From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: David Wang <00107082@163.com>,
richard.henderson@linaro.org, linux@armlinux.org.uk,
catalin.marinas@arm.com, will@kernel.org, guoren@kernel.org,
chenhuacai@kernel.org, kernel@xen0n.name,
James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com, deller@gmx.de,
mpe@ellerman.id.au, paul.walmsley@sifive.com,
ysato@users.sourceforge.jp, dalias@libc.org,
glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de, davem@davemloft.net,
andreas@gaisler.com, mingo@redhat.com, bp@alien8.de,
dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, x86@kernel.org, chris@zankel.net,
jcmvbkbc@gmail.com
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-csky@vger.kernel.org,
loongarch@lists.linux.dev, linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org,
David Wang <00107082@163.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kernel/irq/proc: performance: replace seq_printf with seq_put_decimal_ull_width
Date: Fri, 08 Nov 2024 15:25:13 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87r07lol9y.ffs@tglx> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241103080552.4787-1-00107082@163.com>
David!
On Sun, Nov 03 2024 at 16:05, David Wang wrote:
$Subject: [PATCH] kernel/irq/proc: performance: ...
That's not a valid subsystem prefix.
> seq_printf is costy, when stress reading /proc/interrupts, profiling indicates
> seq_printf takes about ~47% of show_interrupts samples:
Also please follow the documentation for denoting functions in change
logs:
https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/maintainer-tip.html#function-references-in-changelogs
> arch/alpha/kernel/irq.c | 8 +--
> arch/arm/kernel/smp.c | 4 +-
> arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c | 3 +-
> arch/csky/kernel/smp.c | 4 +-
> arch/loongarch/kernel/smp.c | 2 +-
> arch/parisc/kernel/irq.c | 34 ++++++------
> arch/powerpc/kernel/irq.c | 44 ++++++++--------
> arch/riscv/kernel/smp.c | 3 +-
> arch/sh/kernel/irq.c | 4 +-
> arch/sparc/kernel/irq_32.c | 12 ++---
> arch/sparc/kernel/irq_64.c | 4 +-
> arch/x86/kernel/irq.c | 100 ++++++++++++++++++------------------
> arch/xtensa/kernel/irq.c | 2 +-
> arch/xtensa/kernel/smp.c | 4 +-
> kernel/irq/proc.c | 6 ++-
There is no dependency on these changes. So please split them up into
seperate patches for core and the individual architectures.
Thanks,
tglx
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: David Wang <00107082@163.com>,
richard.henderson@linaro.org, linux@armlinux.org.uk,
catalin.marinas@arm.com, will@kernel.org, guoren@kernel.org,
chenhuacai@kernel.org, kernel@xen0n.name,
James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com, deller@gmx.de,
mpe@ellerman.id.au, paul.walmsley@sifive.com,
ysato@users.sourceforge.jp, dalias@libc.org,
glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de, davem@davemloft.net,
andreas@gaisler.com, mingo@redhat.com, bp@alien8.de,
dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, x86@kernel.org, chris@zankel.net,
jcmvbkbc@gmail.com
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-csky@vger.kernel.org,
loongarch@lists.linux.dev, linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org,
David Wang <00107082@163.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kernel/irq/proc: performance: replace seq_printf with seq_put_decimal_ull_width
Date: Fri, 08 Nov 2024 15:25:13 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87r07lol9y.ffs@tglx> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241103080552.4787-1-00107082@163.com>
David!
On Sun, Nov 03 2024 at 16:05, David Wang wrote:
$Subject: [PATCH] kernel/irq/proc: performance: ...
That's not a valid subsystem prefix.
> seq_printf is costy, when stress reading /proc/interrupts, profiling indicates
> seq_printf takes about ~47% of show_interrupts samples:
Also please follow the documentation for denoting functions in change
logs:
https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/maintainer-tip.html#function-references-in-changelogs
> arch/alpha/kernel/irq.c | 8 +--
> arch/arm/kernel/smp.c | 4 +-
> arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c | 3 +-
> arch/csky/kernel/smp.c | 4 +-
> arch/loongarch/kernel/smp.c | 2 +-
> arch/parisc/kernel/irq.c | 34 ++++++------
> arch/powerpc/kernel/irq.c | 44 ++++++++--------
> arch/riscv/kernel/smp.c | 3 +-
> arch/sh/kernel/irq.c | 4 +-
> arch/sparc/kernel/irq_32.c | 12 ++---
> arch/sparc/kernel/irq_64.c | 4 +-
> arch/x86/kernel/irq.c | 100 ++++++++++++++++++------------------
> arch/xtensa/kernel/irq.c | 2 +-
> arch/xtensa/kernel/smp.c | 4 +-
> kernel/irq/proc.c | 6 ++-
There is no dependency on these changes. So please split them up into
seperate patches for core and the individual architectures.
Thanks,
tglx
_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-11-08 14:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-11-03 8:05 [PATCH] kernel/irq/proc: performance: replace seq_printf with seq_put_decimal_ull_width David Wang
2024-11-03 8:05 ` David Wang
2024-11-08 14:25 ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2024-11-08 14:25 ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-11-08 15:28 ` David Wang
2024-11-08 15:28 ` David Wang
2024-12-11 22:32 ` patchwork-bot+linux-riscv
2024-12-11 22:32 ` patchwork-bot+linux-riscv
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87r07lol9y.ffs@tglx \
--to=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=00107082@163.com \
--cc=James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com \
--cc=andreas@gaisler.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=chenhuacai@kernel.org \
--cc=chris@zankel.net \
--cc=dalias@libc.org \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=deller@gmx.de \
--cc=glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de \
--cc=guoren@kernel.org \
--cc=jcmvbkbc@gmail.com \
--cc=kernel@xen0n.name \
--cc=linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-csky@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-sh@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=loongarch@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=paul.walmsley@sifive.com \
--cc=richard.henderson@linaro.org \
--cc=sparclinux@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=ysato@users.sourceforge.jp \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.