All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Rast <trast@inf.ethz.ch>
To: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Cc: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>, Git List <git@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC] blame: accept multiple -L ranges
Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2013 11:18:26 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87mwpuepst.fsf@linux-k42r.v.cablecom.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7vppurv8bl.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> (Junio C. Hamano's message of "Tue, 09 Jul 2013 12:31:42 -0700")

Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> writes:

> Thomas Rast <trast@inf.ethz.ch> writes:
>
>> If you define it that way, the output of
>>
>>   git blame -L 4,6; git blame -L /A/,+20
>>
>> is significantly different from
>>
>>   git blame -L 4,6 -L /A/,+20
>>
>> Not just in the presentation or any possible coalescing, but in the
>> meaning of the ranges.
>>
>> Do you really want to make it that way?
>
> Absolutely.  The primary reason I want to be able to specify two
> ranges at the same time is to follow two functions in a file that
> appear in separate places, and /A/ might not be unique.  When I want
> to say "I want to see from here to there, and then from here to
> there, and then from here to there", it would be very frustrating if
> "and then" resets what I mean by "here" every time and make these
> three evaluated independently.

Ok, fair enough.  That is at least an argument other than "trust me, I
care deeply" :-)

But still, log -L should then be changed to match this behavior (for all
args affecting a single file).  Currently it always does the scan for
the start of the range from line 1 of the file.

-- 
Thomas Rast
trast@{inf,student}.ethz.ch

  parent reply	other threads:[~2013-07-10  9:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-07-07  8:45 [PATCH/RFC] blame: accept multiple -L ranges Eric Sunshine
2013-07-07  9:58 ` Junio C Hamano
2013-07-09 15:04   ` Eric Sunshine
2013-07-09 16:39     ` Junio C Hamano
2013-07-09 17:17       ` Eric Sunshine
2013-07-09 17:42       ` Thomas Rast
2013-07-09 18:23         ` Eric Sunshine
2013-07-09 18:55           ` Junio C Hamano
2013-07-09 19:07             ` Eric Sunshine
2013-07-09 19:12             ` Thomas Rast
2013-07-09 19:21               ` Jonathan Nieder
2013-07-09 19:31               ` Junio C Hamano
2013-07-09 19:57                 ` Michael Haggerty
2013-07-09 20:25                   ` Junio C Hamano
2013-07-22  8:12                     ` Eric Sunshine
2013-07-22 10:39                       ` Thomas Rast
2013-07-22 17:23                         ` Junio C Hamano
2013-07-22 19:19                           ` Thomas Rast
2013-07-22 21:34                             ` Junio C Hamano
2013-07-10  9:18                 ` Thomas Rast [this message]
2013-07-11 16:44                   ` Junio C Hamano
2013-07-09 18:57         ` Junio C Hamano

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87mwpuepst.fsf@linux-k42r.v.cablecom.net \
    --to=trast@inf.ethz.ch \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=sunshine@sunshineco.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.