From: Huang, Ying <ying.huang@intel.com>
To: lkp@lists.01.org
Subject: Re: [direct] e594571852: xfstests.generic.299.fail
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 09:51:56 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87lh9oyxj7.fsf@yhuang-dev.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20151123112026.GE23418@quack.suse.cz>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 734 bytes --]
Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> writes:
> Hello,
>
> On Mon 23-11-15 16:29:25, kernel test robot wrote:
>> FYI, we noticed the below changes on
>>
>> git://internal_merge_and_test_tree
>> revert-e594571852b03a5503ba48edd718462e99bf238e-e594571852b03a5503ba48edd718462e99bf238e
>> commit e594571852b03a5503ba48edd718462e99bf238e ("direct-io: Fix negative return from dio read beyond eof")
>
> Do you have the file:
>
> /lkp/benchmarks/xfstests/results//generic/299.full
>
> produced by the failed test? Thanks!
Sorry, we don't collect that data during regular regression test. Is
that needed all the time? We will change our test scripts to collect
that data. But that need some time.
Best Regards,
Huang, Ying
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Huang\, Ying" <ying.huang@intel.com>
To: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: Avi Kivity <avi@scylladb.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
0day robot <fengguang.wu@intel.com>, <lkp@01.org>,
Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [LKP] [lkp] [direct] e594571852: xfstests.generic.299.fail
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 09:51:56 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87lh9oyxj7.fsf@yhuang-dev.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20151123112026.GE23418@quack.suse.cz> (Jan Kara's message of "Mon, 23 Nov 2015 12:20:26 +0100")
Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> writes:
> Hello,
>
> On Mon 23-11-15 16:29:25, kernel test robot wrote:
>> FYI, we noticed the below changes on
>>
>> git://internal_merge_and_test_tree
>> revert-e594571852b03a5503ba48edd718462e99bf238e-e594571852b03a5503ba48edd718462e99bf238e
>> commit e594571852b03a5503ba48edd718462e99bf238e ("direct-io: Fix negative return from dio read beyond eof")
>
> Do you have the file:
>
> /lkp/benchmarks/xfstests/results//generic/299.full
>
> produced by the failed test? Thanks!
Sorry, we don't collect that data during regular regression test. Is
that needed all the time? We will change our test scripts to collect
that data. But that need some time.
Best Regards,
Huang, Ying
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-11-24 1:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-11-23 8:29 [direct] e594571852: xfstests.generic.299.fail kernel test robot
2015-11-23 8:29 ` [lkp] " kernel test robot
2015-11-23 11:20 ` Jan Kara
2015-11-23 11:20 ` [lkp] " Jan Kara
2015-11-24 1:51 ` Huang, Ying [this message]
2015-11-24 1:51 ` [LKP] " Huang, Ying
2015-11-24 4:45 ` Huang, Ying
2015-11-24 4:45 ` [LKP] [lkp] " Huang, Ying
2015-11-24 10:03 ` Jan Kara
2015-11-24 10:03 ` [LKP] [lkp] " Jan Kara
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87lh9oyxj7.fsf@yhuang-dev.intel.com \
--to=ying.huang@intel.com \
--cc=lkp@lists.01.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.