All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: js1304@gmail.com, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	mgorman@techsingularity.net, Laura Abbott <lauraa@codeaurora.org>,
	Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>,
	Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>,
	Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@mina86.com>,
	Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/6] mm/cma: introduce new zone, ZONE_CMA
Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2016 18:10:46 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87pooqsa41.fsf@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87vayisfx3.fsf@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

"Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> writes:

> ....
>
>>  static inline void check_highest_zone(enum zone_type k)
>>  {
>> -	if (k > policy_zone && k != ZONE_MOVABLE)
>> +	if (k > policy_zone && k != ZONE_MOVABLE && !is_zone_cma_idx(k))
>>  		policy_zone = k;
>>  }
>>
>
>
> Should we apply policy to allocation from ZONE CMA ?. CMA reserve
> happens early and may mostly come from one node. Do we want the
> CMA allocation to fail if we use mbind(MPOL_BIND) with a node mask not
> including that node on which CMA is reserved, considering CMA memory is
> going to be used for special purpose.

Looking at this again, I guess CMA alloc is not going to depend on
memory policy, but this is for other movable allocation ?

-aneesh

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: js1304@gmail.com, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	mgorman@techsingularity.net, Laura Abbott <lauraa@codeaurora.org>,
	Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>,
	Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>,
	Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@mina86.com>,
	Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/6] mm/cma: introduce new zone, ZONE_CMA
Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2016 18:10:46 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87pooqsa41.fsf@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87vayisfx3.fsf@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

"Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> writes:

> ....
>
>>  static inline void check_highest_zone(enum zone_type k)
>>  {
>> -	if (k > policy_zone && k != ZONE_MOVABLE)
>> +	if (k > policy_zone && k != ZONE_MOVABLE && !is_zone_cma_idx(k))
>>  		policy_zone = k;
>>  }
>>
>
>
> Should we apply policy to allocation from ZONE CMA ?. CMA reserve
> happens early and may mostly come from one node. Do we want the
> CMA allocation to fail if we use mbind(MPOL_BIND) with a node mask not
> including that node on which CMA is reserved, considering CMA memory is
> going to be used for special purpose.

Looking at this again, I guess CMA alloc is not going to depend on
memory policy, but this is for other movable allocation ?

-aneesh

  reply	other threads:[~2016-08-30 12:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-08-29  5:07 [PATCH v5 0/6] Introduce ZONE_CMA js1304
2016-08-29  5:07 ` js1304
2016-08-29  5:07 ` [PATCH v5 1/6] mm/page_alloc: don't reserve ZONE_HIGHMEM for ZONE_MOVABLE request js1304
2016-08-29  5:07   ` js1304
2016-09-16  3:14   ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2016-09-16  3:14     ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2016-09-22  5:30     ` Joonsoo Kim
2016-09-22  5:30       ` Joonsoo Kim
2016-09-21  9:06   ` Vlastimil Babka
2016-09-21  9:06     ` Vlastimil Babka
2016-08-29  5:07 ` [PATCH v5 2/6] mm/cma: introduce new zone, ZONE_CMA js1304
2016-08-29  5:07   ` js1304
2016-08-30 10:35   ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2016-08-30 10:35     ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2016-08-30 12:40     ` Aneesh Kumar K.V [this message]
2016-08-30 12:40       ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2016-08-31  7:58       ` Joonsoo Kim
2016-08-31  7:58         ` Joonsoo Kim
2016-09-21  9:11   ` Vlastimil Babka
2016-09-21  9:11     ` Vlastimil Babka
2016-08-29  5:07 ` [PATCH v5 3/6] mm/cma: populate ZONE_CMA js1304
2016-08-29  5:07   ` js1304
2016-09-21  9:20   ` Vlastimil Babka
2016-09-21  9:20     ` Vlastimil Babka
2016-09-22  5:45     ` Joonsoo Kim
2016-09-22  5:45       ` Joonsoo Kim
2016-09-22  6:50       ` Joonsoo Kim
2016-09-22  6:50         ` Joonsoo Kim
2016-09-22 15:59         ` Vlastimil Babka
2016-09-22 15:59           ` Vlastimil Babka
2016-09-28  5:34           ` Joonsoo Kim
2016-09-28  5:34             ` Joonsoo Kim
2016-08-29  5:07 ` [PATCH v5 4/6] mm/cma: remove ALLOC_CMA js1304
2016-08-29  5:07   ` js1304
2016-08-29  5:07 ` [PATCH v5 5/6] mm/cma: remove MIGRATE_CMA js1304
2016-08-29  5:07   ` js1304
2016-08-29  5:07 ` [PATCH v5 6/6] mm/cma: remove per zone CMA stat js1304
2016-08-29  5:07   ` js1304
2016-08-29  9:27 ` [PATCH v5 0/6] Introduce ZONE_CMA Aneesh Kumar K.V
2016-08-29  9:27   ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2016-08-30  8:21   ` Joonsoo Kim
2016-08-30  8:21     ` Joonsoo Kim
2016-08-30 10:39     ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2016-08-30 10:39       ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2016-08-31  8:03       ` Joonsoo Kim
2016-08-31  8:03         ` Joonsoo Kim
2016-09-01  5:47         ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2016-09-01  5:47           ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2016-09-01  6:01           ` Joonsoo Kim
2016-09-01  6:01             ` Joonsoo Kim
2016-09-21 14:47           ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2016-09-21 14:47             ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2016-09-22  5:32             ` Joonsoo Kim
2016-09-22  5:32               ` Joonsoo Kim

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87pooqsa41.fsf@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \
    --cc=js1304@gmail.com \
    --cc=lauraa@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
    --cc=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
    --cc=mina86@mina86.com \
    --cc=minchan@kernel.org \
    --cc=riel@redhat.com \
    --cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.