From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
To: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>,
mripard@kernel.org, maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com,
airlied@linux.ie, daniel@ffwll.ch
Cc: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org,
Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>,
nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org,
freedreno@lists.freedesktop.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 3/5] drm/dp: Move DisplayPort helpers into separate helper module
Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2021 13:04:00 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87pmpy3za7.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211215104318.18866-4-tzimmermann@suse.de>
On Wed, 15 Dec 2021, Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de> wrote:
> * move DP helper code into dp/ (Jani)
I suggested adding the subdirectory, but I'm going to bikeshed the name,
which I didn't suggest.
$ find drivers/gpu/drm -mindepth 1 -maxdepth 1 -type d | wc -l
68
Assuming we move more of the drm modules to subdirectories, how are they
going to stand out from drivers?
I suggested drm_dp, which I understand results in tautology, but hey,
all the filenames under drm/ also have drm_*.[ch]. And I find that very
useful for git greps and other code archeology. With just the dp name,
you'd have to know and list all the drm subdirectories when looking up
stuff that's part of drm but not drivers.
BR,
Jani.
--
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
To: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>,
mripard@kernel.org, maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com,
airlied@linux.ie, daniel@ffwll.ch
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, freedreno@lists.freedesktop.org,
nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org,
Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/5] drm/dp: Move DisplayPort helpers into separate helper module
Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2021 13:04:00 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87pmpy3za7.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211215104318.18866-4-tzimmermann@suse.de>
On Wed, 15 Dec 2021, Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de> wrote:
> * move DP helper code into dp/ (Jani)
I suggested adding the subdirectory, but I'm going to bikeshed the name,
which I didn't suggest.
$ find drivers/gpu/drm -mindepth 1 -maxdepth 1 -type d | wc -l
68
Assuming we move more of the drm modules to subdirectories, how are they
going to stand out from drivers?
I suggested drm_dp, which I understand results in tautology, but hey,
all the filenames under drm/ also have drm_*.[ch]. And I find that very
useful for git greps and other code archeology. With just the dp name,
you'd have to know and list all the drm subdirectories when looking up
stuff that's part of drm but not drivers.
BR,
Jani.
--
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
To: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>,
mripard@kernel.org, maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com,
airlied@linux.ie, daniel@ffwll.ch
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, freedreno@lists.freedesktop.org,
nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org,
Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/5] drm/dp: Move DisplayPort helpers into separate helper module
Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2021 13:04:00 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87pmpy3za7.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211215104318.18866-4-tzimmermann@suse.de>
On Wed, 15 Dec 2021, Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de> wrote:
> * move DP helper code into dp/ (Jani)
I suggested adding the subdirectory, but I'm going to bikeshed the name,
which I didn't suggest.
$ find drivers/gpu/drm -mindepth 1 -maxdepth 1 -type d | wc -l
68
Assuming we move more of the drm modules to subdirectories, how are they
going to stand out from drivers?
I suggested drm_dp, which I understand results in tautology, but hey,
all the filenames under drm/ also have drm_*.[ch]. And I find that very
useful for git greps and other code archeology. With just the dp name,
you'd have to know and list all the drm subdirectories when looking up
stuff that's part of drm but not drivers.
BR,
Jani.
--
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center
_______________________________________________
Linux-rockchip mailing list
Linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
To: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>,
mripard@kernel.org, maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com,
airlied@linux.ie, daniel@ffwll.ch
Cc: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org,
nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org,
freedreno@lists.freedesktop.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [Nouveau] [PATCH v2 3/5] drm/dp: Move DisplayPort helpers into separate helper module
Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2021 13:04:00 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87pmpy3za7.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211215104318.18866-4-tzimmermann@suse.de>
On Wed, 15 Dec 2021, Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de> wrote:
> * move DP helper code into dp/ (Jani)
I suggested adding the subdirectory, but I'm going to bikeshed the name,
which I didn't suggest.
$ find drivers/gpu/drm -mindepth 1 -maxdepth 1 -type d | wc -l
68
Assuming we move more of the drm modules to subdirectories, how are they
going to stand out from drivers?
I suggested drm_dp, which I understand results in tautology, but hey,
all the filenames under drm/ also have drm_*.[ch]. And I find that very
useful for git greps and other code archeology. With just the dp name,
you'd have to know and list all the drm subdirectories when looking up
stuff that's part of drm but not drivers.
BR,
Jani.
--
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
To: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>,
mripard@kernel.org, maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com,
airlied@linux.ie, daniel@ffwll.ch
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, freedreno@lists.freedesktop.org,
nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org,
Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/5] drm/dp: Move DisplayPort helpers into separate helper module
Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2021 13:04:00 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87pmpy3za7.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211215104318.18866-4-tzimmermann@suse.de>
On Wed, 15 Dec 2021, Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de> wrote:
> * move DP helper code into dp/ (Jani)
I suggested adding the subdirectory, but I'm going to bikeshed the name,
which I didn't suggest.
$ find drivers/gpu/drm -mindepth 1 -maxdepth 1 -type d | wc -l
68
Assuming we move more of the drm modules to subdirectories, how are they
going to stand out from drivers?
I suggested drm_dp, which I understand results in tautology, but hey,
all the filenames under drm/ also have drm_*.[ch]. And I find that very
useful for git greps and other code archeology. With just the dp name,
you'd have to know and list all the drm subdirectories when looking up
stuff that's part of drm but not drivers.
BR,
Jani.
--
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
To: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>,
mripard@kernel.org, maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com,
airlied@linux.ie, daniel@ffwll.ch
Cc: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org,
Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>,
nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org,
freedreno@lists.freedesktop.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/5] drm/dp: Move DisplayPort helpers into separate helper module
Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2021 13:04:00 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87pmpy3za7.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211215104318.18866-4-tzimmermann@suse.de>
On Wed, 15 Dec 2021, Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de> wrote:
> * move DP helper code into dp/ (Jani)
I suggested adding the subdirectory, but I'm going to bikeshed the name,
which I didn't suggest.
$ find drivers/gpu/drm -mindepth 1 -maxdepth 1 -type d | wc -l
68
Assuming we move more of the drm modules to subdirectories, how are they
going to stand out from drivers?
I suggested drm_dp, which I understand results in tautology, but hey,
all the filenames under drm/ also have drm_*.[ch]. And I find that very
useful for git greps and other code archeology. With just the dp name,
you'd have to know and list all the drm subdirectories when looking up
stuff that's part of drm but not drivers.
BR,
Jani.
--
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-12-15 11:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 66+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-12-15 10:43 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 0/5] drm/dp: Move DisplayPort helpers into own module Thomas Zimmermann
2021-12-15 10:43 ` Thomas Zimmermann
2021-12-15 10:43 ` Thomas Zimmermann
2021-12-15 10:43 ` [Nouveau] " Thomas Zimmermann
2021-12-15 10:43 ` Thomas Zimmermann
2021-12-15 10:43 ` Thomas Zimmermann
2021-12-15 10:43 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 1/5] drm/dp_mst: Remove trailing whitespace Thomas Zimmermann
2021-12-15 10:43 ` Thomas Zimmermann
2021-12-15 10:43 ` Thomas Zimmermann
2021-12-15 10:43 ` [Nouveau] " Thomas Zimmermann
2021-12-15 10:43 ` Thomas Zimmermann
2021-12-15 10:43 ` Thomas Zimmermann
2021-12-15 10:43 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 2/5] drm/dp: Move DP declarations into separate header file Thomas Zimmermann
2021-12-15 10:43 ` Thomas Zimmermann
2021-12-15 10:43 ` Thomas Zimmermann
2021-12-15 10:43 ` [Nouveau] " Thomas Zimmermann
2021-12-15 10:43 ` Thomas Zimmermann
2021-12-15 10:43 ` Thomas Zimmermann
2021-12-15 10:43 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 3/5] drm/dp: Move DisplayPort helpers into separate helper module Thomas Zimmermann
2021-12-15 10:43 ` Thomas Zimmermann
2021-12-15 10:43 ` Thomas Zimmermann
2021-12-15 10:43 ` [Nouveau] " Thomas Zimmermann
2021-12-15 10:43 ` Thomas Zimmermann
2021-12-15 10:43 ` Thomas Zimmermann
2021-12-15 11:04 ` Jani Nikula [this message]
2021-12-15 11:04 ` Jani Nikula
2021-12-15 11:04 ` Jani Nikula
2021-12-15 11:04 ` [Nouveau] " Jani Nikula
2021-12-15 11:04 ` Jani Nikula
2021-12-15 11:04 ` Jani Nikula
2021-12-15 11:12 ` [Intel-gfx] " Thomas Zimmermann
2021-12-15 11:12 ` Thomas Zimmermann
2021-12-15 11:12 ` Thomas Zimmermann
2021-12-15 11:12 ` [Nouveau] " Thomas Zimmermann
2021-12-15 11:12 ` Thomas Zimmermann
2021-12-15 11:12 ` Thomas Zimmermann
2022-01-11 10:21 ` [Intel-gfx] " Javier Martinez Canillas
2022-01-11 10:21 ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2022-01-11 10:21 ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2022-01-11 10:21 ` [Nouveau] " Javier Martinez Canillas
2022-01-11 10:21 ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2022-01-11 10:21 ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2022-01-08 23:56 ` [Intel-gfx] " Michał Mirosław
2022-01-08 23:56 ` Michał Mirosław
2022-01-08 23:56 ` Michał Mirosław
2022-01-08 23:56 ` [Nouveau] " Michał Mirosław
2022-01-08 23:56 ` Michał Mirosław
2022-01-08 23:56 ` Michał Mirosław
2022-01-11 18:58 ` [Intel-gfx] [Nouveau] " Lyude Paul
2022-01-11 18:58 ` Lyude Paul
2022-01-11 18:58 ` Lyude Paul
2022-01-11 18:58 ` Lyude Paul
2022-01-11 18:58 ` Lyude Paul
2021-12-15 10:43 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 4/5] drm/dp: Move public DisplayPort headers into dp/ Thomas Zimmermann
2021-12-15 10:43 ` Thomas Zimmermann
2021-12-15 10:43 ` Thomas Zimmermann
2021-12-15 10:43 ` [Nouveau] " Thomas Zimmermann
2021-12-15 10:43 ` Thomas Zimmermann
2021-12-15 10:43 ` Thomas Zimmermann
2021-12-15 10:43 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 5/5] drm/dp: Move DisplayPort AUX bus helpers " Thomas Zimmermann
2021-12-15 10:43 ` Thomas Zimmermann
2021-12-15 10:43 ` Thomas Zimmermann
2021-12-15 10:43 ` [Nouveau] " Thomas Zimmermann
2021-12-15 10:43 ` Thomas Zimmermann
2021-12-15 10:43 ` Thomas Zimmermann
2021-12-15 12:05 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BUILD: failure for drm/dp: Move DisplayPort helpers into own module (rev2) Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87pmpy3za7.fsf@intel.com \
--to=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
--cc=airlied@linux.ie \
--cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=freedreno@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
--cc=mripard@kernel.org \
--cc=nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=tzimmermann@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.