From: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
To: "Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <f4bug@amsat.org>
Cc: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>,
Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>,
venture@google.com, hskinnemoen@google.com,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Hao Wu <wuhaotsh@google.com>,
kfting@nuvoton.com, qemu-arm@nongnu.org, Avi.Fishman@nuvoton.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 7/7] hw/arm: Add ID for NPCM7XX SMBus
Date: Wed, 03 Nov 2021 11:16:54 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87tugtilwp.fsf@dusky.pond.sub.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e2afad0e-8116-a1b0-f473-7c44ba32112f@amsat.org> ("Philippe Mathieu-Daudé"'s message of "Tue, 2 Nov 2021 09:55:17 +0100")
Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org> writes:
> +Markus/Eduardo
>
> On 11/1/21 18:33, Peter Maydell wrote:
>> On Thu, 21 Oct 2021 at 19:40, Hao Wu <wuhaotsh@google.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> The ID can be used to indicate SMBus modules when adding
>>> dynamic devices to them.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Hao Wu <wuhaotsh@google.com>
>>> ---
>>> hw/arm/npcm7xx.c | 1 +
>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/hw/arm/npcm7xx.c b/hw/arm/npcm7xx.c
>>> index 2ab0080e0b..72953d65ef 100644
>>> --- a/hw/arm/npcm7xx.c
>>> +++ b/hw/arm/npcm7xx.c
>>> @@ -421,6 +421,7 @@ static void npcm7xx_init(Object *obj)
>>> for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(s->smbus); i++) {
>>> object_initialize_child(obj, "smbus[*]", &s->smbus[i],
>>> TYPE_NPCM7XX_SMBUS);
>>> + DEVICE(&s->smbus[i])->id = g_strdup_printf("smbus[%d]", i);
>>> }
>>
>> This one looks weird to me -- I'm pretty sure we shouldn't be messing
>> about with the DeviceState id string like that. It's supposed to be
>> internal to the QOM/qdev code.
It's meant for the user. Devices created by code shouldn't set it. Not
least because any ID they pick could clash with the user's.
> I agree with you, however:
>
> $ git grep -F -- '->id = g_strdup' hw
> hw/arm/virt.c:1512: dev->id = g_strdup(TYPE_PLATFORM_BUS_DEVICE);
> hw/block/xen-block.c:761: drive->id = g_strdup(id);
> hw/block/xen-block.c:853: iothread->id = g_strdup(id);
> hw/core/machine-qmp-cmds.c:169: m->id = g_strdup(object_get_canonical_path_component(obj));
> hw/mem/pc-dimm.c:244: di->id = g_strdup(dev->id);
> hw/pci-bridge/pci_expander_bridge.c:248: bds->id = g_strdup(dev_name);
> hw/ppc/e500.c:1009: dev->id = g_strdup(TYPE_PLATFORM_BUS_DEVICE);
> hw/s390x/s390-pci-bus.c:1003: dev->id = g_strdup_printf("auto_%02x:%02x.%01x",
> hw/sh4/sh7750.c:819: dev->id = g_strdup("sci");
> hw/sh4/sh7750.c:836: dev->id = g_strdup("scif");
> hw/virtio/virtio-mem-pci.c:69: vi->id = g_strdup(dev->id);
> hw/virtio/virtio-pmem-pci.c:74: vi->id = g_strdup(dev->id);
This includes false positives, i.e. assignments to members of structs
other than DeviceState. It also misses other ways to mess with
DeviceState member id.
Compiling with
diff --git a/include/hw/qdev-core.h b/include/hw/qdev-core.h
index 1bad07002d..b17ccd6065 100644
--- a/include/hw/qdev-core.h
+++ b/include/hw/qdev-core.h
@@ -176,7 +176,7 @@ struct DeviceState {
Object parent_obj;
/*< public >*/
- char *id;
+ char *const id;
char *canonical_path;
bool realized;
bool pending_deleted_event;
ferrets out the actual assignments. I got:
../hw/ppc/spapr_vio.c: In function ‘spapr_vio_busdev_realize’:
../hw/ppc/spapr_vio.c:505:22: error: assignment of read-only member ‘id’
505 | dev->qdev.id = id;
| ^
This supplies a default ID to a vio-spapr-device. Feels like a bad
idea.
../softmmu/qdev-monitor.c: In function ‘qdev_set_id’:
../softmmu/qdev-monitor.c:593:21: error: assignment of read-only member ‘id’
593 | dev->id = id;
| ^
This assigns the user-supplied ID.
../hw/dma/xlnx-zdma.c: In function ‘zdma_realize’:
../hw/dma/xlnx-zdma.c:777:12: error: assignment of read-only location ‘*r’
777 | *r = (RegisterInfo) {
| ^
This *clobbers* the DeviceState embedded in *r, including its member id.
Suspicious.
../hw/pci-bridge/pci_expander_bridge.c: In function ‘pxb_dev_realize_common’:
../hw/pci-bridge/pci_expander_bridge.c:248:17: error: assignment of read-only member ‘id’
248 | bds->id = g_strdup(dev_name);
| ^
This creates a pci-bridge device and gives it the same ID as the pxb
device being realized. Doesn't this result in duplicate IDs?!?
../hw/arm/virt.c: In function ‘create_platform_bus’:
../hw/arm/virt.c:1512:13: error: assignment of read-only member ‘id’
1512 | dev->id = g_strdup(TYPE_PLATFORM_BUS_DEVICE);
| ^
Helper function to create a platform-bus-device. ID is set to
"platform-bus-device". Feels like a bad idea.
../hw/ppc/e500.c: In function ‘ppce500_init’:
../hw/ppc/e500.c:1009:17: error: assignment of read-only member ‘id’
1009 | dev->id = g_strdup(TYPE_PLATFORM_BUS_DEVICE);
| ^
Likewise.
../hw/s390x/s390-pci-bus.c: In function ‘s390_pcihost_plug’:
../hw/s390x/s390-pci-bus.c:1003:21: error: assignment of read-only member ‘id’
1003 | dev->id = g_strdup_printf("auto_%02x:%02x.%01x",
| ^
This supplies a default ID to a the device being plugged (I think).
Feels like a bad idea.
../hw/sh4/sh7750.c: In function ‘sh7750_init’:
../hw/sh4/sh7750.c:819:13: error: assignment of read-only member ‘id’
819 | dev->id = g_strdup("sci");
| ^
../hw/sh4/sh7750.c:836:13: error: assignment of read-only member ‘id’
836 | dev->id = g_strdup("scif");
| ^
These create sh-serial devices. Their IDs are set to "sci" and "scif",
respectively. Feels like a bad idea.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-11-03 10:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-10-21 18:39 [PATCH v2 0/7] Misc NPCM7XX patches Hao Wu
2021-10-21 18:39 ` [PATCH v2 1/7] hw/i2c: Clear ACK bit in NPCM7xx SMBus module Hao Wu
2021-11-01 17:35 ` Peter Maydell
2021-10-21 18:39 ` [PATCH v2 2/7] hw/i2c: Read FIFO during RXF_CTL change in NPCM7XX SMBus Hao Wu
2021-10-21 18:50 ` Corey Minyard
2021-10-21 18:39 ` [PATCH v2 3/7] hw/adc: Fix CONV bit in NPCM7XX ADC CON register Hao Wu
2021-11-01 17:35 ` Peter Maydell
2021-10-21 18:39 ` [PATCH v2 4/7] hw/adc: Make adci[*] R/W in NPCM7XX ADC Hao Wu
2021-11-01 17:37 ` Peter Maydell
2021-10-21 18:39 ` [PATCH v2 5/7] hw/nvram: Update at24c EEPROM init function in NPCM7xx boards Hao Wu
2021-11-01 17:41 ` Peter Maydell
2021-11-01 17:47 ` Hao Wu
2021-11-03 9:13 ` Thomas Huth
2021-11-03 21:52 ` Hao Wu
2021-11-04 20:50 ` Peter Maydell
2021-10-21 18:39 ` [PATCH v2 6/7] hw/arm: quanta-gbs-bmc add i2c devices Hao Wu
2021-10-21 18:39 ` [PATCH v2 7/7] hw/arm: Add ID for NPCM7XX SMBus Hao Wu
2021-11-01 17:33 ` Peter Maydell
2021-11-01 22:54 ` Hao Wu
2021-11-02 8:55 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2021-11-03 10:16 ` Markus Armbruster [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87tugtilwp.fsf@dusky.pond.sub.org \
--to=armbru@redhat.com \
--cc=Avi.Fishman@nuvoton.com \
--cc=ehabkost@redhat.com \
--cc=f4bug@amsat.org \
--cc=hskinnemoen@google.com \
--cc=kfting@nuvoton.com \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-arm@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=venture@google.com \
--cc=wuhaotsh@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.