All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>, David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [patch v2 for-4.0] mm, thp: really limit transparent hugepage allocation to local node
Date: Tue, 05 May 2015 18:52:58 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87oalzcg5p.fsf@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <55488994.8010303@suse.cz>

Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> writes:

> On 04/21/2015 09:31 AM, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
>> Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> writes:
>>
>>> On 25.2.2015 22:24, David Rientjes wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> alloc_pages_preferred_node() variant, change the exact_node() variant to pass
>>>>> __GFP_THISNODE, and audit and adjust all callers accordingly.
>>>>>
....
...
>>> Right, we might be changing behavior not just for slab allocators, but
>>> also others using such
>>> combination of flags.
>>
>> Any update on this ? Did we reach a conclusion on how to go forward here
>> ?
>
> I believe David's later version was merged already. Or what exactly are 
> you asking about?

When I checked last time I didn't find it. Hence I asked here. Now I
see that it got committed as 5265047ac30191ea24b16503165000c225f54feb

Thanks
-aneesh

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>, David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [patch v2 for-4.0] mm, thp: really limit transparent hugepage allocation to local node
Date: Tue, 05 May 2015 18:52:58 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87oalzcg5p.fsf@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <55488994.8010303@suse.cz>

Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> writes:

> On 04/21/2015 09:31 AM, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
>> Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> writes:
>>
>>> On 25.2.2015 22:24, David Rientjes wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> alloc_pages_preferred_node() variant, change the exact_node() variant to pass
>>>>> __GFP_THISNODE, and audit and adjust all callers accordingly.
>>>>>
....
...
>>> Right, we might be changing behavior not just for slab allocators, but
>>> also others using such
>>> combination of flags.
>>
>> Any update on this ? Did we reach a conclusion on how to go forward here
>> ?
>
> I believe David's later version was merged already. Or what exactly are 
> you asking about?

When I checked last time I didn't find it. Hence I asked here. Now I
see that it got committed as 5265047ac30191ea24b16503165000c225f54feb

Thanks
-aneesh


  reply	other threads:[~2015-05-05 13:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-02-24 22:24 [patch for-4.0] mm, thp: really limit transparent hugepage allocation to local node David Rientjes
2015-02-24 22:24 ` David Rientjes
2015-02-24 23:24 ` [patch v2 " David Rientjes
2015-02-24 23:24   ` David Rientjes
2015-02-25 10:52   ` Vlastimil Babka
2015-02-25 10:52     ` Vlastimil Babka
2015-02-25 21:24     ` David Rientjes
2015-02-25 21:24       ` David Rientjes
2015-02-25 23:55       ` Vlastimil Babka
2015-02-25 23:55         ` Vlastimil Babka
2015-04-21  7:31         ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2015-04-21  7:31           ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2015-05-05  9:12           ` Vlastimil Babka
2015-05-05  9:12             ` Vlastimil Babka
2015-05-05 13:22             ` Aneesh Kumar K.V [this message]
2015-05-05 13:22               ` Aneesh Kumar K.V

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87oalzcg5p.fsf@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=gthelen@google.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.