* [LTP] Do we have some simple way to get the current cgroup.procs path?
@ 2022-07-14 6:00 xuyang2018.jy
2022-07-14 10:24 ` Li Wang
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: xuyang2018.jy @ 2022-07-14 6:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Richard Palethorpe, Li Wang; +Cc: LTP List
Hi Richard, LI
I am writting a simple regression test[1]that refer to kernel selftest cgroup test_core[2]. I may name it as memcontrol05.c.
It tests cgroup migration permission check should be performed based on the credentials at the time of open instead of write.
I have used ltp cgroup framework, but ltp cgroup only use SAFE_CGROUP_PRINTF to write value.
How can get the cgroup root_dir ltp_dir path? So I can open this fd
and change/save effective uid between open and write?
[1]https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=1756d7994a
[2]https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/tools/testing/selftests/cgroup/test_core.c#n684
ps: my draft code as below:
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <stdio.h>
#include <sys/types.h>
#include <pwd.h>
#include "tst_test.h"
static struct tst_cg_group *cg_child;
static uid_t nobody_uid, save_uid;
static void test_lesser_euid_open(void)
{
cg_child = tst_cg_group_mk(tst_cg, "child");
SAFE_CG_PRINTF(cg_child, "cgroup.procs", "%d", getpid());
if (!SAFE_FORK()) {
seteuid(nobody_uid);
SAFE_CG_PRINTF(cg_child, "cgroup.procs", "%d", getpid());
seteuid(save_uid);
exit(0);
}
tst_reap_children();
SAFE_CG_PRINTF(tst_cg_drain, "cgroup.procs", "%d", getpid());
cg_child = tst_cg_group_rm(cg_child);
}
static void setup(void)
{
struct passwd *pw;
pw = SAFE_GETPWNAM("nobody");
nobody_uid = pw->pw_uid;
save_uid = geteuid();
}
static void cleanup(void)
{
if (cg_child) {
SAFE_CG_PRINTF(tst_cg_drain, "cgroup.procs", "%d", getpid());
cg_child = tst_cg_group_rm(cg_child);
}
}
static struct tst_test test = {
.setup = setup,
.cleanup = cleanup,
.test_all = test_lesser_euid_open,
.forks_child = 1,
.needs_root = 1,
.needs_cgroup_ctrls = (const char *const[]){ "memory", NULL },
};
I have think about it yesterday and read ltp cgroup framework code, but don't have good idea.
Best Regards
Yang Xu
--
Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [LTP] Do we have some simple way to get the current cgroup.procs path?
2022-07-14 6:00 [LTP] Do we have some simple way to get the current cgroup.procs path? xuyang2018.jy
@ 2022-07-14 10:24 ` Li Wang
2022-07-18 7:35 ` xuyang2018.jy
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Li Wang @ 2022-07-14 10:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: xuyang2018.jy@fujitsu.com; +Cc: LTP List
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1063 bytes --]
Hi Xu,
On Thu, Jul 14, 2022 at 2:02 PM xuyang2018.jy@fujitsu.com <
xuyang2018.jy@fujitsu.com> wrote:
> Hi Richard, LI
>
> I am writting a simple regression test[1]that refer to kernel selftest
> cgroup test_core[2]. I may name it as memcontrol05.c.
>
> It tests cgroup migration permission check should be performed based on
> the credentials at the time of open instead of write.
>
> I have used ltp cgroup framework, but ltp cgroup only use
> SAFE_CGROUP_PRINTF to write value.
>
> How can get the cgroup root_dir ltp_dir path? So I can open this fd
> and change/save effective uid between open and write?
>
Not sure if I fully understand your requirements.
Can we achieve this test by creating a two-layer subdirectory?
Does only the root/ltp_dir mandatory for completing your test?
If yes, I think tst_cg_print_config() maybe fits your purpose,
but that would need additional function help extracting that.
Take a reference to see how Luke gets the root path (in shell):
https://lists.linux.it/pipermail/ltp/2022-April/028772.html
--
Regards,
Li Wang
[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 2235 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 60 bytes --]
--
Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [LTP] Do we have some simple way to get the current cgroup.procs path?
2022-07-14 10:24 ` Li Wang
@ 2022-07-18 7:35 ` xuyang2018.jy
2022-07-18 9:33 ` Richard Palethorpe
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: xuyang2018.jy @ 2022-07-18 7:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Li Wang; +Cc: LTP List
Hi Li
> Hi Xu,
>
> On Thu, Jul 14, 2022 at 2:02 PM xuyang2018.jy@fujitsu.com
> <mailto:xuyang2018.jy@fujitsu.com> <xuyang2018.jy@fujitsu.com
> <mailto:xuyang2018.jy@fujitsu.com>> wrote:
>
> Hi Richard, LI
>
> I am writting a simple regression test[1]that refer to kernel
> selftest cgroup test_core[2]. I may name it as memcontrol05.c.
>
> It tests cgroup migration permission check should be performed based
> on the credentials at the time of open instead of write.
>
> I have used ltp cgroup framework, but ltp cgroup only use
> SAFE_CGROUP_PRINTF to write value.
>
> How can get the cgroup root_dir ltp_dir path? So I can open this fd
> and change/save effective uid between open and write?
>
> Not sure if I fully understand your requirements.
> Can we achieve this test by creating a two-layer subdirectory?
I think yes.
>
> Does only the root/ltp_dir mandatory for completing your test?
It also need gettid subdirectory and cgroup name.
> If yes, I think tst_cg_print_config() maybe fits your purpose,
> but that would need additional function help extracting that.
>
> Take a reference to see how Luke gets the root path (in shell):
> https://lists.linux.it/pipermail/ltp/2022-April/028772.html
> <https://lists.linux.it/pipermail/ltp/2022-April/028772.html>
Thanks, I prefer to use c api and will think about it continuely.
Best Regards
Yang Xu
>
>
> --
> Regards,
> Li Wang
--
Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [LTP] Do we have some simple way to get the current cgroup.procs path?
2022-07-18 7:35 ` xuyang2018.jy
@ 2022-07-18 9:33 ` Richard Palethorpe
2022-07-21 0:59 ` xuyang2018.jy
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Richard Palethorpe @ 2022-07-18 9:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: xuyang2018.jy@fujitsu.com; +Cc: LTP List
Hello,
"xuyang2018.jy@fujitsu.com" <xuyang2018.jy@fujitsu.com> writes:
> Hi Li
>> Hi Xu,
>>
>> On Thu, Jul 14, 2022 at 2:02 PM xuyang2018.jy@fujitsu.com
>> <mailto:xuyang2018.jy@fujitsu.com> <xuyang2018.jy@fujitsu.com
>> <mailto:xuyang2018.jy@fujitsu.com>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Richard, LI
>>
>> I am writting a simple regression test[1]that refer to kernel
>> selftest cgroup test_core[2]. I may name it as memcontrol05.c.
>>
>> It tests cgroup migration permission check should be performed based
>> on the credentials at the time of open instead of write.
>>
>> I have used ltp cgroup framework, but ltp cgroup only use
>> SAFE_CGROUP_PRINTF to write value.
>>
>> How can get the cgroup root_dir ltp_dir path? So I can open this fd
>> and change/save effective uid between open and write?
>>
>> Not sure if I fully understand your requirements.
>> Can we achieve this test by creating a two-layer subdirectory?
>
> I think yes.
I think you must have multiple layers. Otherwise you could break other
tests running in parallel.
>
>>
>> Does only the root/ltp_dir mandatory for completing your test?
>
> It also need gettid subdirectory and cgroup name.
You could create an accessor function in the library to get dir_fd from
cgroup_dir.
This is complicated by V1 CGs where a tst_cg_group can have multiple
struct cgroup_dir's. This isn't a problem for selftests because they
only support V2, but it would be nice to make as many tests as possible
work with V1.
The easiest solution I can think of is to write a library function like
SAFE_CG_GROUP_EACH_DIR(void (*const fn_ptr)(int dir_fd)) which takes a
const function pointer and executes it with the FD of each
directory. Then you can use the internal for_each_dir macro like
SAFE_CGROUP_PRINTF.
>> If yes, I think tst_cg_print_config() maybe fits your purpose,
>> but that would need additional function help extracting that.
>>
>> Take a reference to see how Luke gets the root path (in shell):
>> https://lists.linux.it/pipermail/ltp/2022-April/028772.html
>> <https://lists.linux.it/pipermail/ltp/2022-April/028772.html>
>
> Thanks, I prefer to use c api and will think about it continuely.
>
> Best Regards
> Yang Xu
>>
>>
>> --
>> Regards,
>> Li Wang
--
Thank you,
Richard.
--
Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [LTP] Do we have some simple way to get the current cgroup.procs path?
2022-07-18 9:33 ` Richard Palethorpe
@ 2022-07-21 0:59 ` xuyang2018.jy
2022-08-02 10:10 ` xuyang2018.jy
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: xuyang2018.jy @ 2022-07-21 0:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: rpalethorpe@suse.de; +Cc: LTP List
Hi Richard
> Hello,
>
> "xuyang2018.jy@fujitsu.com" <xuyang2018.jy@fujitsu.com> writes:
>
>> Hi Li
>>> Hi Xu,
>>>
>>> On Thu, Jul 14, 2022 at 2:02 PM xuyang2018.jy@fujitsu.com
>>> <mailto:xuyang2018.jy@fujitsu.com> <xuyang2018.jy@fujitsu.com
>>> <mailto:xuyang2018.jy@fujitsu.com>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Richard, LI
>>>
>>> I am writting a simple regression test[1]that refer to kernel
>>> selftest cgroup test_core[2]. I may name it as memcontrol05.c.
>>>
>>> It tests cgroup migration permission check should be performed based
>>> on the credentials at the time of open instead of write.
>>>
>>> I have used ltp cgroup framework, but ltp cgroup only use
>>> SAFE_CGROUP_PRINTF to write value.
>>>
>>> How can get the cgroup root_dir ltp_dir path? So I can open this fd
>>> and change/save effective uid between open and write?
>>>
>>> Not sure if I fully understand your requirements.
>>> Can we achieve this test by creating a two-layer subdirectory?
>>
>> I think yes.
>
> I think you must have multiple layers. Otherwise you could break other
> tests running in parallel.
>
>>
>>>
>>> Does only the root/ltp_dir mandatory for completing your test?
>>
>> It also need gettid subdirectory and cgroup name.
>
> You could create an accessor function in the library to get dir_fd from
> cgroup_dir.
>
> This is complicated by V1 CGs where a tst_cg_group can have multiple
> struct cgroup_dir's. This isn't a problem for selftests because they
> only support V2, but it would be nice to make as many tests as possible
> work with V1.
>
Yes, this bug exists on both v1 and v2.
> The easiest solution I can think of is to write a library function like
> SAFE_CG_GROUP_EACH_DIR(void (*const fn_ptr)(int dir_fd)) which takes a
> const function pointer and executes it with the FD of each
> directory. Then you can use the internal for_each_dir macro like
> SAFE_CGROUP_PRINTF.
>
Thanks, I will try this.
Best Regards
Yang Xu
>>> If yes, I think tst_cg_print_config() maybe fits your purpose,
>>> but that would need additional function help extracting that.
>>>
>>> Take a reference to see how Luke gets the root path (in shell):
>>> https://lists.linux.it/pipermail/ltp/2022-April/028772.html
>>> <https://lists.linux.it/pipermail/ltp/2022-April/028772.html>
>>
>> Thanks, I prefer to use c api and will think about it continuely.
>>
>> Best Regards
>> Yang Xu
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Regards,
>>> Li Wang
>
>
--
Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [LTP] Do we have some simple way to get the current cgroup.procs path?
2022-07-21 0:59 ` xuyang2018.jy
@ 2022-08-02 10:10 ` xuyang2018.jy
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: xuyang2018.jy @ 2022-08-02 10:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: rpalethorpe@suse.de, Li Wang; +Cc: LTP List
Hi Richard,Li
Today, I try it again by adding two cgroup functions and succeed by
using at* syscalls(I like at* syscalls because they are so convient). I
will send patch set to mail list tomorrow.
+int safe_cg_open(const char *const file, const int lineno,
+ const struct tst_cg_group *cg,
+ const char *const file_name, int flags)
+{
+ const struct cgroup_file *const cfile =
+ cgroup_file_find(file, lineno, file_name);
+ struct cgroup_dir *const *dir;
+ const char *alias;
+ int fd;
+
+ for_each_dir(cg, cfile->ctrl_indx, dir) {
+ alias = cgroup_file_alias(cfile, *dir);
+ if (!alias)
+ continue;
+
+ fd = safe_openat(file, lineno, (*dir)->dir_fd, alias,
flags);
+ }
+
+ return fd;
+}
+
+void safe_cg_fchown(const char *const file, const int lineno,
+ const struct tst_cg_group *cg,
+ const char *const file_name, uid_t owner, gid_t
group)
+{
+ const struct cgroup_file *const cfile =
+ cgroup_file_find(file, lineno, file_name);
+ struct cgroup_dir *const *dir;
+ const char *alias;
+
+ for_each_dir(cg, cfile->ctrl_indx, dir) {
+ alias = cgroup_file_alias(cfile, *dir);
+ if (!alias)
+ continue;
+
+
+ safe_fchownat(file, lineno, (*dir)->dir_fd, alias,
owner, group, 0);
+ }
+}
+
Best Regards
Yang Xu
> Hi Richard
>> Hello,
>>
>> "xuyang2018.jy@fujitsu.com" <xuyang2018.jy@fujitsu.com> writes:
>>
>>> Hi Li
>>>> Hi Xu,
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Jul 14, 2022 at 2:02 PM xuyang2018.jy@fujitsu.com
>>>> <mailto:xuyang2018.jy@fujitsu.com> <xuyang2018.jy@fujitsu.com
>>>> <mailto:xuyang2018.jy@fujitsu.com>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi Richard, LI
>>>>
>>>> I am writting a simple regression test[1]that refer to kernel
>>>> selftest cgroup test_core[2]. I may name it as memcontrol05.c.
>>>>
>>>> It tests cgroup migration permission check should be performed based
>>>> on the credentials at the time of open instead of write.
>>>>
>>>> I have used ltp cgroup framework, but ltp cgroup only use
>>>> SAFE_CGROUP_PRINTF to write value.
>>>>
>>>> How can get the cgroup root_dir ltp_dir path? So I can open this fd
>>>> and change/save effective uid between open and write?
>>>>
>>>> Not sure if I fully understand your requirements.
>>>> Can we achieve this test by creating a two-layer subdirectory?
>>>
>>> I think yes.
>>
>> I think you must have multiple layers. Otherwise you could break other
>> tests running in parallel.
>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Does only the root/ltp_dir mandatory for completing your test?
>>>
>>> It also need gettid subdirectory and cgroup name.
>>
>> You could create an accessor function in the library to get dir_fd from
>> cgroup_dir.
>>
>> This is complicated by V1 CGs where a tst_cg_group can have multiple
>> struct cgroup_dir's. This isn't a problem for selftests because they
>> only support V2, but it would be nice to make as many tests as possible
>> work with V1.
>>
>
> Yes, this bug exists on both v1 and v2.
>
>> The easiest solution I can think of is to write a library function like
>> SAFE_CG_GROUP_EACH_DIR(void (*const fn_ptr)(int dir_fd)) which takes a
>> const function pointer and executes it with the FD of each
>> directory. Then you can use the internal for_each_dir macro like
>> SAFE_CGROUP_PRINTF.
>>
>
> Thanks, I will try this.
>
> Best Regards
> Yang Xu
>>>> If yes, I think tst_cg_print_config() maybe fits your purpose,
>>>> but that would need additional function help extracting that.
>>>>
>>>> Take a reference to see how Luke gets the root path (in shell):
>>>> https://lists.linux.it/pipermail/ltp/2022-April/028772.html
>>>> <https://lists.linux.it/pipermail/ltp/2022-April/028772.html>
>>>
>>> Thanks, I prefer to use c api and will think about it continuely.
>>>
>>> Best Regards
>>> Yang Xu
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Li Wang
>>
>>
>
--
Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2022-08-02 10:10 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2022-07-14 6:00 [LTP] Do we have some simple way to get the current cgroup.procs path? xuyang2018.jy
2022-07-14 10:24 ` Li Wang
2022-07-18 7:35 ` xuyang2018.jy
2022-07-18 9:33 ` Richard Palethorpe
2022-07-21 0:59 ` xuyang2018.jy
2022-08-02 10:10 ` xuyang2018.jy
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.