From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
To: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
Cc: kernel-team@android.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] KVM: arm64: Narrow PMU sysreg reset values to architectural requirements
Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2021 16:59:58 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87mtqq6w75.wl-maz@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210713143949.GJ22278@shell.armlinux.org.uk>
On Tue, 13 Jul 2021 15:39:49 +0100,
"Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@armlinux.org.uk> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jul 13, 2021 at 02:58:58PM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> > +static void reset_pmu_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, const struct sys_reg_desc *r)
> > +{
> > + u64 n, mask;
> > +
> > + /* No PMU available, any PMU reg may UNDEF... */
> > + if (!kvm_arm_support_pmu_v3())
> > + return;
> > +
> > + n = read_sysreg(pmcr_el0) >> ARMV8_PMU_PMCR_N_SHIFT;
> > + n &= ARMV8_PMU_PMCR_N_MASK;
> > +
> > + reset_unknown(vcpu, r);
> > +
> > + mask = BIT(ARMV8_PMU_CYCLE_IDX);
> > + if (n)
> > + mask |= GENMASK(n - 1, 0);
> > +
> > + __vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, r->reg) &= mask;
>
> Would this read more logically to structure it as:
>
> mask = BIT(ARMV8_PMU_CYCLE_IDX);
>
> n = read_sysreg(pmcr_el0) >> ARMV8_PMU_PMCR_N_SHIFT;
> n &= ARMV8_PMU_PMCR_N_MASK;
> if (n)
> mask |= GENMASK(n - 1, 0);
>
> reset_unknown(vcpu, r);
> __vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, r->reg) &= mask;
>
> ?
Yup, that's nicer. Amended locally.
Thanks,
M.
--
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
To: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>,
Alexandre Chartre <alexandre.chartre@oracle.com>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
kernel-team@android.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] KVM: arm64: Narrow PMU sysreg reset values to architectural requirements
Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2021 16:59:58 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87mtqq6w75.wl-maz@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210713143949.GJ22278@shell.armlinux.org.uk>
On Tue, 13 Jul 2021 15:39:49 +0100,
"Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@armlinux.org.uk> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jul 13, 2021 at 02:58:58PM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> > +static void reset_pmu_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, const struct sys_reg_desc *r)
> > +{
> > + u64 n, mask;
> > +
> > + /* No PMU available, any PMU reg may UNDEF... */
> > + if (!kvm_arm_support_pmu_v3())
> > + return;
> > +
> > + n = read_sysreg(pmcr_el0) >> ARMV8_PMU_PMCR_N_SHIFT;
> > + n &= ARMV8_PMU_PMCR_N_MASK;
> > +
> > + reset_unknown(vcpu, r);
> > +
> > + mask = BIT(ARMV8_PMU_CYCLE_IDX);
> > + if (n)
> > + mask |= GENMASK(n - 1, 0);
> > +
> > + __vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, r->reg) &= mask;
>
> Would this read more logically to structure it as:
>
> mask = BIT(ARMV8_PMU_CYCLE_IDX);
>
> n = read_sysreg(pmcr_el0) >> ARMV8_PMU_PMCR_N_SHIFT;
> n &= ARMV8_PMU_PMCR_N_MASK;
> if (n)
> mask |= GENMASK(n - 1, 0);
>
> reset_unknown(vcpu, r);
> __vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, r->reg) &= mask;
>
> ?
Yup, that's nicer. Amended locally.
Thanks,
M.
--
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
To: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>,
Alexandre Chartre <alexandre.chartre@oracle.com>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
kernel-team@android.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] KVM: arm64: Narrow PMU sysreg reset values to architectural requirements
Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2021 16:59:58 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87mtqq6w75.wl-maz@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210713143949.GJ22278@shell.armlinux.org.uk>
On Tue, 13 Jul 2021 15:39:49 +0100,
"Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@armlinux.org.uk> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jul 13, 2021 at 02:58:58PM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> > +static void reset_pmu_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, const struct sys_reg_desc *r)
> > +{
> > + u64 n, mask;
> > +
> > + /* No PMU available, any PMU reg may UNDEF... */
> > + if (!kvm_arm_support_pmu_v3())
> > + return;
> > +
> > + n = read_sysreg(pmcr_el0) >> ARMV8_PMU_PMCR_N_SHIFT;
> > + n &= ARMV8_PMU_PMCR_N_MASK;
> > +
> > + reset_unknown(vcpu, r);
> > +
> > + mask = BIT(ARMV8_PMU_CYCLE_IDX);
> > + if (n)
> > + mask |= GENMASK(n - 1, 0);
> > +
> > + __vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, r->reg) &= mask;
>
> Would this read more logically to structure it as:
>
> mask = BIT(ARMV8_PMU_CYCLE_IDX);
>
> n = read_sysreg(pmcr_el0) >> ARMV8_PMU_PMCR_N_SHIFT;
> n &= ARMV8_PMU_PMCR_N_MASK;
> if (n)
> mask |= GENMASK(n - 1, 0);
>
> reset_unknown(vcpu, r);
> __vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, r->reg) &= mask;
>
> ?
Yup, that's nicer. Amended locally.
Thanks,
M.
--
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-07-13 16:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-07-13 13:58 [PATCH 0/3] kvm-arm64: Fix PMU reset values (and more) Marc Zyngier
2021-07-13 13:58 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-13 13:58 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-13 13:58 ` [PATCH 1/3] KVM: arm64: Narrow PMU sysreg reset values to architectural requirements Marc Zyngier
2021-07-13 13:58 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-13 13:58 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-13 14:39 ` Russell King (Oracle)
2021-07-13 14:39 ` Russell King (Oracle)
2021-07-13 14:39 ` Russell King (Oracle)
2021-07-13 15:59 ` Marc Zyngier [this message]
2021-07-13 15:59 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-13 15:59 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-13 16:15 ` Russell King (Oracle)
2021-07-13 16:15 ` Russell King (Oracle)
2021-07-13 16:15 ` Russell King (Oracle)
2021-07-14 15:48 ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-07-14 15:48 ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-07-14 15:48 ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-07-15 11:11 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-15 11:11 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-15 11:11 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-15 11:51 ` Robin Murphy
2021-07-15 11:51 ` Robin Murphy
2021-07-15 11:51 ` Robin Murphy
2021-07-15 12:25 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-15 12:25 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-15 12:25 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-13 13:58 ` [PATCH 2/3] KVM: arm64: Drop unnecessary masking of PMU registers Marc Zyngier
2021-07-13 13:58 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-13 13:58 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-14 16:12 ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-07-14 16:12 ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-07-14 16:12 ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-07-13 13:59 ` [PATCH 3/3] KVM: arm64: Disabling disabled PMU counters wastes a lot of time Marc Zyngier
2021-07-13 13:59 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-13 13:59 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-14 16:18 ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-07-14 16:18 ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-07-14 16:18 ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-07-15 8:34 ` [PATCH 0/3] kvm-arm64: Fix PMU reset values (and more) Alexandre Chartre
2021-07-15 8:34 ` Alexandre Chartre
2021-07-15 8:34 ` Alexandre Chartre
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87mtqq6w75.wl-maz@kernel.org \
--to=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=kernel-team@android.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.