* [PATCH] irqchip/riscv-aplic: Register syscore operations only once
@ 2026-03-09 8:11 ` liu.xuemei1
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: liu.xuemei1 @ 2026-03-09 8:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: anup, tglx, pjw, palmer, aou, alex, liujingqi, cyan.yang, nick.hu,
yongxuan.wang
Cc: linux-riscv, linux-kernel
From: Jessica Liu <liu.xuemei1@zte.com.cn>
We can have multiple APLIC instances so setup global state
and resgister syscore operations only once.
Fixes: 95a8ddde3660 ("irqchip/riscv-aplic: Preserve APLIC states across suspend/resume")
Signed-off-by: Jessica Liu <liu.xuemei1@zte.com.cn>
---
drivers/irqchip/irq-riscv-aplic-main.c | 5 ++++-
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-riscv-aplic-main.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-riscv-aplic-main.c
index 4495ca26abf5..8299e0da6577 100644
--- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-riscv-aplic-main.c
+++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-riscv-aplic-main.c
@@ -20,6 +20,7 @@
#include "irq-riscv-aplic-main.h"
static LIST_HEAD(aplics);
+static bool aplic_global_setup_done __ro_after_init;
static void aplic_restore_states(struct aplic_priv *priv)
{
@@ -375,8 +376,10 @@ static int aplic_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
if (rc)
dev_err_probe(dev, rc, "failed to setup APLIC in %s mode\n",
msi_mode ? "MSI" : "direct");
- else
+ else if (!aplic_global_setup_done) {
register_syscore(&aplic_syscore);
+ aplic_global_setup_done = true;
+ }
#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
if (!acpi_disabled)
--
2.27.0
_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread* [PATCH] irqchip/riscv-aplic: Register syscore operations only once @ 2026-03-09 8:11 ` liu.xuemei1 0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: liu.xuemei1 @ 2026-03-09 8:11 UTC (permalink / raw) To: anup, tglx, pjw, palmer, aou, alex, liujingqi, cyan.yang, nick.hu, yongxuan.wang Cc: linux-riscv, linux-kernel From: Jessica Liu <liu.xuemei1@zte.com.cn> We can have multiple APLIC instances so setup global state and resgister syscore operations only once. Fixes: 95a8ddde3660 ("irqchip/riscv-aplic: Preserve APLIC states across suspend/resume") Signed-off-by: Jessica Liu <liu.xuemei1@zte.com.cn> --- drivers/irqchip/irq-riscv-aplic-main.c | 5 ++++- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-riscv-aplic-main.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-riscv-aplic-main.c index 4495ca26abf5..8299e0da6577 100644 --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-riscv-aplic-main.c +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-riscv-aplic-main.c @@ -20,6 +20,7 @@ #include "irq-riscv-aplic-main.h" static LIST_HEAD(aplics); +static bool aplic_global_setup_done __ro_after_init; static void aplic_restore_states(struct aplic_priv *priv) { @@ -375,8 +376,10 @@ static int aplic_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) if (rc) dev_err_probe(dev, rc, "failed to setup APLIC in %s mode\n", msi_mode ? "MSI" : "direct"); - else + else if (!aplic_global_setup_done) { register_syscore(&aplic_syscore); + aplic_global_setup_done = true; + } #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI if (!acpi_disabled) -- 2.27.0 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] irqchip/riscv-aplic: Register syscore operations only once 2026-03-09 8:11 ` liu.xuemei1 @ 2026-03-09 9:17 ` Thomas Gleixner -1 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: Thomas Gleixner @ 2026-03-09 9:17 UTC (permalink / raw) To: liu.xuemei1, anup, pjw, palmer, aou, alex, liujingqi, cyan.yang, nick.hu, yongxuan.wang Cc: linux-riscv, linux-kernel On Mon, Mar 09 2026 at 16:11, liu wrote: > From: Jessica Liu <liu.xuemei1@zte.com.cn> > > We can have multiple APLIC instances so setup global state s/We/A system/ Also which global state are you referring to? > and resgister syscore operations only once. register You also fail to describe what the problem is caused by registering the syscore ops more than once. > Fixes: 95a8ddde3660 ("irqchip/riscv-aplic: Preserve APLIC states across suspend/resume") > Signed-off-by: Jessica Liu <liu.xuemei1@zte.com.cn> > --- > drivers/irqchip/irq-riscv-aplic-main.c | 5 ++++- > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-riscv-aplic-main.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-riscv-aplic-main.c > index 4495ca26abf5..8299e0da6577 100644 > --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-riscv-aplic-main.c > +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-riscv-aplic-main.c > @@ -20,6 +20,7 @@ > #include "irq-riscv-aplic-main.h" > > static LIST_HEAD(aplics); > +static bool aplic_global_setup_done __ro_after_init; Again. That global state reference is confusing at best. > static void aplic_restore_states(struct aplic_priv *priv) > { > @@ -375,8 +376,10 @@ static int aplic_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > if (rc) > dev_err_probe(dev, rc, "failed to setup APLIC in %s mode\n", > msi_mode ? "MSI" : "direct"); > - else > + else if (!aplic_global_setup_done) { > register_syscore(&aplic_syscore); > + aplic_global_setup_done = true; > + } Aside of violating the bracket rules, this code is broken already in a very subtle way: If the probe fails then it should not invoke acpi_dev_clear_dependencies() either. Something like the below makes it entirely clear what this is about. The fix for the probe fail vs. acpi dependencies obviously wants to be split out into a separate patch. Thanks, tglx --- --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-riscv-aplic-main.c +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-riscv-aplic-main.c @@ -116,6 +116,16 @@ static struct syscore aplic_syscore = { .ops = &aplic_syscore_ops, }; +static bool aplic_syscore_registered __ro_after_init; + +static void aplic_syscore_init(void); +{ + if (!aplic_syscore_registered) { + register_syscore(&aplic_syscore); + aplic_syscore_registered = true; + } +} + static int aplic_pm_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb, unsigned long action, void *data) { struct aplic_priv *priv = container_of(nb, struct aplic_priv, genpd_nb); @@ -372,18 +382,20 @@ static int aplic_probe(struct platform_d rc = aplic_msi_setup(dev, regs); else rc = aplic_direct_setup(dev, regs); - if (rc) + + if (rc) { dev_err_probe(dev, rc, "failed to setup APLIC in %s mode\n", msi_mode ? "MSI" : "direct"); - else - register_syscore(&aplic_syscore); + return rc; + } + + aplic_syscore_register(); #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI if (!acpi_disabled) acpi_dev_clear_dependencies(ACPI_COMPANION(dev)); #endif - - return rc; + return 0; } static const struct of_device_id aplic_match[] = { _______________________________________________ linux-riscv mailing list linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] irqchip/riscv-aplic: Register syscore operations only once @ 2026-03-09 9:17 ` Thomas Gleixner 0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: Thomas Gleixner @ 2026-03-09 9:17 UTC (permalink / raw) To: liu.xuemei1, anup, pjw, palmer, aou, alex, liujingqi, cyan.yang, nick.hu, yongxuan.wang Cc: linux-riscv, linux-kernel On Mon, Mar 09 2026 at 16:11, liu wrote: > From: Jessica Liu <liu.xuemei1@zte.com.cn> > > We can have multiple APLIC instances so setup global state s/We/A system/ Also which global state are you referring to? > and resgister syscore operations only once. register You also fail to describe what the problem is caused by registering the syscore ops more than once. > Fixes: 95a8ddde3660 ("irqchip/riscv-aplic: Preserve APLIC states across suspend/resume") > Signed-off-by: Jessica Liu <liu.xuemei1@zte.com.cn> > --- > drivers/irqchip/irq-riscv-aplic-main.c | 5 ++++- > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-riscv-aplic-main.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-riscv-aplic-main.c > index 4495ca26abf5..8299e0da6577 100644 > --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-riscv-aplic-main.c > +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-riscv-aplic-main.c > @@ -20,6 +20,7 @@ > #include "irq-riscv-aplic-main.h" > > static LIST_HEAD(aplics); > +static bool aplic_global_setup_done __ro_after_init; Again. That global state reference is confusing at best. > static void aplic_restore_states(struct aplic_priv *priv) > { > @@ -375,8 +376,10 @@ static int aplic_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > if (rc) > dev_err_probe(dev, rc, "failed to setup APLIC in %s mode\n", > msi_mode ? "MSI" : "direct"); > - else > + else if (!aplic_global_setup_done) { > register_syscore(&aplic_syscore); > + aplic_global_setup_done = true; > + } Aside of violating the bracket rules, this code is broken already in a very subtle way: If the probe fails then it should not invoke acpi_dev_clear_dependencies() either. Something like the below makes it entirely clear what this is about. The fix for the probe fail vs. acpi dependencies obviously wants to be split out into a separate patch. Thanks, tglx --- --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-riscv-aplic-main.c +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-riscv-aplic-main.c @@ -116,6 +116,16 @@ static struct syscore aplic_syscore = { .ops = &aplic_syscore_ops, }; +static bool aplic_syscore_registered __ro_after_init; + +static void aplic_syscore_init(void); +{ + if (!aplic_syscore_registered) { + register_syscore(&aplic_syscore); + aplic_syscore_registered = true; + } +} + static int aplic_pm_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb, unsigned long action, void *data) { struct aplic_priv *priv = container_of(nb, struct aplic_priv, genpd_nb); @@ -372,18 +382,20 @@ static int aplic_probe(struct platform_d rc = aplic_msi_setup(dev, regs); else rc = aplic_direct_setup(dev, regs); - if (rc) + + if (rc) { dev_err_probe(dev, rc, "failed to setup APLIC in %s mode\n", msi_mode ? "MSI" : "direct"); - else - register_syscore(&aplic_syscore); + return rc; + } + + aplic_syscore_register(); #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI if (!acpi_disabled) acpi_dev_clear_dependencies(ACPI_COMPANION(dev)); #endif - - return rc; + return 0; } static const struct of_device_id aplic_match[] = { ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-03-09 9:17 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2026-03-09 8:11 [PATCH] irqchip/riscv-aplic: Register syscore operations only once liu.xuemei1 2026-03-09 8:11 ` liu.xuemei1 2026-03-09 9:17 ` Thomas Gleixner 2026-03-09 9:17 ` Thomas Gleixner
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.