From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
To: Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>
Cc: kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] KVM: arm64: Minor improvements to RAZ register handling
Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2021 10:47:57 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87sfx7q4du.wl-maz@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210927124911.191729-1-alexandru.elisei@arm.com>
Hi Alexandru,
On Mon, 27 Sep 2021 13:49:09 +0100,
Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com> wrote:
>
> What sparked these two small patches is the series that fixed the PMU reset
> values and their visibility from userspace, more specifically the
> discussion around the patch that removed the PMSWINC_EL0 shadow register
> [1].
>
> The patches are straightforward cleanups without any changes in
> functionality.
>
> Tested on a rockpro64, by running kvm-unit-tests under qemu.
>
> [1] https://www.spinics.net/lists/kvm-arm/msg47976.html
>
> Alexandru Elisei (2):
> KVM: arm64: Return early from read_id_reg() if register is RAZ
> KVM: arm64: Use get_raz_reg() for userspace reads of PMSWINC_EL0
>
> arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
If you are going to respin this one, now would be the time! :-)
Thanks,
M.
--
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
To: Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, james.morse@arm.com,
suzuki.poulose@arm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] KVM: arm64: Minor improvements to RAZ register handling
Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2021 10:47:57 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87sfx7q4du.wl-maz@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210927124911.191729-1-alexandru.elisei@arm.com>
Hi Alexandru,
On Mon, 27 Sep 2021 13:49:09 +0100,
Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com> wrote:
>
> What sparked these two small patches is the series that fixed the PMU reset
> values and their visibility from userspace, more specifically the
> discussion around the patch that removed the PMSWINC_EL0 shadow register
> [1].
>
> The patches are straightforward cleanups without any changes in
> functionality.
>
> Tested on a rockpro64, by running kvm-unit-tests under qemu.
>
> [1] https://www.spinics.net/lists/kvm-arm/msg47976.html
>
> Alexandru Elisei (2):
> KVM: arm64: Return early from read_id_reg() if register is RAZ
> KVM: arm64: Use get_raz_reg() for userspace reads of PMSWINC_EL0
>
> arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
If you are going to respin this one, now would be the time! :-)
Thanks,
M.
--
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-10-11 9:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-09-27 12:49 [PATCH 0/2] KVM: arm64: Minor improvements to RAZ register handling Alexandru Elisei
2021-09-27 12:49 ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-09-27 12:49 ` [PATCH 1/2] KVM: arm64: Return early from read_id_reg() if register is RAZ Alexandru Elisei
2021-09-27 12:49 ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-09-30 13:22 ` Andrew Jones
2021-09-30 13:22 ` Andrew Jones
2021-09-27 12:49 ` [PATCH 2/2] KVM: arm64: Use get_raz_reg() for userspace reads of PMSWINC_EL0 Alexandru Elisei
2021-09-27 12:49 ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-09-30 13:29 ` Andrew Jones
2021-09-30 13:29 ` Andrew Jones
2021-10-06 14:49 ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-10-06 14:49 ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-10-06 15:23 ` Andrew Jones
2021-10-06 15:23 ` Andrew Jones
2021-10-06 15:35 ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-10-06 15:35 ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-10-11 9:47 ` Marc Zyngier [this message]
2021-10-11 9:47 ` [PATCH 0/2] KVM: arm64: Minor improvements to RAZ register handling Marc Zyngier
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87sfx7q4du.wl-maz@kernel.org \
--to=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=alexandru.elisei@arm.com \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.