From: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
To: Gabor Juhos <j4g8y7@gmail.com>
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
Md Sadre Alam <quic_mdalam@quicinc.com>,
Varadarajan Narayanan <quic_varada@quicinc.com>,
Sricharan Ramabadhran <quic_srichara@quicinc.com>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com>,
linux-spi@vger.kernel.org, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org,
linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] spi: spi-qpic-snand: avoid memory corruption
Date: Mon, 26 May 2025 10:13:39 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87r00b23ik.fsf@bootlin.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250525-qpic-snand-avoid-mem-corruption-v1-0-5fe528def7fb@gmail.com> (Gabor Juhos's message of "Sun, 25 May 2025 19:05:34 +0200")
Hi Gabor,
On 25/05/2025 at 19:05:34 +02, Gabor Juhos <j4g8y7@gmail.com> wrote:
> The 'spi-qpic-nand' driver may cause memory corruption under some
> circumstances. The first patch in the series changes the driver to
> avoid that, whereas the second adds some sanity checks to the common
> QPIC code in order to make detecting such errors easier in the future.
>
> Signed-off-by: Gabor Juhos <j4g8y7@gmail.com>
> ---
> Gabor Juhos (2):
> spi: spi-qpic-snand: reallocate BAM transactions
> mtd: nand: qpic_common: prevent out of bounds access of BAM
> arrays
Are these two paches related somehow? Or can we apply them in
two different trees? If yes, please send the patches separately, which
eases our work.
Thanks,
Miquèl
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
To: Gabor Juhos <j4g8y7@gmail.com>
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
Md Sadre Alam <quic_mdalam@quicinc.com>,
Varadarajan Narayanan <quic_varada@quicinc.com>,
Sricharan Ramabadhran <quic_srichara@quicinc.com>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com>,
linux-spi@vger.kernel.org, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org,
linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] spi: spi-qpic-snand: avoid memory corruption
Date: Mon, 26 May 2025 10:13:39 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87r00b23ik.fsf@bootlin.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250525-qpic-snand-avoid-mem-corruption-v1-0-5fe528def7fb@gmail.com> (Gabor Juhos's message of "Sun, 25 May 2025 19:05:34 +0200")
Hi Gabor,
On 25/05/2025 at 19:05:34 +02, Gabor Juhos <j4g8y7@gmail.com> wrote:
> The 'spi-qpic-nand' driver may cause memory corruption under some
> circumstances. The first patch in the series changes the driver to
> avoid that, whereas the second adds some sanity checks to the common
> QPIC code in order to make detecting such errors easier in the future.
>
> Signed-off-by: Gabor Juhos <j4g8y7@gmail.com>
> ---
> Gabor Juhos (2):
> spi: spi-qpic-snand: reallocate BAM transactions
> mtd: nand: qpic_common: prevent out of bounds access of BAM
> arrays
Are these two paches related somehow? Or can we apply them in
two different trees? If yes, please send the patches separately, which
eases our work.
Thanks,
Miquèl
______________________________________________________
Linux MTD discussion mailing list
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-05-26 8:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-05-25 17:05 [PATCH 0/2] spi: spi-qpic-snand: avoid memory corruption Gabor Juhos
2025-05-25 17:05 ` Gabor Juhos
2025-05-25 17:05 ` [PATCH 1/2] spi: spi-qpic-snand: reallocate BAM transactions Gabor Juhos
2025-05-25 17:05 ` Gabor Juhos
2025-05-26 5:56 ` Md Sadre Alam
2025-05-26 5:56 ` Md Sadre Alam
2025-05-27 11:28 ` Mark Brown
2025-05-27 11:28 ` Mark Brown
2025-05-27 12:23 ` Gabor Juhos
2025-05-27 12:23 ` Gabor Juhos
2025-05-25 17:05 ` [PATCH 2/2] mtd: nand: qpic_common: prevent out of bounds access of BAM arrays Gabor Juhos
2025-05-25 17:05 ` Gabor Juhos
2025-05-26 6:53 ` Md Sadre Alam
2025-05-26 6:53 ` Md Sadre Alam
2025-05-26 20:01 ` Gabor Juhos
2025-05-26 20:01 ` Gabor Juhos
2025-05-28 6:11 ` Lakshmi Sowjanya D (QUIC)
2025-05-28 6:11 ` Lakshmi Sowjanya D (QUIC)
2025-05-26 9:27 ` Miquel Raynal
2025-05-26 9:27 ` Miquel Raynal
2025-05-26 20:21 ` Gabor Juhos
2025-05-26 20:21 ` Gabor Juhos
2025-05-26 8:13 ` Miquel Raynal [this message]
2025-05-26 8:13 ` [PATCH 0/2] spi: spi-qpic-snand: avoid memory corruption Miquel Raynal
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87r00b23ik.fsf@bootlin.com \
--to=miquel.raynal@bootlin.com \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=j4g8y7@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-spi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=quic_mdalam@quicinc.com \
--cc=quic_srichara@quicinc.com \
--cc=quic_varada@quicinc.com \
--cc=richard@nod.at \
--cc=vigneshr@ti.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.