* [PATCH v6 1/5] drm: add macro drm_file_err to print process info
@ 2025-04-17 9:13 Sunil Khatri
2025-04-17 9:13 ` [PATCH v6 2/5] drm/amdgpu: add drm_file reference in userq_mgr Sunil Khatri
` (4 more replies)
0 siblings, 5 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Sunil Khatri @ 2025-04-17 9:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dri-devel, amd-gfx
Cc: Alex Deucher, Christian König, Tvrtko Ursulin,
Pierre-Eric Pelloux-Prayer, Jani Nikula, Sunil Khatri
Add a drm helper macro which append the process information for
the drm_file over drm_err.
v5: change to macro from function (Christian Koenig)
add helper functions for lock/unlock (Christian Koenig)
v6: remove __maybe_unused and make function inline (Jani Nikula)
remove drm_print.h
Signed-off-by: Sunil Khatri <sunil.khatri@amd.com>
---
include/drm/drm_file.h | 37 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 37 insertions(+)
diff --git a/include/drm/drm_file.h b/include/drm/drm_file.h
index 94d365b22505..856b38e996c7 100644
--- a/include/drm/drm_file.h
+++ b/include/drm/drm_file.h
@@ -446,6 +446,43 @@ static inline bool drm_is_accel_client(const struct drm_file *file_priv)
return file_priv->minor->type == DRM_MINOR_ACCEL;
}
+static inline struct task_struct *drm_task_lock(struct drm_file *file_priv)
+{
+ struct task_struct *task;
+ struct pid *pid;
+
+ mutex_lock(&file_priv->client_name_lock);
+ rcu_read_lock();
+ pid = rcu_dereference(file_priv->pid);
+ task = pid_task(pid, PIDTYPE_TGID);
+ return task;
+}
+
+static inline void drm_task_unlock(struct drm_file *file_priv)
+{
+ rcu_read_unlock();
+ mutex_unlock(&file_priv->client_name_lock);
+}
+/**
+ * drm_file_err - Fill info string with process name and pid
+ * @file_priv: context of interest for process name and pid
+ * @fmt: prinf() like format string
+ *
+ * This update the user provided buffer with process
+ * name and pid information for @file_priv
+ */
+#define drm_file_err(file_priv, fmt, ...) \
+ do { \
+ struct task_struct *task; \
+ struct drm_device *dev = file_priv->minor->dev; \
+ \
+ task = drm_task_lock(file_priv); \
+ drm_err(dev, "comm: %s pid: %d client: %s " fmt, \
+ task ? task->comm : "", task ? task->pid : 0, \
+ file_priv->client_name ?: "Unset", ##__VA_ARGS__); \
+ drm_task_unlock(file_priv); \
+ } while (0)
+
void drm_file_update_pid(struct drm_file *);
struct drm_minor *drm_minor_acquire(struct xarray *minors_xa, unsigned int minor_id);
--
2.34.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6 2/5] drm/amdgpu: add drm_file reference in userq_mgr
2025-04-17 9:13 [PATCH v6 1/5] drm: add macro drm_file_err to print process info Sunil Khatri
@ 2025-04-17 9:13 ` Sunil Khatri
2025-04-17 9:13 ` [PATCH v6 3/5] drm/amdgpu: use drm_file_err to add process info Sunil Khatri
` (3 subsequent siblings)
4 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Sunil Khatri @ 2025-04-17 9:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dri-devel, amd-gfx
Cc: Alex Deucher, Christian König, Tvrtko Ursulin,
Pierre-Eric Pelloux-Prayer, Jani Nikula, Sunil Khatri
drm_file will be used in usermode queues code to
enable better process information in logging and hence
add drm_file part of the userq_mgr struct.
update the drm_file pointer in userq_mgr for each
amdgpu_driver_open_kms.
Signed-off-by: Sunil Khatri <sunil.khatri@amd.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_kms.c | 1 +
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_userqueue.h | 1 +
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_kms.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_kms.c
index 3d319687c1c9..3de3071d66ee 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_kms.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_kms.c
@@ -1436,6 +1436,7 @@ int amdgpu_driver_open_kms(struct drm_device *dev, struct drm_file *file_priv)
amdgpu_ctx_mgr_init(&fpriv->ctx_mgr, adev);
+ fpriv->userq_mgr.file = file_priv;
r = amdgpu_userq_mgr_init(&fpriv->userq_mgr, adev);
if (r)
DRM_WARN("Can't setup usermode queues, use legacy workload submission only\n");
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_userqueue.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_userqueue.h
index 381b9c6f0573..fe51a45f7ee4 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_userqueue.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_userqueue.h
@@ -77,6 +77,7 @@ struct amdgpu_userq_mgr {
struct amdgpu_device *adev;
struct delayed_work resume_work;
struct list_head list;
+ struct drm_file *file;
};
struct amdgpu_db_info {
--
2.34.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6 3/5] drm/amdgpu: use drm_file_err to add process info
2025-04-17 9:13 [PATCH v6 1/5] drm: add macro drm_file_err to print process info Sunil Khatri
2025-04-17 9:13 ` [PATCH v6 2/5] drm/amdgpu: add drm_file reference in userq_mgr Sunil Khatri
@ 2025-04-17 9:13 ` Sunil Khatri
2025-04-17 9:13 ` [PATCH v6 4/5] drm/amdgpu: change DRM_ERROR to drm_file_err in amdgpu_userqueue.c Sunil Khatri
` (2 subsequent siblings)
4 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Sunil Khatri @ 2025-04-17 9:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dri-devel, amd-gfx
Cc: Alex Deucher, Christian König, Tvrtko Ursulin,
Pierre-Eric Pelloux-Prayer, Jani Nikula, Sunil Khatri
add process and pid information in the userqueue error
logging to make it more useful in resolving the error
by logs. drm_file_err logs pid and process name by
default.
Sample log:
[ 42.444297] [drm:amdgpu_userqueue_wait_for_signal [amdgpu]] *ERROR* Timed out waiting for fence f=000000001c74d978 for comm:Xwayland pid:3427
[ 42.444669] [drm:amdgpu_userqueue_suspend [amdgpu]] *ERROR* Not suspending userqueue, timeout waiting for comm:Xwayland pid:3427
[ 42.824729] [drm:amdgpu_userqueue_wait_for_signal [amdgpu]] *ERROR* Timed out waiting for fence f=0000000074407d3e for comm:systemd-logind pid:1058
[ 42.825082] [drm:amdgpu_userqueue_suspend [amdgpu]] *ERROR* Not suspending userqueue, timeout waiting for comm:systemd-logind pid:1058
Signed-off-by: Sunil Khatri <sunil.khatri@amd.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_userqueue.c | 14 ++++++++------
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_userqueue.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_userqueue.c
index 1867520ba258..ea43bcd63feb 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_userqueue.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_userqueue.c
@@ -43,7 +43,7 @@ amdgpu_userqueue_cleanup(struct amdgpu_userq_mgr *uq_mgr,
if (f && !dma_fence_is_signaled(f)) {
ret = dma_fence_wait_timeout(f, true, msecs_to_jiffies(100));
if (ret <= 0) {
- DRM_ERROR("Timed out waiting for fence f=%p\n", f);
+ drm_file_err(uq_mgr->file, "Timed out waiting for fence f=%p\n", f);
return;
}
}
@@ -440,7 +440,8 @@ amdgpu_userqueue_resume_all(struct amdgpu_userq_mgr *uq_mgr)
}
if (ret)
- DRM_ERROR("Failed to map all the queues\n");
+ drm_file_err(uq_mgr->file, "Failed to map all the queues\n");
+
return ret;
}
@@ -598,7 +599,8 @@ amdgpu_userqueue_suspend_all(struct amdgpu_userq_mgr *uq_mgr)
}
if (ret)
- DRM_ERROR("Couldn't unmap all the queues\n");
+ drm_file_err(uq_mgr->file, "Couldn't unmap all the queues\n");
+
return ret;
}
@@ -615,7 +617,7 @@ amdgpu_userqueue_wait_for_signal(struct amdgpu_userq_mgr *uq_mgr)
continue;
ret = dma_fence_wait_timeout(f, true, msecs_to_jiffies(100));
if (ret <= 0) {
- DRM_ERROR("Timed out waiting for fence f=%p\n", f);
+ drm_file_err(uq_mgr->file, "Timed out waiting for fence f=%p\n", f);
return -ETIMEDOUT;
}
}
@@ -634,13 +636,13 @@ amdgpu_userqueue_suspend(struct amdgpu_userq_mgr *uq_mgr,
/* Wait for any pending userqueue fence work to finish */
ret = amdgpu_userqueue_wait_for_signal(uq_mgr);
if (ret) {
- DRM_ERROR("Not suspending userqueue, timeout waiting for work\n");
+ drm_file_err(uq_mgr->file, "Not suspending userqueue, timeout waiting\n");
return;
}
ret = amdgpu_userqueue_suspend_all(uq_mgr);
if (ret) {
- DRM_ERROR("Failed to evict userqueue\n");
+ drm_file_err(uq_mgr->file, "Failed to evict userqueue\n");
return;
}
--
2.34.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6 4/5] drm/amdgpu: change DRM_ERROR to drm_file_err in amdgpu_userqueue.c
2025-04-17 9:13 [PATCH v6 1/5] drm: add macro drm_file_err to print process info Sunil Khatri
2025-04-17 9:13 ` [PATCH v6 2/5] drm/amdgpu: add drm_file reference in userq_mgr Sunil Khatri
2025-04-17 9:13 ` [PATCH v6 3/5] drm/amdgpu: use drm_file_err to add process info Sunil Khatri
@ 2025-04-17 9:13 ` Sunil Khatri
2025-04-17 9:13 ` [PATCH v6 5/5] drm/amdgpu: change DRM_DBG_DRIVER to drm_dbg_driver Sunil Khatri
2025-04-17 9:35 ` [PATCH v6 1/5] drm: add macro drm_file_err to print process info Jani Nikula
4 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Sunil Khatri @ 2025-04-17 9:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dri-devel, amd-gfx
Cc: Alex Deucher, Christian König, Tvrtko Ursulin,
Pierre-Eric Pelloux-Prayer, Jani Nikula, Sunil Khatri
change the DRM_ERROR to drm_file_err to ad process name
and pid to the logging.
Signed-off-by: Sunil Khatri <sunil.khatri@amd.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_userqueue.c | 52 +++++++++++--------
1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_userqueue.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_userqueue.c
index ea43bcd63feb..4957c7b04fe8 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_userqueue.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_userqueue.c
@@ -123,25 +123,25 @@ int amdgpu_userqueue_create_object(struct amdgpu_userq_mgr *uq_mgr,
r = amdgpu_bo_create(adev, &bp, &userq_obj->obj);
if (r) {
- DRM_ERROR("Failed to allocate BO for userqueue (%d)", r);
+ drm_file_err(uq_mgr->file, "Failed to allocate BO for userqueue (%d)", r);
return r;
}
r = amdgpu_bo_reserve(userq_obj->obj, true);
if (r) {
- DRM_ERROR("Failed to reserve BO to map (%d)", r);
+ drm_file_err(uq_mgr->file, "Failed to reserve BO to map (%d)", r);
goto free_obj;
}
r = amdgpu_ttm_alloc_gart(&(userq_obj->obj)->tbo);
if (r) {
- DRM_ERROR("Failed to alloc GART for userqueue object (%d)", r);
+ drm_file_err(uq_mgr->file, "Failed to alloc GART for userqueue object (%d)", r);
goto unresv;
}
r = amdgpu_bo_kmap(userq_obj->obj, &userq_obj->cpu_ptr);
if (r) {
- DRM_ERROR("Failed to map BO for userqueue (%d)", r);
+ drm_file_err(uq_mgr->file, "Failed to map BO for userqueue (%d)", r);
goto unresv;
}
@@ -177,7 +177,7 @@ amdgpu_userqueue_get_doorbell_index(struct amdgpu_userq_mgr *uq_mgr,
gobj = drm_gem_object_lookup(filp, db_info->doorbell_handle);
if (gobj == NULL) {
- DRM_ERROR("Can't find GEM object for doorbell\n");
+ drm_file_err(uq_mgr->file, "Can't find GEM object for doorbell\n");
return -EINVAL;
}
@@ -187,13 +187,15 @@ amdgpu_userqueue_get_doorbell_index(struct amdgpu_userq_mgr *uq_mgr,
/* Pin the BO before generating the index, unpin in queue destroy */
r = amdgpu_bo_pin(db_obj->obj, AMDGPU_GEM_DOMAIN_DOORBELL);
if (r) {
- DRM_ERROR("[Usermode queues] Failed to pin doorbell object\n");
+ drm_file_err(uq_mgr->file,
+ "[Usermode queues] Failed to pin doorbell object\n");
goto unref_bo;
}
r = amdgpu_bo_reserve(db_obj->obj, true);
if (r) {
- DRM_ERROR("[Usermode queues] Failed to pin doorbell object\n");
+ drm_file_err(uq_mgr->file,
+ "[Usermode queues] Failed to pin doorbell object\n");
goto unpin_bo;
}
@@ -215,7 +217,8 @@ amdgpu_userqueue_get_doorbell_index(struct amdgpu_userq_mgr *uq_mgr,
break;
default:
- DRM_ERROR("[Usermode queues] IP %d not support\n", db_info->queue_type);
+ drm_file_err(uq_mgr->file,
+ "[Usermode queues] IP %d not support\n", db_info->queue_type);
r = -EINVAL;
goto unpin_bo;
}
@@ -282,7 +285,8 @@ amdgpu_userqueue_create(struct drm_file *filp, union drm_amdgpu_userq *args)
if (args->in.ip_type != AMDGPU_HW_IP_GFX &&
args->in.ip_type != AMDGPU_HW_IP_DMA &&
args->in.ip_type != AMDGPU_HW_IP_COMPUTE) {
- DRM_ERROR("Usermode queue doesn't support IP type %u\n", args->in.ip_type);
+ drm_file_err(uq_mgr->file,
+ "Usermode queue doesn't support IP type %u\n", args->in.ip_type);
return -EINVAL;
}
@@ -304,14 +308,16 @@ amdgpu_userqueue_create(struct drm_file *filp, union drm_amdgpu_userq *args)
uq_funcs = adev->userq_funcs[args->in.ip_type];
if (!uq_funcs) {
- DRM_ERROR("Usermode queue is not supported for this IP (%u)\n", args->in.ip_type);
+ drm_file_err(uq_mgr->file,
+ "Usermode queue is not supported for this IP (%u)\n",
+ args->in.ip_type);
r = -EINVAL;
goto unlock;
}
queue = kzalloc(sizeof(struct amdgpu_usermode_queue), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!queue) {
- DRM_ERROR("Failed to allocate memory for queue\n");
+ drm_file_err(uq_mgr->file, "Failed to allocate memory for queue\n");
r = -ENOMEM;
goto unlock;
}
@@ -327,7 +333,7 @@ amdgpu_userqueue_create(struct drm_file *filp, union drm_amdgpu_userq *args)
/* Convert relative doorbell offset into absolute doorbell index */
index = amdgpu_userqueue_get_doorbell_index(uq_mgr, &db_info, filp);
if (index == (uint64_t)-EINVAL) {
- DRM_ERROR("Failed to get doorbell for queue\n");
+ drm_file_err(uq_mgr->file, "Failed to get doorbell for queue\n");
kfree(queue);
goto unlock;
}
@@ -336,13 +342,13 @@ amdgpu_userqueue_create(struct drm_file *filp, union drm_amdgpu_userq *args)
xa_init_flags(&queue->fence_drv_xa, XA_FLAGS_ALLOC);
r = amdgpu_userq_fence_driver_alloc(adev, queue);
if (r) {
- DRM_ERROR("Failed to alloc fence driver\n");
+ drm_file_err(uq_mgr->file, "Failed to alloc fence driver\n");
goto unlock;
}
r = uq_funcs->mqd_create(uq_mgr, &args->in, queue);
if (r) {
- DRM_ERROR("Failed to create Queue\n");
+ drm_file_err(uq_mgr->file, "Failed to create Queue\n");
amdgpu_userq_fence_driver_free(queue);
kfree(queue);
goto unlock;
@@ -350,7 +356,7 @@ amdgpu_userqueue_create(struct drm_file *filp, union drm_amdgpu_userq *args)
qid = idr_alloc(&uq_mgr->userq_idr, queue, 1, AMDGPU_MAX_USERQ_COUNT, GFP_KERNEL);
if (qid < 0) {
- DRM_ERROR("Failed to allocate a queue id\n");
+ drm_file_err(uq_mgr->file, "Failed to allocate a queue id\n");
amdgpu_userq_fence_driver_free(queue);
uq_funcs->mqd_destroy(uq_mgr, queue);
kfree(queue);
@@ -360,7 +366,7 @@ amdgpu_userqueue_create(struct drm_file *filp, union drm_amdgpu_userq *args)
r = uq_funcs->map(uq_mgr, queue);
if (r) {
- DRM_ERROR("Failed to map Queue\n");
+ drm_file_err(uq_mgr->file, "Failed to map Queue\n");
idr_remove(&uq_mgr->userq_idr, qid);
amdgpu_userq_fence_driver_free(queue);
uq_funcs->mqd_destroy(uq_mgr, queue);
@@ -388,7 +394,7 @@ int amdgpu_userq_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
return -EINVAL;
r = amdgpu_userqueue_create(filp, args);
if (r)
- DRM_ERROR("Failed to create usermode queue\n");
+ drm_file_err(filp, "Failed to create usermode queue\n");
break;
case AMDGPU_USERQ_OP_FREE:
@@ -406,7 +412,7 @@ int amdgpu_userq_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
return -EINVAL;
r = amdgpu_userqueue_destroy(filp, args->in.queue_id);
if (r)
- DRM_ERROR("Failed to destroy usermode queue\n");
+ drm_file_err(filp, "Failed to destroy usermode queue\n");
break;
default:
@@ -479,7 +485,7 @@ amdgpu_userqueue_validate_bos(struct amdgpu_userq_mgr *uq_mgr)
ret = amdgpu_vm_lock_pd(vm, &exec, 2);
drm_exec_retry_on_contention(&exec);
if (unlikely(ret)) {
- DRM_ERROR("Failed to lock PD\n");
+ drm_file_err(uq_mgr->file, "Failed to lock PD\n");
goto unlock_all;
}
@@ -519,7 +525,7 @@ amdgpu_userqueue_validate_bos(struct amdgpu_userq_mgr *uq_mgr)
bo = bo_va->base.bo;
ret = amdgpu_userqueue_validate_vm_bo(NULL, bo);
if (ret) {
- DRM_ERROR("Failed to validate BO\n");
+ drm_file_err(uq_mgr->file, "Failed to validate BO\n");
goto unlock_all;
}
@@ -550,7 +556,7 @@ amdgpu_userqueue_validate_bos(struct amdgpu_userq_mgr *uq_mgr)
ret = amdgpu_eviction_fence_replace_fence(&fpriv->evf_mgr, &exec);
if (ret)
- DRM_ERROR("Failed to replace eviction fence\n");
+ drm_file_err(uq_mgr->file, "Failed to replace eviction fence\n");
unlock_all:
drm_exec_fini(&exec);
@@ -569,13 +575,13 @@ static void amdgpu_userqueue_resume_worker(struct work_struct *work)
ret = amdgpu_userqueue_validate_bos(uq_mgr);
if (ret) {
- DRM_ERROR("Failed to validate BOs to restore\n");
+ drm_file_err(uq_mgr->file, "Failed to validate BOs to restore\n");
goto unlock;
}
ret = amdgpu_userqueue_resume_all(uq_mgr);
if (ret) {
- DRM_ERROR("Failed to resume all queues\n");
+ drm_file_err(uq_mgr->file, "Failed to resume all queues\n");
goto unlock;
}
--
2.34.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6 5/5] drm/amdgpu: change DRM_DBG_DRIVER to drm_dbg_driver
2025-04-17 9:13 [PATCH v6 1/5] drm: add macro drm_file_err to print process info Sunil Khatri
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2025-04-17 9:13 ` [PATCH v6 4/5] drm/amdgpu: change DRM_ERROR to drm_file_err in amdgpu_userqueue.c Sunil Khatri
@ 2025-04-17 9:13 ` Sunil Khatri
2025-04-17 9:35 ` [PATCH v6 1/5] drm: add macro drm_file_err to print process info Jani Nikula
4 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Sunil Khatri @ 2025-04-17 9:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dri-devel, amd-gfx
Cc: Alex Deucher, Christian König, Tvrtko Ursulin,
Pierre-Eric Pelloux-Prayer, Jani Nikula, Sunil Khatri
update the functions in amdgpu_userqueues.c from
DRM_DBG_DRIVER to drm_dbg_driver so multi gpu instance
can be logged in.
Signed-off-by: Sunil Khatri <sunil.khatri@amd.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_userqueue.c | 8 +++++---
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_userqueue.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_userqueue.c
index 4957c7b04fe8..7ca46d96c692 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_userqueue.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_userqueue.c
@@ -225,7 +225,8 @@ amdgpu_userqueue_get_doorbell_index(struct amdgpu_userq_mgr *uq_mgr,
index = amdgpu_doorbell_index_on_bar(uq_mgr->adev, db_obj->obj,
db_info->doorbell_offset, db_size);
- DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("[Usermode queues] doorbell index=%lld\n", index);
+ drm_dbg_driver(adev_to_drm(uq_mgr->adev),
+ "[Usermode queues] doorbell index=%lld\n", index);
amdgpu_bo_unreserve(db_obj->obj);
return index;
@@ -252,7 +253,7 @@ amdgpu_userqueue_destroy(struct drm_file *filp, int queue_id)
queue = amdgpu_userqueue_find(uq_mgr, queue_id);
if (!queue) {
- DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("Invalid queue id to destroy\n");
+ drm_dbg_driver(adev_to_drm(adev), "Invalid queue id to destroy\n");
mutex_unlock(&uq_mgr->userq_mutex);
return -EINVAL;
}
@@ -416,7 +417,8 @@ int amdgpu_userq_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
break;
default:
- DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("Invalid user queue op specified: %d\n", args->in.op);
+ drm_dbg_driver(dev, "Invalid user queue op specified: %d\n",
+ args->in.op);
return -EINVAL;
}
--
2.34.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v6 1/5] drm: add macro drm_file_err to print process info
2025-04-17 9:13 [PATCH v6 1/5] drm: add macro drm_file_err to print process info Sunil Khatri
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2025-04-17 9:13 ` [PATCH v6 5/5] drm/amdgpu: change DRM_DBG_DRIVER to drm_dbg_driver Sunil Khatri
@ 2025-04-17 9:35 ` Jani Nikula
2025-04-17 9:57 ` Christian König
4 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Jani Nikula @ 2025-04-17 9:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Sunil Khatri, dri-devel, amd-gfx
Cc: Alex Deucher, Christian König, Tvrtko Ursulin,
Pierre-Eric Pelloux-Prayer, Sunil Khatri
On Thu, 17 Apr 2025, Sunil Khatri <sunil.khatri@amd.com> wrote:
> Add a drm helper macro which append the process information for
> the drm_file over drm_err.
>
> v5: change to macro from function (Christian Koenig)
> add helper functions for lock/unlock (Christian Koenig)
>
> v6: remove __maybe_unused and make function inline (Jani Nikula)
> remove drm_print.h
I guess I gave all kinds of comments, but in the end my conclusion was:
why does *any* of this have to be static inline or macros? Make
drm_file_err() a regular function and hide the implementation inside
drm_file.c. That's the cleanest approach IMO.
BR,
Jani.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sunil Khatri <sunil.khatri@amd.com>
> ---
> include/drm/drm_file.h | 37 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 37 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/include/drm/drm_file.h b/include/drm/drm_file.h
> index 94d365b22505..856b38e996c7 100644
> --- a/include/drm/drm_file.h
> +++ b/include/drm/drm_file.h
> @@ -446,6 +446,43 @@ static inline bool drm_is_accel_client(const struct drm_file *file_priv)
> return file_priv->minor->type == DRM_MINOR_ACCEL;
> }
>
> +static inline struct task_struct *drm_task_lock(struct drm_file *file_priv)
> +{
> + struct task_struct *task;
> + struct pid *pid;
> +
> + mutex_lock(&file_priv->client_name_lock);
> + rcu_read_lock();
> + pid = rcu_dereference(file_priv->pid);
> + task = pid_task(pid, PIDTYPE_TGID);
> + return task;
> +}
> +
> +static inline void drm_task_unlock(struct drm_file *file_priv)
> +{
> + rcu_read_unlock();
> + mutex_unlock(&file_priv->client_name_lock);
> +}
> +/**
> + * drm_file_err - Fill info string with process name and pid
> + * @file_priv: context of interest for process name and pid
> + * @fmt: prinf() like format string
> + *
> + * This update the user provided buffer with process
> + * name and pid information for @file_priv
> + */
> +#define drm_file_err(file_priv, fmt, ...) \
> + do { \
> + struct task_struct *task; \
> + struct drm_device *dev = file_priv->minor->dev; \
> + \
> + task = drm_task_lock(file_priv); \
> + drm_err(dev, "comm: %s pid: %d client: %s " fmt, \
> + task ? task->comm : "", task ? task->pid : 0, \
> + file_priv->client_name ?: "Unset", ##__VA_ARGS__); \
> + drm_task_unlock(file_priv); \
> + } while (0)
> +
> void drm_file_update_pid(struct drm_file *);
>
> struct drm_minor *drm_minor_acquire(struct xarray *minors_xa, unsigned int minor_id);
--
Jani Nikula, Intel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v6 1/5] drm: add macro drm_file_err to print process info
2025-04-17 9:35 ` [PATCH v6 1/5] drm: add macro drm_file_err to print process info Jani Nikula
@ 2025-04-17 9:57 ` Christian König
2025-04-17 11:07 ` Jani Nikula
0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Christian König @ 2025-04-17 9:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jani Nikula, Sunil Khatri, dri-devel, amd-gfx
Cc: Alex Deucher, Tvrtko Ursulin, Pierre-Eric Pelloux-Prayer
Am 17.04.25 um 11:35 schrieb Jani Nikula:
> On Thu, 17 Apr 2025, Sunil Khatri <sunil.khatri@amd.com> wrote:
>> Add a drm helper macro which append the process information for
>> the drm_file over drm_err.
>>
>> v5: change to macro from function (Christian Koenig)
>> add helper functions for lock/unlock (Christian Koenig)
>>
>> v6: remove __maybe_unused and make function inline (Jani Nikula)
>> remove drm_print.h
> I guess I gave all kinds of comments, but in the end my conclusion was:
> why does *any* of this have to be static inline or macros? Make
> drm_file_err() a regular function and hide the implementation inside
> drm_file.c. That's the cleanest approach IMO.
That won't work. The macro is necessary to concatenate the format strings.
But the drm_task_lock() and drm_task_unlock() functions shouldn't be in the header. Those can be perfectly in drm_file.c or drm_print.c
And we should put drm_file_err into drm_print.h instead of drm_file.h as far as I can see.
Regards,
Christian.
>
> BR,
> Jani.
>
>> Signed-off-by: Sunil Khatri <sunil.khatri@amd.com>
>> ---
>> include/drm/drm_file.h | 37 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 37 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/include/drm/drm_file.h b/include/drm/drm_file.h
>> index 94d365b22505..856b38e996c7 100644
>> --- a/include/drm/drm_file.h
>> +++ b/include/drm/drm_file.h
>> @@ -446,6 +446,43 @@ static inline bool drm_is_accel_client(const struct drm_file *file_priv)
>> return file_priv->minor->type == DRM_MINOR_ACCEL;
>> }
>>
>> +static inline struct task_struct *drm_task_lock(struct drm_file *file_priv)
>> +{
>> + struct task_struct *task;
>> + struct pid *pid;
>> +
>> + mutex_lock(&file_priv->client_name_lock);
>> + rcu_read_lock();
>> + pid = rcu_dereference(file_priv->pid);
>> + task = pid_task(pid, PIDTYPE_TGID);
>> + return task;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static inline void drm_task_unlock(struct drm_file *file_priv)
>> +{
>> + rcu_read_unlock();
>> + mutex_unlock(&file_priv->client_name_lock);
>> +}
>> +/**
>> + * drm_file_err - Fill info string with process name and pid
>> + * @file_priv: context of interest for process name and pid
>> + * @fmt: prinf() like format string
>> + *
>> + * This update the user provided buffer with process
>> + * name and pid information for @file_priv
>> + */
>> +#define drm_file_err(file_priv, fmt, ...) \
>> + do { \
>> + struct task_struct *task; \
>> + struct drm_device *dev = file_priv->minor->dev; \
>> + \
>> + task = drm_task_lock(file_priv); \
>> + drm_err(dev, "comm: %s pid: %d client: %s " fmt, \
>> + task ? task->comm : "", task ? task->pid : 0, \
>> + file_priv->client_name ?: "Unset", ##__VA_ARGS__); \
>> + drm_task_unlock(file_priv); \
>> + } while (0)
>> +
>> void drm_file_update_pid(struct drm_file *);
>>
>> struct drm_minor *drm_minor_acquire(struct xarray *minors_xa, unsigned int minor_id);
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v6 1/5] drm: add macro drm_file_err to print process info
2025-04-17 9:57 ` Christian König
@ 2025-04-17 11:07 ` Jani Nikula
2025-04-17 11:18 ` Christian König
0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Jani Nikula @ 2025-04-17 11:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Christian König, Sunil Khatri, dri-devel, amd-gfx
Cc: Alex Deucher, Tvrtko Ursulin, Pierre-Eric Pelloux-Prayer
On Thu, 17 Apr 2025, Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com> wrote:
> Am 17.04.25 um 11:35 schrieb Jani Nikula:
>> On Thu, 17 Apr 2025, Sunil Khatri <sunil.khatri@amd.com> wrote:
>>> Add a drm helper macro which append the process information for
>>> the drm_file over drm_err.
>>>
>>> v5: change to macro from function (Christian Koenig)
>>> add helper functions for lock/unlock (Christian Koenig)
>>>
>>> v6: remove __maybe_unused and make function inline (Jani Nikula)
>>> remove drm_print.h
>> I guess I gave all kinds of comments, but in the end my conclusion was:
>> why does *any* of this have to be static inline or macros? Make
>> drm_file_err() a regular function and hide the implementation inside
>> drm_file.c. That's the cleanest approach IMO.
>
> That won't work. The macro is necessary to concatenate the format strings.
I think you can handle them using struct va_format and %pV.
BR,
Jani.
>
> But the drm_task_lock() and drm_task_unlock() functions shouldn't be in the header. Those can be perfectly in drm_file.c or drm_print.c
>
> And we should put drm_file_err into drm_print.h instead of drm_file.h as far as I can see.
>
> Regards,
> Christian.
>
>>
>> BR,
>> Jani.
>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Sunil Khatri <sunil.khatri@amd.com>
>>> ---
>>> include/drm/drm_file.h | 37 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>> 1 file changed, 37 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/include/drm/drm_file.h b/include/drm/drm_file.h
>>> index 94d365b22505..856b38e996c7 100644
>>> --- a/include/drm/drm_file.h
>>> +++ b/include/drm/drm_file.h
>>> @@ -446,6 +446,43 @@ static inline bool drm_is_accel_client(const struct drm_file *file_priv)
>>> return file_priv->minor->type == DRM_MINOR_ACCEL;
>>> }
>>>
>>> +static inline struct task_struct *drm_task_lock(struct drm_file *file_priv)
>>> +{
>>> + struct task_struct *task;
>>> + struct pid *pid;
>>> +
>>> + mutex_lock(&file_priv->client_name_lock);
>>> + rcu_read_lock();
>>> + pid = rcu_dereference(file_priv->pid);
>>> + task = pid_task(pid, PIDTYPE_TGID);
>>> + return task;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static inline void drm_task_unlock(struct drm_file *file_priv)
>>> +{
>>> + rcu_read_unlock();
>>> + mutex_unlock(&file_priv->client_name_lock);
>>> +}
>>> +/**
>>> + * drm_file_err - Fill info string with process name and pid
>>> + * @file_priv: context of interest for process name and pid
>>> + * @fmt: prinf() like format string
>>> + *
>>> + * This update the user provided buffer with process
>>> + * name and pid information for @file_priv
>>> + */
>>> +#define drm_file_err(file_priv, fmt, ...) \
>>> + do { \
>>> + struct task_struct *task; \
>>> + struct drm_device *dev = file_priv->minor->dev; \
>>> + \
>>> + task = drm_task_lock(file_priv); \
>>> + drm_err(dev, "comm: %s pid: %d client: %s " fmt, \
>>> + task ? task->comm : "", task ? task->pid : 0, \
>>> + file_priv->client_name ?: "Unset", ##__VA_ARGS__); \
>>> + drm_task_unlock(file_priv); \
>>> + } while (0)
>>> +
>>> void drm_file_update_pid(struct drm_file *);
>>>
>>> struct drm_minor *drm_minor_acquire(struct xarray *minors_xa, unsigned int minor_id);
>
--
Jani Nikula, Intel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v6 1/5] drm: add macro drm_file_err to print process info
2025-04-17 11:07 ` Jani Nikula
@ 2025-04-17 11:18 ` Christian König
2025-04-17 11:30 ` Jani Nikula
0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Christian König @ 2025-04-17 11:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jani Nikula, Sunil Khatri, dri-devel, amd-gfx
Cc: Alex Deucher, Tvrtko Ursulin, Pierre-Eric Pelloux-Prayer
Am 17.04.25 um 13:07 schrieb Jani Nikula:
> On Thu, 17 Apr 2025, Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com> wrote:
>> Am 17.04.25 um 11:35 schrieb Jani Nikula:
>>> On Thu, 17 Apr 2025, Sunil Khatri <sunil.khatri@amd.com> wrote:
>>>> Add a drm helper macro which append the process information for
>>>> the drm_file over drm_err.
>>>>
>>>> v5: change to macro from function (Christian Koenig)
>>>> add helper functions for lock/unlock (Christian Koenig)
>>>>
>>>> v6: remove __maybe_unused and make function inline (Jani Nikula)
>>>> remove drm_print.h
>>> I guess I gave all kinds of comments, but in the end my conclusion was:
>>> why does *any* of this have to be static inline or macros? Make
>>> drm_file_err() a regular function and hide the implementation inside
>>> drm_file.c. That's the cleanest approach IMO.
>> That won't work. The macro is necessary to concatenate the format strings.
> I think you can handle them using struct va_format and %pV.
Oh, really good point! I wasn't aware that this functionality exists.
Going to discuss that with Sunil internally.
Thanks,
Christian.
>
> BR,
> Jani.
>
>
>> But the drm_task_lock() and drm_task_unlock() functions shouldn't be in the header. Those can be perfectly in drm_file.c or drm_print.c
>>
>> And we should put drm_file_err into drm_print.h instead of drm_file.h as far as I can see.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Christian.
>>
>>> BR,
>>> Jani.
>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Sunil Khatri <sunil.khatri@amd.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> include/drm/drm_file.h | 37 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>> 1 file changed, 37 insertions(+)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/include/drm/drm_file.h b/include/drm/drm_file.h
>>>> index 94d365b22505..856b38e996c7 100644
>>>> --- a/include/drm/drm_file.h
>>>> +++ b/include/drm/drm_file.h
>>>> @@ -446,6 +446,43 @@ static inline bool drm_is_accel_client(const struct drm_file *file_priv)
>>>> return file_priv->minor->type == DRM_MINOR_ACCEL;
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> +static inline struct task_struct *drm_task_lock(struct drm_file *file_priv)
>>>> +{
>>>> + struct task_struct *task;
>>>> + struct pid *pid;
>>>> +
>>>> + mutex_lock(&file_priv->client_name_lock);
>>>> + rcu_read_lock();
>>>> + pid = rcu_dereference(file_priv->pid);
>>>> + task = pid_task(pid, PIDTYPE_TGID);
>>>> + return task;
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> +static inline void drm_task_unlock(struct drm_file *file_priv)
>>>> +{
>>>> + rcu_read_unlock();
>>>> + mutex_unlock(&file_priv->client_name_lock);
>>>> +}
>>>> +/**
>>>> + * drm_file_err - Fill info string with process name and pid
>>>> + * @file_priv: context of interest for process name and pid
>>>> + * @fmt: prinf() like format string
>>>> + *
>>>> + * This update the user provided buffer with process
>>>> + * name and pid information for @file_priv
>>>> + */
>>>> +#define drm_file_err(file_priv, fmt, ...) \
>>>> + do { \
>>>> + struct task_struct *task; \
>>>> + struct drm_device *dev = file_priv->minor->dev; \
>>>> + \
>>>> + task = drm_task_lock(file_priv); \
>>>> + drm_err(dev, "comm: %s pid: %d client: %s " fmt, \
>>>> + task ? task->comm : "", task ? task->pid : 0, \
>>>> + file_priv->client_name ?: "Unset", ##__VA_ARGS__); \
>>>> + drm_task_unlock(file_priv); \
>>>> + } while (0)
>>>> +
>>>> void drm_file_update_pid(struct drm_file *);
>>>>
>>>> struct drm_minor *drm_minor_acquire(struct xarray *minors_xa, unsigned int minor_id);
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v6 1/5] drm: add macro drm_file_err to print process info
2025-04-17 11:18 ` Christian König
@ 2025-04-17 11:30 ` Jani Nikula
2025-04-17 11:38 ` Khatri, Sunil
0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Jani Nikula @ 2025-04-17 11:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Christian König, Sunil Khatri, dri-devel, amd-gfx
Cc: Alex Deucher, Tvrtko Ursulin, Pierre-Eric Pelloux-Prayer
On Thu, 17 Apr 2025, Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com> wrote:
> Am 17.04.25 um 13:07 schrieb Jani Nikula:
>> On Thu, 17 Apr 2025, Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com> wrote:
>>> Am 17.04.25 um 11:35 schrieb Jani Nikula:
>>>> On Thu, 17 Apr 2025, Sunil Khatri <sunil.khatri@amd.com> wrote:
>>>>> Add a drm helper macro which append the process information for
>>>>> the drm_file over drm_err.
>>>>>
>>>>> v5: change to macro from function (Christian Koenig)
>>>>> add helper functions for lock/unlock (Christian Koenig)
>>>>>
>>>>> v6: remove __maybe_unused and make function inline (Jani Nikula)
>>>>> remove drm_print.h
>>>> I guess I gave all kinds of comments, but in the end my conclusion was:
>>>> why does *any* of this have to be static inline or macros? Make
>>>> drm_file_err() a regular function and hide the implementation inside
>>>> drm_file.c. That's the cleanest approach IMO.
>>> That won't work. The macro is necessary to concatenate the format strings.
>> I think you can handle them using struct va_format and %pV.
>
> Oh, really good point! I wasn't aware that this functionality exists.
>
> Going to discuss that with Sunil internally.
Please see the completely untested patch below for a starting point.
BR,
Jani.
From 55968ab339467c5b6e12ceb157ecbaf62eaa6082 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Sunil Khatri <sunil.khatri@amd.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2025 14:43:51 +0530
Subject: [PATCH] drm: add macro drm_file_err to print process info
Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Add a drm helper macro which append the process information for
the drm_file over drm_err.
v5: change to macro from function (Christian Koenig)
add helper functions for lock/unlock (Christian Koenig)
v6: remove __maybe_unused and make function inline (Jani Nikula)
remove drm_print.h
Signed-off-by: Sunil Khatri <sunil.khatri@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/drm_file.c | 45 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
include/drm/drm_file.h | 3 +++
2 files changed, 48 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_file.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_file.c
index c299cd94d3f7..dea954f57890 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_file.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_file.c
@@ -1025,3 +1025,48 @@ struct file *mock_drm_getfile(struct drm_minor *minor, unsigned int flags)
return file;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_FOR_TESTS_ONLY(mock_drm_getfile);
+
+static struct task_struct *drm_task_lock(struct drm_file *file_priv)
+{
+ struct task_struct *task;
+ struct pid *pid;
+
+ mutex_lock(&file_priv->client_name_lock);
+ rcu_read_lock();
+ pid = rcu_dereference(file_priv->pid);
+ task = pid_task(pid, PIDTYPE_TGID);
+
+ return task;
+}
+
+static void drm_task_unlock(struct drm_file *file_priv)
+{
+ rcu_read_unlock();
+ mutex_unlock(&file_priv->client_name_lock);
+}
+/**
+ * drm_file_err - Fill info string with process name and pid
+ * @file_priv: context of interest for process name and pid
+ * @format: printf() like format string
+ *
+ * This update the user provided buffer with process
+ * name and pid information for @file_priv
+ */
+void drm_file_err(struct drm_file *file_priv, const char *format, ...)
+{
+ struct drm_device *dev = file_priv->minor->dev;
+ struct task_struct *task;
+ struct va_format vaf;
+ va_list args;
+
+ va_start(args, format);
+ vaf.fmt = format;
+ vaf.va = &args;
+
+ task = drm_task_lock(file_priv);
+ drm_err(dev, "comm: %s pid: %d client: %s %pV",
+ task ? task->comm : "", task ? task->pid : 0,
+ file_priv->client_name ?: "Unset", &vaf);
+ drm_task_unlock(file_priv);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_file_err);
diff --git a/include/drm/drm_file.h b/include/drm/drm_file.h
index 94d365b22505..ceb08a67f0b7 100644
--- a/include/drm/drm_file.h
+++ b/include/drm/drm_file.h
@@ -446,6 +446,9 @@ static inline bool drm_is_accel_client(const struct drm_file *file_priv)
return file_priv->minor->type == DRM_MINOR_ACCEL;
}
+__printf(2, 3)
+void drm_file_err(struct drm_file *file_priv, const char *format, ...);
+
void drm_file_update_pid(struct drm_file *);
struct drm_minor *drm_minor_acquire(struct xarray *minors_xa, unsigned int minor_id);
--
2.39.5
--
Jani Nikula, Intel
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* RE: [PATCH v6 1/5] drm: add macro drm_file_err to print process info
2025-04-17 11:30 ` Jani Nikula
@ 2025-04-17 11:38 ` Khatri, Sunil
0 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Khatri, Sunil @ 2025-04-17 11:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jani Nikula, Koenig, Christian, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Deucher, Alexander, Tvrtko Ursulin, Pelloux-Prayer, Pierre-Eric
[AMD Official Use Only - AMD Internal Distribution Only]
-----Original Message-----
From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
Sent: Thursday, April 17, 2025 5:00 PM
To: Koenig, Christian <Christian.Koenig@amd.com>; Khatri, Sunil <Sunil.Khatri@amd.com>; dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org; amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Deucher, Alexander <Alexander.Deucher@amd.com>; Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@igalia.com>; Pelloux-Prayer, Pierre-Eric <Pierre-eric.Pelloux-prayer@amd.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/5] drm: add macro drm_file_err to print process info
On Thu, 17 Apr 2025, Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com> wrote:
> Am 17.04.25 um 13:07 schrieb Jani Nikula:
>> On Thu, 17 Apr 2025, Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com> wrote:
>>> Am 17.04.25 um 11:35 schrieb Jani Nikula:
>>>> On Thu, 17 Apr 2025, Sunil Khatri <sunil.khatri@amd.com> wrote:
>>>>> Add a drm helper macro which append the process information for
>>>>> the drm_file over drm_err.
>>>>>
>>>>> v5: change to macro from function (Christian Koenig)
>>>>> add helper functions for lock/unlock (Christian Koenig)
>>>>>
>>>>> v6: remove __maybe_unused and make function inline (Jani Nikula)
>>>>> remove drm_print.h
>>>> I guess I gave all kinds of comments, but in the end my conclusion was:
>>>> why does *any* of this have to be static inline or macros? Make
>>>> drm_file_err() a regular function and hide the implementation
>>>> inside drm_file.c. That's the cleanest approach IMO.
>>> That won't work. The macro is necessary to concatenate the format strings.
>> I think you can handle them using struct va_format and %pV.
>
> Oh, really good point! I wasn't aware that this functionality exists.
>
> Going to discuss that with Sunil internally.
Please see the completely untested patch below for a starting point.
BR,
Jani.
From 55968ab339467c5b6e12ceb157ecbaf62eaa6082 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Sunil Khatri <sunil.khatri@amd.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2025 14:43:51 +0530
Subject: [PATCH] drm: add macro drm_file_err to print process info
Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Add a drm helper macro which append the process information for the drm_file over drm_err.
v5: change to macro from function (Christian Koenig)
add helper functions for lock/unlock (Christian Koenig)
v6: remove __maybe_unused and make function inline (Jani Nikula)
remove drm_print.h
Signed-off-by: Sunil Khatri <sunil.khatri@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/drm_file.c | 45 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
include/drm/drm_file.h | 3 +++
2 files changed, 48 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_file.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_file.c index c299cd94d3f7..dea954f57890 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_file.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_file.c
@@ -1025,3 +1025,48 @@ struct file *mock_drm_getfile(struct drm_minor *minor, unsigned int flags)
return file;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_FOR_TESTS_ONLY(mock_drm_getfile);
+
+static struct task_struct *drm_task_lock(struct drm_file *file_priv) {
+ struct task_struct *task;
+ struct pid *pid;
+
+ mutex_lock(&file_priv->client_name_lock);
+ rcu_read_lock();
+ pid = rcu_dereference(file_priv->pid);
+ task = pid_task(pid, PIDTYPE_TGID);
+
+ return task;
+}
+
+static void drm_task_unlock(struct drm_file *file_priv) {
+ rcu_read_unlock();
+ mutex_unlock(&file_priv->client_name_lock);
+}
+/**
+ * drm_file_err - Fill info string with process name and pid
+ * @file_priv: context of interest for process name and pid
+ * @format: printf() like format string
+ *
+ * This update the user provided buffer with process
+ * name and pid information for @file_priv */ void drm_file_err(struct
+drm_file *file_priv, const char *format, ...) {
+ struct drm_device *dev = file_priv->minor->dev;
+ struct task_struct *task;
+ struct va_format vaf;
+ va_list args;
+
+ va_start(args, format);
+ vaf.fmt = format;
+ vaf.va = &args;
+
+ task = drm_task_lock(file_priv);
+ drm_err(dev, "comm: %s pid: %d client: %s %pV",
+ task ? task->comm : "", task ? task->pid : 0,
+ file_priv->client_name ?: "Unset", &vaf);
+ drm_task_unlock(file_priv);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_file_err);
I made this change only and validating it. Thanks a lot for suggesting it. Would be great if it works as intended and as we need it.
Regards
Sunil Khatri
diff --git a/include/drm/drm_file.h b/include/drm/drm_file.h index 94d365b22505..ceb08a67f0b7 100644
--- a/include/drm/drm_file.h
+++ b/include/drm/drm_file.h
@@ -446,6 +446,9 @@ static inline bool drm_is_accel_client(const struct drm_file *file_priv)
return file_priv->minor->type == DRM_MINOR_ACCEL; }
+__printf(2, 3)
+void drm_file_err(struct drm_file *file_priv, const char *format, ...);
+
void drm_file_update_pid(struct drm_file *);
struct drm_minor *drm_minor_acquire(struct xarray *minors_xa, unsigned int minor_id);
--
2.39.5
--
Jani Nikula, Intel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2025-04-17 11:38 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2025-04-17 9:13 [PATCH v6 1/5] drm: add macro drm_file_err to print process info Sunil Khatri
2025-04-17 9:13 ` [PATCH v6 2/5] drm/amdgpu: add drm_file reference in userq_mgr Sunil Khatri
2025-04-17 9:13 ` [PATCH v6 3/5] drm/amdgpu: use drm_file_err to add process info Sunil Khatri
2025-04-17 9:13 ` [PATCH v6 4/5] drm/amdgpu: change DRM_ERROR to drm_file_err in amdgpu_userqueue.c Sunil Khatri
2025-04-17 9:13 ` [PATCH v6 5/5] drm/amdgpu: change DRM_DBG_DRIVER to drm_dbg_driver Sunil Khatri
2025-04-17 9:35 ` [PATCH v6 1/5] drm: add macro drm_file_err to print process info Jani Nikula
2025-04-17 9:57 ` Christian König
2025-04-17 11:07 ` Jani Nikula
2025-04-17 11:18 ` Christian König
2025-04-17 11:30 ` Jani Nikula
2025-04-17 11:38 ` Khatri, Sunil
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.