From: Felipe Balbi <felipe.balbi@linux.intel.com>
To: Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com>
Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@baylibre.com>,
linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
robh+dt@kernel.org, linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: usb: dwc3: Move Amlogic G12A DWC3 Glue Bindings to YAML schemas
Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2019 13:21:55 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87sgnh2kho.fsf@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFBinCBOEG6GT=dp5XQ3+nC18axSodPbgMfE6F7eHLE3gZfSoA@mail.gmail.com>
Hi,
Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com> writes:
> Hi Felipe,
>
> On Tue, Oct 22, 2019 at 9:39 AM Felipe Balbi
> <felipe.balbi@linux.intel.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@baylibre.com> writes:
>>
>> > Now that we have the DT validation in place, let's convert the device tree
>> > bindings for the Amlogic G12A DWC3 Glue Bindings over to a YAML schemas,
>> > the AXG and GXL glue bindings will be converted later.
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@baylibre.com>
>>
>> Is this a thing now? Why do we need a new format?
> this is a 2019 thing now, see an initial announcement from Rob from a
> year ago: [0]
>
> the new yaml schemas allow validation of the actual .dts
> this can be used for verifying that the example in the dt-bindings is
> correct, as well as for verifying the actual .dts file (so they match
> the actual dt-binding)
> (Rob's old mail - linked above - still has these two on the TODO list,
> nowadays this works fine)
>
> Neil is working towards full yaml schema based validation for all IP
> blocks used on Amlogic SoCs.
> with this patch we get a bit closer to that goal
cool, thanks for the background :-)
--
balbi
_______________________________________________
linux-amlogic mailing list
linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-amlogic
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Felipe Balbi <felipe.balbi@linux.intel.com>
To: Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com>
Cc: Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@baylibre.com>,
robh+dt@kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: usb: dwc3: Move Amlogic G12A DWC3 Glue Bindings to YAML schemas
Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2019 13:21:55 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87sgnh2kho.fsf@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFBinCBOEG6GT=dp5XQ3+nC18axSodPbgMfE6F7eHLE3gZfSoA@mail.gmail.com>
Hi,
Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com> writes:
> Hi Felipe,
>
> On Tue, Oct 22, 2019 at 9:39 AM Felipe Balbi
> <felipe.balbi@linux.intel.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@baylibre.com> writes:
>>
>> > Now that we have the DT validation in place, let's convert the device tree
>> > bindings for the Amlogic G12A DWC3 Glue Bindings over to a YAML schemas,
>> > the AXG and GXL glue bindings will be converted later.
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@baylibre.com>
>>
>> Is this a thing now? Why do we need a new format?
> this is a 2019 thing now, see an initial announcement from Rob from a
> year ago: [0]
>
> the new yaml schemas allow validation of the actual .dts
> this can be used for verifying that the example in the dt-bindings is
> correct, as well as for verifying the actual .dts file (so they match
> the actual dt-binding)
> (Rob's old mail - linked above - still has these two on the TODO list,
> nowadays this works fine)
>
> Neil is working towards full yaml schema based validation for all IP
> blocks used on Amlogic SoCs.
> with this patch we get a bit closer to that goal
cool, thanks for the background :-)
--
balbi
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Felipe Balbi <felipe.balbi@linux.intel.com>
To: Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com>
Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@baylibre.com>,
linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
robh+dt@kernel.org, linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: usb: dwc3: Move Amlogic G12A DWC3 Glue Bindings to YAML schemas
Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2019 13:21:55 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87sgnh2kho.fsf@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFBinCBOEG6GT=dp5XQ3+nC18axSodPbgMfE6F7eHLE3gZfSoA@mail.gmail.com>
Hi,
Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com> writes:
> Hi Felipe,
>
> On Tue, Oct 22, 2019 at 9:39 AM Felipe Balbi
> <felipe.balbi@linux.intel.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@baylibre.com> writes:
>>
>> > Now that we have the DT validation in place, let's convert the device tree
>> > bindings for the Amlogic G12A DWC3 Glue Bindings over to a YAML schemas,
>> > the AXG and GXL glue bindings will be converted later.
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@baylibre.com>
>>
>> Is this a thing now? Why do we need a new format?
> this is a 2019 thing now, see an initial announcement from Rob from a
> year ago: [0]
>
> the new yaml schemas allow validation of the actual .dts
> this can be used for verifying that the example in the dt-bindings is
> correct, as well as for verifying the actual .dts file (so they match
> the actual dt-binding)
> (Rob's old mail - linked above - still has these two on the TODO list,
> nowadays this works fine)
>
> Neil is working towards full yaml schema based validation for all IP
> blocks used on Amlogic SoCs.
> with this patch we get a bit closer to that goal
cool, thanks for the background :-)
--
balbi
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-10-25 10:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-10-21 13:23 [PATCH] dt-bindings: usb: dwc3: Move Amlogic G12A DWC3 Glue Bindings to YAML schemas Neil Armstrong
2019-10-21 13:23 ` Neil Armstrong
2019-10-21 13:23 ` Neil Armstrong
2019-10-22 7:37 ` Felipe Balbi
2019-10-22 7:37 ` Felipe Balbi
2019-10-22 7:37 ` Felipe Balbi
2019-10-24 20:05 ` Martin Blumenstingl
2019-10-24 20:05 ` Martin Blumenstingl
2019-10-24 20:05 ` Martin Blumenstingl
2019-10-25 10:21 ` Felipe Balbi [this message]
2019-10-25 10:21 ` Felipe Balbi
2019-10-25 10:21 ` Felipe Balbi
2019-10-24 19:59 ` Martin Blumenstingl
2019-10-24 19:59 ` Martin Blumenstingl
2019-10-24 19:59 ` Martin Blumenstingl
2019-10-29 16:00 ` Rob Herring
2019-10-29 16:00 ` Rob Herring
2019-10-29 16:00 ` Rob Herring
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87sgnh2kho.fsf@gmail.com \
--to=felipe.balbi@linux.intel.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com \
--cc=narmstrong@baylibre.com \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.