From: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
To: Jouni Malinen <jouni@codeaurora.org>
Cc: ath11k@lists.infradead.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org,
Baochen Qiang <bqiang@codeaurora.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] ath11k: Change number of TCL rings to one for QCA6390
Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2021 18:12:08 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87tui4pwdz.fsf@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210914163726.38604-1-jouni@codeaurora.org> (Jouni Malinen's message of "Tue, 14 Sep 2021 19:37:24 +0300")
Jouni Malinen <jouni@codeaurora.org> writes:
> From: Baochen Qiang <bqiang@codeaurora.org>
>
> Some targets, QCA6390 for example, use only one TCL ring,
> it is better to initialize only one ring and leave others
> untouched for such targets.
>
> Tested-on: QCA6390 hw2.0 PCI WLAN.HST.1.0.1-01740-QCAHSTSWPLZ_V2_TO_X86-1
>
> Signed-off-by: Baochen Qiang <bqiang@codeaurora.org>
> Signed-off-by: Jouni Malinen <jouni@codeaurora.org>
It's better? Please be more specific. Does this fix a bug or is this
just a theoretical fix you found during code review?
--
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/
https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches
--
ath11k mailing list
ath11k@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath11k
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
To: Jouni Malinen <jouni@codeaurora.org>
Cc: ath11k@lists.infradead.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org,
Baochen Qiang <bqiang@codeaurora.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] ath11k: Change number of TCL rings to one for QCA6390
Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2021 18:12:08 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87tui4pwdz.fsf@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210914163726.38604-1-jouni@codeaurora.org> (Jouni Malinen's message of "Tue, 14 Sep 2021 19:37:24 +0300")
Jouni Malinen <jouni@codeaurora.org> writes:
> From: Baochen Qiang <bqiang@codeaurora.org>
>
> Some targets, QCA6390 for example, use only one TCL ring,
> it is better to initialize only one ring and leave others
> untouched for such targets.
>
> Tested-on: QCA6390 hw2.0 PCI WLAN.HST.1.0.1-01740-QCAHSTSWPLZ_V2_TO_X86-1
>
> Signed-off-by: Baochen Qiang <bqiang@codeaurora.org>
> Signed-off-by: Jouni Malinen <jouni@codeaurora.org>
It's better? Please be more specific. Does this fix a bug or is this
just a theoretical fix you found during code review?
--
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/
https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-09-28 15:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-09-14 16:37 [PATCH 1/3] ath11k: Change number of TCL rings to one for QCA6390 Jouni Malinen
2021-09-14 16:37 ` Jouni Malinen
2021-09-14 16:37 ` [PATCH 2/3] ath11k: change return buffer manager " Jouni Malinen
2021-09-14 16:37 ` Jouni Malinen
2021-09-16 10:02 ` Kalle Valo
2021-09-16 10:02 ` Kalle Valo
2021-09-28 15:09 ` Kalle Valo
2021-09-28 15:09 ` Kalle Valo
2021-09-28 15:14 ` Kalle Valo
2021-09-28 15:14 ` Kalle Valo
2021-09-29 2:42 ` bqiang
2021-09-29 2:42 ` bqiang
2021-10-01 6:26 ` Kalle Valo
2021-10-01 6:26 ` Kalle Valo
2021-10-05 14:10 ` Kalle Valo
2021-10-05 14:10 ` Kalle Valo
2021-10-25 13:02 ` Kalle Valo
2021-10-25 13:02 ` Kalle Valo
2021-10-25 13:03 ` Kalle Valo
2021-10-25 13:03 ` Kalle Valo
2021-09-14 16:37 ` [PATCH 3/3] ath11k: set correct NL80211_FEATURE_DYNAMIC_SMPS for WCN6855 Jouni Malinen
2021-09-14 16:37 ` Jouni Malinen
2021-09-16 10:08 ` Kalle Valo
2021-09-16 10:08 ` Kalle Valo
2021-09-16 14:09 ` Wen Gong
2021-09-16 14:09 ` Wen Gong
2021-09-16 15:15 ` Kalle Valo
2021-09-16 15:15 ` Kalle Valo
2021-10-28 10:07 ` Kalle Valo
2021-10-28 10:07 ` Kalle Valo
2021-10-29 2:30 ` Wen Gong
2021-10-29 2:30 ` Wen Gong
2021-11-01 14:13 ` Kalle Valo
2021-11-01 14:13 ` Kalle Valo
2021-09-28 15:12 ` Kalle Valo [this message]
2021-09-28 15:12 ` [PATCH 1/3] ath11k: Change number of TCL rings to one for QCA6390 Kalle Valo
2021-09-29 2:15 ` bqiang
2021-09-29 2:15 ` bqiang
2021-10-05 14:06 ` Kalle Valo
2021-10-05 14:06 ` Kalle Valo
2021-10-11 15:12 ` Kalle Valo
2021-10-11 15:12 ` Kalle Valo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87tui4pwdz.fsf@codeaurora.org \
--to=kvalo@codeaurora.org \
--cc=ath11k@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=bqiang@codeaurora.org \
--cc=jouni@codeaurora.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.