All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>
To: Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com>, grinberg@compulab.co.il
Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: OMAP baseline test results for v3.7-rc2
Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2012 18:04:16 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87r4oqc833.fsf@deeprootsystems.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1210202125300.774@utopia.booyaka.com> (Paul Walmsley's message of "Sat, 20 Oct 2012 21:26:32 +0000 (UTC)")

+Igor

Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com> writes:

> Here are some basic OMAP test results for Linux v3.7-rc2.
> Logs and other details at:
>
>     http://www.pwsan.com/omap/testlogs/test_v3.7-rc2/20121020134755/

[...]

> * 37xx EVM: CORE not entering dynamic off-idle
>   - Cause unknown; dynamic retention-idle seems to work; system suspend to 
>     off works

I got a start on this one, and discovered (using CM_IDLEST1_CORE) that
SPI1 was not idle when going off.  A quick hack disabling the
touchscreen showed that after that, core was hitting idle just fine.

I ran out of time today debugging this, but it's definitely realted to
the GPIO debounce setting for the touchscreen.  Changing it to zero[1]
makes CORE hit retention again in idle.

Igor, I'm hoping you might know what's going on here since we already
had some problems with this ads7846 init stuff and you're more familiar
with this debounce init.

Kevin

[1]
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-omap3evm.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-omap3evm.c
index b9b776b..3afdc50 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-omap3evm.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-omap3evm.c
@@ -734,7 +734,7 @@ static void __init omap3_evm_init(void)
 	omap_nand_flash_init(NAND_BUSWIDTH_16, omap3evm_nand_partitions,
 			     ARRAY_SIZE(omap3evm_nand_partitions));
 
-	omap_ads7846_init(1, OMAP3_EVM_TS_GPIO, 310, NULL);
+	omap_ads7846_init(1, OMAP3_EVM_TS_GPIO, 0, NULL);
 	omap3evm_init_smsc911x();
 	omap3_evm_display_init();
 	omap3_evm_wl12xx_init();

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: khilman@deeprootsystems.com (Kevin Hilman)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: OMAP baseline test results for v3.7-rc2
Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2012 18:04:16 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87r4oqc833.fsf@deeprootsystems.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1210202125300.774@utopia.booyaka.com> (Paul Walmsley's message of "Sat, 20 Oct 2012 21:26:32 +0000 (UTC)")

+Igor

Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com> writes:

> Here are some basic OMAP test results for Linux v3.7-rc2.
> Logs and other details at:
>
>     http://www.pwsan.com/omap/testlogs/test_v3.7-rc2/20121020134755/

[...]

> * 37xx EVM: CORE not entering dynamic off-idle
>   - Cause unknown; dynamic retention-idle seems to work; system suspend to 
>     off works

I got a start on this one, and discovered (using CM_IDLEST1_CORE) that
SPI1 was not idle when going off.  A quick hack disabling the
touchscreen showed that after that, core was hitting idle just fine.

I ran out of time today debugging this, but it's definitely realted to
the GPIO debounce setting for the touchscreen.  Changing it to zero[1]
makes CORE hit retention again in idle.

Igor, I'm hoping you might know what's going on here since we already
had some problems with this ads7846 init stuff and you're more familiar
with this debounce init.

Kevin

[1]
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-omap3evm.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-omap3evm.c
index b9b776b..3afdc50 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-omap3evm.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-omap3evm.c
@@ -734,7 +734,7 @@ static void __init omap3_evm_init(void)
 	omap_nand_flash_init(NAND_BUSWIDTH_16, omap3evm_nand_partitions,
 			     ARRAY_SIZE(omap3evm_nand_partitions));
 
-	omap_ads7846_init(1, OMAP3_EVM_TS_GPIO, 310, NULL);
+	omap_ads7846_init(1, OMAP3_EVM_TS_GPIO, 0, NULL);
 	omap3evm_init_smsc911x();
 	omap3_evm_display_init();
 	omap3_evm_wl12xx_init();

  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-10-23  1:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-10-20 21:26 OMAP baseline test results for v3.7-rc2 Paul Walmsley
2012-10-20 21:26 ` Paul Walmsley
2012-10-21 17:06 ` Paul Walmsley
2012-10-21 17:06   ` Paul Walmsley
2012-10-22 16:10 ` Jon Hunter
2012-10-22 16:10   ` Jon Hunter
2012-10-22 17:17   ` Paul Walmsley
2012-10-22 17:17     ` Paul Walmsley
2012-10-22 17:18     ` Paul Walmsley
2012-10-22 17:18       ` Paul Walmsley
2012-10-22 16:28 ` Jon Hunter
2012-10-22 16:28   ` Jon Hunter
2012-10-22 16:38   ` Tony Lindgren
2012-10-22 16:38     ` Tony Lindgren
2012-10-23 19:34     ` Paul Walmsley
2012-10-23 19:34       ` Paul Walmsley
2012-10-22 18:35   ` Paul Walmsley
2012-10-22 18:35     ` Paul Walmsley
2012-10-22 18:36     ` Paul Walmsley
2012-10-22 18:36       ` Paul Walmsley
2012-10-22 18:50       ` Jon Hunter
2012-10-22 18:50         ` Jon Hunter
2012-10-22 18:48     ` Jon Hunter
2012-10-22 18:48       ` Jon Hunter
2012-10-23  1:53       ` Matt Porter
2012-10-23  1:53         ` Matt Porter
2012-10-23  3:15         ` Paul Walmsley
2012-10-23  3:15           ` Paul Walmsley
2012-10-23  4:57           ` Paul Walmsley
2012-10-23  4:57             ` Paul Walmsley
2012-10-23 12:24           ` Matt Porter
2012-10-23 12:24             ` Matt Porter
2012-10-23 13:11             ` Matt Porter
2012-10-23 13:11               ` Matt Porter
2012-10-23 21:03               ` Kevin Hilman
2012-10-23 21:03                 ` Kevin Hilman
2012-10-23 21:11                 ` Matt Porter
2012-10-23 21:11                   ` Matt Porter
2012-10-25 14:14                   ` Kevin Hilman
2012-10-25 14:14                     ` Kevin Hilman
2012-10-23  1:04 ` Kevin Hilman [this message]
2012-10-23  1:04   ` Kevin Hilman
2012-10-23 18:19   ` Kevin Hilman
2012-10-23 18:19     ` Kevin Hilman
2012-10-24  9:01     ` Igor Grinberg
2012-10-24  9:01       ` Igor Grinberg

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87r4oqc833.fsf@deeprootsystems.com \
    --to=khilman@deeprootsystems.com \
    --cc=grinberg@compulab.co.il \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=paul@pwsan.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.