From: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] hugetlb_cgroup: use lockdep_assert_held rather than spin_is_locked
Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2014 21:13:39 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87r40l67dg.fsf@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1407849830-22500-1-git-send-email-mhocko@suse.cz>
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz> writes:
> spin_lock may be an empty struct for !SMP configurations and so
> arch_spin_is_locked may return unconditional 0 and trigger the VM_BUG_ON
> even when the lock is held.
>
> Replace spin_is_locked by lockdep_assert_held. We will not BUG anymore
> but it is questionable whether crashing makes a lot of sense in the
> uncharge path. Uncharge happens after the last page reference was
> released so nobody should touch the page and the function doesn't update
> any shared state except for res counter which uses synchronization of
> its own.
We do update the hugepage's hugetlb cgroup details. But as you mentioned,
this should not be an issue because we are in hugepage free.
Reviewed-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>
> Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>
> ---
> mm/hugetlb_cgroup.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/hugetlb_cgroup.c b/mm/hugetlb_cgroup.c
> index 9aae6f47433f..9edf189a5ef3 100644
> --- a/mm/hugetlb_cgroup.c
> +++ b/mm/hugetlb_cgroup.c
> @@ -217,7 +217,7 @@ void hugetlb_cgroup_uncharge_page(int idx, unsigned long nr_pages,
>
> if (hugetlb_cgroup_disabled())
> return;
> - VM_BUG_ON(!spin_is_locked(&hugetlb_lock));
> + lockdep_assert_held(&hugetlb_lock);
> h_cg = hugetlb_cgroup_from_page(page);
> if (unlikely(!h_cg))
> return;
> --
> 2.1.0.rc1
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] hugetlb_cgroup: use lockdep_assert_held rather than spin_is_locked
Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2014 21:13:39 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87r40l67dg.fsf@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1407849830-22500-1-git-send-email-mhocko@suse.cz>
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz> writes:
> spin_lock may be an empty struct for !SMP configurations and so
> arch_spin_is_locked may return unconditional 0 and trigger the VM_BUG_ON
> even when the lock is held.
>
> Replace spin_is_locked by lockdep_assert_held. We will not BUG anymore
> but it is questionable whether crashing makes a lot of sense in the
> uncharge path. Uncharge happens after the last page reference was
> released so nobody should touch the page and the function doesn't update
> any shared state except for res counter which uses synchronization of
> its own.
We do update the hugepage's hugetlb cgroup details. But as you mentioned,
this should not be an issue because we are in hugepage free.
Reviewed-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>
> Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>
> ---
> mm/hugetlb_cgroup.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/hugetlb_cgroup.c b/mm/hugetlb_cgroup.c
> index 9aae6f47433f..9edf189a5ef3 100644
> --- a/mm/hugetlb_cgroup.c
> +++ b/mm/hugetlb_cgroup.c
> @@ -217,7 +217,7 @@ void hugetlb_cgroup_uncharge_page(int idx, unsigned long nr_pages,
>
> if (hugetlb_cgroup_disabled())
> return;
> - VM_BUG_ON(!spin_is_locked(&hugetlb_lock));
> + lockdep_assert_held(&hugetlb_lock);
> h_cg = hugetlb_cgroup_from_page(page);
> if (unlikely(!h_cg))
> return;
> --
> 2.1.0.rc1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-08-12 15:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-08-12 13:23 [PATCH] hugetlb_cgroup: use lockdep_assert_held rather than spin_is_locked Michal Hocko
2014-08-12 13:23 ` Michal Hocko
2014-08-12 15:43 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V [this message]
2014-08-12 15:43 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87r40l67dg.fsf@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.