All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dmitry Monakhov <dmonakhov@openvz.org>
To: tytso@mit.edu
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ext4: Always journal quota file modifications
Date: Thu, 03 Jun 2010 18:13:03 +0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87ocfsi4r4.fsf@openvz.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100603125312.GH24062@thunk.org> (tytso@mit.edu's message of "Thu, 3 Jun 2010 08:53:12 -0400")

tytso@mit.edu writes:

> On Wed, Jun 02, 2010 at 04:23:13PM +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
>> When journaled quota options are not specified, we do writes
>> to quota files just in data=ordered mode. This actually causes
>> warnings from JBD2 about dirty journaled buffer because ext4_getblk
>> unconditionally treats a block allocated by it as metadata. Since
>> quota actually is filesystem metadata, the easiest way to get rid
>> of the warning is to always treat quota writes as metadata...
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
>
> I'm worried about this patch in the short-term.  In the long-term I
> think the quota file should become a special file much like the
> journal, and then this makes a huge amount of sense.  But I worry
> about what might happen if (a) someone tries writing to the quota file
> directly from userspace, maybe right before quota is enabled (and
> before delayed allocation writes complete, such that some writes are
> happening via the journal in ext4_quota_write and some w/o going
> through the journal in ext4_writepage), and (b) what happens if quota
> is disabled, the quota file is deleted, and some blocks get reused ---
> and then system crashes before a journal commit can happen.
>
> All of these problems go away if the quota file isn't visible from
> userspace, and it becomes a special file.  In the short term I think
> we could make this change, but I think we would also have to (1) treat
> the quota file as immutable while quotas are enabled (so it cannot be
> opened for writing), (2) force an fsync of the quota file and a
> journal commit before enabling quotas, and (3) force a journal commit
> after disabling quotas.
3'rd is already true
int vfs_quota_disable(...)
{...
        /* Sync the superblock so that buffers with quota data are written to
         * disk (and so userspace sees correct data afterwards). */
        if (sb->s_op->sync_fs)
                sb->s_op->sync_fs(sb, 1);
        sync_blockdev(sb->s_bdev);
        /* Now the quota files are just ordinary files and we can set the
         * inode flags back. Moreover we discard the pagecache so that
...}
>
> The other thing we might try that might mostly fix things is to change
> ext4_should_journal_data() in ext4_jbd2.h to return true if it's a
> quota file --- but we don't know which files are the quota files when
> quotas are disabled, so we would still need to do (2) and (3).  But
> this would allow us to write to the quota file while quotas are
> enabled, if we think this is necessary --- although I think it's a bad
> idea, so I'd be in favor of simply not allowing quota files to be
> writable from userspace while quotas are enabled.  Jan, is this going
> to cause any problems with quotautils?
>
> OTOH, I think we have similar races with journaled quotas, and no one
> has complained (although the vast majority of the quota documentation
> on various HOWTO pages still don't talk about journaled quotas, so I
> don't know how many people are using journaled quotas.  :-/ )
>
>>   Ted, this patch fixes some JBD2 warning for me when running XFSQA
>> with quotas enabled. I think this is a move into a direction you are
>> trying to achieve as well. Will you merge the patch or should I do it?
>
> I'm happy to carry the patch, since I Have Plans to try to make quotas
> be a first class supported filesystem feature (i.e., make the quota
> file a special file, and make quota files be always journaled if they
> are journaled, and make the !@#! magic quota options handling in
> /proc/mounts go away) in the 2.6.36 timeframe.
>
> So the question is should we try to merge something like this for
> 2.6.35 or 2.6.35.y, and if so, how much bullet-proofing do we feel is
> necessary for some of these races that I've outlined above.
>
> 	      	      	    	       	    - Ted
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

  reply	other threads:[~2010-06-03 14:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-06-02 14:23 [PATCH] ext4: Always journal quota file modifications Jan Kara
2010-06-02 21:39 ` Eric Sandeen
2010-06-02 23:46   ` Jan Kara
2010-06-03  9:07 ` Dmitry Monakhov
2010-06-03 11:54   ` Jan Kara
2010-06-03 12:53 ` tytso
2010-06-03 14:13   ` Dmitry Monakhov [this message]
2010-06-03 14:19   ` Jan Kara
2010-06-03 17:10     ` tytso
2010-06-04 14:45       ` Jan Kara
2010-06-03 16:47   ` Bernd Schubert
2010-07-05 20:08 ` Eric Sandeen
2010-07-27 13:37   ` Ted Ts'o

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87ocfsi4r4.fsf@openvz.org \
    --to=dmonakhov@openvz.org \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.