From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>,
James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>, Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>,
kvmarm@lists.linux.dev, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/5] KVM: arm64: Share all userspace hardened thread data with the hypervisor
Date: Sun, 31 Mar 2024 11:00:41 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87msqesoty.wl-maz@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240329-arm64-2023-dpisa-v6-1-ba42db6c27f3@kernel.org>
On Fri, 29 Mar 2024 00:13:42 +0000,
Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> As part of the lazy FPSIMD state transitioning done by the hypervisor we
> currently share the userpsace FPSIMD state in thread->uw.fpsimd_state with
> the host. Since this struct is non-extensible userspace ABI we have to keep
Using the same representation is just pure convenience, and nothing
requires us to use the it in the kernel/hypervisor.
> the definition as is but the addition of FPMR in the 2023 dpISA means that
> we will want to share more storage with the host. To facilitate this
> refactor the current code to share the entire thread->uw rather than just
> the one field.
So this increase the required sharing with EL2 from 528 bytes to
560. Not a huge deal, but definitely moving in the wrong direction. Is
there any plans to add more stuff to this structure that wouldn't be
*directly* relevant to the hypervisor?
>
> The large number of references to fpsimd_state make it very inconvenient
> to add an additional wrapper struct.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
> ---
> arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 3 ++-
> arch/arm64/include/asm/processor.h | 2 +-
> arch/arm64/kvm/fpsimd.c | 13 ++++++-------
> arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/include/hyp/switch.h | 2 +-
> arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/hyp-main.c | 4 ++--
> 5 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> index 9e8a496fb284..8a251f0da900 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> @@ -27,6 +27,7 @@
> #include <asm/fpsimd.h>
> #include <asm/kvm.h>
> #include <asm/kvm_asm.h>
> +#include <asm/processor.h>
> #include <asm/vncr_mapping.h>
>
> #define __KVM_HAVE_ARCH_INTC_INITIALIZED
> @@ -640,7 +641,7 @@ struct kvm_vcpu_arch {
> struct kvm_guest_debug_arch vcpu_debug_state;
> struct kvm_guest_debug_arch external_debug_state;
>
> - struct user_fpsimd_state *host_fpsimd_state; /* hyp VA */
> + struct thread_struct_uw *host_uw; /* hyp VA */
> struct task_struct *parent_task;
Well, this is going away, and you know it.
M.
--
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>,
James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>, Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>,
kvmarm@lists.linux.dev, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/5] KVM: arm64: Share all userspace hardened thread data with the hypervisor
Date: Sun, 31 Mar 2024 11:00:41 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87msqesoty.wl-maz@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240329-arm64-2023-dpisa-v6-1-ba42db6c27f3@kernel.org>
On Fri, 29 Mar 2024 00:13:42 +0000,
Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> As part of the lazy FPSIMD state transitioning done by the hypervisor we
> currently share the userpsace FPSIMD state in thread->uw.fpsimd_state with
> the host. Since this struct is non-extensible userspace ABI we have to keep
Using the same representation is just pure convenience, and nothing
requires us to use the it in the kernel/hypervisor.
> the definition as is but the addition of FPMR in the 2023 dpISA means that
> we will want to share more storage with the host. To facilitate this
> refactor the current code to share the entire thread->uw rather than just
> the one field.
So this increase the required sharing with EL2 from 528 bytes to
560. Not a huge deal, but definitely moving in the wrong direction. Is
there any plans to add more stuff to this structure that wouldn't be
*directly* relevant to the hypervisor?
>
> The large number of references to fpsimd_state make it very inconvenient
> to add an additional wrapper struct.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
> ---
> arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 3 ++-
> arch/arm64/include/asm/processor.h | 2 +-
> arch/arm64/kvm/fpsimd.c | 13 ++++++-------
> arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/include/hyp/switch.h | 2 +-
> arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/hyp-main.c | 4 ++--
> 5 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> index 9e8a496fb284..8a251f0da900 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> @@ -27,6 +27,7 @@
> #include <asm/fpsimd.h>
> #include <asm/kvm.h>
> #include <asm/kvm_asm.h>
> +#include <asm/processor.h>
> #include <asm/vncr_mapping.h>
>
> #define __KVM_HAVE_ARCH_INTC_INITIALIZED
> @@ -640,7 +641,7 @@ struct kvm_vcpu_arch {
> struct kvm_guest_debug_arch vcpu_debug_state;
> struct kvm_guest_debug_arch external_debug_state;
>
> - struct user_fpsimd_state *host_fpsimd_state; /* hyp VA */
> + struct thread_struct_uw *host_uw; /* hyp VA */
> struct task_struct *parent_task;
Well, this is going away, and you know it.
M.
--
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-03-31 10:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-03-29 0:13 [PATCH v6 0/5] KVM: arm64: Support for 2023 dpISA extensions Mark Brown
2024-03-29 0:13 ` Mark Brown
2024-03-29 0:13 ` [PATCH v6 1/5] KVM: arm64: Share all userspace hardened thread data with the hypervisor Mark Brown
2024-03-29 0:13 ` Mark Brown
2024-03-31 10:00 ` Marc Zyngier [this message]
2024-03-31 10:00 ` Marc Zyngier
2024-04-02 14:34 ` Mark Brown
2024-04-02 14:34 ` Mark Brown
2024-04-02 14:53 ` Marc Zyngier
2024-04-02 14:53 ` Marc Zyngier
2024-04-02 16:20 ` Mark Brown
2024-04-02 16:20 ` Mark Brown
2024-04-10 7:27 ` Marc Zyngier
2024-04-10 7:27 ` Marc Zyngier
2024-04-10 21:43 ` Mark Brown
2024-04-10 21:43 ` Mark Brown
2024-03-29 0:13 ` [PATCH v6 2/5] KVM: arm64: Add newly allocated ID registers to register descriptions Mark Brown
2024-03-29 0:13 ` Mark Brown
2024-03-31 10:59 ` Marc Zyngier
2024-03-31 10:59 ` Marc Zyngier
2024-04-02 17:21 ` Mark Brown
2024-04-02 17:21 ` Mark Brown
2024-04-10 10:32 ` Marc Zyngier
2024-04-10 10:32 ` Marc Zyngier
2024-04-10 16:33 ` Mark Brown
2024-04-10 16:33 ` Mark Brown
2024-03-29 0:13 ` [PATCH v6 3/5] KVM: arm64: Support FEAT_FPMR for guests Mark Brown
2024-03-29 0:13 ` Mark Brown
2024-03-29 0:13 ` [PATCH v6 4/5] KVM: arm64: selftests: Document feature registers added in 2023 extensions Mark Brown
2024-03-29 0:13 ` Mark Brown
2024-03-29 0:13 ` [PATCH v6 5/5] KVM: arm64: selftests: Teach get-reg-list about FPMR Mark Brown
2024-03-29 0:13 ` Mark Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87msqesoty.wl-maz@kernel.org \
--to=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=Dave.Martin@arm.com \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.