Re: [PATCH v6 1/4] powerpc: Document details on H_SCM_HEALTH hcall

[Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>]

Vaibhav Jain <vaibhav@linux.ibm.com> writes:

> Add documentation to 'papr_hcalls.rst' describing the bitmap flags
> that are returned from H_SCM_HEALTH hcall as per the PAPR-SCM
> specification.
>
> Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
> Cc: "Aneesh Kumar K . V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Vaibhav Jain <vaibhav@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
> Changelog:
>
> v5..v6
> * New patch in the series
> ---
>  Documentation/powerpc/papr_hcalls.rst | 43 ++++++++++++++++++++++++---
>  1 file changed, 39 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/powerpc/papr_hcalls.rst b/Documentation/powerpc/papr_hcalls.rst
> index 3493631a60f8..9a5ba5eaf323 100644
> --- a/Documentation/powerpc/papr_hcalls.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/powerpc/papr_hcalls.rst
> @@ -220,13 +220,48 @@ from the LPAR memory.
>  **H_SCM_HEALTH**
>  
>  | Input: drcIndex
> -| Out: *health-bitmap, health-bit-valid-bitmap*
> +| Out: *health-bitmap (r4), health-bit-valid-bitmap (r5)*
>  | Return Value: *H_Success, H_Parameter, H_Hardware*
>  
>  Given a DRC Index return the info on predictive failure and overall health of
> -the NVDIMM. The asserted bits in the health-bitmap indicate a single predictive
> -failure and health-bit-valid-bitmap indicate which bits in health-bitmap are
> -valid.
> +the NVDIMM. The asserted bits in the health-bitmap indicate one or more states
> +(described in table below) of the NVDIMM and health-bit-valid-bitmap indicate
> +which bits in health-bitmap are valid.
> +
> +Health Bitmap Flags:
> +
> ++------+-----------------------------------------------------------------------+
> +|  Bit |               Definition                                              |
> ++======+=======================================================================+
> +|  00  | SCM device is unable to persist memory contents.                      |
> +|      | If the system is powered down, nothing will be saved.                 |
> ++------+-----------------------------------------------------------------------+

Are these correct bit numbers or backward IBM big endian bit numbers?

ie. which bit is LSB?

cheers
_______________________________________________
Linux-nvdimm mailing list -- linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org
To unsubscribe send an email to linux-nvdimm-leave@lists.01.org