All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Valo, Kalle" <kvalo@qca.qualcomm.com>
To: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Cc: Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>,
	"linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
	"ath10k@lists.infradead.org" <ath10k@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ath10k: remove VHT capabilities from 2.4GHz
Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2016 12:03:03 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87mvogy3ux.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1461654272.16188.4.camel@sipsolutions.net> (Johannes Berg's message of "Tue, 26 Apr 2016 09:04:32 +0200")

Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net> writes:

> On Thu, 2016-04-21 at 08:15 -0700, Ben Greear wrote:
>
>> The thing is, it actually works just fine with the patch I posted
>> to fix mac80211, and at any rate, even if the mac80211 patch isn't
>> applied, the ath10k driver works just fine in HT mode.
>
> This patch has no implications on HT, and I wasn't planning on applying
> the mac80211 patch.

Yeah, makes sense. I'm planning to apply this soon.

> As I said, I have no objections to doing the (Broadcom) vendor specific
> IEs for "VHT" in 2.4 GHz band, but I don't think we should advertise
> the spec IEs when they're explicitly specified to be used only in the
> 5.2 GHz band.

But we really should have this, any volunteers? :) I think it shouldn't
be too hard to do so this would be a good project for someone looking
for a simple, but useful, task on wireless stack.

-- 
Kalle Valo
_______________________________________________
ath10k mailing list
ath10k@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Valo, Kalle" <kvalo@qca.qualcomm.com>
To: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Cc: Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>,
	"ath10k@lists.infradead.org" <ath10k@lists.infradead.org>,
	"linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ath10k: remove VHT capabilities from 2.4GHz
Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2016 12:03:03 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87mvogy3ux.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1461654272.16188.4.camel@sipsolutions.net> (Johannes Berg's message of "Tue, 26 Apr 2016 09:04:32 +0200")

Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net> writes:

> On Thu, 2016-04-21 at 08:15 -0700, Ben Greear wrote:
>
>> The thing is, it actually works just fine with the patch I posted
>> to fix mac80211, and at any rate, even if the mac80211 patch isn't
>> applied, the ath10k driver works just fine in HT mode.
>
> This patch has no implications on HT, and I wasn't planning on applying
> the mac80211 patch.

Yeah, makes sense. I'm planning to apply this soon.

> As I said, I have no objections to doing the (Broadcom) vendor specific
> IEs for "VHT" in 2.4 GHz band, but I don't think we should advertise
> the spec IEs when they're explicitly specified to be used only in the
> 5.2 GHz band.

But we really should have this, any volunteers? :) I think it shouldn't
be too hard to do so this would be a good project for someone looking
for a simple, but useful, task on wireless stack.

-- 
Kalle Valo

  reply	other threads:[~2016-04-26 12:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-04-21 13:17 [PATCH v2] ath10k: remove VHT capabilities from 2.4GHz Kalle Valo
2016-04-21 13:17 ` Kalle Valo
2016-04-21 15:15 ` Ben Greear
2016-04-21 15:15   ` Ben Greear
2016-04-21 20:09   ` Sebastian Gottschall
2016-04-21 23:07     ` Michael Ney
2016-04-26  7:04   ` Johannes Berg
2016-04-26  7:04     ` Johannes Berg
2016-04-26 12:03     ` Valo, Kalle [this message]
2016-04-26 12:03       ` Valo, Kalle
2016-04-26 20:07       ` Krishna Chaitanya
2016-04-26 20:07         ` Krishna Chaitanya
2016-04-26 20:10         ` Ben Greear
2016-04-26 20:10           ` Ben Greear
2016-04-27  6:43           ` Krishna Chaitanya
2016-04-27  6:43             ` Krishna Chaitanya
2016-04-27  9:16             ` Jouni Malinen
2016-04-27  9:16               ` Jouni Malinen
2016-04-27  9:37               ` Krishna Chaitanya
2016-04-27  9:37                 ` Krishna Chaitanya
2016-04-27  9:45                 ` Johannes Berg
2016-04-27  9:45                   ` Johannes Berg
2016-05-06 18:08 ` Valo, Kalle
2016-05-06 18:08   ` Valo, Kalle

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87mvogy3ux.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com \
    --to=kvalo@qca.qualcomm.com \
    --cc=ath10k@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=greearb@candelatech.com \
    --cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.