From: "Toke Høiland-Jørgensen" <toke@redhat.com>
To: Yibo Zhao <yiboz@codeaurora.org>
Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, ath10k@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] mac80211: defer txqs removal from rbtree
Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2019 13:23:37 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87sgothmpy.fsf@toke.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c3ee7ece0986f1c50513cd5fdd2ee03f@codeaurora.org>
Yibo Zhao <yiboz@codeaurora.org> writes:
> On 2019-09-18 05:10, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
>> Yibo Zhao <yiboz@codeaurora.org> writes:
>>
>>> In a loop txqs dequeue scenario, if the first txq in the rbtree gets
>>> removed from rbtree immediately in the ieee80211_return_txq(), the
>>> loop will break soon in the ieee80211_next_txq() due to schedule_pos
>>> not leading to the second txq in the rbtree. Thus, defering the
>>> removal right before the end of this schedule round.
>>>
>>> Co-developed-by: Yibo Zhao <yiboz@codeaurora.org>
>>> Signed-off-by: Yibo Zhao <yiboz@codeaurora.org>
>>> Signed-off-by: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@toke.dk>
>>
>> I didn't write this patch, so please don't use my sign-off. I'll add
>> ack or review tags as appropriate in reply; but a few comments first:
>>
>>> ---
>>> include/net/mac80211.h | 16 ++++++++++--
>>> net/mac80211/ieee80211_i.h | 3 +++
>>> net/mac80211/main.c | 6 +++++
>>> net/mac80211/tx.c | 63
>>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
>>> 4 files changed, 83 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/include/net/mac80211.h b/include/net/mac80211.h
>>> index ac2ed8e..ba5a345 100644
>>> --- a/include/net/mac80211.h
>>> +++ b/include/net/mac80211.h
>>> @@ -925,6 +925,8 @@ struct ieee80211_tx_rate {
>>>
>>> #define IEEE80211_MAX_TX_RETRY 31
>>>
>>> +#define IEEE80211_AIRTIME_TXQ_RM_CHK_INTV_IN_MS 100
>>> +
>>> static inline void ieee80211_rate_set_vht(struct ieee80211_tx_rate
>>> *rate,
>>> u8 mcs, u8 nss)
>>> {
>>> @@ -6232,7 +6234,8 @@ struct sk_buff *ieee80211_tx_dequeue(struct
>>> ieee80211_hw *hw,
>>> * @ac: AC number to return packets from.
>>> *
>>> * Should only be called between calls to
>>> ieee80211_txq_schedule_start()
>>> - * and ieee80211_txq_schedule_end().
>>> + * and ieee80211_txq_schedule_end(). If the txq is empty, it will be
>>> added
>>> + * to a remove list and get removed later.
>>> * Returns the next txq if successful, %NULL if no queue is eligible.
>>> If a txq
>>> * is returned, it should be returned with ieee80211_return_txq()
>>> after the
>>> * driver has finished scheduling it.
>>> @@ -6268,7 +6271,8 @@ void ieee80211_txq_schedule_start(struct
>>> ieee80211_hw *hw, u8 ac)
>>> * @hw: pointer as obtained from ieee80211_alloc_hw()
>>> * @ac: AC number to acquire locks for
>>> *
>>> - * Release locks previously acquired by ieee80211_txq_schedule_end().
>>> + * Release locks previously acquired by ieee80211_txq_schedule_end().
>>> Check
>>> + * and remove the empty txq from rb-tree.
>>> */
>>> void ieee80211_txq_schedule_end(struct ieee80211_hw *hw, u8 ac)
>>> __releases(txq_lock);
>>> @@ -6287,6 +6291,14 @@ void ieee80211_schedule_txq(struct ieee80211_hw
>>> *hw, struct ieee80211_txq *txq)
>>> __acquires(txq_lock) __releases(txq_lock);
>>>
>>> /**
>>> + * ieee80211_txqs_check - Check txqs waiting for removal
>>> + *
>>> + * @tmr: pointer as obtained from local
>>> + *
>>> + */
>>> +void ieee80211_txqs_check(struct timer_list *tmr);
>>> +
>>> +/**
>>> * ieee80211_txq_may_transmit - check whether TXQ is allowed to
>>> transmit
>>> *
>>> * This function is used to check whether given txq is allowed to
>>> transmit by
>>> diff --git a/net/mac80211/ieee80211_i.h b/net/mac80211/ieee80211_i.h
>>> index a4556f9..49aa143e 100644
>>> --- a/net/mac80211/ieee80211_i.h
>>> +++ b/net/mac80211/ieee80211_i.h
>>> @@ -847,6 +847,7 @@ struct txq_info {
>>> struct codel_stats cstats;
>>> struct sk_buff_head frags;
>>> struct rb_node schedule_order;
>>> + struct list_head candidate;
>>> unsigned long flags;
>>>
>>> /* keep last! */
>>> @@ -1145,6 +1146,8 @@ struct ieee80211_local {
>>> u64 airtime_v_t[IEEE80211_NUM_ACS];
>>> u64 airtime_weight_sum[IEEE80211_NUM_ACS];
>>>
>>> + struct list_head remove_list[IEEE80211_NUM_ACS];
>>> + struct timer_list remove_timer;
>>> u16 airtime_flags;
>>>
>>> const struct ieee80211_ops *ops;
>>> diff --git a/net/mac80211/main.c b/net/mac80211/main.c
>>> index e9ffa8e..78fe24a 100644
>>> --- a/net/mac80211/main.c
>>> +++ b/net/mac80211/main.c
>>> @@ -667,10 +667,15 @@ struct ieee80211_hw
>>> *ieee80211_alloc_hw_nm(size_t priv_data_len,
>>>
>>> for (i = 0; i < IEEE80211_NUM_ACS; i++) {
>>> local->active_txqs[i] = RB_ROOT_CACHED;
>>> + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&local->remove_list[i]);
>>> spin_lock_init(&local->active_txq_lock[i]);
>>> }
>>> local->airtime_flags = AIRTIME_USE_TX | AIRTIME_USE_RX;
>>>
>>> + timer_setup(&local->remove_timer, ieee80211_txqs_check, 0);
>>> + mod_timer(&local->remove_timer,
>>> + jiffies +
>>> msecs_to_jiffies(IEEE80211_AIRTIME_TXQ_RM_CHK_INTV_IN_MS));
>>> +
>>> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&local->chanctx_list);
>>> mutex_init(&local->chanctx_mtx);
>>>
>>> @@ -1305,6 +1310,7 @@ void ieee80211_unregister_hw(struct ieee80211_hw
>>> *hw)
>>> tasklet_kill(&local->tx_pending_tasklet);
>>> tasklet_kill(&local->tasklet);
>>>
>>> + del_timer_sync(&local->remove_timer);
>>> #ifdef CONFIG_INET
>>> unregister_inetaddr_notifier(&local->ifa_notifier);
>>> #endif
>>> diff --git a/net/mac80211/tx.c b/net/mac80211/tx.c
>>> index d00baaa..42ca010 100644
>>> --- a/net/mac80211/tx.c
>>> +++ b/net/mac80211/tx.c
>>> @@ -1450,6 +1450,7 @@ void ieee80211_txq_init(struct
>>> ieee80211_sub_if_data *sdata,
>>> codel_stats_init(&txqi->cstats);
>>> __skb_queue_head_init(&txqi->frags);
>>> RB_CLEAR_NODE(&txqi->schedule_order);
>>> + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&txqi->candidate);
>>>
>>> txqi->txq.vif = &sdata->vif;
>>>
>>> @@ -3724,6 +3725,9 @@ void ieee80211_schedule_txq(struct ieee80211_hw
>>> *hw,
>>>
>>> spin_lock_bh(&local->active_txq_lock[ac]);
>>>
>>> + if (!list_empty(&txqi->candidate))
>>> + list_del_init(&txqi->candidate);
>>> +
>>> if (!RB_EMPTY_NODE(&txqi->schedule_order))
>>> goto out;
>>>
>>> @@ -3783,6 +3787,20 @@ static void __ieee80211_unschedule_txq(struct
>>> ieee80211_hw *hw,
>>> RB_CLEAR_NODE(&txqi->schedule_order);
>>> }
>>>
>>> +void ieee80211_remove_txq(struct ieee80211_hw *hw,
>>> + struct ieee80211_txq *txq)
>>> +{
>>> + struct ieee80211_local *local = hw_to_local(hw);
>>> + struct txq_info *txqi = to_txq_info(txq);
>>> +
>>> + lockdep_assert_held(&local->active_txq_lock[txq->ac]);
>>> +
>>> + if (!RB_EMPTY_NODE(&txqi->schedule_order)) {
>>> + __ieee80211_unschedule_txq(hw, txq);
>>> + list_del_init(&txqi->candidate);
>>> + }
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> void ieee80211_unschedule_txq(struct ieee80211_hw *hw,
>>> struct ieee80211_txq *txq)
>>> __acquires(txq_lock) __releases(txq_lock)
>>> @@ -3790,7 +3808,7 @@ void ieee80211_unschedule_txq(struct
>>> ieee80211_hw *hw,
>>> struct ieee80211_local *local = hw_to_local(hw);
>>>
>>> spin_lock_bh(&local->active_txq_lock[txq->ac]);
>>> - __ieee80211_unschedule_txq(hw, txq);
>>> + ieee80211_remove_txq(hw, txq);
>>> spin_unlock_bh(&local->active_txq_lock[txq->ac]);
>>> }
>>>
>>> @@ -3803,11 +3821,48 @@ void ieee80211_return_txq(struct ieee80211_hw
>>> *hw,
>>> lockdep_assert_held(&local->active_txq_lock[txq->ac]);
>>>
>>> if (!RB_EMPTY_NODE(&txqi->schedule_order) &&
>>> - (skb_queue_empty(&txqi->frags) && !txqi->tin.backlog_packets))
>>> - __ieee80211_unschedule_txq(hw, txq);
>>> + !txq_has_queue(&txqi->txq) &&
>>> + list_empty(&txqi->candidate))
>>> + list_add_tail(&txqi->candidate, &local->remove_list[txq->ac]);
>>> +
>>> }
>>> EXPORT_SYMBOL(ieee80211_return_txq);
>>>
>>> +void __ieee80211_check_txqs(struct ieee80211_local *local, int ac)
>>> +{
>>> + struct txq_info *iter, *tmp;
>>> + struct sta_info *sta;
>>> +
>>> + lockdep_assert_held(&local->active_txq_lock[ac]);
>>> +
>>> + list_for_each_entry_safe(iter, tmp, &local->remove_list[ac],
>>> + candidate) {
>>> + sta = container_of(iter->txq.sta, struct sta_info, sta);
>>> +
>>> + if (txq_has_queue(&iter->txq))
>>> + list_del_init(&iter->candidate);
>>> + else
>>> + ieee80211_remove_txq(&local->hw, &iter->txq);
>>> + }
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +void ieee80211_txqs_check(struct timer_list *t)
>>> +{
>>> + struct ieee80211_local *local = from_timer(local, t, remove_timer);
>>> + struct txq_info *iter, *tmp;
>>> + struct sta_info *sta;
>>> + int ac;
>>> +
>>> + for (ac = 0; ac < IEEE80211_NUM_ACS; ac++) {
>>> + spin_lock_bh(&local->active_txq_lock[ac]);
>>> + __ieee80211_check_txqs(local, ac);
>>> + spin_unlock_bh(&local->active_txq_lock[ac]);
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + mod_timer(&local->remove_timer,
>>> + jiffies +
>>> msecs_to_jiffies(IEEE80211_AIRTIME_TXQ_RM_CHK_INTV_IN_MS));
>>> +}
>>
>> I'll ask the same as I did last time (where you told me to hold off
>> until this round):
>>
>> Why do you need the timer and the periodic check? If TXQs are added to
>> the remove list during the scheduling run, and __ieee80211_check_txqs()
>> is run from schedule_end(), isn't that sufficient to clear the list?
> Is it possible that a txq is not added to the remove list but then
> packets in it are dropped by fq_codel algo? Like the station disconnects
> without any notification.
Well as long as all the other cleanup paths call directly into
__unschedule_txq(), that should remove stations from the scheduler when
they disconnect etc.
We only need to defer removal inside a single "scheduling round" (i.e.,
between a pair of ieee80211_txq_schedule_start/end. So if we just walk
the remove list in schedule_end() we should be enough, no?
Hmm, or maybe a simpler way to fix the original issue is just to have
unschedule_txq() update the schedule_pos() pointer?
I.e., unschedule_txq checks if the txq being removed is currently being
pointed to by schedule_pos[ac], and if it is, it updates schedule_pos to
be the rb_next of the current value?
-Toke
_______________________________________________
ath10k mailing list
ath10k@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Toke Høiland-Jørgensen" <toke@redhat.com>
To: Yibo Zhao <yiboz@codeaurora.org>
Cc: ath10k@lists.infradead.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] mac80211: defer txqs removal from rbtree
Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2019 13:23:37 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87sgothmpy.fsf@toke.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c3ee7ece0986f1c50513cd5fdd2ee03f@codeaurora.org>
Yibo Zhao <yiboz@codeaurora.org> writes:
> On 2019-09-18 05:10, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
>> Yibo Zhao <yiboz@codeaurora.org> writes:
>>
>>> In a loop txqs dequeue scenario, if the first txq in the rbtree gets
>>> removed from rbtree immediately in the ieee80211_return_txq(), the
>>> loop will break soon in the ieee80211_next_txq() due to schedule_pos
>>> not leading to the second txq in the rbtree. Thus, defering the
>>> removal right before the end of this schedule round.
>>>
>>> Co-developed-by: Yibo Zhao <yiboz@codeaurora.org>
>>> Signed-off-by: Yibo Zhao <yiboz@codeaurora.org>
>>> Signed-off-by: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@toke.dk>
>>
>> I didn't write this patch, so please don't use my sign-off. I'll add
>> ack or review tags as appropriate in reply; but a few comments first:
>>
>>> ---
>>> include/net/mac80211.h | 16 ++++++++++--
>>> net/mac80211/ieee80211_i.h | 3 +++
>>> net/mac80211/main.c | 6 +++++
>>> net/mac80211/tx.c | 63
>>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
>>> 4 files changed, 83 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/include/net/mac80211.h b/include/net/mac80211.h
>>> index ac2ed8e..ba5a345 100644
>>> --- a/include/net/mac80211.h
>>> +++ b/include/net/mac80211.h
>>> @@ -925,6 +925,8 @@ struct ieee80211_tx_rate {
>>>
>>> #define IEEE80211_MAX_TX_RETRY 31
>>>
>>> +#define IEEE80211_AIRTIME_TXQ_RM_CHK_INTV_IN_MS 100
>>> +
>>> static inline void ieee80211_rate_set_vht(struct ieee80211_tx_rate
>>> *rate,
>>> u8 mcs, u8 nss)
>>> {
>>> @@ -6232,7 +6234,8 @@ struct sk_buff *ieee80211_tx_dequeue(struct
>>> ieee80211_hw *hw,
>>> * @ac: AC number to return packets from.
>>> *
>>> * Should only be called between calls to
>>> ieee80211_txq_schedule_start()
>>> - * and ieee80211_txq_schedule_end().
>>> + * and ieee80211_txq_schedule_end(). If the txq is empty, it will be
>>> added
>>> + * to a remove list and get removed later.
>>> * Returns the next txq if successful, %NULL if no queue is eligible.
>>> If a txq
>>> * is returned, it should be returned with ieee80211_return_txq()
>>> after the
>>> * driver has finished scheduling it.
>>> @@ -6268,7 +6271,8 @@ void ieee80211_txq_schedule_start(struct
>>> ieee80211_hw *hw, u8 ac)
>>> * @hw: pointer as obtained from ieee80211_alloc_hw()
>>> * @ac: AC number to acquire locks for
>>> *
>>> - * Release locks previously acquired by ieee80211_txq_schedule_end().
>>> + * Release locks previously acquired by ieee80211_txq_schedule_end().
>>> Check
>>> + * and remove the empty txq from rb-tree.
>>> */
>>> void ieee80211_txq_schedule_end(struct ieee80211_hw *hw, u8 ac)
>>> __releases(txq_lock);
>>> @@ -6287,6 +6291,14 @@ void ieee80211_schedule_txq(struct ieee80211_hw
>>> *hw, struct ieee80211_txq *txq)
>>> __acquires(txq_lock) __releases(txq_lock);
>>>
>>> /**
>>> + * ieee80211_txqs_check - Check txqs waiting for removal
>>> + *
>>> + * @tmr: pointer as obtained from local
>>> + *
>>> + */
>>> +void ieee80211_txqs_check(struct timer_list *tmr);
>>> +
>>> +/**
>>> * ieee80211_txq_may_transmit - check whether TXQ is allowed to
>>> transmit
>>> *
>>> * This function is used to check whether given txq is allowed to
>>> transmit by
>>> diff --git a/net/mac80211/ieee80211_i.h b/net/mac80211/ieee80211_i.h
>>> index a4556f9..49aa143e 100644
>>> --- a/net/mac80211/ieee80211_i.h
>>> +++ b/net/mac80211/ieee80211_i.h
>>> @@ -847,6 +847,7 @@ struct txq_info {
>>> struct codel_stats cstats;
>>> struct sk_buff_head frags;
>>> struct rb_node schedule_order;
>>> + struct list_head candidate;
>>> unsigned long flags;
>>>
>>> /* keep last! */
>>> @@ -1145,6 +1146,8 @@ struct ieee80211_local {
>>> u64 airtime_v_t[IEEE80211_NUM_ACS];
>>> u64 airtime_weight_sum[IEEE80211_NUM_ACS];
>>>
>>> + struct list_head remove_list[IEEE80211_NUM_ACS];
>>> + struct timer_list remove_timer;
>>> u16 airtime_flags;
>>>
>>> const struct ieee80211_ops *ops;
>>> diff --git a/net/mac80211/main.c b/net/mac80211/main.c
>>> index e9ffa8e..78fe24a 100644
>>> --- a/net/mac80211/main.c
>>> +++ b/net/mac80211/main.c
>>> @@ -667,10 +667,15 @@ struct ieee80211_hw
>>> *ieee80211_alloc_hw_nm(size_t priv_data_len,
>>>
>>> for (i = 0; i < IEEE80211_NUM_ACS; i++) {
>>> local->active_txqs[i] = RB_ROOT_CACHED;
>>> + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&local->remove_list[i]);
>>> spin_lock_init(&local->active_txq_lock[i]);
>>> }
>>> local->airtime_flags = AIRTIME_USE_TX | AIRTIME_USE_RX;
>>>
>>> + timer_setup(&local->remove_timer, ieee80211_txqs_check, 0);
>>> + mod_timer(&local->remove_timer,
>>> + jiffies +
>>> msecs_to_jiffies(IEEE80211_AIRTIME_TXQ_RM_CHK_INTV_IN_MS));
>>> +
>>> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&local->chanctx_list);
>>> mutex_init(&local->chanctx_mtx);
>>>
>>> @@ -1305,6 +1310,7 @@ void ieee80211_unregister_hw(struct ieee80211_hw
>>> *hw)
>>> tasklet_kill(&local->tx_pending_tasklet);
>>> tasklet_kill(&local->tasklet);
>>>
>>> + del_timer_sync(&local->remove_timer);
>>> #ifdef CONFIG_INET
>>> unregister_inetaddr_notifier(&local->ifa_notifier);
>>> #endif
>>> diff --git a/net/mac80211/tx.c b/net/mac80211/tx.c
>>> index d00baaa..42ca010 100644
>>> --- a/net/mac80211/tx.c
>>> +++ b/net/mac80211/tx.c
>>> @@ -1450,6 +1450,7 @@ void ieee80211_txq_init(struct
>>> ieee80211_sub_if_data *sdata,
>>> codel_stats_init(&txqi->cstats);
>>> __skb_queue_head_init(&txqi->frags);
>>> RB_CLEAR_NODE(&txqi->schedule_order);
>>> + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&txqi->candidate);
>>>
>>> txqi->txq.vif = &sdata->vif;
>>>
>>> @@ -3724,6 +3725,9 @@ void ieee80211_schedule_txq(struct ieee80211_hw
>>> *hw,
>>>
>>> spin_lock_bh(&local->active_txq_lock[ac]);
>>>
>>> + if (!list_empty(&txqi->candidate))
>>> + list_del_init(&txqi->candidate);
>>> +
>>> if (!RB_EMPTY_NODE(&txqi->schedule_order))
>>> goto out;
>>>
>>> @@ -3783,6 +3787,20 @@ static void __ieee80211_unschedule_txq(struct
>>> ieee80211_hw *hw,
>>> RB_CLEAR_NODE(&txqi->schedule_order);
>>> }
>>>
>>> +void ieee80211_remove_txq(struct ieee80211_hw *hw,
>>> + struct ieee80211_txq *txq)
>>> +{
>>> + struct ieee80211_local *local = hw_to_local(hw);
>>> + struct txq_info *txqi = to_txq_info(txq);
>>> +
>>> + lockdep_assert_held(&local->active_txq_lock[txq->ac]);
>>> +
>>> + if (!RB_EMPTY_NODE(&txqi->schedule_order)) {
>>> + __ieee80211_unschedule_txq(hw, txq);
>>> + list_del_init(&txqi->candidate);
>>> + }
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> void ieee80211_unschedule_txq(struct ieee80211_hw *hw,
>>> struct ieee80211_txq *txq)
>>> __acquires(txq_lock) __releases(txq_lock)
>>> @@ -3790,7 +3808,7 @@ void ieee80211_unschedule_txq(struct
>>> ieee80211_hw *hw,
>>> struct ieee80211_local *local = hw_to_local(hw);
>>>
>>> spin_lock_bh(&local->active_txq_lock[txq->ac]);
>>> - __ieee80211_unschedule_txq(hw, txq);
>>> + ieee80211_remove_txq(hw, txq);
>>> spin_unlock_bh(&local->active_txq_lock[txq->ac]);
>>> }
>>>
>>> @@ -3803,11 +3821,48 @@ void ieee80211_return_txq(struct ieee80211_hw
>>> *hw,
>>> lockdep_assert_held(&local->active_txq_lock[txq->ac]);
>>>
>>> if (!RB_EMPTY_NODE(&txqi->schedule_order) &&
>>> - (skb_queue_empty(&txqi->frags) && !txqi->tin.backlog_packets))
>>> - __ieee80211_unschedule_txq(hw, txq);
>>> + !txq_has_queue(&txqi->txq) &&
>>> + list_empty(&txqi->candidate))
>>> + list_add_tail(&txqi->candidate, &local->remove_list[txq->ac]);
>>> +
>>> }
>>> EXPORT_SYMBOL(ieee80211_return_txq);
>>>
>>> +void __ieee80211_check_txqs(struct ieee80211_local *local, int ac)
>>> +{
>>> + struct txq_info *iter, *tmp;
>>> + struct sta_info *sta;
>>> +
>>> + lockdep_assert_held(&local->active_txq_lock[ac]);
>>> +
>>> + list_for_each_entry_safe(iter, tmp, &local->remove_list[ac],
>>> + candidate) {
>>> + sta = container_of(iter->txq.sta, struct sta_info, sta);
>>> +
>>> + if (txq_has_queue(&iter->txq))
>>> + list_del_init(&iter->candidate);
>>> + else
>>> + ieee80211_remove_txq(&local->hw, &iter->txq);
>>> + }
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +void ieee80211_txqs_check(struct timer_list *t)
>>> +{
>>> + struct ieee80211_local *local = from_timer(local, t, remove_timer);
>>> + struct txq_info *iter, *tmp;
>>> + struct sta_info *sta;
>>> + int ac;
>>> +
>>> + for (ac = 0; ac < IEEE80211_NUM_ACS; ac++) {
>>> + spin_lock_bh(&local->active_txq_lock[ac]);
>>> + __ieee80211_check_txqs(local, ac);
>>> + spin_unlock_bh(&local->active_txq_lock[ac]);
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + mod_timer(&local->remove_timer,
>>> + jiffies +
>>> msecs_to_jiffies(IEEE80211_AIRTIME_TXQ_RM_CHK_INTV_IN_MS));
>>> +}
>>
>> I'll ask the same as I did last time (where you told me to hold off
>> until this round):
>>
>> Why do you need the timer and the periodic check? If TXQs are added to
>> the remove list during the scheduling run, and __ieee80211_check_txqs()
>> is run from schedule_end(), isn't that sufficient to clear the list?
> Is it possible that a txq is not added to the remove list but then
> packets in it are dropped by fq_codel algo? Like the station disconnects
> without any notification.
Well as long as all the other cleanup paths call directly into
__unschedule_txq(), that should remove stations from the scheduler when
they disconnect etc.
We only need to defer removal inside a single "scheduling round" (i.e.,
between a pair of ieee80211_txq_schedule_start/end. So if we just walk
the remove list in schedule_end() we should be enough, no?
Hmm, or maybe a simpler way to fix the original issue is just to have
unschedule_txq() update the schedule_pos() pointer?
I.e., unschedule_txq checks if the txq being removed is currently being
pointed to by schedule_pos[ac], and if it is, it updates schedule_pos to
be the rb_next of the current value?
-Toke
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-09-18 11:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 80+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-09-16 13:09 [PATCH 1/4] mac80211: Switch to a virtual time-based airtime scheduler Yibo Zhao
2019-09-16 13:09 ` Yibo Zhao
2019-09-16 13:09 ` [PATCH 2/4] mac80211: defer txqs removal from rbtree Yibo Zhao
2019-09-16 13:09 ` Yibo Zhao
2019-09-17 21:10 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2019-09-17 21:10 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2019-09-18 10:27 ` Yibo Zhao
2019-09-18 10:27 ` Yibo Zhao
2019-09-18 11:23 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen [this message]
2019-09-18 11:23 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2019-09-19 9:56 ` Yibo Zhao
2019-09-19 9:56 ` Yibo Zhao
2019-09-19 10:37 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2019-09-19 10:37 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2019-09-20 8:29 ` Yibo Zhao
2019-09-20 8:29 ` Yibo Zhao
2019-09-20 9:15 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2019-09-20 9:15 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2019-09-21 10:49 ` Yibo Zhao
2019-09-21 10:49 ` Yibo Zhao
2019-09-21 11:27 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2019-09-21 11:27 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2019-09-21 11:53 ` Yibo Zhao
2019-09-21 11:53 ` Yibo Zhao
2019-09-21 12:22 ` Yibo Zhao
2019-09-21 12:22 ` Yibo Zhao
2019-09-21 13:02 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2019-09-21 13:02 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2019-09-21 13:24 ` Yibo Zhao
2019-09-21 13:24 ` Yibo Zhao
2019-09-21 14:00 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2019-09-21 14:00 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2019-09-22 5:19 ` Yibo Zhao
2019-09-22 5:19 ` Yibo Zhao
2019-09-23 10:47 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2019-09-23 10:47 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2019-09-23 11:42 ` Kalle Valo
2019-09-23 11:42 ` Kalle Valo
2019-09-23 16:39 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2019-09-23 16:39 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2019-09-24 5:27 ` Kalle Valo
2019-09-24 5:27 ` Kalle Valo
2019-09-24 7:23 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2019-09-24 7:23 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2019-09-24 2:45 ` Yibo Zhao
2019-09-24 2:45 ` Yibo Zhao
2019-09-24 7:26 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2019-09-24 7:26 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2019-09-24 8:31 ` Yibo Zhao
2019-09-24 8:31 ` Yibo Zhao
2019-09-24 8:44 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2019-09-24 8:44 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2019-09-16 13:09 ` [PATCH 3/4] mac80211: fix low throughput in push pull mode Yibo Zhao
2019-09-16 13:09 ` Yibo Zhao
2019-09-16 15:27 ` Johannes Berg
2019-09-16 15:27 ` Johannes Berg
2019-09-17 6:36 ` Yibo Zhao
2019-09-17 6:36 ` Yibo Zhao
2019-09-17 6:55 ` Johannes Berg
2019-09-17 6:55 ` Johannes Berg
2019-09-17 21:12 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2019-09-17 21:12 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2019-09-18 10:02 ` Yibo Zhao
2019-09-18 10:02 ` Yibo Zhao
2019-09-18 10:16 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2019-09-18 10:16 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2019-09-18 10:18 ` Yibo Zhao
2019-09-18 10:18 ` Yibo Zhao
2019-09-16 13:09 ` [PATCH 4/4] mac80211: Sync airtime weight sum with per AC synced sta airtime weight together Yibo Zhao
2019-09-16 13:09 ` Yibo Zhao
2019-09-17 21:24 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2019-09-17 21:24 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2019-09-18 10:16 ` Yibo Zhao
2019-09-18 10:16 ` Yibo Zhao
2019-09-16 14:51 ` [PATCH 1/4] mac80211: Switch to a virtual time-based airtime scheduler Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2019-09-16 14:51 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2019-09-17 21:31 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2019-09-17 21:31 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2019-09-20 8:37 ` Yibo Zhao
2019-09-20 8:37 ` Yibo Zhao
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87sgothmpy.fsf@toke.dk \
--to=toke@redhat.com \
--cc=ath10k@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=yiboz@codeaurora.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.