All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
To: Athira Rajeev <atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	acme@kernel.org, jolsa@kernel.org, disgoel@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
	maddy@linux.vnet.ibm.com, rnsastry@linux.ibm.com,
	kjain@linux.ibm.com, irogers@google.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 2/2] tools/perf/tests: Fix session topology test to skip the test in guest environment
Date: Fri, 06 May 2022 12:40:38 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87r157tmc9.fsf@mpe.ellerman.id.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220505094000.58220-3-atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

Athira Rajeev <atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com> writes:
> The session topology test fails in powerpc pSeries platform.
> Test logs:
> <<>>
> Session topology : FAILED!
> <<>>
>
> This testcases tests cpu topology by checking the core_id and
> socket_id stored in perf_env from perf session. The data from
> perf session is compared with the cpu topology information
> from "/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpuX/topology" like core_id,
> physical_package_id. In case of virtual environment, detail
> like physical_package_id is restricted to be exposed. Hence
> physical_package_id is set to -1. The testcase fails on such
> platforms since socket_id can't be fetched from topology info.
>
> Skip the testcase in powerpc for pSeries. Use the utility
> function "cpuinfo_field" to check platform from /proc/cpuinfo.

I don't think that's the right way to fix it.

If we ever had a "pseries" machine that did expose physical_package_id
then this test would continue to skip, even when it could succeed.

So if physical_package_id being -1 is the problem then you should skip
the test based on that.

cheers

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
To: Athira Rajeev <atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	acme@kernel.org, jolsa@kernel.org, disgoel@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc: irogers@google.com, maddy@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
	rnsastry@linux.ibm.com, kjain@linux.ibm.com,
	linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 2/2] tools/perf/tests: Fix session topology test to skip the test in guest environment
Date: Fri, 06 May 2022 12:40:38 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87r157tmc9.fsf@mpe.ellerman.id.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220505094000.58220-3-atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

Athira Rajeev <atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com> writes:
> The session topology test fails in powerpc pSeries platform.
> Test logs:
> <<>>
> Session topology : FAILED!
> <<>>
>
> This testcases tests cpu topology by checking the core_id and
> socket_id stored in perf_env from perf session. The data from
> perf session is compared with the cpu topology information
> from "/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpuX/topology" like core_id,
> physical_package_id. In case of virtual environment, detail
> like physical_package_id is restricted to be exposed. Hence
> physical_package_id is set to -1. The testcase fails on such
> platforms since socket_id can't be fetched from topology info.
>
> Skip the testcase in powerpc for pSeries. Use the utility
> function "cpuinfo_field" to check platform from /proc/cpuinfo.

I don't think that's the right way to fix it.

If we ever had a "pseries" machine that did expose physical_package_id
then this test would continue to skip, even when it could succeed.

So if physical_package_id being -1 is the problem then you should skip
the test based on that.

cheers

  reply	other threads:[~2022-05-06  2:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-05-05  9:39 [PATCH V2 0/2] Fix session topology test for powerpc and add utility function to get cpuinfo entries Athira Rajeev
2022-05-05  9:39 ` Athira Rajeev
2022-05-05  9:39 ` [PATCH V2 1/2] tools/perf: Add utility function to read /proc/cpuinfo for any field Athira Rajeev
2022-05-05  9:39   ` Athira Rajeev
2022-05-05 17:24   ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2022-05-05 17:24     ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2022-05-06  9:33     ` Athira Rajeev
2022-05-06  9:33       ` Athira Rajeev
2022-05-10 13:38       ` Athira Rajeev
2022-05-10 17:08         ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2022-05-05  9:40 ` [PATCH V2 2/2] tools/perf/tests: Fix session topology test to skip the test in guest environment Athira Rajeev
2022-05-05  9:40   ` Athira Rajeev
2022-05-06  2:40   ` Michael Ellerman [this message]
2022-05-06  2:40     ` Michael Ellerman
2022-05-05 10:49 ` [PATCH V2 0/2] Fix session topology test for powerpc and add utility function to get cpuinfo entries Disha Goel
2022-05-05 10:52 ` kajoljain
2022-05-05 10:52   ` kajoljain

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87r157tmc9.fsf@mpe.ellerman.id.au \
    --to=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=disgoel@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=irogers@google.com \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=kjain@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=maddy@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=rnsastry@linux.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.