condition. BR, Jani. > -Daniel > >> Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> >> >> >> BR, >> Jani. >> >> > >> > Suggested-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> >> > Signed-off-by: Pankaj Bharadiya <pankaj.laxminarayan.bharadiya@intel.com> >> > --- >> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_utils.h | 15 --------------- >> > 1 file changed, 15 deletions(-) >> > >> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_utils.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_utils.h >> > index 03a73d2bd50d..c666a64375d9 100644 >> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_utils.h >> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_utils.h >> > @@ -36,21 +36,6 @@ struct timer_list; >> > >> > #define FDO_BUG_URL "https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/wikis/How-to-file-i915-bugs" >> > >> > -#undef WARN_ON >> > -/* Many gcc seem to no see through this and fall over :( */ >> > -#if 0 >> > -#define WARN_ON(x) ({ \ >> > - bool __i915_warn_cond = (x); \ >> > - if (__builtin_constant_p(__i915_warn_cond)) \ >> > - BUILD_BUG_ON(__i915_warn_cond); \ >> > - WARN(__i915_warn_cond, "WARN_ON(" #x ")"); }) >> > -#else >> > -#define WARN_ON(x) WARN((x), "%s", "WARN_ON(" __stringify(x) ")") >> > -#endif >> > - >> > -#undef WARN_ON_ONCE >> > -#define WARN_ON_ONCE(x) WARN_ONCE((x), "%s", "WARN_ON_ONCE(" __stringify(x) ")") >> > - >> > #define MISSING_CASE(x) WARN(1, "Missing case (%s == %ld)\n", \ >> > __stringify(x), (long)(x)) >> >> -- >> Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center -- Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915: Remove WARN_ON and WARN_ON_ONCE overrides. 2020-04-02 5:52 ` [Intel-gfx] " Pankaj Bharadiya (?) (?) @ 2020-04-02 7:01 ` Patchwork -1 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread From: Patchwork @ 2020-04-02 7:01 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Pankaj Bharadiya; +Cc: intel-gfx == Series Details == Series: drm/i915: Remove WARN_ON and WARN_ON_ONCE overrides. URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/75390/ State : success == Summary == CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_8236 -> Patchwork_17174 ==================================================== Summary ------- **SUCCESS** No regressions found. External URL: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_17174/index.html Known issues ------------ Here are the changes found in Patchwork_17174 that come from known issues: ### IGT changes ### #### Issues hit #### * igt@kms_chamelium@dp-crc-fast: - fi-cml-u2: [PASS][1] -> [FAIL][2] ([i915#262]) [1]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_8236/fi-cml-u2/igt@kms_chamelium@dp-crc-fast.html [2]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_17174/fi-cml-u2/igt@kms_chamelium@dp-crc-fast.html #### Warnings #### * igt@kms_cursor_legacy@basic-flip-after-cursor-legacy: - fi-kbl-x1275: [DMESG-WARN][3] ([i915#62] / [i915#92] / [i915#95]) -> [DMESG-WARN][4] ([i915#62] / [i915#92]) +3 similar issues [3]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_8236/fi-kbl-x1275/igt@kms_cursor_legacy@basic-flip-after-cursor-legacy.html [4]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_17174/fi-kbl-x1275/igt@kms_cursor_legacy@basic-flip-after-cursor-legacy.html * igt@kms_flip@basic-flip-vs-modeset: - fi-kbl-x1275: [DMESG-WARN][5] ([i915#62] / [i915#92]) -> [DMESG-WARN][6] ([i915#62] / [i915#92] / [i915#95]) +7 similar issues [5]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_8236/fi-kbl-x1275/igt@kms_flip@basic-flip-vs-modeset.html [6]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_17174/fi-kbl-x1275/igt@kms_flip@basic-flip-vs-modeset.html [i915#262]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/262 [i915#62]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/62 [i915#92]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/92 [i915#95]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/95 Participating hosts (47 -> 38) ------------------------------ Additional (2): fi-hsw-peppy fi-elk-e7500 Missing (11): fi-ilk-m540 fi-bdw-5557u fi-hsw-4200u fi-glk-dsi fi-bsw-cyan fi-snb-2520m fi-kbl-7500u fi-ctg-p8600 fi-kbl-7560u fi-byt-clapper fi-bdw-samus Build changes ------------- * CI: CI-20190529 -> None * Linux: CI_DRM_8236 -> Patchwork_17174 CI-20190529: 20190529 CI_DRM_8236: 698ce59acca37b93bfcdee6899504be3eb113097 @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/gfx-ci/linux IGT_5556: 311cb1b360b7ae00fab80b822cd34fd512f08ce9 @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/xorg/app/intel-gpu-tools Patchwork_17174: 2328c1f4d826c1ee018403f89587d61bbad177e3 @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/gfx-ci/linux == Linux commits == 2328c1f4d826 drm/i915: Remove WARN_ON and WARN_ON_ONCE overrides. == Logs == For more details see: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_17174/index.html _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure for drm/i915: Remove WARN_ON and WARN_ON_ONCE overrides. 2020-04-02 5:52 ` [Intel-gfx] " Pankaj Bharadiya ` (2 preceding siblings ...) (?) @ 2020-04-03 10:34 ` Patchwork -1 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread From: Patchwork @ 2020-04-03 10:34 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Pankaj Bharadiya; +Cc: intel-gfx == Series Details == Series: drm/i915: Remove WARN_ON and WARN_ON_ONCE overrides. URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/75390/ State : failure == Summary == CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_8236_full -> Patchwork_17174_full ==================================================== Summary ------- **FAILURE** Serious unknown changes coming with Patchwork_17174_full absolutely need to be verified manually. If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the changes introduced in Patchwork_17174_full, please notify your bug team to allow them to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false positives in CI. Possible new issues ------------------- Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in Patchwork_17174_full: ### IGT changes ### #### Possible regressions #### * igt@gem_mmap_gtt@cpuset-basic-small-copy-odd: - shard-skl: [PASS][1] -> [FAIL][2] [1]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_8236/shard-skl8/igt@gem_mmap_gtt@cpuset-basic-small-copy-odd.html [2]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_17174/shard-skl1/igt@gem_mmap_gtt@cpuset-basic-small-copy-odd.html * igt@gem_tiled_swapping@non-threaded: - shard-apl: [PASS][3] -> [FAIL][4] [3]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_8236/shard-apl8/igt@gem_tiled_swapping@non-threaded.html [4]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_17174/shard-apl2/igt@gem_tiled_swapping@non-threaded.html - shard-iclb: [PASS][5] -> [FAIL][6] [5]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_8236/shard-iclb6/igt@gem_tiled_swapping@non-threaded.html [6]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_17174/shard-iclb2/igt@gem_tiled_swapping@non-threaded.html - shard-kbl: [PASS][7] -> [FAIL][8] [7]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_8236/shard-kbl2/igt@gem_tiled_swapping@non-threaded.html [8]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_17174/shard-kbl1/igt@gem_tiled_swapping@non-threaded.html New tests --------- New tests have been introduced between CI_DRM_8236_full and Patchwork_17174_full: ### New IGT tests (25) ### * igt@gem_busy@busy: - Statuses : - Exec time: [None] s * igt@gem_exec_reloc@basic-spin: - Statuses : - Exec time: [None] s * igt@gem_exec_schedule@implicit-write-read: - Statuses : - Exec time: [None] s * igt@perf_pmu@busy: - Statuses : - Exec time: [None] s * igt@perf_pmu@busy-accuracy-2: - Statuses : - Exec time: [None] s * igt@perf_pmu@busy-accuracy-50: - Statuses : - Exec time: [None] s * igt@perf_pmu@busy-accuracy-98: - Statuses : - Exec time: [None] s * igt@perf_pmu@busy-check-all: - Statuses : - Exec time: [None] s * igt@perf_pmu@busy-double-start: - Statuses : - Exec time: [None] s * igt@perf_pmu@busy-hang: - Statuses : - Exec time: [None] s * igt@perf_pmu@busy-idle: - Statuses : - Exec time: [None] s * igt@perf_pmu@busy-no-semaphores: - Statuses : - Exec time: [None] s * igt@perf_pmu@busy-start: - Statuses : - Exec time: [None] s * igt@perf_pmu@enable-race: - Statuses : - Exec time: [None] s * igt@perf_pmu@idle: - Statuses : - Exec time: [None] s * igt@perf_pmu@idle-no-semaphores: - Statuses : - Exec time: [None] s * igt@perf_pmu@init-wait: - Statuses : - Exec time: [None] s * igt@perf_pmu@most-busy-check-all: - Statuses : - Exec time: [None] s * igt@perf_pmu@most-busy-idle-check-all: - Statuses : - Exec time: [None] s * igt@perf_pmu@multi-client: - Statuses : - Exec time: [None] s * igt@perf_pmu@render-node-busy: - Statuses : - Exec time: [None] s * igt@perf_pmu@render-node-busy-idle: - Statuses : - Exec time: [None] s * igt@perf_pmu@semaphore-busy: - Statuses : - Exec time: [None] s * igt@perf_pmu@semaphore-wait: - Statuses : - Exec time: [None] s * igt@perf_pmu@semaphore-wait-idle: - Statuses : - Exec time: [None] s Known issues ------------ Here are the changes found in Patchwork_17174_full that come from known issues: ### IGT changes ### #### Issues hit #### * igt@gem_cs_tlb@vcs1: - shard-iclb: [PASS][9] -> [SKIP][10] ([fdo#112080]) [9]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_8236/shard-iclb2/igt@gem_cs_tlb@vcs1.html [10]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_17174/shard-iclb5/igt@gem_cs_tlb@vcs1.html * igt@kms_flip@2x-flip-vs-expired-vblank-interruptible: - shard-glk: [PASS][11] -> [FAIL][12] ([i915#79]) [11]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_8236/shard-glk7/igt@kms_flip@2x-flip-vs-expired-vblank-interruptible.html [12]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_17174/shard-glk3/igt@kms_flip@2x-flip-vs-expired-vblank-interruptible.html * igt@kms_flip@flip-vs-suspend-interruptible: - shard-skl: [PASS][13] -> [INCOMPLETE][14] ([i915#221]) [13]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_8236/shard-skl4/igt@kms_flip@flip-vs-suspend-interruptible.html [14]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_17174/shard-skl5/igt@kms_flip@flip-vs-suspend-interruptible.html * igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@fbc-suspend: - shard-kbl: [PASS][15] -> [DMESG-WARN][16] ([i915#180] / [i915#93] / [i915#95]) +1 similar issue [15]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_8236/shard-kbl7/igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@fbc-suspend.html [16]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_17174/shard-kbl2/igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@fbc-suspend.html * igt@kms_hdr@bpc-switch-suspend: - shard-kbl: [PASS][17] -> [DMESG-WARN][18] ([i915#180]) +3 similar issues [17]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_8236/shard-kbl6/igt@kms_hdr@bpc-switch-suspend.html [18]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_17174/shard-kbl3/igt@kms_hdr@bpc-switch-suspend.html * igt@kms_plane@plane-panning-bottom-right-suspend-pipe-a-planes: - shard-apl: [PASS][19] -> [DMESG-WARN][20] ([i915#180]) [19]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_8236/shard-apl6/igt@kms_plane@plane-panning-bottom-right-suspend-pipe-a-planes.html [20]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_17174/shard-apl3/igt@kms_plane@plane-panning-bottom-right-suspend-pipe-a-planes.html * igt@kms_plane_alpha_blend@pipe-b-coverage-7efc: - shard-skl: [PASS][21] -> [FAIL][22] ([fdo#108145] / [i915#265]) [21]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_8236/shard-skl10/igt@kms_plane_alpha_blend@pipe-b-coverage-7efc.html [22]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_17174/shard-skl7/igt@kms_plane_alpha_blend@pipe-b-coverage-7efc.html * igt@kms_psr@psr2_cursor_render: - shard-iclb: [PASS][23] -> [SKIP][24] ([fdo#109441]) +1 similar issue [23]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_8236/shard-iclb2/igt@kms_psr@psr2_cursor_render.html [24]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_17174/shard-iclb5/igt@kms_psr@psr2_cursor_render.html * igt@kms_setmode@basic: - shard-apl: [PASS][25] -> [FAIL][26] ([i915#31]) [25]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_8236/shard-apl8/igt@kms_setmode@basic.html [26]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_17174/shard-apl2/igt@kms_setmode@basic.html * igt@prime_vgem@fence-wait-bsd2: - shard-iclb: [PASS][27] -> [SKIP][28] ([fdo#109276]) +3 similar issues [27]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_8236/shard-iclb2/igt@prime_vgem@fence-wait-bsd2.html [28]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_17174/shard-iclb5/igt@prime_vgem@fence-wait-bsd2.html #### Possible fixes #### * igt@kms_cursor_crc@pipe-a-cursor-256x256-offscreen: - shard-apl: [FAIL][29] ([i915#54] / [i915#95]) -> [PASS][30] [29]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_8236/shard-apl8/igt@kms_cursor_crc@pipe-a-cursor-256x256-offscreen.html [30]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_17174/shard-apl2/igt@kms_cursor_crc@pipe-a-cursor-256x256-offscreen.html * igt@kms_cursor_crc@pipe-a-cursor-suspend: - shard-kbl: [DMESG-WARN][31] ([i915#180]) -> [PASS][32] +5 similar issues [31]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_8236/shard-kbl7/igt@kms_cursor_crc@pipe-a-cursor-suspend.html [32]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_17174/shard-kbl1/igt@kms_cursor_crc@pipe-a-cursor-suspend.html * igt@kms_cursor_crc@pipe-b-cursor-suspend: - shard-apl: [DMESG-WARN][33] ([i915#180]) -> [PASS][34] +2 similar issues [33]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_8236/shard-apl4/igt@kms_cursor_crc@pipe-b-cursor-suspend.html [34]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_17174/shard-apl8/igt@kms_cursor_crc@pipe-b-cursor-suspend.html * igt@kms_draw_crc@draw-method-rgb565-mmap-gtt-xtiled: - shard-glk: [FAIL][35] ([i915#52] / [i915#54]) -> [PASS][36] [35]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_8236/shard-glk7/igt@kms_draw_crc@draw-method-rgb565-mmap-gtt-xtiled.html [36]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_17174/shard-glk3/igt@kms_draw_crc@draw-method-rgb565-mmap-gtt-xtiled.html * igt@kms_flip@flip-vs-expired-vblank-interruptible: - shard-skl: [FAIL][37] ([i915#79]) -> [PASS][38] [37]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_8236/shard-skl2/igt@kms_flip@flip-vs-expired-vblank-interruptible.html [38]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_17174/shard-skl4/igt@kms_flip@flip-vs-expired-vblank-interruptible.html * igt@kms_flip@flip-vs-suspend: - shard-skl: [INCOMPLETE][39] ([i915#221]) -> [PASS][40] [39]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_8236/shard-skl4/igt@kms_flip@flip-vs-suspend.html [40]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_17174/shard-skl5/igt@kms_flip@flip-vs-suspend.html * igt@kms_hdr@bpc-switch-dpms: - shard-skl: [FAIL][41] ([i915#1188]) -> [PASS][42] +1 similar issue [41]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_8236/shard-skl1/igt@kms_hdr@bpc-switch-dpms.html [42]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_17174/shard-skl3/igt@kms_hdr@bpc-switch-dpms.html * igt@kms_plane_alpha_blend@pipe-c-coverage-7efc: - shard-skl: [FAIL][43] ([fdo#108145] / [i915#265]) -> [PASS][44] [43]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_8236/shard-skl10/igt@kms_plane_alpha_blend@pipe-c-coverage-7efc.html [44]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_17174/shard-skl7/igt@kms_plane_alpha_blend@pipe-c-coverage-7efc.html * igt@kms_psr@psr2_primary_page_flip: - shard-iclb: [SKIP][45] ([fdo#109441]) -> [PASS][46] +2 similar issues [45]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_8236/shard-iclb6/igt@kms_psr@psr2_primary_page_flip.html [46]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_17174/shard-iclb2/igt@kms_psr@psr2_primary_page_flip.html #### Warnings #### * igt@i915_pm_dc@dc3co-vpb-simulation: - shard-iclb: [SKIP][47] ([i915#588]) -> [SKIP][48] ([i915#658]) [47]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_8236/shard-iclb2/igt@i915_pm_dc@dc3co-vpb-simulation.html [48]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_17174/shard-iclb5/igt@i915_pm_dc@dc3co-vpb-simulation.html * igt@i915_pm_dc@dc6-psr: - shard-tglb: [SKIP][49] ([i915#468]) -> [FAIL][50] ([i915#454]) [49]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_8236/shard-tglb2/igt@i915_pm_dc@dc6-psr.html [50]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_17174/shard-tglb7/igt@i915_pm_dc@dc6-psr.html * igt@kms_plane_alpha_blend@pipe-a-constant-alpha-max: - shard-apl: [FAIL][51] ([fdo#108145] / [i915#265]) -> [FAIL][52] ([fdo#108145] / [i915#265] / [i915#95]) [51]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_8236/shard-apl1/igt@kms_plane_alpha_blend@pipe-a-constant-alpha-max.html [52]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_17174/shard-apl8/igt@kms_plane_alpha_blend@pipe-a-constant-alpha-max.html {name}: This element is suppressed. This means it is ignored when computing the status of the difference (SUCCESS, WARNING, or FAILURE). [fdo#108145]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=108145 [fdo#109276]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109276 [fdo#109441]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109441 [fdo#112080]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=112080 [i915#1188]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/1188 [i915#1542]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/1542 [i915#180]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/180 [i915#221]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/221 [i915#265]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/265 [i915#31]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/31 [i915#454]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/454 [i915#468]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/468 [i915#52]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/52 [i915#54]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/54 [i915#588]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/588 [i915#658]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/658 [i915#79]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/79 [i915#93]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/93 [i915#95]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/95 Participating hosts (10 -> 10) ------------------------------ No changes in participating hosts Build changes ------------- * CI: CI-20190529 -> None * Linux: CI_DRM_8236 -> Patchwork_17174 CI-20190529: 20190529 CI_DRM_8236: 698ce59acca37b93bfcdee6899504be3eb113097 @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/gfx-ci/linux IGT_5556: 311cb1b360b7ae00fab80b822cd34fd512f08ce9 @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/xorg/app/intel-gpu-tools Patchwork_17174: 2328c1f4d826c1ee018403f89587d61bbad177e3 @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/gfx-ci/linux piglit_4509: fdc5a4ca11124ab8413c7988896eec4c97336694 @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/piglit == Logs == For more details see: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_17174/index.html _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2020-04-03 10:34 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 10+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2020-04-02 5:52 [PATCH] drm/i915: Remove WARN_ON and WARN_ON_ONCE overrides Pankaj Bharadiya 2020-04-02 5:52 ` [Intel-gfx] " Pankaj Bharadiya 2020-04-02 6:22 ` Jani Nikula 2020-04-02 6:22 ` [Intel-gfx] " Jani Nikula 2020-04-02 7:27 ` Daniel Vetter 2020-04-02 7:27 ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter 2020-04-02 8:09 ` Jani Nikula 2020-04-02 8:09 ` [Intel-gfx] " Jani Nikula 2020-04-02 7:01 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for " Patchwork 2020-04-03 10:34 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.