From: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
To: Shirley Ma <mashirle@us.ibm.com>, "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Cc: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.hengli.com.au>,
davem@davemloft.net, kvm@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] virtio_net: remove send completion interrupts and avoid TX queue overrun through packet drop
Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2011 11:00:53 +1030 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87r59xbbr6.fsf@rustcorp.com.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1300847204.3441.26.camel@localhost.localdomain>
> With simply removing the notify here, it does help the case when TX
> overrun hits too often, for example for 1K message size, the single
> TCP_STREAM performance improved from 2.xGb/s to 4.xGb/s.
OK, we'll be getting rid of the "kick on full", so please delete that on
all benchmarks.
Now, does the capacity check before add_buf() still win anything? I
can't see how unless we have some weird bug.
Once we've sorted that out, we should look at the more radical change
of publishing last_used and using that to intuit whether interrupts
should be sent. If we're not careful with ordering and barriers that
could introduce more bugs.
Anything else on the optimization agenda I've missed?
Thanks,
Rusty.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-03-24 0:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-03-17 0:12 [PATCH 2/2] virtio_net: remove send completion interrupts and avoid TX queue overrun through packet drop Shirley Ma
2011-03-17 5:02 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-03-17 15:18 ` Shirley Ma
2011-03-18 3:28 ` Shirley Ma
2011-03-18 13:15 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-03-18 16:54 ` Shirley Ma
2011-03-17 5:10 ` Rusty Russell
2011-03-17 15:10 ` Shirley Ma
2011-03-18 13:33 ` Herbert Xu
2011-03-19 1:41 ` Shirley Ma
2011-03-21 18:03 ` Shirley Ma
2011-03-22 11:36 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-03-23 2:26 ` Shirley Ma
2011-03-24 0:30 ` Rusty Russell [this message]
2011-03-24 4:14 ` Shirley Ma
2011-03-24 14:28 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-03-24 17:46 ` Shirley Ma
2011-03-24 18:10 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-03-25 4:51 ` Rusty Russell
2011-03-25 4:50 ` Rusty Russell
2011-03-27 7:52 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-04-04 6:13 ` Rusty Russell
2011-03-24 0:16 ` Rusty Russell
2011-03-24 6:39 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87r59xbbr6.fsf@rustcorp.com.au \
--to=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=herbert@gondor.hengli.com.au \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mashirle@us.ibm.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.