From: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
To: Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@ti.com>
Cc: Alan Cox <alan@linux.intel.com>, Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>,
linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-serial@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>, Partha Basak <p-basak2@ti.com>,
Vishwanath Sripathy <vishwanath.bs@ti.com>,
Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>,
"Govindraj.R" <govindraj.raja@ti.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 00/20] OMAP2+: UART: Runtime adaptation + cleanup
Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2011 09:35:56 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87pqfsxtkz.fsf@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4EE75E1A.7080101@ti.com> (Rajendra Nayak's message of "Tue, 13 Dec 2011 19:45:54 +0530")
Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@ti.com> writes:
> Hi Kevin,
>
> On Wednesday 07 December 2011 05:51 AM, Kevin Hilman wrote:
>> "Govindraj.R"<govindraj.raja@ti.com> writes:
>>
>>> Converting uart driver to adapt to pm runtime API's.
>>> Code re-org + cleanup.
>>> Moving some functionality from serial.c to omap-serial.c
>>
>> Alan, can you confirm your Ack's are still valid on the drivers/tty
>> parts of this series? It has gone through quite a few changes since
>> your original ack.
>>
>> Greg, are you ok with this series merging via the OMAP tree since it is
>> changing arch/arm/mach-omap2/* code as well as the driver, and should go
>> together. If so, with your ack (on the drivers/tty/* parts), I'll
>> handle this series through the OMAP tree.
>
> I had a series to add DT support for omap-serial, which I did on top
> of the runtime series from Govindraj. Its already acked by Rob Herring
> for the DT parts. Would you be able to pick those up as well if its
> fine with Greg?
Yes, those should go on top of Govindraj's series.
I'm OK with taking them, but I'd like to see them rebased on Govidraj's
latest and see several Tested-by reports from various people since it is
pretty late in the merge cycle.
Kevin
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: khilman@ti.com (Kevin Hilman)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v8 00/20] OMAP2+: UART: Runtime adaptation + cleanup
Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2011 09:35:56 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87pqfsxtkz.fsf@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4EE75E1A.7080101@ti.com> (Rajendra Nayak's message of "Tue, 13 Dec 2011 19:45:54 +0530")
Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@ti.com> writes:
> Hi Kevin,
>
> On Wednesday 07 December 2011 05:51 AM, Kevin Hilman wrote:
>> "Govindraj.R"<govindraj.raja@ti.com> writes:
>>
>>> Converting uart driver to adapt to pm runtime API's.
>>> Code re-org + cleanup.
>>> Moving some functionality from serial.c to omap-serial.c
>>
>> Alan, can you confirm your Ack's are still valid on the drivers/tty
>> parts of this series? It has gone through quite a few changes since
>> your original ack.
>>
>> Greg, are you ok with this series merging via the OMAP tree since it is
>> changing arch/arm/mach-omap2/* code as well as the driver, and should go
>> together. If so, with your ack (on the drivers/tty/* parts), I'll
>> handle this series through the OMAP tree.
>
> I had a series to add DT support for omap-serial, which I did on top
> of the runtime series from Govindraj. Its already acked by Rob Herring
> for the DT parts. Would you be able to pick those up as well if its
> fine with Greg?
Yes, those should go on top of Govindraj's series.
I'm OK with taking them, but I'd like to see them rebased on Govidraj's
latest and see several Tested-by reports from various people since it is
pretty late in the merge cycle.
Kevin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-12-13 17:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-11-11 9:57 [PATCH v8 00/20] OMAP2+: UART: Runtime adaptation + cleanup Govindraj.R
2011-11-11 9:57 ` Govindraj.R
2011-11-11 9:57 ` [PATCH v8 01/20] OMAP2+: UART: cleanup + remove uart pm specific API Govindraj.R
2011-11-11 9:57 ` Govindraj.R
2011-11-11 9:57 ` [PATCH v8 02/20] OMAP2+: UART: cleanup 8250 console driver support Govindraj.R
2011-11-11 9:57 ` Govindraj.R
2011-11-11 9:57 ` [PATCH v8 03/20] OMAP2+: UART: Cleanup part of clock gating mechanism for uart Govindraj.R
2011-11-11 9:57 ` Govindraj.R
2011-11-11 9:57 ` [PATCH v8 04/20] OMAP2+: UART: Add default mux for all uarts Govindraj.R
2011-11-11 9:57 ` Govindraj.R
2011-11-11 9:57 ` [PATCH v8 05/20] OMAP2+: UART: Remove mapbase/membase fields from pdata Govindraj.R
2011-11-11 9:57 ` Govindraj.R
2011-11-11 9:57 ` [PATCH v8 06/20] OMAP2+: UART: Add runtime pm support for omap-serial driver Govindraj.R
2011-11-11 9:57 ` Govindraj.R
2011-11-11 9:57 ` [PATCH v8 07/20] OMAP2+: UART: Remove context_save and move context restore to driver Govindraj.R
2011-11-11 9:57 ` Govindraj.R
2011-11-11 9:57 ` [PATCH v8 08/20] OMAP2+: UART: Ensure all reg values configured are available from port structure Govindraj.R
2011-11-11 9:57 ` Govindraj.R
2011-11-11 9:57 ` [PATCH v8 09/20] OMAP2+: UART: Remove uart reset function Govindraj.R
2011-11-11 9:57 ` Govindraj.R
2011-12-07 0:21 ` [PATCH v8 00/20] OMAP2+: UART: Runtime adaptation + cleanup Kevin Hilman
2011-12-07 0:21 ` Kevin Hilman
2011-12-07 0:46 ` Alan Cox
2011-12-07 0:46 ` Alan Cox
2011-12-13 14:15 ` Rajendra Nayak
2011-12-13 14:15 ` Rajendra Nayak
2011-12-13 17:35 ` Kevin Hilman [this message]
2011-12-13 17:35 ` Kevin Hilman
2011-12-13 13:01 ` Govindraj
2011-12-13 13:01 ` Govindraj
2011-12-13 19:26 ` Kevin Hilman
2011-12-13 19:26 ` Kevin Hilman
2011-12-14 8:46 ` Govindraj
2011-12-14 8:46 ` Govindraj
2011-12-14 15:29 ` Kevin Hilman
2011-12-14 15:29 ` Kevin Hilman
2011-12-14 16:20 ` Govindraj
2011-12-14 16:20 ` Govindraj
2011-12-14 18:56 ` Kevin Hilman
2011-12-14 18:56 ` Kevin Hilman
2011-12-13 23:32 ` Kevin Hilman
2011-12-13 23:32 ` Kevin Hilman
2011-12-14 9:21 ` Govindraj
2011-12-14 9:21 ` Govindraj
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87pqfsxtkz.fsf@ti.com \
--to=khilman@ti.com \
--cc=alan@linux.intel.com \
--cc=govindraj.raja@ti.com \
--cc=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-serial@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=p-basak2@ti.com \
--cc=rnayak@ti.com \
--cc=santosh.shilimkar@ti.com \
--cc=tony@atomide.com \
--cc=vishwanath.bs@ti.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.