All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@linux.alibaba.com>
To: Joshua Hahn <joshua.hahnjy@gmail.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	 gourry@gourry.net, honggyu.kim@sk.com,  yunjeong.mun@sk.com,
	 gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, rafael@kernel.org,  lenb@kernel.org,
	 dan.j.williams@intel.com, Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com,
	 dave.jiang@intel.com, horen.chuang@linux.dev,
	 hannes@cmpxchg.org,  osalvador@suse.de,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,  linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@kvack.org,  kernel-team@meta.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8] mm/mempolicy: Weighted Interleave Auto-tuning
Date: Tue, 13 May 2025 09:41:10 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87tt5puw21.fsf@DESKTOP-5N7EMDA> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250512142511.3959833-1-joshua.hahnjy@gmail.com> (Joshua Hahn's message of "Mon, 12 May 2025 07:25:10 -0700")

Joshua Hahn <joshua.hahnjy@gmail.com> writes:

> On Mon, 12 May 2025 09:35:16 +0800 "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@linux.alibaba.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi, Joshua,
>> 
>> Joshua Hahn <joshua.hahnjy@gmail.com> writes:
>> 
>> [snip]
>> 
>> > @@ -3707,8 +3720,12 @@ static void wi_state_free(void)
>> >  	kfree(&wi_group->wi_kobj);
>> >  }
>> >
>> > +static struct kobj_attribute wi_auto_attr =
>> > +	__ATTR(auto, 0664, weighted_interleave_auto_show,
>> > +			   weighted_interleave_auto_store);
>> > +
>> >  static void wi_cleanup(void) {
>> > -	sysfs_remove_file(&wi_group->wi_kobj, &wi_group->auto_kobj_attr.attr);
>> > +	sysfs_remove_file(&wi_group->wi_kobj, &wi_auto_attr.attr);
>> 
>> If we use wi_auto_attr directly here, we can remove auto_kobj_attr field
>> from struct sysfs_wi_group?
>
> Hi Ying, thank you for this comment. I should have caught it as well.
> Removing the last users / setters doesn't seem complicated.
>
> Andrew, I'm very sorry -- do you think you can fold this fixlet in as well?
> This is a minor change that removes the only users of this variable.
>
> diff --git a/mm/mempolicy.c b/mm/mempolicy.c
> index d5ae36d2eda8..8581cc861945 100644
> --- a/mm/mempolicy.c
> +++ b/mm/mempolicy.c
> @@ -3543,7 +3543,6 @@ struct iw_node_attr {
>  struct sysfs_wi_group {
>         struct kobject wi_kobj;
>         struct mutex kobj_lock;
> -       struct kobj_attribute auto_kobj_attr;
>         struct iw_node_attr *nattrs[];
>  };
>
> @@ -3833,7 +3832,6 @@ static int __init add_weighted_interleave_group(struct kobject *mempolicy_kobj)
>         err = sysfs_create_file(&wi_group->wi_kobj, &wi_auto_attr.attr);
>         if (err)
>                 goto err_put_kobj;
> -       wi_group->auto_kobj_attr = wi_auto_attr
>
>         for_each_online_node(nid) {
>                 if (!node_state(nid, N_MEMORY))
>
> Thank you both, I hope you have a great day!

Thanks!  LGTM, please feel free to add my

Reviewed-by: Huang Ying <ying.huang@linux.alibaba.com>

---
Best Regards,
Huang, Ying

  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-05-13  1:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-05-05 18:23 [PATCH v8] mm/mempolicy: Weighted Interleave Auto-tuning Joshua Hahn
2025-05-10  5:25 ` Huang, Ying
2025-05-10 18:51   ` Joshua Hahn
2025-05-11  2:58     ` Joshua Hahn
2025-05-11 12:56       ` Honggyu Kim
2025-05-12 14:14         ` Joshua Hahn
2025-05-16  4:37           ` Honggyu Kim
2025-05-16 14:43             ` Joshua Hahn
2025-05-17  8:26               ` Huang, Ying
2025-05-12  1:35       ` Huang, Ying
2025-05-12 14:25         ` Joshua Hahn
2025-05-12 22:29           ` Andrew Morton
2025-05-13 14:01             ` Joshua Hahn
2025-05-13  1:41           ` Huang, Ying [this message]
2025-05-13 13:59             ` Joshua Hahn
2025-05-19  1:56 ` Joshua Hahn
2025-05-19 22:31   ` Andrew Morton

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87tt5puw21.fsf@DESKTOP-5N7EMDA \
    --to=ying.huang@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=dave.jiang@intel.com \
    --cc=gourry@gourry.net \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=honggyu.kim@sk.com \
    --cc=horen.chuang@linux.dev \
    --cc=joshua.hahnjy@gmail.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
    --cc=lenb@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=osalvador@suse.de \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=yunjeong.mun@sk.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.