From: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
To: Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@ti.com>
Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] OMAP2+: PM: Warn users of sleep_while_idle if !CONFIG_CPU_IDLE
Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2011 13:54:17 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87sjv6h5h2.fsf@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1297857860-3713-1-git-send-email-rnayak@ti.com> (Rajendra Nayak's message of "Wed, 16 Feb 2011 17:34:20 +0530")
Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@ti.com> writes:
> This should help users who do a
> 'echo 1 > /debug/pm_debug/sleep_while_idle' with a
> config which has !CONFIG_CPU_IDLE and wonder
> why OMAP is'nt sleeping in idle.
This isn't quite right, as 'sleep_while_idle' is actually a flag for
whether or not to call omap_sram_idle() at all.
Even without CPUidle, WFI will still be attempted.
Kevin
> Signed-off-by: Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@ti.com>
> ---
> arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm-debug.c | 9 +++++++++
> 1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm-debug.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm-debug.c
> index 125f565..1e722a0 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm-debug.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm-debug.c
> @@ -569,6 +569,10 @@ static int option_get(void *data, u64 *val)
>
> *val = *option;
>
> +#ifndef CONFIG_CPU_IDLE
> + if (option == &sleep_while_idle)
> + pr_warn("CONFIG_CPU_IDLE is not enabled\n");
> +#endif
> return 0;
> }
>
> @@ -581,6 +585,11 @@ static int option_set(void *data, u64 val)
>
> *option = val;
>
> +#ifndef CONFIG_CPU_IDLE
> + if (option == &sleep_while_idle)
> + pr_warn("CONFIG_CPU_IDLE is not enabled\n");
> +#endif
> +
> if (option == &enable_off_mode) {
> if (val)
> omap_pm_enable_off_mode();
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: khilman@ti.com (Kevin Hilman)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] OMAP2+: PM: Warn users of sleep_while_idle if !CONFIG_CPU_IDLE
Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2011 13:54:17 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87sjv6h5h2.fsf@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1297857860-3713-1-git-send-email-rnayak@ti.com> (Rajendra Nayak's message of "Wed, 16 Feb 2011 17:34:20 +0530")
Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@ti.com> writes:
> This should help users who do a
> 'echo 1 > /debug/pm_debug/sleep_while_idle' with a
> config which has !CONFIG_CPU_IDLE and wonder
> why OMAP is'nt sleeping in idle.
This isn't quite right, as 'sleep_while_idle' is actually a flag for
whether or not to call omap_sram_idle() at all.
Even without CPUidle, WFI will still be attempted.
Kevin
> Signed-off-by: Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@ti.com>
> ---
> arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm-debug.c | 9 +++++++++
> 1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm-debug.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm-debug.c
> index 125f565..1e722a0 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm-debug.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm-debug.c
> @@ -569,6 +569,10 @@ static int option_get(void *data, u64 *val)
>
> *val = *option;
>
> +#ifndef CONFIG_CPU_IDLE
> + if (option == &sleep_while_idle)
> + pr_warn("CONFIG_CPU_IDLE is not enabled\n");
> +#endif
> return 0;
> }
>
> @@ -581,6 +585,11 @@ static int option_set(void *data, u64 val)
>
> *option = val;
>
> +#ifndef CONFIG_CPU_IDLE
> + if (option == &sleep_while_idle)
> + pr_warn("CONFIG_CPU_IDLE is not enabled\n");
> +#endif
> +
> if (option == &enable_off_mode) {
> if (val)
> omap_pm_enable_off_mode();
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-03-01 21:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-02-16 12:04 [PATCH] OMAP2+: PM: Warn users of sleep_while_idle if !CONFIG_CPU_IDLE Rajendra Nayak
2011-02-16 12:04 ` Rajendra Nayak
2011-03-01 21:54 ` Kevin Hilman [this message]
2011-03-01 21:54 ` Kevin Hilman
2011-03-03 9:32 ` Rajendra Nayak
2011-03-03 9:32 ` Rajendra Nayak
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87sjv6h5h2.fsf@ti.com \
--to=khilman@ti.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rnayak@ti.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.