From: Nix <nix@esperi.org.uk>
To: "Wyborny\, Carolyn" <carolyn.wyborny@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Boot <bootc@bootc.net>,
"e1000-devel\@lists.sourceforge.net"
<e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>,
netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [E1000-devel] e1000e interface hang on 82574L
Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2012 16:19:32 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87r4wova0b.fsf@spindle.srvr.nix> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9BBC4E0CF881AA4299206E2E1412B6260E512E0C@ORSMSX102.amr.corp.intel.com> (Carolyn Wyborny's message of "Mon, 19 Mar 2012 14:59:41 +0000")
On 19 Mar 2012, Carolyn Wyborny stated:
> So, at least we are clear in your situation, the ASPM needs to be
> disabled. Please let me know if there are continued problems after
> booting with pcie_aspm=off.
If you look further down in
<http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=3170405&group_id=42302&atid=447449>
you'll see that I tested that, and it doesn't work :( even if it did
work, it shouldn't be needed: the driver attempts to turn off PCIe ASPM
on affected NICs, and fails, apparently because *something* turns it
back on again.
--
NULL && (void)
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Nix <nix@esperi.org.uk>
To: "Wyborny\, Carolyn" <carolyn.wyborny@intel.com>
Cc: "e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net"
<e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>,
netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>, Chris Boot <bootc@bootc.net>,
lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: e1000e interface hang on 82574L
Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2012 16:19:32 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87r4wova0b.fsf@spindle.srvr.nix> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9BBC4E0CF881AA4299206E2E1412B6260E512E0C@ORSMSX102.amr.corp.intel.com> (Carolyn Wyborny's message of "Mon, 19 Mar 2012 14:59:41 +0000")
On 19 Mar 2012, Carolyn Wyborny stated:
> So, at least we are clear in your situation, the ASPM needs to be
> disabled. Please let me know if there are continued problems after
> booting with pcie_aspm=off.
If you look further down in
<http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=3170405&group_id=42302&atid=447449>
you'll see that I tested that, and it doesn't work :( even if it did
work, it shouldn't be needed: the driver attempts to turn off PCIe ASPM
on affected NICs, and fails, apparently because *something* turns it
back on again.
--
NULL && (void)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF email is sponsosred by:
Try Windows Azure free for 90 days Click Here
http://p.sf.net/sfu/sfd2d-msazure
_______________________________________________
E1000-devel mailing list
E1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/e1000-devel
To learn more about Intel® Ethernet, visit http://communities.intel.com/community/wired
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-03-19 16:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-12-27 22:01 e1000e interface hang on 82574L Chris Boot
2011-12-27 22:33 ` Dave Taht
2011-12-31 9:31 ` Chris Boot
2011-12-31 9:31 ` Chris Boot
2012-01-03 0:02 ` Wyborny, Carolyn
2012-01-04 17:12 ` Chris Boot
2012-01-04 17:12 ` Chris Boot
2012-01-15 11:10 ` Chris Boot
2012-01-16 15:56 ` Wyborny, Carolyn
2012-01-16 15:56 ` Wyborny, Carolyn
2012-01-16 16:04 ` Chris Boot
2012-03-17 15:59 ` Chris Boot
2012-03-17 17:54 ` Chris Boot
2012-03-17 17:54 ` Chris Boot
2012-03-17 23:50 ` [E1000-devel] " Nix
2012-03-17 23:50 ` Nix
2012-03-19 14:59 ` Wyborny, Carolyn
2012-03-19 14:59 ` Wyborny, Carolyn
2012-03-19 16:19 ` Nix [this message]
2012-03-19 16:19 ` Nix
2012-03-19 16:29 ` [E1000-devel] " Wyborny, Carolyn
2012-03-19 17:31 ` Nix
2012-04-06 10:17 ` Chris Boot
2012-04-06 12:12 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2012-04-06 13:41 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2012-04-06 13:41 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2012-04-06 13:48 ` [E1000-devel] " Chris Boot
2012-04-06 13:48 ` Chris Boot
2012-04-06 16:05 ` [E1000-devel] " Nix
2012-04-06 16:05 ` Nix
2012-04-06 16:04 ` [E1000-devel] " Nix
2012-04-06 16:04 ` Nix
2012-04-23 21:29 ` [PATCH RFC 0/2] e1000e: 82574 also needs ASPM L1 completely disabled Chris Boot
2012-04-23 21:29 ` [PATCH 1/2] e1000e: Disable ASPM L1 on 82574 Chris Boot
2012-04-23 23:18 ` [E1000-devel] " Jeff Kirsher
2012-04-23 23:18 ` Jeff Kirsher
2012-04-24 11:08 ` Nix
2012-04-24 11:08 ` Nix
2012-06-01 21:17 ` Chris Boot
2012-06-01 21:17 ` Chris Boot
2012-06-07 1:41 ` Greg KH
2012-04-23 21:29 ` [PATCH 2/2] e1000e: Remove special case for 82573/82574 ASPM L1 disablement Chris Boot
2012-04-23 21:29 ` Chris Boot
2012-04-23 23:18 ` [E1000-devel] " Jeff Kirsher
2012-04-23 23:18 ` Jeff Kirsher
2012-04-23 23:11 ` [PATCH RFC 0/2] e1000e: 82574 also needs ASPM L1 completely disabled Jesse Brandeburg
2012-04-23 23:11 ` Jesse Brandeburg
2012-04-29 16:45 ` Nix
2012-04-29 16:45 ` Nix
2012-04-29 18:03 ` Chris Boot
2012-04-29 18:03 ` Chris Boot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87r4wova0b.fsf@spindle.srvr.nix \
--to=nix@esperi.org.uk \
--cc=bootc@bootc.net \
--cc=carolyn.wyborny@intel.com \
--cc=e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.