Re: [PATCH 0/6] Hello,

From: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
To: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@linaro.org>
Cc: Pratyush Yadav <pratyush@kernel.org>,
	 Michael Walle <mwalle@kernel.org>,
	 Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
	 Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com>,
	 Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>,
	 Steam Lin <STLin2@winbond.com>,
	linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org,  linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	stable@vger.kernel.org,  Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@linux.dev>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] Hello,
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2025 10:35:41 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87seej7fv6.fsf@bootlin.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c67466c0-c133-4fac-82d5-b412693f9d30@linaro.org> (Tudor Ambarus's message of "Mon, 10 Nov 2025 08:54:24 +0200")

On 10/11/2025 at 08:54:24 +02, Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@linaro.org> wrote:

> Hi, Miquel,
>
> On 11/5/25 7:26 PM, Miquel Raynal wrote:
>> Here is a series adding support for 6 Winbond SPI NOR chips. Describing
>> these chips is needed otherwise the block protection feature is not
>> available. Everything else looks fine otherwise.
>
> I'm glad to see this, you're an locking expert now :). Do you care to
> extend the SPI NOR testing requirements [1] with steps on how to test the
> locking? There's some testing proposed at [2], would you please check and
> review it?

Good idea. Let me have a loot at what Sean proposed.

> [1] https://docs.kernel.org/driver-api/mtd/spi-nor.html#minimum-testing-requirements
> [2] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/92e99a96-5582-48a5-a4f9-e9b33fcff171@linux.dev/

Thanks,
Miquèl

______________________________________________________
Linux MTD discussion mailing list
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/