From: Mathieu Othacehe <othacehe@gnu.org>
To: Stefan Wahren <wahrenst@gmx.net>
Cc: Wadim Egorov <w.egorov@phytec.de>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>,
Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@pengutronix.de>,
Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com>,
NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@nxp.com>,
Li Yang <leoyang.li@nxp.com>,
Primoz Fiser <primoz.fiser@norik.com>,
Christoph Stoidner <c.stoidner@phytec.de>,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, upstream@lists.phytec.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/3] arm64: dts: imx93: Add phyBOARD-Segin-i.MX93 support
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2024 14:48:14 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87o7da4zc1.fsf@gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <47c79a0a-5be0-4ee8-87d4-fd03809a9664@gmx.net> (Stefan Wahren's message of "Wed, 24 Jan 2024 12:39:26 +0100")
Hello Stefan,
>> Defining line names should be fine. But I would still prefer to have
>> the muxing in an overlay bound to a specific use case.
> I'm fine with this. Unfortunately Mathieu dropped the line names in V5
> today :-(
>
> AFAIR reviewers should have 2 weeks time maximum. This was just 2 days.
I am sorry but it is not easy for me to deal with contradictory input. I
chose to remove the gpio-line-names even though it also seemed like a
nice addition to me. The idea was to not interfere with Phytec plans in
the future.
There is no hurry and I can always restore them in a v6.
Let me know what you think,
Thanks,
Mathieu
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Mathieu Othacehe <othacehe@gnu.org>
To: Stefan Wahren <wahrenst@gmx.net>
Cc: Wadim Egorov <w.egorov@phytec.de>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>,
Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@pengutronix.de>,
Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com>,
NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@nxp.com>,
Li Yang <leoyang.li@nxp.com>,
Primoz Fiser <primoz.fiser@norik.com>,
Christoph Stoidner <c.stoidner@phytec.de>,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, upstream@lists.phytec.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/3] arm64: dts: imx93: Add phyBOARD-Segin-i.MX93 support
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2024 14:48:14 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87o7da4zc1.fsf@gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <47c79a0a-5be0-4ee8-87d4-fd03809a9664@gmx.net> (Stefan Wahren's message of "Wed, 24 Jan 2024 12:39:26 +0100")
Hello Stefan,
>> Defining line names should be fine. But I would still prefer to have
>> the muxing in an overlay bound to a specific use case.
> I'm fine with this. Unfortunately Mathieu dropped the line names in V5
> today :-(
>
> AFAIR reviewers should have 2 weeks time maximum. This was just 2 days.
I am sorry but it is not easy for me to deal with contradictory input. I
chose to remove the gpio-line-names even though it also seemed like a
nice addition to me. The idea was to not interfere with Phytec plans in
the future.
There is no hurry and I can always restore them in a v6.
Let me know what you think,
Thanks,
Mathieu
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-01-24 13:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-01-22 9:53 [PATCH v4 0/3] Add phyBOARD-Segin-i.MX93 support Mathieu Othacehe
2024-01-22 9:53 ` Mathieu Othacehe
2024-01-22 9:53 ` [PATCH v4 1/3] dt-bindings: arm: fsl: Add phyBOARD-Segin-i.MX93 Mathieu Othacehe
2024-01-22 9:53 ` Mathieu Othacehe
2024-01-22 9:53 ` [PATCH v4 2/3] dt-bindings: gpio: gpio-vf610: add gpio-line-names Mathieu Othacehe
2024-01-22 9:53 ` Mathieu Othacehe
2024-01-22 12:32 ` Stefan Wahren
2024-01-22 12:32 ` Stefan Wahren
2024-01-22 18:01 ` Conor Dooley
2024-01-22 18:01 ` Conor Dooley
2024-01-22 9:53 ` [PATCH v4 3/3] arm64: dts: imx93: Add phyBOARD-Segin-i.MX93 support Mathieu Othacehe
2024-01-22 9:53 ` Mathieu Othacehe
2024-01-23 6:11 ` Wadim Egorov
2024-01-23 6:11 ` Wadim Egorov
2024-01-23 7:42 ` Stefan Wahren
2024-01-23 7:42 ` Stefan Wahren
2024-01-23 8:25 ` Wadim Egorov
2024-01-23 8:25 ` Wadim Egorov
2024-01-23 10:21 ` Stefan Wahren
2024-01-23 10:21 ` Stefan Wahren
2024-01-24 5:13 ` Wadim Egorov
2024-01-24 5:13 ` Wadim Egorov
2024-01-24 11:39 ` Stefan Wahren
2024-01-24 11:39 ` Stefan Wahren
2024-01-24 13:48 ` Mathieu Othacehe [this message]
2024-01-24 13:48 ` Mathieu Othacehe
2024-01-24 17:28 ` Stefan Wahren
2024-01-24 17:28 ` Stefan Wahren
2024-01-25 6:05 ` Wadim Egorov
2024-01-25 6:05 ` Wadim Egorov
2024-01-25 6:12 ` Primoz Fiser
2024-01-25 6:12 ` Primoz Fiser
2024-01-25 7:41 ` Stefan Wahren
2024-01-25 7:41 ` Stefan Wahren
2024-01-23 7:44 ` Mathieu Othacehe
2024-01-23 7:44 ` Mathieu Othacehe
2024-01-23 8:34 ` Primoz Fiser
2024-01-23 8:34 ` Primoz Fiser
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87o7da4zc1.fsf@gnu.org \
--to=othacehe@gnu.org \
--cc=c.stoidner@phytec.de \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=festevam@gmail.com \
--cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org \
--cc=leoyang.li@nxp.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-imx@nxp.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=primoz.fiser@norik.com \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
--cc=shawnguo@kernel.org \
--cc=upstream@lists.phytec.de \
--cc=w.egorov@phytec.de \
--cc=wahrenst@gmx.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.