Re: [PATCH v3 6/8] usb: dwc2: host: Assume all devices are on one single_tt hub

From: Felipe Balbi <balbi-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>
To: John Youn <John.Youn-HKixBCOQz3hWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
Cc: gregory.herrero-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org,
	"Heiko Stübner" <heiko-4mtYJXux2i+zQB+pC5nmwQ@public.gmane.org>,
	johnyoun-HKixBCOQz3hWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org,
	gregkh-hQyY1W1yCW8ekmWlsbkhG0B+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org,
	ming.lei-Z7WLFzj8eWMS+FvcfC7Uqw@public.gmane.org,
	linux-usb-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	"Douglas Anderson"
	<dianders-F7+t8E8rja9g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org>,
	linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	linux-rockchip-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org,
	yousaf.kaukab-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org,
	stern-nwvwT67g6+6dFdvTe/nMLpVzexx5G7lz@public.gmane.org,
	"Yunzhi Li" <lyz-TNX95d0MmH7DzftRWevZcw@public.gmane.org>,
	"Julius Werner" <jwerner-F7+t8E8rja9g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org>,
	dinguyen-yzvPICuk2ABMcg4IHK0kFoH6Mc4MB0Vx@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 6/8] usb: dwc2: host: Assume all devices are on one single_tt hub
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2015 09:34:11 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87lh9uf1fw.fsf@saruman.tx.rr.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1447721484-22548-7-git-send-email-dianders-F7+t8E8rja9g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org>

[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2377 bytes --]

Hi,

Douglas Anderson <dianders-F7+t8E8rja9g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org> writes:
> Until we have logic to determine which devices share the same TT let's
> add logic to assume that all devices on a given dwc2 controller are on
> one single_tt hub.  This is better than the previous code that assumed
> that all devices were on one multi_tt hub, since single_tt hubs
> appear (in my experience) to be much more common and any schedule that
> would work on a single_tt hub will also work on a multi_tt hub.  This
> will prevent more than 8 total low/full speed devices to be on the bus
> at one time, but that's a reasonable restriction until we've made things
> smarter.
>
> Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders-F7+t8E8rja9g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org>
> ---
> Changes in v3:
> - Assuming single_tt is new for v3; not terribly well tested (yet).
>
> Changes in v2: None
>
>  drivers/usb/dwc2/core.h      |  1 +
>  drivers/usb/dwc2/hcd_queue.c | 40 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  2 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/dwc2/core.h b/drivers/usb/dwc2/core.h
> index 567ee2c9e69f..09aa2b5ae29e 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/dwc2/core.h
> +++ b/drivers/usb/dwc2/core.h
> @@ -782,6 +782,7 @@ struct dwc2_hsotg {
>  	u16 periodic_usecs;
>  	unsigned long periodic_bitmap[DIV_ROUND_UP(TOTAL_PERIODIC_USEC,
>  						   BITS_PER_LONG)];
> +	bool has_split[8];

why don't you use a u8 instead then just set each bit for each
"has_split" you need to take care of. This array is kinda ugly.

> @@ -386,6 +409,13 @@ static int dwc2_find_multi_uframe(struct dwc2_hsotg *hsotg, struct dwc2_qh *qh)
>  	bitmap_set(hsotg->periodic_bitmap, start, qh->usecs);
>  	qh->start_usecs = start;
>  
> +	if (qh->do_split) {
> +		for (i = start / EARLY_FRAME_USEC;
> +		     i < DIV_ROUND_UP(start + utime - 1, EARLY_FRAME_USEC);
> +		     i++)
> +			hsotg->has_split[i] = true;

hsotg->has_split |= BIT(i);

> @@ -546,6 +577,13 @@ static void dwc2_deschedule_periodic(struct dwc2_hsotg *hsotg,
>  	}
>  
>  	bitmap_clear(hsotg->periodic_bitmap, start, utime);
> +
> +	if (qh->do_split) {
> +		for (i = start / EARLY_FRAME_USEC;
> +		     i < DIV_ROUND_UP(start + utime - 1, EARLY_FRAME_USEC);
> +		     i++)
> +			hsotg->has_split[i] = false;

hsotg->has_split &= ~BIT(i);

-- 
balbi

[-- Attachment #1.2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 818 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 200 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
Linux-rockchip mailing list
Linux-rockchip-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip