All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
To: Gaurav K Singh <gaurav.k.singh@intel.com>,
	intel-gfx <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
Cc: Shobhit Kumar <shobhit.kumar@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/10] drm/i915: Update the DSI disable path to	support dual link panel disabling
Date: Thu, 04 Dec 2014 13:37:33 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87oarjlk76.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1417670936-31032-10-git-send-email-gaurav.k.singh@intel.com>

On Thu, 04 Dec 2014, Gaurav K Singh <gaurav.k.singh@intel.com> wrote:
> We need to program both port registers during dual link disable path.
>
> v2: Address review comments by Jani
>     - Used a for loop instead of do-while loop.
>
> v3: Used for_each_dsi_port macro instead of for loop
>
> Signed-off-by: Gaurav K Singh <gaurav.k.singh@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Shobhit Kumar <shobhit.kumar@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi.c |   67 ++++++++++++++++++++------------------
>  1 file changed, 36 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi.c
> index 22b1570..5ae4015 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi.c
> @@ -281,9 +281,8 @@ static void intel_dsi_disable(struct intel_encoder *encoder)
>  {
>  	struct drm_device *dev = encoder->base.dev;
>  	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
> -	struct intel_crtc *intel_crtc = to_intel_crtc(encoder->base.crtc);
>  	struct intel_dsi *intel_dsi = enc_to_intel_dsi(&encoder->base);
> -	enum port port = intel_dsi_pipe_to_port(intel_crtc->pipe);
> +	enum port port;
>  	u32 temp;
>  
>  	DRM_DEBUG_KMS("\n");
> @@ -295,23 +294,24 @@ static void intel_dsi_disable(struct intel_encoder *encoder)
>  		msleep(2);
>  	}
>  
> -	/* Panel commands can be sent when clock is in LP11 */
> -	I915_WRITE(MIPI_DEVICE_READY(port), 0x0);
> -
> -	temp = I915_READ(MIPI_CTRL(port));
> -	temp &= ~ESCAPE_CLOCK_DIVIDER_MASK;
> -	I915_WRITE(MIPI_CTRL(port), temp |
> -		   intel_dsi->escape_clk_div <<
> -		   ESCAPE_CLOCK_DIVIDER_SHIFT);
> +	for_each_dsi_port(port, intel_dsi->ports) {
> +		/* Panel commands can be sent when clock is in LP11 */
> +		I915_WRITE(MIPI_DEVICE_READY(port), 0x0);
>  
> -	I915_WRITE(MIPI_EOT_DISABLE(port), CLOCKSTOP);
> +		temp = I915_READ(MIPI_CTRL(port));
> +		temp &= ~ESCAPE_CLOCK_DIVIDER_MASK;
> +		I915_WRITE(MIPI_CTRL(port), temp |
> +			   intel_dsi->escape_clk_div <<
> +			   ESCAPE_CLOCK_DIVIDER_SHIFT);
>  
> -	temp = I915_READ(MIPI_DSI_FUNC_PRG(port));
> -	temp &= ~VID_MODE_FORMAT_MASK;
> -	I915_WRITE(MIPI_DSI_FUNC_PRG(port), temp);
> +		I915_WRITE(MIPI_EOT_DISABLE(port), CLOCKSTOP);
>  
> -	I915_WRITE(MIPI_DEVICE_READY(port), 0x1);
> +		temp = I915_READ(MIPI_DSI_FUNC_PRG(port));
> +		temp &= ~VID_MODE_FORMAT_MASK;
> +		I915_WRITE(MIPI_DSI_FUNC_PRG(port), temp);
>  
> +		I915_WRITE(MIPI_DEVICE_READY(port), 0x1);
> +	}
>  	/* if disable packets are sent before sending shutdown packet then in
>  	 * some next enable sequence send turn on packet error is observed */
>  	if (intel_dsi->dev.dev_ops->disable)
> @@ -323,31 +323,36 @@ static void intel_dsi_disable(struct intel_encoder *encoder)
>  static void intel_dsi_clear_device_ready(struct intel_encoder *encoder)
>  {
>  	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = encoder->base.dev->dev_private;
> -	struct intel_crtc *intel_crtc = to_intel_crtc(encoder->base.crtc);
> -	enum port port = intel_dsi_pipe_to_port(intel_crtc->pipe);
> +	struct intel_dsi *intel_dsi = enc_to_intel_dsi(&encoder->base);
> +	enum port port;
>  	u32 val;
>  
>  	DRM_DEBUG_KMS("\n");
> +	for_each_dsi_port(port, intel_dsi->ports) {
>  
> -	I915_WRITE(MIPI_DEVICE_READY(port), DEVICE_READY | ULPS_STATE_ENTER);
> -	usleep_range(2000, 2500);
> +		I915_WRITE(MIPI_DEVICE_READY(port), DEVICE_READY |
> +							ULPS_STATE_ENTER);
> +		usleep_range(2000, 2500);
>  
> -	I915_WRITE(MIPI_DEVICE_READY(port), DEVICE_READY | ULPS_STATE_EXIT);
> -	usleep_range(2000, 2500);
> +		I915_WRITE(MIPI_DEVICE_READY(port), DEVICE_READY |
> +							ULPS_STATE_EXIT);
> +		usleep_range(2000, 2500);
>  
> -	I915_WRITE(MIPI_DEVICE_READY(port), DEVICE_READY | ULPS_STATE_ENTER);
> -	usleep_range(2000, 2500);
> +		I915_WRITE(MIPI_DEVICE_READY(port), DEVICE_READY |
> +							ULPS_STATE_ENTER);
> +		usleep_range(2000, 2500);
>  
> -	if (wait_for(((I915_READ(MIPI_PORT_CTRL(port)) & AFE_LATCHOUT)
> -		      == 0x00000), 30))
> -		DRM_ERROR("DSI LP not going Low\n");
> +		if (wait_for(((I915_READ(MIPI_PORT_CTRL(PORT_A)) & AFE_LATCHOUT)
> +							== 0x00000), 30))
> +			DRM_ERROR("DSI LP not going Low\n");

I find it a bit odd that you do the sequence for each port, while this
bit is specific to port A. It deserves a comment at the very least.

But perhaps we need several for_each_dsi_port() loops here, doing some
things for all ports, then common things (like this one, and maybe group
sleeps into one too?), then again some things for all ports, etc.

I am really not sure what the right thing is, but this *feels* a bit
odd. Please explain at least.

In the end, I don't see anything particularly wrong with the patch, so

Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>


>  
> -	val = I915_READ(MIPI_PORT_CTRL(port));
> -	I915_WRITE(MIPI_PORT_CTRL(port), val & ~LP_OUTPUT_HOLD);
> -	usleep_range(1000, 1500);
> +		val = I915_READ(MIPI_PORT_CTRL(port));
> +		I915_WRITE(MIPI_PORT_CTRL(port), val & ~LP_OUTPUT_HOLD);
> +		usleep_range(1000, 1500);
>  
> -	I915_WRITE(MIPI_DEVICE_READY(port), 0x00);
> -	usleep_range(2000, 2500);
> +		I915_WRITE(MIPI_DEVICE_READY(port), 0x00);
> +		usleep_range(2000, 2500);
> +	}
>  
>  	vlv_disable_dsi_pll(encoder);
>  }
> -- 
> 1.7.9.5
>
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  reply	other threads:[~2014-12-04 11:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-12-04  5:28 [PATCH 00/10] BYT DSI Dual Link Support Gaurav K Singh
2014-12-04  5:28 ` [PATCH 01/10] drm/i915: New functions added for enabling & disabling MIPI Port Ctrl reg Gaurav K Singh
2014-12-04  9:13   ` Jani Nikula
2014-12-04  5:28 ` [PATCH 02/10] drm/i915: Added port as parameter to the functions which does read/write of DSI Controller Gaurav K Singh
2014-12-04  9:14   ` Jani Nikula
2014-12-04 11:22     ` Daniel Vetter
2014-12-05 12:50       ` Singh, Gaurav K
2014-12-05 14:38         ` Daniel Vetter
2014-12-05 20:35           ` Singh, Gaurav K
2014-12-04  5:28 ` [PATCH 03/10] drm/i915: Add support for port enable/disable for dual link configuration Gaurav K Singh
2014-12-04  9:17   ` Jani Nikula
2014-12-05  8:39     ` [PATCH v4 " Gaurav K Singh
2014-12-05 12:52       ` Jani Nikula
2014-12-04  5:28 ` [PATCH 04/10] drm/i915: Pixel Clock changes for DSI dual link Gaurav K Singh
2014-12-04  9:27   ` Jani Nikula
2014-12-05  8:43     ` [PATCH v3 " Gaurav K Singh
2014-12-05 16:33     ` [PATCH " Singh, Gaurav K
2014-12-05 16:54       ` Siluvery, Arun
2014-12-05 17:18         ` Singh, Gaurav K
2014-12-05 17:36         ` Jani Nikula
2014-12-05 17:48           ` Siluvery, Arun
2014-12-05 20:43             ` Singh, Gaurav K
2014-12-04  5:28 ` [PATCH 05/10] drm/i915: Dual link needs Shutdown and Turn on packet for both ports Gaurav K Singh
2014-12-04 10:41   ` Jani Nikula
2014-12-05 19:10     ` [PATCH 5/5] " Gaurav K Singh
2014-12-05 20:53       ` Daniel Vetter
2014-12-04  5:28 ` [PATCH 06/10] drm/i915: Enable DSI PLL for both DSI0 and DSI1 in case of dual link Gaurav K Singh
2014-12-04 11:17   ` Jani Nikula
2014-12-04  5:28 ` [PATCH 07/10] drm/i915: cck reg used for checking DSI Pll locked Gaurav K Singh
2014-12-04 11:22   ` Jani Nikula
2014-12-05  8:46     ` [PATCH v2 " Gaurav K Singh
2014-12-04  5:28 ` [PATCH 08/10] drm/i915: MIPI Timings related changes for dual link Gaurav K Singh
2014-12-04 11:24   ` Jani Nikula
2014-12-04  5:28 ` [PATCH 09/10] drm/i915: Update the DSI disable path to support dual link panel disabling Gaurav K Singh
2014-12-04 11:37   ` Jani Nikula [this message]
2014-12-05  8:52     ` [PATCH v4 " Gaurav K Singh
2014-12-04  5:28 ` [PATCH 10/10] drm/i915: Update the DSI enable path to support dual link panel enabling Gaurav K Singh
2014-12-04 11:49   ` Jani Nikula
2014-12-05  8:54     ` [PATCH v4 10/10] drm/i915: Update the DSI enable path to support dual Gaurav K Singh
2014-12-05 20:31       ` [PATCH " Gaurav K Singh
2014-12-05  4:04   ` [PATCH 10/10] drm/i915: Update the DSI enable path to support dual link panel enabling shuang.he

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87oarjlk76.fsf@intel.com \
    --to=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=gaurav.k.singh@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=shobhit.kumar@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.