From: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
lf-virt <virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
Eric Van Hensbergen <ericvh@gmail.com>,
Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@gmail.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] virtio: 9p: correctly pass physical address to userspace for high pages
Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2012 12:49:06 +1030 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87lif4o739.fsf@rustcorp.com.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1350468877-7677-1-git-send-email-will.deacon@arm.com>
Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> writes:
> When using a virtio transport, the 9p net device allocates pages to back
> the descriptors inserted into the virtqueue. These allocations may be
> performed from atomic context (under the channel lock) and can therefore
> return high mappings which aren't suitable for virt_to_phys.
I had not appreciated that subtlety about GFP_ATOMIC :(
This isn't just 9p, the console, block, scsi and net devices also use
GFP_ATOMIC.
> @@ -165,7 +166,8 @@ static int vring_add_indirect(struct vring_virtqueue *vq,
> /* Use a single buffer which doesn't continue */
> head = vq->free_head;
> vq->vring.desc[head].flags = VRING_DESC_F_INDIRECT;
> - vq->vring.desc[head].addr = virt_to_phys(desc);
> + vq->vring.desc[head].addr = page_to_phys(kmap_to_page(desc)) +
> + ((unsigned long)desc & ~PAGE_MASK);
> vq->vring.desc[head].len = i * sizeof(struct vring_desc);
Gah, virt_to_phys_harder()?
What's the performance effect? If it's negligible, why doesn't
virt_to_phys() just do this for us?
We do have an alternate solution: masking out __GFP_HIGHMEM from the
kmalloc of desc. If it fails, we will fall back to laying out the
virtio request directly inside the ring; if it doesn't fit, we'll wait
for the device to consume more buffers.
> @@ -325,7 +326,7 @@ static int p9_get_mapped_pages(struct virtio_chan *chan,
> int count = nr_pages;
> while (nr_pages) {
> s = rest_of_page(data);
> - pages[index++] = virt_to_page(data);
> + pages[index++] = kmap_to_page(data);
> data += s;
> nr_pages--;
> }
This seems like a separate bug fix.
Cheers,
Rusty.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
To: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@gmail.com>,
Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>,
"lf-virt" <virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
"Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Eric Van Hensbergen <ericvh@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] virtio: 9p: correctly pass physical address to userspace for high pages
Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2012 12:49:06 +1030 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87lif4o739.fsf@rustcorp.com.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1350468877-7677-1-git-send-email-will.deacon@arm.com>
Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> writes:
> When using a virtio transport, the 9p net device allocates pages to back
> the descriptors inserted into the virtqueue. These allocations may be
> performed from atomic context (under the channel lock) and can therefore
> return high mappings which aren't suitable for virt_to_phys.
I had not appreciated that subtlety about GFP_ATOMIC :(
This isn't just 9p, the console, block, scsi and net devices also use
GFP_ATOMIC.
> @@ -165,7 +166,8 @@ static int vring_add_indirect(struct vring_virtqueue *vq,
> /* Use a single buffer which doesn't continue */
> head = vq->free_head;
> vq->vring.desc[head].flags = VRING_DESC_F_INDIRECT;
> - vq->vring.desc[head].addr = virt_to_phys(desc);
> + vq->vring.desc[head].addr = page_to_phys(kmap_to_page(desc)) +
> + ((unsigned long)desc & ~PAGE_MASK);
> vq->vring.desc[head].len = i * sizeof(struct vring_desc);
Gah, virt_to_phys_harder()?
What's the performance effect? If it's negligible, why doesn't
virt_to_phys() just do this for us?
We do have an alternate solution: masking out __GFP_HIGHMEM from the
kmalloc of desc. If it fails, we will fall back to laying out the
virtio request directly inside the ring; if it doesn't fit, we'll wait
for the device to consume more buffers.
> @@ -325,7 +326,7 @@ static int p9_get_mapped_pages(struct virtio_chan *chan,
> int count = nr_pages;
> while (nr_pages) {
> s = rest_of_page(data);
> - pages[index++] = virt_to_page(data);
> + pages[index++] = kmap_to_page(data);
> data += s;
> nr_pages--;
> }
This seems like a separate bug fix.
Cheers,
Rusty.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-10-18 2:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-10-17 10:14 [PATCH] virtio: 9p: correctly pass physical address to userspace for high pages Will Deacon
2012-10-17 16:05 ` Sasha Levin
2012-10-17 16:17 ` Will Deacon
2012-10-18 2:19 ` Rusty Russell [this message]
2012-10-18 2:19 ` Rusty Russell
2012-10-18 9:42 ` Will Deacon
2012-10-18 9:42 ` Will Deacon
2012-10-18 23:39 ` Rusty Russell
2012-10-18 23:39 ` Rusty Russell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87lif4o739.fsf@rustcorp.com.au \
--to=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ericvh@gmail.com \
--cc=levinsasha928@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.