From: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
To: Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com>
Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Jean Pihet <jean.pihet@newoldbits.com>,
Tero Kristo <t-kristo@ti.com>, Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@ti.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Revert "ARM: OMAP3: PM: call pre/post transition per powerdomain"
Date: Tue, 07 Aug 2012 15:44:47 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87lihqz5i8.fsf@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1344372107-17786-1-git-send-email-khilman@ti.com> (Kevin Hilman's message of "Tue, 7 Aug 2012 13:41:47 -0700")
Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com> writes:
> This reverts commit 58f0829b7186150318c79515f0e0850c5e7a9c89.
>
> Converstion to per-pwrdm per/post transition calls was a bit
> premature. Only tracking MPU, PER & CORE in the idle path means we
> lose the accounting for all the other powerdomains which may also
> transition in idle. On OMAP3, due to autodeps, several powerdomains
> transition along with MPU (e.g. DSS, USBHOST), and the accounting for
> these was lost with this patch.
>
> This patch should be revisited when the upcoming clkdm/pwrmdm/voltdm
> use-counting seires is merged since then we can properly do accounting
> without relying on a call in the idle path.
>
> Cc: Jean Pihet <jean.pihet@newoldbits.com>
> Cc: Tero Kristo <t-kristo@ti.com>
> Cc: Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@ti.com>
> Reported-by: Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com>
> Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
After some debugging with Paul, I found that the patch being reverted
here was the cause of another regression: GPIO context not being
properly restored after off mode. This caused the nfsroot problems in
off-mode on boards with ethernet devices with GPIO IRQ lines (Overo,
37xx EVM, ...)
Updating changelog, and will post v2 shortly.
Kevin
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: khilman@ti.com (Kevin Hilman)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] Revert "ARM: OMAP3: PM: call pre/post transition per powerdomain"
Date: Tue, 07 Aug 2012 15:44:47 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87lihqz5i8.fsf@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1344372107-17786-1-git-send-email-khilman@ti.com> (Kevin Hilman's message of "Tue, 7 Aug 2012 13:41:47 -0700")
Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com> writes:
> This reverts commit 58f0829b7186150318c79515f0e0850c5e7a9c89.
>
> Converstion to per-pwrdm per/post transition calls was a bit
> premature. Only tracking MPU, PER & CORE in the idle path means we
> lose the accounting for all the other powerdomains which may also
> transition in idle. On OMAP3, due to autodeps, several powerdomains
> transition along with MPU (e.g. DSS, USBHOST), and the accounting for
> these was lost with this patch.
>
> This patch should be revisited when the upcoming clkdm/pwrmdm/voltdm
> use-counting seires is merged since then we can properly do accounting
> without relying on a call in the idle path.
>
> Cc: Jean Pihet <jean.pihet@newoldbits.com>
> Cc: Tero Kristo <t-kristo@ti.com>
> Cc: Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@ti.com>
> Reported-by: Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com>
> Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
After some debugging with Paul, I found that the patch being reverted
here was the cause of another regression: GPIO context not being
properly restored after off mode. This caused the nfsroot problems in
off-mode on boards with ethernet devices with GPIO IRQ lines (Overo,
37xx EVM, ...)
Updating changelog, and will post v2 shortly.
Kevin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-08-07 22:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-08-07 20:41 [PATCH] Revert "ARM: OMAP3: PM: call pre/post transition per powerdomain" Kevin Hilman
2012-08-07 20:41 ` Kevin Hilman
2012-08-07 22:44 ` Kevin Hilman [this message]
2012-08-07 22:44 ` Kevin Hilman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87lihqz5i8.fsf@ti.com \
--to=khilman@ti.com \
--cc=jean.pihet@newoldbits.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paul@pwsan.com \
--cc=rnayak@ti.com \
--cc=t-kristo@ti.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.