From: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
To: Michael Ellerman <patch-notifications@ellerman.id.au>,
Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Sathvika Vasireddy <sv@linux.ibm.com>,
Naveen N Rao <naveen@kernel.org>,
Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: (subset) [PATCH v4 00/15] powerpc/objtool: uaccess validation for PPC32 (v4)
Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2023 15:00:38 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87mszpj1u1.fsf@mail.lhotse> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <168986105076.1117384.18255319220057556882.b4-ty@ellerman.id.au>
Michael Ellerman <patch-notifications@ellerman.id.au> writes:
> On Tue, 11 Jul 2023 18:08:26 +0200, Christophe Leroy wrote:
>> This series adds UACCESS validation for PPC32. It includes
>> a dozen of changes to objtool core.
>>
>> It applies on top of series "Cleanup/Optimise KUAP (v3)"
>> https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/linuxppc-dev/list/?series=363368&state=*
>>
>> It is almost mature, performs code analysis for all PPC32.
>>
>> [...]
>
> Applied to powerpc/fixes.
>
> [01/15] Revert "powerpc/bug: Provide better flexibility to WARN_ON/__WARN_FLAGS() with asm goto"
> https://git.kernel.org/powerpc/c/b49e578b9314db051da0ad72bba24094193f9bd0
Sorry that's b4 getting confused, I actually applied the v5 that I sent:
https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/linuxppc-dev/patch/20230712134552.534955-1-mpe@ellerman.id.au/
cheers
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
To: Michael Ellerman <patch-notifications@ellerman.id.au>,
Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Sathvika Vasireddy <sv@linux.ibm.com>,
Naveen N Rao <naveen@kernel.org>,
Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: (subset) [PATCH v4 00/15] powerpc/objtool: uaccess validation for PPC32 (v4)
Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2023 15:00:38 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87mszpj1u1.fsf@mail.lhotse> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <168986105076.1117384.18255319220057556882.b4-ty@ellerman.id.au>
Michael Ellerman <patch-notifications@ellerman.id.au> writes:
> On Tue, 11 Jul 2023 18:08:26 +0200, Christophe Leroy wrote:
>> This series adds UACCESS validation for PPC32. It includes
>> a dozen of changes to objtool core.
>>
>> It applies on top of series "Cleanup/Optimise KUAP (v3)"
>> https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/linuxppc-dev/list/?series=363368&state=*
>>
>> It is almost mature, performs code analysis for all PPC32.
>>
>> [...]
>
> Applied to powerpc/fixes.
>
> [01/15] Revert "powerpc/bug: Provide better flexibility to WARN_ON/__WARN_FLAGS() with asm goto"
> https://git.kernel.org/powerpc/c/b49e578b9314db051da0ad72bba24094193f9bd0
Sorry that's b4 getting confused, I actually applied the v5 that I sent:
https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/linuxppc-dev/patch/20230712134552.534955-1-mpe@ellerman.id.au/
cheers
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-07-21 5:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-07-11 16:08 [PATCH v4 00/15] powerpc/objtool: uaccess validation for PPC32 (v4) Christophe Leroy
2023-07-11 16:08 ` Christophe Leroy
2023-07-11 16:08 ` [PATCH v4 01/15] Revert "powerpc/bug: Provide better flexibility to WARN_ON/__WARN_FLAGS() with asm goto" Christophe Leroy
2023-07-11 16:08 ` Christophe Leroy
2023-07-11 16:08 ` [PATCH v4 02/15] objtool: Move back misplaced comment Christophe Leroy
2023-07-11 16:08 ` Christophe Leroy
2023-07-11 16:08 ` [PATCH v4 03/15] objtool: Allow an architecture to disable objtool on ASM files Christophe Leroy
2023-07-11 16:08 ` Christophe Leroy
2023-07-11 16:08 ` [PATCH v4 04/15] objtool: Fix JUMP_ENTRY_SIZE for bi-arch like powerpc Christophe Leroy
2023-07-11 16:08 ` Christophe Leroy
2023-07-11 16:08 ` [PATCH v4 05/15] objtool: Add INSN_RETURN_CONDITIONAL Christophe Leroy
2023-07-11 16:08 ` Christophe Leroy
2023-07-11 16:08 ` [PATCH v4 06/15] objtool: Add support for relative switch tables Christophe Leroy
2023-07-11 16:08 ` Christophe Leroy
2023-07-11 16:08 ` [PATCH v4 07/15] objtool: Merge mark_func_jump_tables() and add_func_jump_tables() Christophe Leroy
2023-07-11 16:08 ` Christophe Leroy
2023-07-11 16:08 ` [PATCH v4 08/15] objtool: Track general purpose register used for switch table base Christophe Leroy
2023-07-11 16:08 ` Christophe Leroy
2023-07-11 16:08 ` [PATCH v4 09/15] objtool: Find end of switch table directly Christophe Leroy
2023-07-11 16:08 ` Christophe Leroy
2023-07-11 16:08 ` [PATCH v4 10/15] objtool: When looking for switch tables also follow conditional and dynamic jumps Christophe Leroy
2023-07-11 16:08 ` Christophe Leroy
2023-07-11 16:08 ` [PATCH v4 11/15] objtool: .rodata.cst{2/4/8/16} are not switch tables Christophe Leroy
2023-07-11 16:08 ` Christophe Leroy
2023-07-11 16:08 ` [PATCH v4 12/15] objtool: Add support for more complex UACCESS control Christophe Leroy
2023-07-11 16:08 ` Christophe Leroy
2023-07-11 16:08 ` [PATCH v4 13/15] objtool: Prepare noreturns.h for more architectures Christophe Leroy
2023-07-11 16:08 ` Christophe Leroy
2023-07-11 16:08 ` [PATCH v4 14/15] powerpc/bug: Annotate reachable after warning trap Christophe Leroy
2023-07-11 16:08 ` Christophe Leroy
2023-07-11 16:08 ` [PATCH v4 15/15] powerpc: Implement UACCESS validation on PPC32 Christophe Leroy
2023-07-11 16:08 ` Christophe Leroy
2023-07-12 14:23 ` [PATCH v4 00/15] powerpc/objtool: uaccess validation for PPC32 (v4) Peter Zijlstra
2023-07-12 14:23 ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-07-12 16:29 ` Christophe Leroy
2023-07-12 16:29 ` Christophe Leroy
2023-07-20 13:50 ` (subset) " Michael Ellerman
2023-07-20 13:50 ` Michael Ellerman
2023-07-21 5:00 ` Michael Ellerman [this message]
2023-07-21 5:00 ` Michael Ellerman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87mszpj1u1.fsf@mail.lhotse \
--to=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu \
--cc=jpoimboe@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=naveen@kernel.org \
--cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
--cc=patch-notifications@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=sv@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.