All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nix <nix@esperi.org.uk>
To: Jeff Dike <jdike@addtoit.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@timesys.com>,
	linux-kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [uml-devel] [2.6.24.x] UML select()/poll() oversleeping reproducibly
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2008 22:14:14 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87od9apdjd.fsf@hades.wkstn.nix> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080318170019.GA8747@c2.user-mode-linux.org> (Jeff Dike's message of "Tue, 18 Mar 2008 13:00:19 -0400")

On 18 Mar 2008, Jeff Dike told this:
> This version keeps track of the time between ticks (as reported by the
> host's gettimeofday) and adjusts its sleeping and reporting ticks
> accordingly.

I can confirm that, as expected, this patch works well enough that
timing problems don't break dhclient anymore (which requires a 2x
oversleep, which you're a long way from now).

At last I can upgrade my firewall :)

-- 
`The rest is a tale of post and counter-post.' --- Ian Rawlings
                                                   describes USENET

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-devel mailing list
User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Nix <nix@esperi.org.uk>
To: Jeff Dike <jdike@addtoit.com>
Cc: user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
	linux-kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@timesys.com>
Subject: Re: [2.6.24.x] UML select()/poll() oversleeping reproducibly
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2008 22:14:14 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87od9apdjd.fsf@hades.wkstn.nix> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080318170019.GA8747@c2.user-mode-linux.org> (Jeff Dike's message of "Tue, 18 Mar 2008 13:00:19 -0400")

On 18 Mar 2008, Jeff Dike told this:
> This version keeps track of the time between ticks (as reported by the
> host's gettimeofday) and adjusts its sleeping and reporting ticks
> accordingly.

I can confirm that, as expected, this patch works well enough that
timing problems don't break dhclient anymore (which requires a 2x
oversleep, which you're a long way from now).

At last I can upgrade my firewall :)

-- 
`The rest is a tale of post and counter-post.' --- Ian Rawlings
                                                   describes USENET

  parent reply	other threads:[~2008-03-19 22:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-02-13 19:57 [uml-devel] g_timeout_add clowncoder
2008-02-14  0:38 ` Jeff Dike
2008-02-14 22:16   ` clowncoder
2008-02-15 16:02     ` Jeff Dike
2008-02-15 17:39       ` clowncoder
2008-02-15 18:46         ` Jeff Dike
2008-03-14 23:01           ` [uml-devel] [2.6.24.x] UML select()/poll() oversleeping reproducibly (was Re: g_timeout_add) Nix
2008-03-14 23:01             ` [2.6.24.x] UML select()/poll() oversleeping reproducibly (was Re: [uml-devel] g_timeout_add) Nix
2008-03-17 16:27             ` [uml-devel] [2.6.24.x] UML select()/poll() oversleeping reproducibly (was g_timeout_add) Jeff Dike
2008-03-17 16:27               ` [2.6.24.x] UML select()/poll() oversleeping reproducibly (was Re: [uml-devel] g_timeout_add) Jeff Dike
2008-03-17 17:03             ` [uml-devel] [2.6.24.x] UML select()/poll() oversleeping reproducibly (was g_timeout_add) Jeff Dike
2008-03-17 17:03               ` [2.6.24.x] UML select()/poll() oversleeping reproducibly (was Re: [uml-devel] g_timeout_add) Jeff Dike
2008-03-17 19:34             ` [uml-devel] [2.6.24.x] UML select()/poll() oversleeping reproducibly (was g_timeout_add) Jeff Dike
2008-03-17 19:34               ` [2.6.24.x] UML select()/poll() oversleeping reproducibly (was Re: [uml-devel] g_timeout_add) Jeff Dike
2008-03-17 21:08               ` [uml-devel] [2.6.24.x] UML select()/poll() oversleeping reproducibly Nix
2008-03-17 21:08                 ` Nix
2008-03-18 17:00                 ` [uml-devel] " Jeff Dike
2008-03-18 17:00                   ` Jeff Dike
2008-03-18 19:39                   ` [uml-devel] " Nix
2008-03-18 19:39                     ` Nix
2008-03-19 22:14                   ` Nix [this message]
2008-03-19 22:14                     ` Nix
2008-02-21 22:02   ` [uml-devel] Timeout in the select clowncoder

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87od9apdjd.fsf@hades.wkstn.nix \
    --to=nix@esperi.org.uk \
    --cc=jdike@addtoit.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@timesys.com \
    --cc=user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.