All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
To: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>,
	Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>,
	David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	"Gustavo A. R. Silva" <garsilva@embeddedor.com>,
	Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/i915/intel_sdvo: mark expected switch fall-throughs
Date: Thu, 09 Nov 2017 11:13:54 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87lgjfak6l.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87wp2zammy.fsf@intel.com>

On Thu, 09 Nov 2017, Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 08 Nov 2017, "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <garsilva@embeddedor.com> wrote:
>> In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
>> where we are expecting to fall through.
>>
>> Addresses-Coverity-ID: 141432
>> Addresses-Coverity-ID: 141433
>> Addresses-Coverity-ID: 141434
>> Addresses-Coverity-ID: 141435
>> Addresses-Coverity-ID: 141436
>> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <garsilva@embeddedor.com>
>
> Acked-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>

More explicitly, the patch looks good, but I'll give others the chance
to chime in before merging. In particular Chris has been doing plenty of
warning fixes lately.

BR,
Jani.


>
>> ---
>>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_sdvo.c | 11 ++++++-----
>>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_sdvo.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_sdvo.c
>> index 7437944..921e372 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_sdvo.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_sdvo.c
>> @@ -1327,6 +1327,7 @@ static void intel_sdvo_pre_enable(struct intel_encoder *intel_encoder,
>>  	switch (crtc_state->pixel_multiplier) {
>>  	default:
>>  		WARN(1, "unknown pixel multiplier specified\n");
>> +		/* fall through */
>>  	case 1: rate = SDVO_CLOCK_RATE_MULT_1X; break;
>>  	case 2: rate = SDVO_CLOCK_RATE_MULT_2X; break;
>>  	case 4: rate = SDVO_CLOCK_RATE_MULT_4X; break;
>> @@ -2274,15 +2275,15 @@ intel_sdvo_guess_ddc_bus(struct intel_sdvo *sdvo)
>>  	 */
>>  	switch (sdvo->controlled_output) {
>>  	case SDVO_OUTPUT_LVDS1:
>> -		mask |= SDVO_OUTPUT_LVDS1;
>> +		mask |= SDVO_OUTPUT_LVDS1; /* fall through */
>>  	case SDVO_OUTPUT_LVDS0:
>> -		mask |= SDVO_OUTPUT_LVDS0;
>> +		mask |= SDVO_OUTPUT_LVDS0; /* fall through */
>>  	case SDVO_OUTPUT_TMDS1:
>> -		mask |= SDVO_OUTPUT_TMDS1;
>> +		mask |= SDVO_OUTPUT_TMDS1; /* fall through */
>>  	case SDVO_OUTPUT_TMDS0:
>> -		mask |= SDVO_OUTPUT_TMDS0;
>> +		mask |= SDVO_OUTPUT_TMDS0; /* fall through */
>>  	case SDVO_OUTPUT_RGB1:
>> -		mask |= SDVO_OUTPUT_RGB1;
>> +		mask |= SDVO_OUTPUT_RGB1; /* fall through */
>>  	case SDVO_OUTPUT_RGB0:
>>  		mask |= SDVO_OUTPUT_RGB0;
>>  		break;

-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
To: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <garsilva@embeddedor.com>,
	Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>,
	Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>,
	David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	"Gustavo A. R. Silva" <garsilva@embeddedor.com>,
	Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/i915/intel_sdvo: mark expected switch fall-throughs
Date: Thu, 09 Nov 2017 11:13:54 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87lgjfak6l.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87wp2zammy.fsf@intel.com>

On Thu, 09 Nov 2017, Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 08 Nov 2017, "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <garsilva@embeddedor.com> wrote:
>> In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
>> where we are expecting to fall through.
>>
>> Addresses-Coverity-ID: 141432
>> Addresses-Coverity-ID: 141433
>> Addresses-Coverity-ID: 141434
>> Addresses-Coverity-ID: 141435
>> Addresses-Coverity-ID: 141436
>> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <garsilva@embeddedor.com>
>
> Acked-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>

More explicitly, the patch looks good, but I'll give others the chance
to chime in before merging. In particular Chris has been doing plenty of
warning fixes lately.

BR,
Jani.


>
>> ---
>>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_sdvo.c | 11 ++++++-----
>>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_sdvo.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_sdvo.c
>> index 7437944..921e372 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_sdvo.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_sdvo.c
>> @@ -1327,6 +1327,7 @@ static void intel_sdvo_pre_enable(struct intel_encoder *intel_encoder,
>>  	switch (crtc_state->pixel_multiplier) {
>>  	default:
>>  		WARN(1, "unknown pixel multiplier specified\n");
>> +		/* fall through */
>>  	case 1: rate = SDVO_CLOCK_RATE_MULT_1X; break;
>>  	case 2: rate = SDVO_CLOCK_RATE_MULT_2X; break;
>>  	case 4: rate = SDVO_CLOCK_RATE_MULT_4X; break;
>> @@ -2274,15 +2275,15 @@ intel_sdvo_guess_ddc_bus(struct intel_sdvo *sdvo)
>>  	 */
>>  	switch (sdvo->controlled_output) {
>>  	case SDVO_OUTPUT_LVDS1:
>> -		mask |= SDVO_OUTPUT_LVDS1;
>> +		mask |= SDVO_OUTPUT_LVDS1; /* fall through */
>>  	case SDVO_OUTPUT_LVDS0:
>> -		mask |= SDVO_OUTPUT_LVDS0;
>> +		mask |= SDVO_OUTPUT_LVDS0; /* fall through */
>>  	case SDVO_OUTPUT_TMDS1:
>> -		mask |= SDVO_OUTPUT_TMDS1;
>> +		mask |= SDVO_OUTPUT_TMDS1; /* fall through */
>>  	case SDVO_OUTPUT_TMDS0:
>> -		mask |= SDVO_OUTPUT_TMDS0;
>> +		mask |= SDVO_OUTPUT_TMDS0; /* fall through */
>>  	case SDVO_OUTPUT_RGB1:
>> -		mask |= SDVO_OUTPUT_RGB1;
>> +		mask |= SDVO_OUTPUT_RGB1; /* fall through */
>>  	case SDVO_OUTPUT_RGB0:
>>  		mask |= SDVO_OUTPUT_RGB0;
>>  		break;

-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center

  reply	other threads:[~2017-11-09  9:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-11-08 20:27 [PATCH] drm/i915/intel_sdvo: mark expected switch fall-throughs Gustavo A. R. Silva
2017-11-09  8:20 ` Jani Nikula
2017-11-09  8:20   ` Jani Nikula
2017-11-09  9:13   ` Jani Nikula [this message]
2017-11-09  9:13     ` Jani Nikula

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87lgjfak6l.fsf@intel.com \
    --to=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=airlied@linux.ie \
    --cc=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=garsilva@embeddedor.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.