All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Dixit, Ashutosh" <ashutosh.dixit@intel.com>
To: Vinay Belgaumkar <vinay.belgaumkar@intel.com>
Cc: igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [igt-dev] [PATCH v3 i-g-t] tests/i915_pm_freq_api: Add a suspend subtest
Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2023 10:33:36 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87sfajs8pb.wl-ashutosh.dixit@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230616155048.1013239-1-vinay.belgaumkar@intel.com>

On Fri, 16 Jun 2023 08:50:48 -0700, Vinay Belgaumkar wrote:
>
> Verify that SLPC API works as expected after a suspend. Added
> another subtest that does multiple GT resets and checks freq api
> works as expected after each one.
>
> We now check requested frequency instead of soft min/max after a
> reset or suspend. That ensures the soft limits got applied
> correctly at init. Also, disable efficient freq before starting the
> test which allows current freq to be consistent with SLPC min freq.
>

Reviewed-by: Ashutosh Dixit <ashutosh.dixit@intel.com>

> v2: Restore freq in exit handler (Ashutosh)
> v3: Free the allocated stash arrays
>
> Signed-off-by: Vinay Belgaumkar <vinay.belgaumkar@intel.com>
> ---
>  tests/i915/i915_pm_freq_api.c | 92 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
>  1 file changed, 71 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tests/i915/i915_pm_freq_api.c b/tests/i915/i915_pm_freq_api.c
> index 9005cd220..522abee35 100644
> --- a/tests/i915/i915_pm_freq_api.c
> +++ b/tests/i915/i915_pm_freq_api.c
> @@ -18,6 +18,12 @@
>   *
>   * SUBTEST: freq-reset
>   * Description: Test basic freq API works after a reset
> + *
> + * SUBTEST: freq-reset-multiple
> + * Description: Test basic freq API works after multiple resets
> + *
> + * SUBTEST: freq-suspend
> + * Description: Test basic freq API works after a runtime suspend
>   */
>
>  IGT_TEST_DESCRIPTION("Test SLPC freq API");
> @@ -49,7 +55,6 @@ static void test_freq_basic_api(int dirfd, int gt)
>	rpn = get_freq(dirfd, RPS_RPn_FREQ_MHZ);
>	rp0 = get_freq(dirfd, RPS_RP0_FREQ_MHZ);
>	rpe = get_freq(dirfd, RPS_RP1_FREQ_MHZ);
> -	igt_info("System min freq: %dMHz; max freq: %dMHz\n", rpn, rp0);
>
>	/*
>	 * Negative bound tests
> @@ -79,31 +84,66 @@ static void test_freq_basic_api(int dirfd, int gt)
>
>  }
>
> -static void test_reset(int i915, int dirfd, int gt)
> +static void test_reset(int i915, int dirfd, int gt, int count)
>  {
>	uint32_t rpn = get_freq(dirfd, RPS_RPn_FREQ_MHZ);
>	int fd;
>
> +	for (int i = 0; i < count; i++) {
> +		igt_assert_f(set_freq(dirfd, RPS_MIN_FREQ_MHZ, rpn) > 0,
> +			     "Failed after %d good cycles\n", i);
> +		igt_assert_f(set_freq(dirfd, RPS_MAX_FREQ_MHZ, rpn) > 0,
> +			     "Failed after %d good cycles\n", i);
> +		usleep(ACT_FREQ_LATENCY_US);
> +		igt_assert_f(get_freq(dirfd, RPS_CUR_FREQ_MHZ) == rpn,
> +			     "Failed after %d good cycles\n", i);
> +
> +		/* Manually trigger a GT reset */
> +		fd = igt_debugfs_gt_open(i915, gt, "reset", O_WRONLY);
> +		igt_require(fd >= 0);
> +		igt_ignore_warn(write(fd, "1\n", 2));
> +
> +		igt_assert_f(get_freq(dirfd, RPS_CUR_FREQ_MHZ) == rpn,
> +			     "Failed after %d good cycles\n", i);
> +	}
> +	close(fd);
> +}
> +
> +static void test_suspend(int i915, int dirfd, int gt)
> +{
> +	uint32_t rpn = get_freq(dirfd, RPS_RPn_FREQ_MHZ);
> +
>	igt_assert(set_freq(dirfd, RPS_MIN_FREQ_MHZ, rpn) > 0);
>	igt_assert(set_freq(dirfd, RPS_MAX_FREQ_MHZ, rpn) > 0);
>	usleep(ACT_FREQ_LATENCY_US);
> -	igt_assert(get_freq(dirfd, RPS_MIN_FREQ_MHZ) == rpn);
> +	igt_assert(get_freq(dirfd, RPS_CUR_FREQ_MHZ) == rpn);
>
> -	/* Manually trigger a GT reset */
> -	fd = igt_debugfs_gt_open(i915, gt, "reset", O_WRONLY);
> -	igt_require(fd >= 0);
> -	igt_ignore_warn(write(fd, "1\n", 2));
> -	close(fd);
> +	/* Manually trigger a suspend */
> +	igt_system_suspend_autoresume(SUSPEND_STATE_S3,
> +				      SUSPEND_TEST_NONE);
>
> -	igt_assert(get_freq(dirfd, RPS_MIN_FREQ_MHZ) == rpn);
> -	igt_assert(get_freq(dirfd, RPS_MAX_FREQ_MHZ) == rpn);
> +	igt_assert(get_freq(dirfd, RPS_CUR_FREQ_MHZ) == rpn);
>  }
>
> -igt_main
> +int i915 = -1;
> +uint32_t *stash_min, *stash_max;
> +
> +static void restore_sysfs_freq(int sig)
>  {
> -	int i915 = -1;
> -	uint32_t *stash_min, *stash_max;
> +	int dirfd, gt;
> +	/* Restore frequencies */
> +	for_each_sysfs_gt_dirfd(i915, dirfd, gt) {
> +		igt_pm_ignore_slpc_efficient_freq(i915, dirfd, false);
> +		igt_assert(set_freq(dirfd, RPS_MAX_FREQ_MHZ, stash_max[gt]) > 0);
> +		igt_assert(set_freq(dirfd, RPS_MIN_FREQ_MHZ, stash_min[gt]) > 0);
> +	}
> +	free(stash_min);
> +	free(stash_max);
> +	close(i915);
> +}
>
> +igt_main
> +{
>	igt_fixture {
>		int num_gts, dirfd, gt;
>
> @@ -122,7 +162,9 @@ igt_main
>		for_each_sysfs_gt_dirfd(i915, dirfd, gt) {
>			stash_min[gt] = get_freq(dirfd, RPS_MIN_FREQ_MHZ);
>			stash_max[gt] = get_freq(dirfd, RPS_MAX_FREQ_MHZ);
> +			igt_pm_ignore_slpc_efficient_freq(i915, dirfd, true);
>		}
> +		igt_install_exit_handler(restore_sysfs_freq);
>	}
>
>	igt_describe("Test basic API for controlling min/max GT frequency");
> @@ -140,16 +182,24 @@ igt_main
>
>		for_each_sysfs_gt_dirfd(i915, dirfd, gt)
>			igt_dynamic_f("gt%u", gt)
> -				test_reset(i915, dirfd, gt);
> +				test_reset(i915, dirfd, gt, 1);
>	}
>
> -	igt_fixture {
> +	igt_describe("Test basic freq API works after multiple resets");
> +	igt_subtest_with_dynamic_f("freq-reset-multiple") {
>		int dirfd, gt;
> -		/* Restore frequencies */
> -		for_each_sysfs_gt_dirfd(i915, dirfd, gt) {
> -			igt_assert(set_freq(dirfd, RPS_MAX_FREQ_MHZ, stash_max[gt]) > 0);
> -			igt_assert(set_freq(dirfd, RPS_MIN_FREQ_MHZ, stash_min[gt]) > 0);
> -		}
> -		close(i915);
> +
> +		for_each_sysfs_gt_dirfd(i915, dirfd, gt)
> +			igt_dynamic_f("gt%u", gt)
> +				test_reset(i915, dirfd, gt, 50);
> +	}
> +
> +	igt_describe("Test basic freq API works after suspend");
> +	igt_subtest_with_dynamic_f("freq-suspend") {
> +		int dirfd, gt;
> +
> +		for_each_sysfs_gt_dirfd(i915, dirfd, gt)
> +			igt_dynamic_f("gt%u", gt)
> +				test_suspend(i915, dirfd, gt);
>	}
>  }
> --
> 2.38.1
>

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Dixit, Ashutosh" <ashutosh.dixit@intel.com>
To: Vinay Belgaumkar <vinay.belgaumkar@intel.com>
Cc: igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [igt-dev] [PATCH v3 i-g-t] tests/i915_pm_freq_api: Add a suspend subtest
Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2023 10:33:36 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87sfajs8pb.wl-ashutosh.dixit@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230616155048.1013239-1-vinay.belgaumkar@intel.com>

On Fri, 16 Jun 2023 08:50:48 -0700, Vinay Belgaumkar wrote:
>
> Verify that SLPC API works as expected after a suspend. Added
> another subtest that does multiple GT resets and checks freq api
> works as expected after each one.
>
> We now check requested frequency instead of soft min/max after a
> reset or suspend. That ensures the soft limits got applied
> correctly at init. Also, disable efficient freq before starting the
> test which allows current freq to be consistent with SLPC min freq.
>

Reviewed-by: Ashutosh Dixit <ashutosh.dixit@intel.com>

> v2: Restore freq in exit handler (Ashutosh)
> v3: Free the allocated stash arrays
>
> Signed-off-by: Vinay Belgaumkar <vinay.belgaumkar@intel.com>
> ---
>  tests/i915/i915_pm_freq_api.c | 92 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
>  1 file changed, 71 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tests/i915/i915_pm_freq_api.c b/tests/i915/i915_pm_freq_api.c
> index 9005cd220..522abee35 100644
> --- a/tests/i915/i915_pm_freq_api.c
> +++ b/tests/i915/i915_pm_freq_api.c
> @@ -18,6 +18,12 @@
>   *
>   * SUBTEST: freq-reset
>   * Description: Test basic freq API works after a reset
> + *
> + * SUBTEST: freq-reset-multiple
> + * Description: Test basic freq API works after multiple resets
> + *
> + * SUBTEST: freq-suspend
> + * Description: Test basic freq API works after a runtime suspend
>   */
>
>  IGT_TEST_DESCRIPTION("Test SLPC freq API");
> @@ -49,7 +55,6 @@ static void test_freq_basic_api(int dirfd, int gt)
>	rpn = get_freq(dirfd, RPS_RPn_FREQ_MHZ);
>	rp0 = get_freq(dirfd, RPS_RP0_FREQ_MHZ);
>	rpe = get_freq(dirfd, RPS_RP1_FREQ_MHZ);
> -	igt_info("System min freq: %dMHz; max freq: %dMHz\n", rpn, rp0);
>
>	/*
>	 * Negative bound tests
> @@ -79,31 +84,66 @@ static void test_freq_basic_api(int dirfd, int gt)
>
>  }
>
> -static void test_reset(int i915, int dirfd, int gt)
> +static void test_reset(int i915, int dirfd, int gt, int count)
>  {
>	uint32_t rpn = get_freq(dirfd, RPS_RPn_FREQ_MHZ);
>	int fd;
>
> +	for (int i = 0; i < count; i++) {
> +		igt_assert_f(set_freq(dirfd, RPS_MIN_FREQ_MHZ, rpn) > 0,
> +			     "Failed after %d good cycles\n", i);
> +		igt_assert_f(set_freq(dirfd, RPS_MAX_FREQ_MHZ, rpn) > 0,
> +			     "Failed after %d good cycles\n", i);
> +		usleep(ACT_FREQ_LATENCY_US);
> +		igt_assert_f(get_freq(dirfd, RPS_CUR_FREQ_MHZ) == rpn,
> +			     "Failed after %d good cycles\n", i);
> +
> +		/* Manually trigger a GT reset */
> +		fd = igt_debugfs_gt_open(i915, gt, "reset", O_WRONLY);
> +		igt_require(fd >= 0);
> +		igt_ignore_warn(write(fd, "1\n", 2));
> +
> +		igt_assert_f(get_freq(dirfd, RPS_CUR_FREQ_MHZ) == rpn,
> +			     "Failed after %d good cycles\n", i);
> +	}
> +	close(fd);
> +}
> +
> +static void test_suspend(int i915, int dirfd, int gt)
> +{
> +	uint32_t rpn = get_freq(dirfd, RPS_RPn_FREQ_MHZ);
> +
>	igt_assert(set_freq(dirfd, RPS_MIN_FREQ_MHZ, rpn) > 0);
>	igt_assert(set_freq(dirfd, RPS_MAX_FREQ_MHZ, rpn) > 0);
>	usleep(ACT_FREQ_LATENCY_US);
> -	igt_assert(get_freq(dirfd, RPS_MIN_FREQ_MHZ) == rpn);
> +	igt_assert(get_freq(dirfd, RPS_CUR_FREQ_MHZ) == rpn);
>
> -	/* Manually trigger a GT reset */
> -	fd = igt_debugfs_gt_open(i915, gt, "reset", O_WRONLY);
> -	igt_require(fd >= 0);
> -	igt_ignore_warn(write(fd, "1\n", 2));
> -	close(fd);
> +	/* Manually trigger a suspend */
> +	igt_system_suspend_autoresume(SUSPEND_STATE_S3,
> +				      SUSPEND_TEST_NONE);
>
> -	igt_assert(get_freq(dirfd, RPS_MIN_FREQ_MHZ) == rpn);
> -	igt_assert(get_freq(dirfd, RPS_MAX_FREQ_MHZ) == rpn);
> +	igt_assert(get_freq(dirfd, RPS_CUR_FREQ_MHZ) == rpn);
>  }
>
> -igt_main
> +int i915 = -1;
> +uint32_t *stash_min, *stash_max;
> +
> +static void restore_sysfs_freq(int sig)
>  {
> -	int i915 = -1;
> -	uint32_t *stash_min, *stash_max;
> +	int dirfd, gt;
> +	/* Restore frequencies */
> +	for_each_sysfs_gt_dirfd(i915, dirfd, gt) {
> +		igt_pm_ignore_slpc_efficient_freq(i915, dirfd, false);
> +		igt_assert(set_freq(dirfd, RPS_MAX_FREQ_MHZ, stash_max[gt]) > 0);
> +		igt_assert(set_freq(dirfd, RPS_MIN_FREQ_MHZ, stash_min[gt]) > 0);
> +	}
> +	free(stash_min);
> +	free(stash_max);
> +	close(i915);
> +}
>
> +igt_main
> +{
>	igt_fixture {
>		int num_gts, dirfd, gt;
>
> @@ -122,7 +162,9 @@ igt_main
>		for_each_sysfs_gt_dirfd(i915, dirfd, gt) {
>			stash_min[gt] = get_freq(dirfd, RPS_MIN_FREQ_MHZ);
>			stash_max[gt] = get_freq(dirfd, RPS_MAX_FREQ_MHZ);
> +			igt_pm_ignore_slpc_efficient_freq(i915, dirfd, true);
>		}
> +		igt_install_exit_handler(restore_sysfs_freq);
>	}
>
>	igt_describe("Test basic API for controlling min/max GT frequency");
> @@ -140,16 +182,24 @@ igt_main
>
>		for_each_sysfs_gt_dirfd(i915, dirfd, gt)
>			igt_dynamic_f("gt%u", gt)
> -				test_reset(i915, dirfd, gt);
> +				test_reset(i915, dirfd, gt, 1);
>	}
>
> -	igt_fixture {
> +	igt_describe("Test basic freq API works after multiple resets");
> +	igt_subtest_with_dynamic_f("freq-reset-multiple") {
>		int dirfd, gt;
> -		/* Restore frequencies */
> -		for_each_sysfs_gt_dirfd(i915, dirfd, gt) {
> -			igt_assert(set_freq(dirfd, RPS_MAX_FREQ_MHZ, stash_max[gt]) > 0);
> -			igt_assert(set_freq(dirfd, RPS_MIN_FREQ_MHZ, stash_min[gt]) > 0);
> -		}
> -		close(i915);
> +
> +		for_each_sysfs_gt_dirfd(i915, dirfd, gt)
> +			igt_dynamic_f("gt%u", gt)
> +				test_reset(i915, dirfd, gt, 50);
> +	}
> +
> +	igt_describe("Test basic freq API works after suspend");
> +	igt_subtest_with_dynamic_f("freq-suspend") {
> +		int dirfd, gt;
> +
> +		for_each_sysfs_gt_dirfd(i915, dirfd, gt)
> +			igt_dynamic_f("gt%u", gt)
> +				test_suspend(i915, dirfd, gt);
>	}
>  }
> --
> 2.38.1
>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-06-22 17:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-06-16 15:50 [igt-dev] [PATCH v3 i-g-t] tests/i915_pm_freq_api: Add a suspend subtest Vinay Belgaumkar
2023-06-16 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] " Vinay Belgaumkar
2023-06-17  5:40 ` [igt-dev] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for tests/i915_pm_freq_api: Add a suspend subtest (rev3) Patchwork
2023-06-17  8:49 ` [igt-dev] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
2023-06-22  2:09 ` [igt-dev] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for tests/i915_pm_freq_api: Add a suspend subtest (rev4) Patchwork
2023-06-22 13:17 ` [igt-dev] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
2023-06-22 17:33 ` Dixit, Ashutosh [this message]
2023-06-22 17:33   ` [Intel-gfx] [igt-dev] [PATCH v3 i-g-t] tests/i915_pm_freq_api: Add a suspend subtest Dixit, Ashutosh
2023-06-23 10:09 ` [igt-dev] [Intel-gfx] " Kamil Konieczny
2023-06-23 10:09   ` Kamil Konieczny

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87sfajs8pb.wl-ashutosh.dixit@intel.com \
    --to=ashutosh.dixit@intel.com \
    --cc=igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=vinay.belgaumkar@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.