Re: [PATCH net-next v1 1/6] ethtool: add interface to read Tx hardware timestamping statistics

[Rahul Rameshbabu <rrameshbabu@nvidia.com>]

On Tue, 02 Apr, 2024 19:18:42 -0700 Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org> wrote:
> On Tue,  2 Apr 2024 13:52:01 -0700 Rahul Rameshbabu wrote:
>> +/**
>> + * struct ethtool_ts_stats - HW timestamping statistics
>> + * @tx_stats: struct group for TX HW timestamping
>> + *	@pkts: Number of packets successfully timestamped by the hardware.
>> + *	@lost: Number of hardware timestamping requests where the timestamping
>> + *		information from the hardware never arrived for submission with
>> + *		the skb.
>> + *	@err: Number of arbitrary timestamp generation error events that the
>> + *		hardware encountered, exclusive of @lost statistics. Cases such
>> + *		as resource exhaustion, unavailability, firmware errors, and
>> + *		detected illogical timestamp values not submitted with the skb
>> + *		are inclusive to this counter.
>> + */
>> +struct ethtool_ts_stats {
>> +	struct_group(tx_stats,
>
> Doesn't seem like the group should be documented:
>
> include/linux/ethtool.h:503: warning: Excess struct member 'tx_stats' description in 'ethtool_ts_stats'

Was looking into why our internal verification did not catch this. We
run W=1 with clang, but looks like the warning does not get triggered
unless explicitly run with scripts/kernel-doc.

  https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/doc-guide/kernel-doc.html#how-to-format-kernel-doc-comments

I have debugged using strace that the way the kernel doc checking works
when W=1 is set is that the matching source file that is being compiled
is passed to scripts/kernel-doc, so include files are missed from the
doc check. I think this is worth adding to the kernel documentation.

Anyway, I will send out a v2 with this fixed but wait for potentially
more feedback on v1.

--
Thanks,

Rahul Rameshbabu