From: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
To: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Cc: "Daniel P. Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>,
"Eduardo Habkost" <ehabkost@redhat.com>,
"QEMU Developers" <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
"Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
"Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <philmd@redhat.com>,
"Pratik Parvati" <pratikp@vayavyalabs.com>
Subject: Re: sysbus_create_simple Vs qdev_create
Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2020 09:39:04 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87mu3uhbzb.fsf@dusky.pond.sub.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFEAcA-ZrH6vtncD_REPOY8Nmg7HdKWwrSRO9EEPvnjOLnVXoQ@mail.gmail.com> (Peter Maydell's message of "Fri, 17 Jul 2020 18:15:24 +0100")
Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org> writes:
> On Fri, 17 Jul 2020 at 17:32, Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com> wrote:
>> Personally I've not seen a problem with the term "parent" in
>> this scenario. The class inheritance metaphor maps reasonably
>> clearly to a parent/child metaphor.
>
> It's not bad in itself; it's just that it means almost all
> of our objects are in three different kinds of parent-child
> relationship simultaneously, which is confusing if you're
> not used to it...
It's confusing even when you're used to it.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-07-20 7:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-07-14 16:09 sysbus_create_simple Vs qdev_create Pratik Parvati
2020-07-14 16:17 ` Pratik Parvati
2020-07-14 17:02 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2020-07-15 8:32 ` Markus Armbruster
2020-07-15 13:58 ` Pratik Parvati
2020-07-15 14:11 ` Peter Maydell
2020-07-15 14:37 ` Markus Armbruster
2020-07-16 22:21 ` Eduardo Habkost
2020-07-17 5:10 ` Markus Armbruster
2020-07-17 16:23 ` Eduardo Habkost
2020-07-17 16:30 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2020-07-17 17:15 ` Peter Maydell
2020-07-20 7:39 ` Markus Armbruster [this message]
2020-07-20 7:38 ` Markus Armbruster
2020-07-20 15:59 ` Eduardo Habkost
2020-07-21 6:00 ` Markus Armbruster
2020-07-27 14:29 ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-07-28 7:19 ` Markus Armbruster
2020-07-28 17:38 ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-07-28 22:47 ` Eduardo Habkost
2020-07-29 9:54 ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-07-29 13:18 ` Markus Armbruster
2020-07-29 16:08 ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-07-30 10:03 ` Markus Armbruster
2020-07-30 11:09 ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-07-30 12:36 ` Markus Armbruster
2020-07-30 13:38 ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-07-29 14:32 ` Eduardo Habkost
2020-07-29 16:01 ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-07-29 16:08 ` Eduardo Habkost
2020-07-29 16:14 ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-07-29 7:46 ` Markus Armbruster
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87mu3uhbzb.fsf@dusky.pond.sub.org \
--to=armbru@redhat.com \
--cc=berrange@redhat.com \
--cc=ehabkost@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=philmd@redhat.com \
--cc=pratikp@vayavyalabs.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.